StatCounter

Showing posts with label Photography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Photography. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

A young Mick Jagger, from 1965


Photos of the Rolling Stones when they were yoiung are rare, and off stage ones from the early days of the band are even rarer. A collection of photos taken by an unknown photographer in California in 1965 have been discovered. 

There's some nice shots and it's interesting to see Keith Richards looking youthful... 




Wednesday, 24 July 2013

Photos of home

The above image was taken by the Cassini probe orbiting Saturn. The Earth is the blue dot below the last of Saturn's visible rings.


The following image is even more humbling...
This image was taken by Voyager 1 in 1996 and shows the Earth as a tiny blue dot in the right most band of colour.

NASA explains:
'This narrow-angle color image of the Earth, dubbed 'Pale Blue Dot', is a part of the first ever 'portrait' of the solar system taken by Voyager 1. The spacecraft acquired a total of 60 frames for a mosaic of the solar system from a distance of more than 4 billion miles from Earth and about 32 degrees above the ecliptic. From Voyager's great distance Earth is a mere point of light, less than the size of a picture element even in the narrow-angle camera. Earth was a crescent only 0.12 pixel in size. Coincidentally, Earth lies right in the center of one of the scattered light rays resulting from taking the image so close to the sun. This blown-up image of the Earth was taken through three color filters -- violet, blue and green -- and recombined to produce the color image. The background features in the image are artifacts resulting from the magnification.'

Tuesday, 4 December 2012

A nice piece of time lapse photography




California photography and film professor Cy Kuckenbaker filmed 60 different planes which landed at San Diego international airport between 10.30am and 3pm and edited them all together into an amazing 25-second time-lapse video, creating an amazing effect.

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

Sunday, 24 June 2012

Slo-mo hummingbird

I love watching hummingbirds but my attempts at filming them seem always to fail, so I was pleased to find this video.

Saturday, 21 January 2012

Demonising the photographer

Here's an interesting piece of video that shows how too many 'security' staff view photographers

for the background to the video visit Visit Scunthorpe.

I have blogged before about the rather strange views people have of photographers and the quoting of mythical laws against photography, this piece may be an interesting one to keep on hand should you experience problems in the future. It contains the guidance from the Metropolitan Police:
'Photography advice

The Metropolitan Police Service’s approach towards photography in public places is a subject of regular debate.

We encourage officers and the public to be vigilant against terrorism but recognise the balance between effective policing and protecting Londoners and respecting the rights of the media and the general public to take photographs.

Guidance around the issue has been made clear to officers and PCSOs through briefings and internal communications. The following advice is available to all officers and provides a summary of the Metropolitan Police Service’s guidance around photography in public places.


Freedom to photograph/film

Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel.



Photography and Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000

The Terrorism Act 2000 does not prohibit people from taking photographs or digital images in an area where an authority under section 44 is in place.



Officers have the power to view digital images contained in mobile telephones or cameras carried by a person searched under S44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, provided that the viewing is to determine whether the images contained in the camera or mobile telephone are of a kind, which could be used in connection with terrorism. Officers also have the power to seize and retain any article found during the search which the officer reasonably suspects is intended to be used in connection with terrorism.



Photography and Section 43 of the Terrorism Act 2000

Officers have the power to view digital images contained in mobile telephones or cameras carried by a person searched under S43 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to discover whether they have in their possession anything which may constitute evidence that they are involved in terrorism. Officers also have the power to seize and retain any article found during the search which the officer reasonably suspects may constitute evidence that the person is involved in terrorism.

Section 58a of the Terrorism Act 2000

Section 58a of the Terrorism Act 2000 covers the offence of eliciting, publishing or communicating information about members of the armed forces, intelligence services or police.

Any officer making an arrest for an offence under Section 58a must be able to demonstrate a reasonable suspicion that the information was of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.

It should ordinarily be considered inappropriate to use Section 58a to arrest people photographing police officers in the course of normal policing activities, including protests, as without more, there is no link to terrorism.

There is however nothing preventing officers asking questions of an individual who appears to be taking photographs of someone who is or has been a member of Her Majesty’s Forces (HMF), Intelligence Services or a constable.'

Friday, 27 May 2011

Another case of a photographer being mistreated by 'officials'

The British Journal of Photography report an interesting case.
'"Last night I had the “pleasure” of being detained against my will not by the police but by Rail Enforcement Officers who operate on the South Eastern rail services. What did I do wrong? I took a picture of these Rail Enforcement Officers and when they asked me to see and then remove the pictures from my phone I refused."
With these words, Olly, a blogger for the You've Been Cromwelled blog, starts the account of another abuse of power by rail staffers, who questionned Olly's motives for taking photos of them. "While he was asking me these questions his colleague came to join him and he too was asking me similar questions. Each time I told them they had no authority over me, and that I hadn’t committed any crime, nor was I unruly, and I had a perfectly legitimate ticket which entitled me to be on the train. The younger of the two officers explained he had seen me taking pictures of them on the platform and they had the right to see those pictures because of their safety. I refused. The older one then said they did have the authority to do so because of the terrorism act. I asked which terrorism act and why were they enforcing that act if they were not police officers? They informed us they did have those powers."
After being detaine for 30 minutes, British Police officers showed up, confirming that Olly had done anything wrong and should not have been detained.'
I know the tale is from last year but it is one that I was not previously aware of.

