Showing posts with label The 10 best films of 2013. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The 10 best films of 2013. Show all posts

Friday, December 20, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013 No 1 / The Act of Killing


The 10 best films of 2013

No 1 

The Act of Killing


Peter Bradshaw introduces our favourite film of 2013, Joshua Oppenheimer's The Act of Killing. A documentary on the Indonesian mass-killings of the 1960s, Oppenheimer uses his brutal and brilliant film to invite the cinephile killers of the Suharto era re-enact their crimes for the camera 


Jagal - The Act of Killing (full movie)


Peter Bradshaw
Friday 20 December 2013 10.00 GMT


Indonesia's military coup in 1965 ushered in the rule of Major General Suharto, after a purge during which approximately half a million people were murdered as alleged communists by paramilitaries and mobsters. The memory of this mass slaughter is reawakened by documentarian Joshua Oppenheimer in a remarkable and at times unwatchably explicit film, which tracks down the ageing and entirely unrepentant perpetrators and invites them to re-enact the most grisly escapades in the style of their favourite movies. It is a situationist nightmare which flings the evil in our faces — and finally in their faces, too.



Apart from everything else, Oppenheimer shows that unlike the wholesale brutalities in, say, Cambodia or Bosnia or Rwanda, where there has been a flawed but reasonably well-understood institutional attempt to come to terms with the past, the deaths in Indonesia are not officially considered anything to be ashamed of. There is no historical process. Nobody is reassessing or reconsidering the deaths — other than with a warm nostalgic glow. The people involved have grown to old age as part of modern Indonesia's governing class, and the paramilitary tradition in Indonesia continues to flourish.



The Act Of Killing is a Marat/Sade for our times. Just as Peter Weiss's play imagined the imprisoned Marquis De Sade leading the asylum inmates in a dramatisation of Jean-Paul Marat's assassination, so Oppenheimer has found some of the grinningly cheerful killers, now grey-haired grandpas, and persuaded them to revive their most atrocious crimes of torture and mayhem in the styles of the gangster-flicks, Westerns, war movies and musicals which they adore. They are only too happy and delighted to do it. Oppenheimer gives them more than enough rope to hang themselves. A "victim" is despatched to heaven in a bizarre, dream-like musical number with Born Free playing in the background. A brutal interrogation scene is acted out, with the old guys themselves, as excitable as little kids, dressed up as 30s-style mobsters in fedoras.

The murderous bully who stars in this film is Anwar Congo, a racketeer who with his crew ran local cinemas: hence his interest in the movies. He and his associates killed hundreds; now they dress up in various bizarre costumes and helpfully describe everything they did. Merely re-enacting these violent events is visibly too much for some of the participants, playing the victims, on whom the awful truth is beginning to dawn. Despite or even because of the extravagant absurdity of this bizarre pantomime, the reality of what went on begins to dawn on the perpetrators.




A conventional documentary film-maker might challenge these men upfront with what he or she considers to be their crimes and give them a chance to answer back: or in response to silence, he or she might track them down, shove cameras and microphones in their faces which would be duly shoved aside by the angry old killers. Not here. The bad guys are the willing participants: they even sort of know that they are the bad guys — in the sense that the bad guy was always the most charismatic figure in any movie, and they consider themselves to be the buccaneering soldiers of fortune who did some enjoyable dirty work in the war against communism. The idea of movie playacting moreover gratifies their own tendency not to take the idea of guilt at all seriously. Yet fascinatingly, and sensationally, these film re-enactments have entirely the opposite effect.

As the movie proceeds, the tension builds. Will these people realise what we realise? Will they twig, on a simple level, how they are going to be represented in the film? Finally, there is an intestinal explosion of horror. It is a gut-churning film: and a radical dive into history.


