Showing posts with label Anthony Riches. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anthony Riches. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 June 2015

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire VIII: Thunder of the Gods - Anthony Riches

Release Date: 02/04/15
Publisher:  Hodder

SYNOPSIS:

The eighth book in the Empire sequence takes Centurion Marcus Aquila and his Tungrian legion on a dangerous mission to the heart of the Parthian empire

With Rome no longer safe Marcus and the Tungrians are ordered east, to the desolate border lands where Rome and Parthia have vied for supremacy for centuries.

Ordered to relieve the siege of an isolated fortress, their task is doomed to bloody failure unless they can turn the disaffected Third Legion into a fighting force capable of resisting the terrifying Parthian cataphracts.

And Marcus must travel to the enemy capital Ctesiphon on a desperate mission, the only man who can persuade the King of Kings to halt a war that threatens the humiliation of the empire and the slaughter of his friends.


REVIEW:

Anthony is an author that for me is a must have. I love the way his characters come to life, the way that he manages to weld beautiful storytelling with cracking top notch action and then blends it all with prose that just stand out from anything else.

Back this up with dialogue that furthers the reality of the characters alongside an overall arc that keeps giving as the principle character not only room to emotionally grow but also furthers his own goals for vengeance and all round you know that you’re in for a real treat. I just can’t give enough praise for this author.



Thursday, 13 March 2014

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire 7: The Emperor's Knives - Anthony Riches

Release Date: 13/02/14
Publisher:  Hodder

SYNOPSIS:

The seventh novel in Anthony Riches' acclaimed Empire sequence brings Marcus Aquila back to Rome, hunting the men who destroyed his family. But the revenge he craves may cost him and those around him dearly. The young centurion's urge to exact his own brutal justice upon the shadowy cabal of assassins who butchered his family means that he must face them on their own ground, risking his own death at their hands. A senator, a gang boss, a praetorian officer and, deadliest of all, champion gladiator Mortiferum - the Death Bringer - lie in wait. The knives are unsheathed, and ready for blood ...


REVIEW:

The latest outing for Centurion Marius “Two Knives” Corvus who in his quest for vengeance has travelled to Rome. As with Anthony’s other books the tale is full of high octane action, has some magnificent twists and when added to a comraderie that gives the reader a bond with not only the principle player but the unit around him all round generates a book that is not only hard to put down but nigh impossible.

Back this up with some great dialogue, some cracking turns of phrase and of course an authorly style that really works well always moves Anthony to the top of my reading pile. Finally I’d like to add that if you’re a fantasy reader and love David Gemmell’s work, then try Anthony Riches Historical Fiction, it not only has notes of David throughout but also in the latest title has something that you’ll more than appreciate. Great stuff.



Thursday, 13 February 2014

GUEST BLOG: Just Remember This... - Anthony Riches


In all my time writing ‘The Emperor’s Knives’ I found myself coming back to one question time after time. At this point, of course, you’re probably thinking that I was pondering on the merits of the many and different styles of fighting that were seen in the empire’s arenas, over the hundreds of years that the gladiatorial arts held Rome’s population in their thrall. Or, you might wonder, was I perhaps taken up with the question of why it was that a little known Etruscan custom of human sacrifice came to be so popular, second only to chariot racing in the affections of Romans? In truth it was neither of these perfectly valid questions that pre-occupied me.
   
No, reader, the question that was exercising my mind was far more down to earth. Why was it, I mused, that the women of Rome were so very keen on gladiators. And when I say “keen”, I really mean it. To the apparent disgust of the more surviving writers of the time, Rome’s women found much more to attract them in the sweaty, scarred body of a professional fighter whose arena trade branded him as ‘infamis’ - lower than the lowest in the city - than in their own august and sensitively composed works. And, trust me, the gladiators knew only too well the power they wielded.  

Women with money would hire gladiators as bodyguards for an evening out in the city, not simply for their protection but for the pleasure that might be had from their close attentions. The slave girl Chrysis in the Satyricon remarks that ‘there are those who can only get on heat with the absolute dregs…the arena certainly does it for some.’ More than a few famous Romans were reputed to have been fathered by the virile gladiators of the day, and even the real life imperial villain of the Empire series, the Emperor Commodus, was the subject of dark mutterings as to his true parentage. And he did grow up to be fascinated with gladiatorial sport…  

Whether taken with a big pinch of salt or not, there’s no getting away from the fact that gladiators were widely associated with wild, sweaty, brutal sexuality. Gladiator figurines have been found with enormous penises, some even arching back to attack their owner in a particularly Roman visual satire. Gladiator blood was an especially strong juju, and a men marrying a bride whose customary hair parting had been performed with the customary spear head would have been doubly delighted were that spear head to have been dipped in the blood of a dead gladiator, with the power to make her faithful for the length of their marriage. Gladiators were even rented out for sexual purposes, it seems, an apparent perk of the role. These men, steeped in their literal infamy, drew women to them like moths to their flame, and were it not for the genuine opportunity for a man to meet his gods in the arena every time he fought (alright, many bouts were carefully staged, much like modern wrestling, but put two men together with sharp iron and bad things frequently happened) one might even be a little jealous of them.  

Mind you, it wasn’t just the women who were turned on by the sight of blood on the arena sand. The arches (fornices) outside the arena, used by prostitutes to entertain their clients, were so busy that the name stuck, and to this day we still call the sexual act ‘fornication’. Well I do. I love a good old meaty Latin word under such circumstances.  

