Showing posts with label Venus de Milo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Venus de Milo. Show all posts

April 8 - Venus de Milo Discovered!

   Posted on April 8, 2022

This is an update of my post published on April 8, 2011:




On this day in 1820, a peasant named Yorgos Kentrotas discovered the statue of a woman or goddess inside a buried niche in the ancient city ruins of Milos, a Greek island.

Above, the place where the statue was discovered.
Below, the island of Milos today.



A French officer was exploring the island and helped Yorgos excavate the statue, and soon another French officer made arrangements for a purchase by the French ambassador to Turkey.

There are several inconsistent accounts of this discovery and the subsequent sale—it seems clear that representatives of Turkey tried to purchase the ancient statue, and there are accounts of the French seizing the statue just as it was being loaded onto a ship bound for Constantinople—but, at any rate, the statue has been on display in the Louvre, in Paris, France, since 1821.


Most people think the statue portrays Aphrodite, the ancient Greek goddess of love and beauty. The Roman name for Aphrodite, of course, was Venus, and since the statue was discovered on Milos, the name Venus de Milo is most commonly applied to the statue. However, it is not certain that the statue does in fact represent Aphrodite or Venus. Several competing theories include the idea that it portrays the sea goddess Amphitrite, who was very important to the people of Milos.

The Venus de Milo is famously missing her arms. Actually, she is made of two blocks of marble, and various parts were carved separately and then fixed with vertical pegs. This technique was common around 100 BC, when the statue was carved. The arms were never found, although a few fragments of the upper left arm and a left hand holding an apple were found.

The goddess originally wore metal jewelry—bracelet, headband, earrings—as we can see from the remaining fixation holes. She was probably painted in multiple strong, bright colors. For centuries people thought that Greek temples and statuary, made of unpainted white marble, was the essence of Classical beauty, but traces of paint and scientific tests show us that the buildings and statues were once painted.

Some people are horrified to learn that the Ancient Greeks used bright colors on their statues and insist that they look much better white. Do you agree or disagree? 

Does it matter what looks better—or is it important to know what is true?

I couldn't find a colored replica of Venus de Milo,
but check out this other famous Greek statue:
it's a comparison of now-paint-free marble with
what science and other evidence indicate was more
like the original, colorful version of the statue.







Plan ahead:


Check out my Pinterest boards for:
And here are my Pinterest boards for:



April 8 - Armless Beauty...

Posted on April 8, 2020

Here's one account of an important discovery:

On this date in 1820, a Greek peasant named Yorgos Kentrotas was exploring the ruins of the ancient city of Milos. Digging around, he spotted something intriguing, and he ended up discovering a niche that had been buried...

...and inside that niche, in several pieces, was an ancient statue.


It ended up being one of the most famous ancient statues in the world. Called by modern folks Venus de Milo, the statue is on display at one of the most important art museums in the world: the Louvre, in Paris, France. 

Milos is one of the Greek islands.
Venus de Milo was carved around 130 to 100 BCE (Before Common Era), probably by the sculptor Alexandros of Antioch. The "de Milo" part of the statue's name means "of Milos," identifying the island and city where the statue was found. The "Venus" part of the name reflects our guess that the statue is supposed to represent Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love and beauty. The Roman name for Aphrodite is Venus!

You may have noticed that the statue is missing arms. It appears that the arms used to be there, but smaller stick-y-out-y parts of a statue often broke off after centuries and centuries, so many ancient statues are missing arms or noses or other parts.








By the way, there are a few competing stories about exactly who discovered Venus de Milo (and exactly when and where). But the story I gave above is most widely accepted as true.




April 8, 2011


Venus de Milo Discovered 

On this day in 1820 a peasant named Yorgos Kentrotas discovered the statue of a woman or goddess inside a buried niche in the ancient city ruins of Milos, a Greek island. A French officer was exploring the island and helped Yorgos excavate the statue, and soon another French officer made arrangements for a purchase by the French ambassador to Turkey.

There are several inconsistent accounts of this discovery and the subsequent sale—it seems clear that representatives of Turkey tried to purchase the ancient statue, and there are accounts of the French seizing the statue just as it was being loaded onto a ship bound for Constantinople—but, at any rate, the statue has been on display in the Louvre, in Paris, France, since 1821.

Most people think the statue portrays Aphrodite, the ancient Greek goddess of love and beauty. The Roman name for Aphrodite, of course, was Venus, and since the statue was discovered on Milos, the name Venus de Milo is most commonly applied to the statue. However, it is not certain that the statue does in fact represent Aphrodite or Venus. Several competing theories include the idea that it portrays the sea goddess Amphitrite, who was very important to the people of Milos.

The Venus de Milo is famously missing her arms. Actually, she is made of two blocks of marble, and various parts were carved separately and then fixed with vertical pegs. This technique was common around 100 BC, when the statue was carved. The arms were never found, although a few fragments of the upper left arm and a left hand holding an apple were found.

The goddess originally wore metal jewelry—bracelet, headband, earrings—as we can see from the remaining fixation holes. She was probably painted in multiple strong, bright colors. For centuries people thought that Greek temples and statuary, made of unpainted white marble, was the essence of Classical beauty, but traces of paint and scientific tests show us that the buildings and statues were once painted.

Some people are horrified to learn that the Ancient Greeks used bright colors on their statues and insist that they look much better white. Do you agree or disagree? Does it matter what looks better—or is it important to know what is true?