THE GUARDIAN






The 10 best films of 2013 No 1 / The Act of Killing
The 10 best films of 2013 No 2 / The Great Beauty
The 10 best films of 2013 joint third / Behind the Candelabra
The 10 best films of 2013 joint 3rd / Gravity
The 10 best films of 2013 No 5 / Django Unchained
The 10 best films of 2013 No 6/ Before Midnight
The 10 best films of 2013 No 7 / For Ellen
The 10 best films of 2013 No 8 / Only God Forgives
The 10 best films of 2013 No 9 / I Wish

The 10 best films of 2013 No 10 / Wadjda




Thursday, December 19, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013 No 2 / The Great Beauty



The 10 best films of 2013

No 2 

The Great Beauty


As our countdown of the ten best movies of the year nears the end, Xan Brooks revels in Paolo Sorrentino's astonishing satire on la dolce vita 


Xan Brooks
Thursday 19 December 2013 11.43 GMT


The "king of the high life" is heading for a fall in The Great Beauty, Paolo Sorrentino's astonishing satire on la dolce vita and the withering flesh. Here is a film that casts upper-crust Rome as a circle of hell, at once beautiful and damned. It arranges its citizens (crooks and cardinals, sinners and saints) into such a woozy, drunken conga-line that it becomes impossible to tell where one body ends and the other begins.
Everyone, it seems, is tangled and compromised here. They are drunk on excess and staggering towards the balcony's edge - and that may well include the film-makers themselves. The Great Beauty, widely regarded as an acid assault on the Berlusconi era, was bankrolled in part by the old rascal's Medusa Films production house.


Toni Servillo plays Jep Gambadella, our tour guide through the ruins, a jaundiced celebrity journalist who possesses the power to make or break a party by a casual, barbed comment or a curl of his lip. But Jep is in his 60s; he knows that time is running out. More crucially, perhaps, he knows that it's been squandered. He pines for the lost love that got away and for the writing career that might have been his, had he only knuckled down to write a second novel. In the meantime his long, dark night of the soul carries him back and forth beneath the illuminated Martini sign (a neat Roman twist on the eyes of Dr Eckleburg) in search of meaning, entertainment or alcohol, whichever comes easiest.


It is clear from the start that Gambardella is doomed. But his swan-diving descent has a ravishing intensity. Sorrentino takes his subject (the impeccable flaneur, just beginning to rot) and sends him spinning out amid a whirl of exotic flotsam and grotesque little side notes. Jep's revels bounce him from the anguished child splatter-painter ("she makes millions") to the dessicated old nun, 103 last birthday, who sleeps in a cupboard and can name all the birds.

I loved The Great Beauty to bits; it's my film of the year. Try as I might, I can't recall another recent picture that is so rich, so full, or so elegantly staged. Sorrentino's camera glides and swoops, wafting us seamlessly from one tableaux to the next. In the process we become like visitors at a museum, not realising that each fantastical new exhibit, each further step on the schedule, is actually leading us closer and closer towards the exit door. Soon we shall be gone and the world will continue. So drag your heels and stop the clock. Take an extra moment to gawp at the glory, just as Jep stops in his tracks to gawp at the amazing vanishing giraffe. The giraffe appears out of nowhere, it shouldn't be there. It idles in the arena for a few brief moments, before the floodlights are switched off and the city goes dark.

THE GUARDIAN


The 10 best films of 2013 No 1 / The Act of Killing
The 10 best films of 2013 No 2 / The Great Beauty
The 10 best films of 2013 joint third / Behind the Candelabra
The 10 best films of 2013 joint 3rd / Gravity
The 10 best films of 2013 No 5 / Django Unchained
The 10 best films of 2013 No 6/ Before Midnight
The 10 best films of 2013 No 7 / For Ellen
The 10 best films of 2013 No 8 / Only God Forgives
The 10 best films of 2013 No 9 / I Wish
The 10 best films of 2013 No 10 / Wadjda




Wednesday, December 18, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013, joint third / Behind the Candelabra




The 10 best films of 2013

Joint third

Behind the Candelabra


Twas the week before Christmas, and all round the globe, film writers were speculating about the 2014 Oscars. One of the most hotly-contested categories looks set to be best actor. Will it be Dern or Ejiofor? Redford or Hanks?
Catherine Shoard
Wednesday 18 December 2013 17.00 GMT

It could have all been so different. Had assorted studio heads, about three years ago, not made the call that Steven Soderbergh's Liberace biopic would prove "too gay" for them to finance, this year's best actor race would have a done deal.
As it was, Behind the Candelabra's HBO debut means the best Michael Douglas could get in the US was an Emmy. And, duly, a month or two ago, he did.
Behind the Candelabra is dazzling from every angle, with a supporting cast to kill for (most strikingly, Rob Lowe's vampiric plastic surgeon, sucking blood as he nips and tucks) and a script dripping with zingers.