So it wasn’t just the women who were aroused by the whole fight to the death thing. The fact of it, I suppose, is that deep down the human animal still harbours the same visceral instinct to glory in blood and death that sent the Romans into such ecstasies two thousand years ago. After all, it’s the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms, no matter who much we’d like to think we’re better than they were. Scratch the 21st century metrosexual hard enough and you’ll find a Roman pleb with all his lusts and pleasures, beneath the surface? Now there’s a thought to close on.
 
Oh, but before I close, I hope you will read and enjoy two books. One’s my own ‘The Emperor’s Knives’, the seventh book in the Empire series. The latter of the two is Philip Matyszak’s ‘Gladiator’, which I pillaged liberally in the writing of the former (and much of this post for that matter). He’s a great author of Roman fact and fiction, and I heartily recommend him to you.

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire 7: The Emperor's Knives - Anthony Riches

Release Date:13/02/14
Publisher: Hodder

SYNOPSIS:

The seventh novel in Anthony Riches' acclaimed Empire sequence brings Marcus Aquila back to Rome, hunting the men who destroyed his family. But the revenge he craves may cost him and those around him dearly. The young centurion's urge to exact his own brutal justice upon the shadowy cabal of assassins who butchered his family means that he must face them on their own ground, risking his own death at their hands. A senator, a gang boss, a praetorian officer and, deadliest of all, champion gladiator Mortiferum - the Death Bringer - lie in wait. The knives are unsheathed, and ready for blood ...


REVIEW:

The latest outing for Centurion Marius “Two Knives” Corvus who in his quest for vengeance has travelled to Rome. As with Anthony’s other books the tale is full of high octane action, has some magnificent twists and when added to a comraderie that gives the reader a bond with not only the principle player but the unit around him all round generates a book that is not only hard to put down but nigh impossible.

Back this up with some great dialogue, some cracking turns of phrase and of course an authorly style that really works well always moves Anthony to the top of my reading pile. Finally I’d like to add that if you’re a fantasy reader and love David Gemmell’s work, then try Anthony Riches Historical Fiction, it not only has notes of David throughout but also in the latest title has something that you’ll more than appreciate. Great stuff.

Friday, 30 August 2013

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire VI: The Eagle's Vengeance - Anthony RIches

Release Date: 22/08/13
Publisher:  Hodder

SYNOPSIS:

The Tungrian auxiliary cohorts return to Hadrian's Wall after their successful Dacian campaign, only to find Britannia in chaos. The legions are overstretched, struggling to man the forts of the northern frontier in the face of increasing barbarian resistance. The Tungrians are the only soldiers who can be sent into the northern wastes, far beyond the long abandoned wall built by Antoninus, where a lost symbol of imperial power of the Sixth Victorious Legion is reputed to await them. Protected by an impassable swamp and hidden in a fortress atop a high mountain, the eagle of the Sixth legion must be recovered if the legion is to survive. Marcus and his men must penetrate the heart of the enemy's strength, ghosting through a deadly wilderness patrolled by vicious huntresses before breaching the walls of the Fang, an all-but-impregnable fort, if they are to rescue the legion's venerated standard. If successful their escape will be twice as perilous, with the might of a barbarian tribe at their heels.


REVIEW:

It’s no secret that I’ve loved the Empire series since the first book. The writing was crisp, the lead protagonist a joy to spend time with and the trouble that he got into (both on the battlefield as well as off) worked wonderfully well. It made for ideal reading so would I find that I would have the same experience with this book?

To be honest with you, yep, I did. Whilst the novel contains losses of friends, the reader is treated to a high octane story full of political machinations as well as top notch action. Back this up with solid prose, great pace alongside an arc where loose threads are tied up all round makes this a book that was a pure joy to sit down with.

Back this up with the return of some old friends alongside some new devious double dealing villains and all round I was more than happy. I can’t wait to see what Anthony hits back with next, especially when the darker side of a certain city is obviously going to be the key aspect as our heroes work with a new addition, who may or may not be friendly. Great stuff.

Friday, 26 October 2012

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire 5: The Wolf's Gold - Anthony Riches

Release Date: 25/10/12

SYNOPSIS:

Fresh from their victory in Germania, Marcus Aquila and the Tungrians have been sent to Dacia, on the north-eastern edge of the Roman Empire, with the mission to safeguard a major source of imperial power. The mines of Alburnus Major contain enough gold to pave the road to Rome. They would make a mighty prize for the marauding Sarmatae tribesmen who threaten the province, and the outnumbered auxiliaries are entrusted with their safety in the face of a barbarian invasion. Beset by both the Sarmatian horde and more subtle threats offered by men who should be their comrades, the Tungrians must also come to terms with the danger posed by a new and unexpected enemy. They will have to fight to the death to save the honour of the empire - and their own skins.


REVIEW:

It’ll come as no surprise to many that I’m a huge fan of the Empire series by Anthony, it has everything I want in a roman historical fiction story, you want hard fought battles against the odds with blood alongside glory, you got it, you want complex characters, you’ve got that as well, but back that up with some real twisted kick ass politics and the machinations of the roman red tape machine and you really get something spectacular.

Add to that an author who makes you feel that you’re in the front line up to your neck in the brown stuff alongside the Tungarians and you know it’s going to be an adventure that is not only hard to put down but one that will have you checking carefully if “faithful” friends have made it through.

Finally throw into the mix a hidden arc underneath of the deeper fate that Mithras has in store for our Centurion hero and all in you know damn well it’s going to be a long wait for the next outing. Great stuff.



