Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:
[10] 10-11 were omitted by Rhianos and Aph., “ἴσως ἐπεὶ οὐκ ἦν Μυρμιδὼν ὁ Πάτροκλος, Λοκρὸς γὰρ ἦν ἐξ Ὀποῦντος”, Did. But for an oracle the prediction was sufficiently near the fact, and there must have been such an ambiguity or Achilles would not have doubted. Cf. also P 410, T 328. With the former passage there is a clear contradiction, see note there.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.
