ὡς: is seldom used thus with the inf., while οἷος is often so used, cf. 330 c d, 331 a, ὅσον 334 c. —
οὐκ εἶναι: the difference is conceived as a fact. μή would have indicated rather dependence in thought.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
XIX.
Hermann Sauppe. James A. Towle. Commentary on Plato: Protagoras. Ginn & Company. Boston and London. 1889.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.