Thursday, 26 April 2012

GUEST BLOG: AD193 – the Year of the Five Emperors and its aftermath - Anthony Riches

On the eve of the publication of the fourth episode in the Empire series (a series which might just grow to encompass some 25 books just as long as you, dear reader, keep wanting to read them), I thought that it might be nice to provide some clue as the context in which subsequent books in the series will be set. When I started researching a period in which to set my young hero and his supporting cast, the reign of the emperor Commodus and the aftermath of his assassination quickly caught my attention. Civil war, frontier campaigns and plenty of intrigue – that, I told myself, was for me. And, first and foremost, my curiosity was piqued by the year AD193.The late second century saw a sudden and catastrophic end to the extended period of stability that had been maintained since the days of Nerva, engendered by the longstanding principle that successive emperors should be chosen on merit rather than heredity. The disaster of AD193 was rooted in the decision of Marcus Aurelius, an otherwise admirable ruler given the events with which he had to cope (a smallpox pandemic and subsequent barbarian incursions as the northern tribes sought to take advantage of the weakened empire), to gift the throne to his dissolute son Commodus (think Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator).

While Roman scholars have extensively analysed A.D.69, the infamous Year of the Four Emperors which began with Nero on the throne and ended with Vespasian as supreme ruler, the upheavals of A.D.193 saw no less than five men claim the purple in a single year. After over a decade of clearly increasing instability in their emperor, who latterly took to considering himself as the modern incarnation of the god Hercules and fighting in the Flavian Amphitheatre as a gladiator (trust me, there was no greater infamy for a man in Rome), the empire’s terrified ruling class had seen enough. With the assassination of the emperor on the last day of AD192, the respected soldier and senator Publius Helvius Pertinax took the throne. Intending a return to the greater tolerance and stability Rome had enjoyed under the five adoptive emperors who had reigned for most of the 2nd century, men chosen for their abilities rather than by bloodline, he bravely decided not to pay the Praetorian Guard the substantial donative – or bribe – they expected as the price of their complicity. Despite eventually selling off Commodus’s properties and assets - including his concubines – to meet their demands, his standing with the Guard was fatally undermined. After evading one assassination attempt he was put to the sword by a gang of Praetorians in March.

At this point the question of who would rule the empire descended into farce, as the Guard literally auctioned off the throne. Didius Julianus was the winner, paying 25,000 sesterces (eighty years pay for a legionary) for every man in the Praetorian Camp. Lauded by the senate – who had little choice in the matter – he became emperor, but was roundly abused and even pelted with stones when he appeared in public.

At the same time the armies of Britannia, Syria and Pannonia (modern day Hungary) each promptly declared their generals, Albinus, Niger and the North African Septimius Severus, to be Emperor. Removing the Britannia legions as a threat by cannily – and insincerely - declaring Albinus ‘Caesar’ and thus persuading him not to act, Severus used Pannonia’s proximity to Rome to steal a march on his rivals and claim the throne. Having convinced the outnumbered Praetorians to surrender, promising that they would face no punishment, Julianus’s murder by a soldier gave the new emperor sufficient pretext to dismiss them in ignominy, and replace them with his own soldiers.

Tumultuous even by comparison with the bloodiest of Rome’s history , AD193 left the empire’s military might divided between the three generals and left Severus in a precarious position of power, in possession of the capital and the throne, but threatened from the east by Niger and the west by Albinus, former colleagues in the Dacian wars of the 180s. Holding Albinus’s powerful British army at arm’s length with continuing promises of shared power, he sent his generals after Niger. With his forces at first pinned down and then defeated, Niger himself suffered a prompt execution upon his capture close to Antioch.

With the risk posed by the eastern legions removed from the board Severus was free to focus on his only remaining rival, influencing the senate to declare his fellow African and former ally Clodius Albinus, governor of Britannia, an enemy of the state. Goaded by this declaration of war (and a narrowly failed assassination attempt by a messenger from Serverus), or possibly having waited for the power struggle to play out in the hope of confronting a single weakened rival, Albinus took an estimated 40,000 men - pretty much every legionary and auxiliary soldier in Britannia - and marched south with the aim of capturing Rome. Denied passage across the Alps, he pitched his British and Spanish legions against Serverus’s Dacian and German forces at Lugdunum, modern day Lyons.

The engagement that resulted was a titanic affair fought over two days, a rarity in an age when a few hours was usually enough to bring about either an outcome or an exhausted stalemate. At the battle’s climax, with Albinus’s legions apparently victorious and already chanting their victory hymn, Serverus’s superior cavalry took the day. By this hair’s breadth victory the Severan dynasty’s future was assured, and a fresh, if not ultimately fruitful chapter in the empire’s history opened.

Lugdunum, for all that the battle took place in Gaul, was nevertheless a watershed in the province’s history, since Britannia had never before exerted such a pivotal influence in imperial affairs. There was, however, a disastrously high price to be paid for this moment of illusory glory. Not until Serverus’s brutal campaign of subjugation a decade later would the northern British tribes be properly subdued again, and their depredations would have served as a powerful object lesson in the importance of choosing carefully when taking sides in war.