Saturday, 12 March 2011

More tilt shift video

I have blogged about tilt shift video and tilt shift photography before so I was pleased to find this wonderful piece of tilt shift video at Theo Spark...


If you fancy a go yourself take a look at these videos




Or if you are more a Photoshop geek than a photographer this video might be of more interest



Finally here are a couple more tilt shift videos that are just so beautiful
First this one that shows a combination of tilt & shify and timelapse photography

And this one that has some great images




Tuesday, 4 January 2011

Taking a photo of one's own killer

The BBC report the incident of a Philippine politician who accidentally took a photo of his killer. It seems that when Reynaldo Dagsa, a Manila district councillor, took a photo of his family outside their house on New Year's Day, his killer was also captured in the photo - gun in hand. Above is the cropped photo...

Thursday, 18 November 2010

I like a big photo as much as the next man but...

360 Cities have a 80GigaPixel map of London on their site to add to their incredibly detailed photos of other cities. The level of detail is incredible although I have yet to find my house...

Wednesday, 29 September 2010

"Vanity of vanities, all is vanity."

I read that:
'When he was pictured with the Israeli and Palestinian leaders, Binyamin Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas, trailing behind Barack Obama on the red carpet at the White House recently, it was nothing Photoshop could not fix. So, on Tuesday, the state-run daily Al-Ahram published the photo, taken at the launch of the latest Middle East peace talks – but with Mubarak switched to the front of the procession.'

The Guardian have the photos, do take a look...

Sunday, 19 September 2010

How not to take a photo


Boing Boing found this video extolling the virtues of the new Vivitar film camera and interesting it is too. However what worries me is what the quality of the pictures the man in the video would take as he seems to twitch rather a lot as he presses the shutter release; I am guessing quite a lot of motion blur.

Monday, 9 August 2010

We photographers are all guilty

I read at the weekend about a Dutchman, Frank Doorhof, who was taking a photo of his wife in a Coventry shopping centre when a security guard approached him and demanded that the delete the images he had taken. Mr Doorhof is a fashion photographer and so probably had a nice camera and in my experience the police and security people do tend to pick on those of us with good cameras rather than snappers. Why I do not know as my second camera is a compact with a 12x zoom and decent quality imaging. But I digress, the centre management explained the incident thus:
"It's on government advice under the Terrorism Act that people could be taking photographs within public buildings and then using them for unscrupulous means which puts everybody at risk."
I think the key word here is 'could', yes they could but equally they could be doing the same taking photos on their iPhone or similar, or people might just be taking photos of their wife, husband or children OR even in a supposedly free country of an interesting building or anything at all.

It is odd how much energy goes into stopping the law-abiding from leading a normal life whilst the potential terrorists are left alone.

Thursday, 8 July 2010

I'm a photographer not a terrorist


I have blogged before about some of the British police's habit of treating photographers as suspected terrorists and I see on Mrs Rigby's blog that there has been another instance, or rather a series of instances. It would seem that Jules Mattson has been stopped three times under anti-terrorist legislation. Have a read of Mrs Gigby's piece and take a trip to Jules Mattson's blog to show solidarity and for some good photographs as well as the above image...

I feel I must correct Mrs Gigby in one regard, she says: 'There's a saying, isn't there, it's something like "Once is an Accident, twice is a Coincidence, and three times ..."'. Actually the quote as visitors to this blog will have seen before is from Ian Fleming's Goldfinger and is "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence but the third time is enemy action"

Monday, 17 May 2010

Camclegg or Cleggcam?


The five morphing pictures article in The Sunday Telegraph is fascinating but this middle mix picture is all I could find online.

Saturday, 23 January 2010

I’m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist!

I’m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist! invite all Photographers to a mass photo gathering in defence of street photography. Please try attend at 12 Noon in Trafalgar Square.

Friday, 14 August 2009

The police and photographers (further update)

Further to my postings on the police's habit of stopping photography in public places and their seeming equating of photographers with terrorists, I have two pieces that may be of interest.

The first is a handy "Bust card" from "I'm a photographer not a terrorist". This might be best carried along with this Met Police guidance that I blogged about last month.

The second is a heads-up on a photo walk set for tomorrow - Saturday 15 August - assembly point is the Riverside Gardens in Chatham.