Showing posts with label Tomalin (Claire). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tomalin (Claire). Show all posts

17 October 2012

Claire Tomalin: Katherine Mansfield: A Secret Life (1987)

Initial research for Claire Tomalin's biography of Katherine Mansfield was postponed partly because of Jeffrey Meyer's and Antony Alper's books in 1978 and 1980 respectively. Tomalin describes Alpers's biography as 'epic', representing (he believes) a generally misunderstood genius, and Meyers's as 'more cynical', showing a darker Mansfield. She feels that certain aspects of her life have not been dealt with sufficiently, 'in particular the chain of events leading from her first foray into sexual freedom in 1908, and the various long-term results of her association with Floryan Sobieniowski in 1909.' She investigates Mansfield's medical history and Sobieniowski's blackmail of her.

Katherine Mansfield Beauchamp (1888–1923) was born in Wellington, New Zealand the daughter of banker Harold Beauchamp, who became wealthy shortly after her birth and, like her mother Annie, was born in Australia. Family legend has it that Katherine wanted to become a writer on finding out about her father's cousin Elizabeth von Arnim's novel Elizabeth and Her German Garden.

Katherine was the outsider in an otherwise more or less conventional family, although (something she didn't know) the rebellious or transgressive gene seems to have existed in Harold's first cousin Fred, who had at least five unmarried children by a Māori.

On leaving New Zealand to settle permanently in England, Mansfield was entering a society that was changing, becoming more democratic, less male-dominated, with freer sexual habits, a country breaking away from the constraints of the Victorian ethos which had dominated for several decades. In a chapter titled 'London 1908: New Women', Tomalin writes about four women – Virginia Stephen (later Woolf, of course), Ottoline Morrell, Dorothy Brett, and Frieda Weekley, all of whom rebelled against their backgrounds: all of whom came to know and love Mansfield, who had also broken free – from the colonial shackles she'd left at the other end of the world, one to which she would never return.

This compelling book, then, shows a woman eager to embrace different forms of liberation, as Mansfield indeed did, although her story is no exhilarating read, describing a (then) forbidden love followed by pregnancy and miscarriage, sexually transmitted disease followed by a disastrous operation, suffering and illness, an essential relationship that it was essential to keep escaping from, more suffering and illness, and early death. In between, Mansfield never managed to complete a novel but left a number of fine short stories. And she was the inspiration behind a number of fictional characters, of which these are a few examples:

Lawrence's depiction of Ursula Brangwen's distinctly lesbian relationship with the older Winifred Inger in the 'Shame' chapter of The Rainbow seems in part an imagining of Mansfield and her friend Edith Bendall; in Women in Love too, Lawrence based Ursula's sister Gudrun on Mansfield; J. R. Orage satirized her as 'Moira Foisacre' in a series in New Age; the uneasy colonial Louis in Woolf's The Waves has an Australian banker father like Mansfield; and she was posthumously satirized by Aldous Huxley in Those Barren Leaves.

I can't say I'm convinced that Sobianiowski's blackmail of Mansfield was on account of her 'plagiarizing' Chekhov's 'Spat' khochetsia' (translated as 'Sleepy' by Constance Garnett in 1927), and although her 'The-Child-Who-Was-Tired' may well have a similar basic story outline to Chekhov's it is far from being anything like a copy. But Tomalin goes out of her way to put her case for this tenuous blackmail construction, as well as including an Appendix containing several pages from the TLS letters pages for 1951, where several academics argue about the short story.

A few minor grouses:

Unlike Katherine's maternal grandfather Joseph Dyer, or her maternal grandmother Margaret Isabella Mansfield, or her paternal grandmother Elizabeth, nowhere in the text itself, only in the Index, is Katherine's paternal grandfather's name Arthur mentioned, although he is present in several sentences.

I find Tomalin is too eager to psychologize: for instance, regarding a photo of Mansfield aged about nine, the author sees 'a rebellious and inquisitive glimmer' in her eyes, whereas I, especially when bearing in mind the long exposures necessary at the time, merely see a suggestion of boredom.