With ultimate power now safe in one pair of hands, the undisputed emperor went on to fight a series of campaigns along the empire’s frontiers which culminated with his death in York in AD211. But that, as any good historical novelist will tell you, is another story…

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire 4: The Leopard Sword - Anthony Riches

Release Date: 26/04/12

SYNOPSIS:

Britannia has been subdued - and an epic new chapter in Marcus Valerius Aquila's life begins. The murderous Roman agents who nearly captured Marcus have been defeated by his friends. But in order to protect those very friends from the wrath of the emperor, he must leave the province which has been giving him shelter. As Marcus Tribulus Corvus, centurion of the second Tungrian auxiliary cohort, he leads his men from Hadrian's Wall to the Tungrians' original home in Germania Inferior. There he finds a very different world from the turbulent British frontier - but one with its own dangers. Tungrorum, the centre of a once-prosperous farming province, a city already brought low by the ravages of the eastern plague that has swept through the empire, is now threatened by an outbreak of brutally violent robbery. A bandit chieftain called Obduro, his identity always hidden behind an iron cavalry helmet, is robbing and killing with impunity. His sword - sharper, stronger and more deadly than any known to the Roman army - is the lethal symbol of his unstoppable power. And now he has moved beyond mere theft and threatens to destabilize the whole northern frontier of the empire ...


REVIEW:

I’ve enjoyed Anthony’s books since he burst onto the seen a few years ago, they had a great combination of action, a familiar setting for me and added a cracking lead character who demonstrated both tenderness, naivety and the ability to fight when it came to it.

Add to this sharp prose, a great sense of pace which when backed with a writing style that’s very easy to get into, you can’t help but sit back and enjoy the adventure.

Here in the latest title there’s more of the same with a villain that’s the same level as Corvus, has a solid combat style which when accompanied with an almost mythical blade makes for a real challenge for our Centurion hero, almost as if he were a flip side of the same coin. Add to this the Tungarians’ marching back to their homelands to help take some of the heat from our hero with a graphic change of scenery and fighting style and all in this book was a pure joy from start to finish. I really can’t wait to see what Anthony comes up with next.

Wednesday, 27 April 2011

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire 3: Fortress of Spears - Anthony Riches

Release Date: 28/04/11

SYNOPSIS:

In the enthralling third volume of Empire, Anthony Riches takes the legions deep into north Britannia, where the survivors of the rebellion still hope for revenge. The Romans have vanquished the rebel alliance, leaving Calgus, Lord of the Northern Tribes, the prisoner of the chieftains he once led. But the new Roman leader will not let them rest. He forms an audacious plan to capture Dinpaladyr, the Selgovaes' fortress of spears, and return it to the hands of a trusted ally. Marcus Aquila - burning for revenge on an enemy army that has killed one of his best friends - is part of the select group of infantry chosen to go north with the Petriana cavalry and take the fort before the rebel army can reach it. He believes his disguise as Centurion Corvus of the 2nd Tungrians is still holding. But he is just a few days ahead of two of the emperor's agents, sent from Rome to kill him. Pitiless assassins who know his real name, and too much about his friends.


REVIEW:

To be honest I absolutely love a title that takes me on a journey especially when I get to march alongside the ancestors and those who have gone before. Here in the third offering in his Empire series, Anthony returns to the Tungrians as the Legion marches to finish the natives uprising for once and for all. As usual it’s got great action sequences, emotional conflict and some seriously apt prose as the battle gets down and dirty with men dying for each inch of ground. Back that up with great prose alongside an author who plays for keeps and you know that there will be some heavy losses with friends from previous excursions falling by the wayside. Finally, if you want entertainment, battles and action sequences then this title will definitely fulfil the brief for you and a great addition for fans of Bernard Cornwell and Simon Scarrow.

Thursday, 8 July 2010

INTERVIEW: Anthony Riches

Friend of the blog and soon to be epic wall walker (see our earlier post), Anthony Riches has kindly taken the time to answer some more of our questions. Here he goes into detail about the long road to success, how to deal with critics and above all else, why a good red wine and a great scotch are the cure for most ills...


Falcata Times: How would you say that your perspective has changed about selling your own work with multiple novels under your belt?

Anthony Riches: I'm a lot more relaxed about the whole process than I was during the delivery of Arrows of Fury. I had no idea if I could do it again, despite all the bravado with which I faced down my inner uncertainty. Having seen AoF get accepted with only minimal changes to sharpen the plot I’m pretty comfortable in my writing skin now, and ready to take Marcus from 182ad through to 211, in what I plan will be a series of novels set across the late 2nd century Roman Empire’s magnificent diversity.


FT: How would you sell yourself as an author?

AR: Hmmm. How not to demean one’s work whilst making it clear that it’s not exactly literary fiction? Let’s put it this way: I write the kind of stories that I enjoy reading. My novels are about duty and comradeship in difficult times, and the history comes a close second to the plot action. I’ve been described as a ‘Roman Andy McNab’, and if I could achieve anything like the sort of sales that he routinely manages I’d be a happy man! Oh, and my business partner Graham says I have to use his strap line – ‘Gore Galore!’ There you go, my writing summed up in two words!


FT: How would you say that your experience of writing and publishing has changed your method of writing?

AR: That’s a simple one. In the days before I got into print I could decide not to write for a month if I felt out of sorts. Now that I understand the industry’s need for routine and dependable delivery of product if the author is going to build a readership, I can’t allow myself that sort of luxury. Nothing else has changed apart from my recently acquired discipline of writing regularly, but then my books have pretty much escaped any serious surgery to date. If that were to change I suppose I’d have to take a hard look at the nature of my output, but that hasn’t yet come to pass.


FT: With the experience that you've gained now, what do you wish you could have told yourself when you were starting out that you now know?

AR: Just to push the first manuscript harder and earlier. I dithered over the damn thing for years – well, over a decade in point of fact. It’s a lot easier to get through the publishing maze if you have a well known name, or a relevant and prestigious expertise in the era about which you’re writing, which means that there must be many great authors festering down dead ends due to lack of contacts, confidence or perseverance. I would have told myself to stop being so pathetic and get the script out there.