Michael Douglas
Behind the Candelabra
But it's that central casting that clinches it: a turn that's simultaneously transformative - literally, Douglas as you've never seen him before - and a nice sly commentary on his star cache. The baggage he brings to the part is what elevates it beyond showboat or impersonation into inhabitation.


As reviews at the time noted, Douglas's Liberace is more Martian emperor than musician, gliding through his own personal Versailles like a voracious, upholstered pussycat. The arena of Soderbergh's story, too, is out of this world, almost sci-fi. Yet as well as being wild entertainment, Behind the Candelabra works as commentary on fandom and family, love and longing. It took an outlandish affair - between the sex addict closeted super-diva and an apple pie dog handler (Matt Damon's Scott Thorson) - and it made it relatable.
The film ends with Liberace's clear-eyed tribute to his lover:



Why do I love you? I love you not only for what you are, but for what I am when I'm with you. I love you not only for what you have made of yourself, but for what you are making of me. I love you for ignoring the possibilities of the fool in me, and for accepting the possibilities of the good in me. Why do I love you? I love you for closing your eyes to the discords in me, and for adding to the music in me by worshipful listening.

Soderbergh's film sings from the same hymn sheet. It treats its characters, no matter how ludicrous, with dignity and compassion. It loves them because and in spite of their raging absurdity, and doesn't have a problem with the conjunction. Beneath the sequins, behind the lights, it's just lovely.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013, joint 3rd / Gravity




The 10 best films of 2013, joint 3rd – Gravity

Sandra Bullock's down-to-Earthiness and some stunning special effects raise Alfonso Cuarón's space thriller above the rest, in our continuing countdown of this year's top 10 films 


Andrew Pulver
Tuesday 17 December 2013 15.21 GMT

When Gravity finally dropped at the Venice film festival earlier this year, it answered a question that had been perplexing the film world for quite some time: was this long-in-the-making space thriller going to be a gigantic disaster, a folie de grandeur from fast-talking Mexican writer-director Alfonso Cuarón who, despite his impassioned rhetoric, was not necessarily considered the most reliable reins-holder in town?
Well, within minutes of the lights going down, sighs of relief could be heard all around the auditorium – or perhaps it was the first sobbing gasps of terror as the audience, pinned back in their seats, realised what was in store for the two doughty astronauts, played by Sandra Bullock and George Clooney, stranded high above Earth. Cuarón, who had been plugging away on the film for several years, and who had opted to develop entirely new lighting and visual effects techniques to convincingly portray the extra-terrestrial settings, was entitled to feel triumphant, and the film's subsequent box-office performance will have more than satisfied his masters.


With the benefit of hindsight, what Cuarón pulled off is properly extraordinary. Spending vast amounts of money on – and perfectly realising – box-fresh documentary-style visuals which put the viewer right up there in the space shuttle alongside astronauts Ryan Stone (Bullock) and Matt Kowalski (Clooney) is the first, and most obviously impressive achievement. Then, to construct a nerve-shredding thriller that – science quibbles aside – refused to adopt any of the standard sci-fi tricks usually employed by space-set films. More than that, to somehow nudge the narrative into an area that – while not quite Kubrickian – allowed for some heavyweight philosophical/spiritual musing on death and rebirth. And finally – to do all this with Sandra Bullock, queen of quirk, in the driving seat. Though she was by no means first choice for the role, Bullock has turned out to be absolutely inspired casting, injecting a quotidian human warmth to the role that, possibly, may have been lacking had Angelina Jolie, the original lead, not jumped ship.


Gravity, if we're being honest, is not perfect: there are one too many clunking narrative nudges, particularly in the fleshing out of Stone's backstory, which are designed no doubt to ease the minds of studio executives anxious the film would not be relatable enough to be a mainstream hit. But no matter: the immersive brilliance of those zero-grav scenes is without equal – certainly this year, and possibly the entire century to date.