And a 'Māori kit', as C. K. Stead points out in Kin of Place (originally published in the November 1987 issue of the London Review of Books as a review of Tomalin's biography), is not, as Tomalin seemed to think, something that Mansfield wore to show off in England, but is simply a basket.
 
My links to Katherine Mansfield's Birthplace and the place of her death are below:
 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Katherine Mansfield in Wellington, New Zealand

Katherine Mansfield and Gurdjieff in Avon, France

3 August 2012

Claire Tomalin: Charles Dickens: A Life (2011)

It seems appropriate to read a biography of Charles Dickens (1812–70) in this, the bicentenary of his birth, and although I've been familiar with a large number of biographical details about the writer, this is the first book-length biography I've so far tackled. And because I've therefore no measuring stick, it's impossible for me to say how well Claire Tomalin's Charles Dickens: A Life (London: Viking, 2011) captures him, or what additional details about his life she must have unearthed.

But this is an absorbing book that held my attention all the way through, never flagging. Tomalin obviously greatly admires Dickens, but at the same time she can be critical: of his work (he's not very good on female characters, for instance, and of course he can get sentimental and uneven, etc); and of him as a person (such as his cruelty to his wife, his lies and deceit, and so on).

In these 400 pages (with over 100 more for the textual apparatus, etc, this is the trajectory of a an extraordinary man riddled by contradictions, a man of tremendous kindness and generosity, very concerned with social injustice,* a man whose fictional creations have left a permanent impression on countless millions of people, but whose great emotional and sexual passion created enormous problems for most people who knew him.

The first three quarters of the book take us from the feckless father John Dickens living beyond his means through to his adolescent son beginning work in a blacking factory near the Thames in London, then earning his way as a workaholic writer, marrying and becoming increasingly wealthy and famous, until the final quarter which sees him overcome by a kind of madness, a madness that causes him to leave his family, that loses him friends, and means he has an extra family to support, but in secret. Tomalin mentions that Peter Ackroyd, in Dickens (1990), says 'it seems almost inconceivable that [Ellen Ternan and Dicken's] was in any sense a "consummated" affair'. In Tomalin's biography, as in her The Invisible Woman: The Story of Nelly Ternan and Charles Dickens (1990), it seems inconceivable that the affair – which Dickens had with a young woman who was exactly two and a half times his junior, and which lasted from the 1857 'Doncaster experience' when he met her until his death in 1870 – wasn't sexually consummated.

Occasionally I found an odd note in the writing – for instance, Tomalin writes about Caddy Jellyby in Bleak House being forced to work for her mother and is (therefore, I think we're supposed to understand) 'denied a natural, cheerful childhood'. Does this mean that a 'natural' childhood (whatever one of those is) is necessarily cheerful? And when she quotes from a letter Dickens wrote about the unhappiness of his marriage, supposedly reporting what his wife Catherine (before the break) had often said about their separating, Tomalin comments that the words sound like those made during a quarrel, and imagines Catherine saying  "'If things are so bad...' or 'If you dislike me so much – it might be better if we were to separate'." This is speculation verging on fictionalization, is clumsy, and doesn't belong in such a worthy book.

The final brief chapter, after Dickens's death, follows to their death a number of people involved with the author, and is in no small way concerned with the aftermath of the Dickens–Ternan affair. This is a vivid, and highly memorable book.

*Tomalin has suggested elsewhere that Dickens is particularly relevant today, now the gap between rich and poor is widening, and the post-World War II inroads that the Attlee government made towards social equity are being eroded.

The couch Dickens supposedly died on in his home at Gad's Hill Place, Higham, Kent, which is now a school.

Below are links to several posts I've made relating to Dickens.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Charles Dickens in London: London #13
Charles Dickens in Portsmouth, Hampshire
Charles Dickens and Characters in Marylebone Road, London
Charles Dickens in Kingston upon Hull
Charles Dickens Connections in Kensal Green Cemetery, London
Charles Dickens, Edward Wortley Montagu, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu
Charles Dickens and Cleveland Street, Fitzrovia: Literary London #8