FT: What characteristics of your protagonists do you wish that you had yourself and why?

AR: Ambidextrous and expert sword fighting skills would be pretty near the top of the list, closely followed by the stamina to march long distances in heavy Roman armour – and there’s a great chance to mention the Wall Walk that Robin Wade and I are undertaking between 30th May – 3rd June for Help for Heroes. (http://www.justgiving.com/Anthony-Riches). Apart from that I’d like the ability to hand out abuse as inventively as some of the harder edged centurions in my stories – I’m much more one dimensional in my everyday choice of rude language.


FT: Which of your characters are most like you and why?

AR: I’m not sure any of them are very much like me…perhaps my cynicism creeps through every now and then, and the choice of language is a lot like me. I write my characters from what I see in the people around me, not about me…I think.


FT: What of life’s little addictions could you not live without and why?

AR: Good red wine with dinner, great Scotch whisky after it, but most of all, the high performance internal combustion engine.


FT: With regular trips for book tours around the country as well as to various Conventions, what is an absolute travel essential that you couldn't do without?

AR: What book tours and conventions? Come back to me when the Empire series has raised that sort of interest! However, my absolute travel essential given that I spend quite a lot of time on plane has to be the iPod Touch, absolutely the best single device I’ve ever had.


FT: Previously you've had some problems when others have critcised your work, how do you think you've changed to adapt to it or would you say that you're just the same?

AR: Look, every author gets criticised, it’s just part of being published, and anyone that can’t take a joke shouldn’t have joined! I recall getting two crits in short succession on Amazon, one of which pretty much said I was a low brow gore merchant with absolutely no grasp of the period, the other one bemoaning that fact that all the history in ‘Wounds of Honour’ was getting in the way of the action. I don’t think I could change the way I write very much, even if I wanted to, and indeed I believe that the formation of writing style is something that’s more about evolution than revolution. I’m sure there are people who can receive formal training and promptly make something different happen on the page, but I’m not one of them. Sure I’ll be writing differently in ten years time in some way or other, but probably not from conscious choice.


FT: On long journeys, reading is often the pleasure of choice, whose work will you grab at the airport to ensure a good journey?

AR: The usual suspects (for me): Iain M Banks, Richard Morgan, Lee Childs, any good looking thriller and anything that looks interesting, whether fiction or fact, about the Romans. And I buy a LOT of books at airports!


FT: Out of all your novels, which is your favourite and why?

AR: That has to be ‘Wounds of Honour’. Well I’ve only written two (three if you count the almost completed ‘Fortress of Spears’), and I lived with that script for over a decade. ‘Wounds’ is my first literary child, and I love it dearly. Mind you, I’m probably prouder of ‘Arrows of Fury’, given the short time I had to write it in alongside working in Glasgow, Paris and Heidenheim (the back of beyond in Germany) - and sitting on planes two or three times a week.


FT: With everyone having their own personal view as to who should be cast in a film version of their work, who do you think should play your principle protaganists and why?

AR: That’s tricky. I’m not really in touch with young male film actors – not my bag! – but I have imagined a few of the main characters with famous faces as I write; Ross Kemp as First Spear Frontinius , Ray Winstone as Tiberius Rufius, Gerard Butler as Centurion Julius and Dolph Lundgren as Centurion Titus. But as to Marcus…I have no idea. A younger Ioan Gruffudd might fit the bill, but aside from that I’ve not a clue. Film producers, please feel free to surprise me with a few ideas!


FT: Authors are generally a superstitious lot and upon completion of novels follow a certain ritual, what is yours and how has it changed from the original?

AR: Post completion ritual? Not really. I tend to say ‘thank **** for that’ and start the next one…and…err…that’s it. Well, I might have a few scotches to celebrate getting the monkey off my back whilst reaching for the next one…


FT: What was your impression of an author’s lifestyle and status and how has that interpretation changed since you've published a number of books?

AR: I’m not sure I had any real perception of author’s lifestyle, never mind status, pre-publication – my yearning to get published was far more about ego and drive to achieve than any expectation of fame and fortune (and neither of which were ever going to be desperately likely), but I can tell you what I think it is now. For the favoured few I think it’s a probably a doddle, and rewarded with money beyond their expectations when they hit the rich seam of teenage buyers that spend a fortune on wizards and vampires (and probably vampire gangsters, sigh). For the rest of us, whether ‘amateur’ or full time writers, it’s hard work, punctuated by periods of elusive creativity and uncertainty, albeit something that most of us could probably never stop doing it even if there was no reward at the end of the process.


FT: What are the best words of wisdom or tip that you'd give to a new or soon to be published author?

AR: What are you wasting your time reading this for? You’ve got to deliver another one in six months time for Christ’s sake! Get on with some writing! And seriously…ignore the critics and keep doing what you’re doing. Your story was good enough to get published, so get on with turning out some more of the same. Make it better, funnier, more thrilling and surprising by all means, but stop dithering and get writing!

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire: Arrows of Fury - Anthony Riches

BOOK BLURB:

The Battle of the Lost Eagle saved Hadrian's Wall, but the new Roman governor of Britannia must stamp out the rebellion of the northern tribes or risk losing the province. Rampaging south with sword and flame under the command of their murderous chieftain Calgus, they have stretched his forces to the limit. For Marcus - now simply Centurion Corvus of the 1st Tungrian cohort - the campaign has become doubly dangerous. As reinforcements flood into Britannia he is surrounded by new officers with no reason to protect him from the emperor's henchmen. Death could result from a careless word as easily as from an enemy spear Worse, one of them is close on his heels. While Marcus is training two centuries of Syrian archers to survive a barbarian charge and then take the fight back to their enemy, the new prefect of the 2nd Tungrians has discovered his secret. Only a miracle can save Marcus and the men who protect him from disgrace and death ...Anthony Riches once again brings meticulous research together with brilliant storytelling to capture the authentic feel of what life was like for the Roman Army in a brutal war with a remorseless enemy.