Monday, December 16, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013 No 5 / Django Unchained



The 10 best films of 2013

No 5 

Django Unchained


Our rundown of the top 10 films of 2013 continues with Quentin Tarantino's "southern", the hip, flashy revenge fantasy that dared to tackle slavery 

Henry Barnes
Monday 16 December 2013 16.17 GMT

When Django Unchained was released back in January, Spike Lee did what he does best: took umbrage. "American Slavery Was Not A Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western," the director tweeted. "It Was A Holocaust".
Lee hadn't seen the film, but he had a point. Django Unchained, Quentin Tarantino's action fantasy about a freed slave (Jamie Foxx) enacting bloody revenge on plantation owners across the southern states, does make pre-civil war America look cool. It's loaded with style, plugged into a killer soundtrack, shot with a confidence that we hadn't seen from Tarantino since Jackie Brown. The script – for which Tarantino won an Oscar – is funny, the story is exciting, the performances – particularly Christoph Waltz's turn as the dentist-cum-bounty-hunter Dr King Schultz (another Oscar) – are vital. And then, in among all the crash zooms and gunplay and snappy rejoinders, there's the devastating brutality of the slave trade.



Django Unchained is a hip, flashy film that dares to tackle the slave trade. It takes the cartoonish stereotypes of the martial arts, western and blaxploitation genres and uses them to confront a modern audience with the grey areas of contemporary racial politics. Schultz hates the slave trade, but he bought Django, and he is – make no mistake – using him. He's both emancipator and captor. He's also a wealthy, white gun-for-hire who risks his life for the cause of a former slave (for free). In that he's more unrealistic than Calvin Candie, the moustache-twirling villain (played by Leonardo DiCaprio), or Stephen (Samuel L Jackson), the "house slave" overseer at Candie's ranch. Schultz is the moral centre of the film. And he is absolute fantasy. A stab at crude fictional reparation. A symbol for a much more modern sense of white guilt.



And yet, by presenting a rare and meaningful analysis of a period that many are still too wary of talking about, Tarantino compels us to take Django Unchained seriously. The slaves wearing branks in the trader town in Mississippi, the introduction of Django's wife Broomhilda – whipped first, dragged naked from a sweatbox later: these practices happened, the images are horrifically real. And still you watch them recognising that you are experiencing an entertainment product (as all films, even Steve McQueen's sombre analysis of the same subject, 12 Years a Slave, are in part). It's this quandary that makes Django powerful: the same quandary that has made most of Tarantino's films, from the depiction of extreme violence in Reservoir Dogs to the crass racial epithets of Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown, so startling.



A film set to a backdrop of the most inhuman of human behaviour shouldn't be fun. But Django is. It's also shocking and horrible and unwatchably grim. Tarantino makes no apologies for tackling this period of American history in his own indomitable style. In doing so he presents one way – not the wrong way – of reflecting on an atrocity that's almost incomprehensible.


The 10 best films of 2013 No 6 / Before Midnight


The 10 best films of 2013

No 6

Before Midnight


Our countdown continues with a third installment in the saga of Jesse and Celine, now married with children and on holiday in Greece 


Catherine Shoard
Monday 16 December 2013 12.03 GMT




Another year, another sequel, another shameless attempt to cash in on prior brand recognition and to exploit fans desperate for another hit of their favourite franchise. So why was Richard Linklater's second sequel to Before Sunrise greeted with a loving embrace, rather than the spitting backlash that awaits most reboots?
It's because the Before trilogy (actually, I'm holding out for an octet) has most in common with something like the Up documentary series, which traces the progress of a group of people at seven year intervals. The three Before films, spaced with nine years between them, are so brilliantly constructed, so seamlessly blended with the actual aging of their actor/screenwriters that they had started to assume the role of real-life touchstones, rather than works of art.
There was no pressure, then, for this third instalment. No worry that in tripping up the film-makers would not just be trampling the legacy of two minor masterpieces but pulling the plug on something so special and tangible it goes beyond movies. In fact, of course, this turned out pretty much perfect.

Celine and Jesse drive along in their rental car, have lunch with friends, stroll through the fields and look at goats, kiss and row in a hotel room, then have what might be a reconciliation by the sea. That's about it. But for my money, the technical achivement is just as towering as Gravity's. Those precisely-paced long, long scenes, just dialogue, so casual and natural it couldn't be improvised, knock you over, again and again.
Midnight isn't quite flawless. The ending doesn't have the same satisfying crackle of Sunset; the lunch scene is stagey, your sympathies are too skewed away from Delpy. But these imperfections enhance the picture, make you appreciate it all the more, mean you care for its characters in a way that isn't fleeting or situation specific. Before Midnight transcends cinema. It feels like a commitment. It feels like it's for life.