REVIEW:

As a huge fan of Roman Historical Fiction I’ve always loved books set within the United Kingdom as it’s a chance for the reader to explore their heritage. What makes Anthony’s work even more special for me, is that its set on Hadrian’s Wall, which having grown up in Cumbria, is a place I’m more than familiar with.

With this being the second, and perhaps most difficult novel in a series for an author to write I was a little apprehensive as to how the title would develop and whether the characters would be as fun and fresh as I remembered or if they’d grow to acclimatise to their new domain. What Anthony does extremely well is writing combat sequences and when backed up with characters that you’ve come to care for makes it even more heart-stopping as each steps into the battle line. Add to the mix great villains, cracking dialogue and above all a soldier’s humour that just oozes from within the pages and it’s a title that I really can’t recommend enough.

Finally I want to wish Anthony the very best for his Help the Heroes Charity Walk (in full Roman Military gear.)

Monday, 12 April 2010

NEWS: It ain't half cold Mum...

Friend of the blog Anthony Riches (author of Empire: Wounds of Honour and the soon to be released Empire: Arrows of Fury) has let us know about a charity walk that he's doing and we're hoping our readers will support his generous spirit. For the full story in Anthony's own words please read on...

"A few months ago, over lunch with Robin Wade (my agent), and more than comfortably replete with food and booze, I mentioned an idea that had been forming in my head, to go for a walk along Hadrian's Wall in full Roman military kit and thereby raise some money for charity. Robin, being a keen type, promptly called my bluff by offering to join in, and so the idea was plucked from obscurity to become reality. It's not a new idea, of course, lots of people have done the same route in bigger and better ways, and the various re-enactment groups that recreate the Roman army have been at it for years. If not original, Robin and I are certainly keen to do it right, and we've both shelled out to purchase the full kit that would have been worn by Roman auxiliary infantryman at the time of 'Wounds of Honour'. This list of equipment looks like this:

Clothes: Roman hobnailed boots, leggings, leg wrappings, tunic, belt, scarf, padded arming jacket to go under the mail, and a cloak to keep the rain out.

Armour: Mail shirt, helmet, manica (a metal sleeve worn on the sword arm), greaves and shield.

Weapons: Spear, spatha (long sword) and pugio (dagger)

Miscellaneous items: Food bowl, knife, spoon, water bottle, soldier's loculus (leather satchel)

It all weighs quite a lot, so I'm already in training for the sorts of distances we're looking at doing on a daily basis, and I'm also lifting weights when not deciding to doss about being lazy instead. We'll post some photos of the kit (and possibly of us staggering about under its weight) once we're feeling brave enough. I'll be undertaking a series of walks around Hertfordshire in full kit for acclimatisation once the weather improves in 2010, so if you meet me out walking please try not to laugh too loudly.

Friends, associates and casual bystanders are all warmly invited to donate some cash in support of our chosen charity, Help for Heroes (www.helpforheroes.org.uk). This charity operates in support of the servicemen and women, who, having accepted on our behalf a risk greater than most of us will ever take, now need more support than our elected representatives feel able to provide. Donating through JustGiving is simple, fast and totally secure - just go to www.justgiving.com/Anthony-Riches). Your details are safe with JustGiving - they'll never sell them on or send unwanted emails. Once you donate, they'll send your money directly to the charity and make sure Gift Aid is reclaimed on every eligible donation by a UK taxpayer. So it's the most efficient way to donate - we raise more, whilst saving time and cutting costs for the charity.

So please dig deep and donate now. Thank you. "

Friday, 25 September 2009

INTERVIEW: Anthony Riches

Fascinated with stories of the military and warfare since he was a child, Anthony undertook a degree in Military Studies at Manchester University. Years later, having worked hard to pay the bills as well as improving his ability to write fiction, he's come to the fore with a book that goes back to his first love, military history, as the Roman War Machine marches in Britain to help maintain order to the Empire. We decided that we needed to chat to him about how everything came together for him as well as uncovering his own guilty secrets...

Falcata Times: Writing is said to be something that people are afflicted with rather than gifted and that it's something you have to do rather than want. What is your opinion of this statement and how true is it to you?

Anthony Riches: For me, the fact that my stories keep harassing me until I write them down (only for the next part of the narrative to start the same process) means that I’m not really given much of a choice in the matter. Story lines are the last thing I think about when I go to bed, and the first thing on my mind when I wake up, but I wouldn’t have it any other way. It’s true to say that since I have no choice, because this subjective process of narrative creation just never goes away – it only gets a lot stronger when I have downtime from my current day job – I am indeed ‘afflicted’, but for me that’s my strongest blessing in life aside from my family. I love writing, and I fully intend to make it my full time occupation when that makes sense financially.


FT: When did you realise that you wanted to be a writer?

AR: The desire to write professionally first came to me in 1983. I converted my university dissertation (on the disintegration of the US Army in VietNam) into a book that sadly never saw the light of day, despite some interest from a couple of publishers. In the 90’s I noodled about with a thriller for several years – and nearly got an agent to take it – before getting the inspiration that became Wounds of Honour in 1996. Whether sublimating the desire to write to the need to work for a living for twenty five years has made the eventual step to the other side of the glass any sweeter is difficult to say. I’m just wildly grateful to have made it at all.


FT: It is often said that if you can write a short story you can write anything. How true do you think this is and what have you written that either proves or disproves this POV?

AR: I can only partially agree with the idea; although I’ve read some great shorts, really pithy and gripping, some of them have been written by authors whose full length work does rather less for me. I think that there’s a skill to writing a great short that some authors could never master given their need to build stories across broad canvases, while I think there are some authors who don’t have the long grind of building a great full length read in them. Perhaps it’s easier to write a great short when it’s set against the backcloth of an established storyline – Iain M Bank’s ‘The State of the Art’ springs to mind. I’ve never written a short story, so I don’t know if I have the skill to do so or not.


FT: If someone were to enter a bookshop, how would you persuade them to try your novel over someone else's and how would you define it?

AR: I’d tell the potential buyer that if they were a keen reader of historical action novels this would be right up their street, with a constant fast pace, gripping combat, characters you come to care about and a historical accuracy that never gets in the way of the story. I wouldn’t ever seek to compare my work to anyone else’s in my chosen genre though, because for every different style of writing there’s a happy reader base, and who I am to even imply that they’re wrong?


FT: How would you "sell" your book in 20 words or less?

AR: Wronged son of privilege faces down the odds and becomes warrior leader. Brotherhood, betrayal, brutal combat and revenge. Buy it!


FT: Who is a must have on your bookshelf and whose latest release will find you on the bookshops doorstep waiting for it to open?

AR: I’m a great admirer of both Steven Pressfield and (inevitably) Patrick O’Brian, and I enjoy books by a range of authors including Richard Morgan, Lee Child and Stephen Hunter. There’s more detail on my website – www.anthonyriches.com - but the one person whose books I would queue to buy are those written by Iain M Banks. Why does a historical novelist love great science-fiction? I just always have, so why I ended up writing about the distant past is as much of a mystery to me as to everyone else.


FT: When you sit down and write do you know how the story will end or do you just let the pen take you? ie Do you develop character profiles and outlines for your novels before writing them or do you let your idea's develop as you write?

AR: I start my novels with two things – how the story begins, and how it’s likely to end. I should explain that I have a very long term plan for Marcus Valerius Aquila, from the Britannia rebellion of 181 a.d. through to the death of the emperor Septimius Serverus in 211, and within that chronological framework I know the direction each book must take. As a ‘spectator’ novelist, however, I never know is what’s going to happen as each book develops - it just comes to me as I write, in a subconscious process that I guess must be ticking away as I do my day job. How much more productive I’d be without the daily grind of project management is a moot question! My characters usually behave themselves, although I’ve had more than a few ‘where did that come from?!’ moments as one of them does exactly what they want to, rather than what I had intended a moment before, and I treasure those occurrences over everything else in the writing process.


FT: What do you do to relax and what have you read recently?

AR: I read a lot, and I go to air shows and take hundreds of photos in search of that one perfect image. My photography, both good and bad, is showcased at http://tonyriches.smugmug.com/. What have I read recently? ‘The Junior Officer’s Reading Club’ by Patrick Hennessey, ‘Transition’ by Iain M Banks, ‘Desperate Glory’ by Sam Kiley and ‘Legionary: The Roman Soldier’s (Unofficial) Manual’ by Philip Matyszak.


FT: What is your guiltiest pleasure that few know about?

AR: Whisper it quietly – the Warhammer 40k novels that tell the story of the Horus Heresy from the perspective of the various Space Marine chapters involved. I know…but I can’t help it! What a back story!! And the battle scenes...bliss.


FT: Lots of writers tend to have pets. What do you have and what are their key traits (and do they appear in your novel in certain character attributes?)

AR: We live with a gorgeous Staffordshire Bull Terrier bitch who is the spirit of good temper and nevertheless loves nothing better than a good fight with the pack leader, with lots of snarling and snapping but with all bites carefully pulled at the last moment. If she wanted to she could probably have my throat out in seconds, bless her. We also have a kleptomaniac Spaniel who lives a precarious existence since the Bull Terrier tends to discipline him by dint of pulling him around by the ears when he transgresses or is slow to do what the real pack leader (my partner) tells him to do. I can’t say that either of them have ever made it into a book – but who knows…?


FT: Which character within your latest book was the most fun to write and why?

AR: Rufius, the old bugger. He’s got an answer for everything, and he lives for the moment, given a glorious second chance to play at soldiers and help guide Marcus into his chosen profession. I see something of my own inexorable slide into previously unthinkable maturity in him, I suppose.


FT: How similar to your principal protagonist are you?

AR: In no way, shape or form. He’s tall, has nice thick hair, is quite good looking and above all is sudden death with an edged weapon, and I am none of the above. Although I am quite handy with barbeque tongs.


FT: What hobbies do you have and how do they influence your work?

AR: Only the photography, and I get hardly any time for that these days, what with a full time job and a contractual obligation to write a 120,000 word novel every 12 months. At least (my partner tells me) it’s stopped me surfing ‘camera porn’ websites planning my next equipment purchase.


FT: Where do you get your ideas from?

AR: Purely my subconscious. I must be influenced by what I’ve read, but I never consciously use an idea or storyline that I know I’ve read anywhere else. Originality is very important for me.


FT: Do you ever encounter writers block and if so how do you overcome it?

AR: No. I don’t have the time! Seriously, I suspect that not being able to lounge around all day worrying about delivery dates is probably a good thing. When I get time, I write, it’s as simple as that. So far…I’m touching wood now!