Thursday, December 12, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013 No 7 / For Ellen






The 10 best films of 2013

No 7 

For Ellen



So Yong Kim's story about a vulnerable rocker and his daughter is music to Andrew Pulver's ears, as we continue our list of this year's top 10 films 



Andrew Pulver
Thursday 12 December 2013 11.13 GMT




For Ellen arrived somewhat unheralded in cinemas, a product of the 2012 Sundance film festival; unheralded, perhaps, because of its opaque title and director So Yong Kim's track record of wispy meditations on Korean-American identity. But what a pleasure it turned out to be. It's never easy to create a plausible musician on screen – Spinal Tap has seen to that – and particularly a nail-varnish-wearing, soul patch-sporting rocker of the type that Paul Dano impersonates here.


But instead of attempting to distil a hard-partying, cooler-than-thou muso, Dano's Joby Taylor is an intensely vulnerable, childlike figure, as ineffectual as a 10-year-old. We first see him as he drives chaotically through the snow into a small American town (naturally, his car breaks down) on his way to finalise a divorce agreement with his pissed-off wife. The Ellen of the title is their daughter, a sussed but not especially cool six-year-old. And the fourth element in the story is Fred Butler (Jon Heder, barely recognisable from Napoleon Dynamite) as a square but strangely star-struck lawyer attempting to shepherd Taylor through the legal aspects of the separation.




In synopsis, the plot is unremarkable: Taylor wavers over the divorce when he realises it means his wife gains complete custody of Ellen, takes the kid to a shopping mall for a bonding afternoon out, and wavers some more. That's about it. But For Ellen is a study in tonal brilliance, in an absurdly enjoyable alchemy between camera, performance, and self-deprecation. Dano has all the choking sincerity of early Nicolas Cage, laced with the kind of grubby histrionics that Withnail might have tried if he'd been a noughties thrash-metaller. Kim, filming in calm, naturalistic long takes, brings out all the underlying tenderness of this undeniably idiotic character, so much so that every reverse and confusion Taylor experiences becomes more and more unbearable.


In an interview earlier this year, Kim told me For Ellen is informed – like her earlier films – by her father's attempt to reconnect with her after abandoning the family when she was a child. How she managed to transmute such difficult personal experiences into such cinematic delight is something of a miracle.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

The 10 best films of 2013 No 8 / Only God Forgives





The 10 best films of 2013

No 8

Only God Forgives


Continuing our countdown of the best movies of the past year, Peter Bradshaw celebrates a brilliant and brutal anti-revenge film 


Peter Bradshaw
Wednesday 11 December 2013 09.40 GMT

Nicolas Winding Refn's brilliant, bizarre and ultraviolent anti-revenge movie Only God Forgives is his most interesting work since the Pusher trilogy in the Mads Mikkelsen era. It is put together with lethal strangeness: there are bad-dream setpieces of sentimentality and nauseous black comedy. The film takes place in a universe of fear, a place of deepsea-unreality in which you need to breathe through special gills. It is a tragi-exploitation shocker, an enriched uranium-cake of pulp.

Ryan Gosling is the expatriate American gangster Julian, lying low in Bangkok and running a drug business under the cover of a Muay Thai boxing club, co-managed with his psychotic brother, Billy. Billy's horrible fate is to involve Julian in a metaphysical duel with enigmatic local cop Chang, played with eerie poise by Vithaya Pansringarm.
Chang dispenses his own justice with a samurai sword, and Julian – paralysed with some kind of guilt or suppressed qualm of conscience – is mesmerised by the mere rumour of Chang's avenging presence. The situation is complicated by the arrival in Thailand of Julian's formidable mother, uproariously played by Kristin Scott Thomas. Her imperious demands bring a horrible new Freudian dimension to the drama.

Like Julian, like Chang, the film swims through the hostile streets, along corridors, into alleys, round corners, waiting for some terrible, nameless, violent destiny, and yet it entirely upends what you might expect from a revenge movie. This is a very brutal film, and enclosed in a kind of carapace of neon, a strange otherworld. Faces appear to glow in the artificial light, partly illuminated from within by their own madness.

Only God Forgives has something of Scorsese's Taxi Driver and Noé's Enter the Void, granting access to a private hell. On its first appearance, it was excitably denounced and mocked by some critics. But with such a provocative film, some misjudgment is forgivable.