FT: Certain authors are renowned for writing at what many would call uncivilised times. When do you write and how do the others in your household feel about it?

AR: I write at any and all times of the day when I’m free to do so. I work abroad a lot, so I also write in airline seats, in hotels, in departure lounges – just anywhere. And I’m not a middle of the night writer as a rule, but every now and then I’ll wake up at 3.00 am with an idea that turns into an hour or two at the PC. It’s also true that when I’m free to write for a day I often struggle to settle to it with the same ease, and end up hammering away at the keyboard late around midnight.


FT: Sometimes pieces of music seem to influence certain scenes within novels, do you have a soundtrack for your tale or is it a case of writing in silence with perhaps the odd musical break in-between scenes?

AR: I sometimes set iTunes to shuffle while I’m writing, but then I’m forever fiddling when it plays something I’m not in the mood for. I’d love to spend a day or two building some playlists, including one for writing, but I can never spare the time! Usually I put on something that’s a bit ‘background’, some Sasha, or a Bar Lounge album, and ‘wake up’ 50 minutes and a few hundred words later. The other trick is listen to music that I’ve already played to death – Depeche Mode, Queens of the Stone Age, Suede, William Orbit, Prefab Sprout, that sort of thing – and just tune it out as a pleasant background noise. Does it leak into the writing – no…or at least I don’t think so…although I’m just writing a climactic battle right for Empire 3 and I must admit that Velvet Revolver’s Spectacle is doing a pretty good job of getting the adrenaline flowing!


FT: What misconceptions, if any, did you have about the writing and publishing field when you were first getting started?

AR: I think every would-be writer starts out in glorious innocence of the true nature of the publishing industry, and at some point has to be rudely disabused – unless you’re lucky enough to be Joanne Rowling! Its my firm belief that publishing is just like any other industry, with the usual mixture of good people and not so good people, and as I got to know just how lazy, incompetent and dishonest some of the people in my own walk of life are at what they do, I came to realise that I had to arm myself with as much knowledge as possible. I made a point of reading both the Writers’ and Artists’ Yearbook and Carole Blake’s excellent From Pitch to Publication in fine detail, and so I harboured few illusions – especially once I’d been plagiarised by a part-work magazine (but that’s another story). My one word of advice to the would-be author would be the obvious one – a good agent is a prize beyond compare, and well worth the commission percentage.


FT: If music be the food of love, what do you think writing is and please explain your answer?

AR: Writing is in part my escape from reality (although I like my reality!), and the only way I can deal with the insistent hammering of stories trying to get out of my head and onto paper!


FT: What can you tell us about the next novel?

AR: ‘The Battle of Lost Eagle saved Hadrian's Wall, but the new Roman governor of Britannia must stamp out the rebellion of the northern tribes or risk losing the province. Rampaging south with sword and flame under the command of their murderous chieftain Calgus, they have stretched his forces to the limit. For Marcus - now simply Centurion Corvus of the 1st Tungrian cohort - the campaign has become doubly dangerous. As reinforcements flood into Britannia he is surrounded by new officers with no reason to protect him from the emperor's henchmen. Death could result from a careless word as easily as from an enemy spear. Worse, one of them is close on his heels. While Marcus is training two centuries of Syrian archers to survive a barbarian charge and then take the fight back to their enemy, the new prefect of the 2nd Tungrians has discovered his secret. Only a miracle can save Marcus and the men who protect him from disgrace and death.’

Or at least that’s the blurb, and if I tell you much more I’ll spoil it for you. Given the leisurely gestation that Wounds had I’m unsurprisingly a little nervous about a story that took less than a year to write, so I hope you enjoy it when it hits the shelves in April.


FT: What are the last five internet sites that you've visited?

AR: · BBC Football Gossip – I have to know what’s happening to my beloved team, even when most of it seems to be depressing.
· The Bookseller’s chart page – a recent discovery!
· Help for Heroes - I’m planning a sponsored walk of Hadrian’s Wall in full Roman equipment next Easter, and they’re my chosen recipient of the donations I can drum up through my website once I get round to setting it all up.
· Amazon –for the obvious reason. I read so fast that I’ve been accused of inhaling books, and every addict needs a good source of supply.
· Wikipedia – a great source of research if you’re careful not to get taken in!


FT: Did you ever take any writing classes or specific instructions to learn the craft? If so please let us know which ones.

AR: Not much. I did commission a Nooza review, and it was from that I got what was probably the last critical lesson I needed to learn, to ‘show but don’t tell’ (thanks, Nooza reviewer). Until then the novel was groaning under the weight of historical accuracy being explained (by me) at every turn, and you can only imagine my delight with the results when I finally learned to let my characters tell each other the 5% of it that actually mattered. Apart from that it was a simple case of reading a wide range of fiction and reflecting on my own work in that context. I might have got the whole thing to ‘click’ quicker if I’d had a writing group to help me, but I had neither the time nor the courage to expose my fledgling work to an audience. It took me until early 2008 to even show ‘Wounds of Honour’ to my friends.


FT: How did you get past the initial barriers of criticism and rejection?

AR: For a long time I hid my head in the sand, to be frank. Even when an agent (in 2002) said that my idea for Wounds sounded good, but that he was conflicted by his existing client (Simon Scarrow), I took that as some kind of ‘don’t bother sonny’ message, and went back into my shell for several years. In the end I wrote to six agents and was picked up by the last one to reply – thank you Robin – and had he not done so I would probably have given up on the whole thing. There’s a lesson there, readers – when an agent writes back and says ‘we only deal in edgy British fiction’ (I’ve had that one, and from an agent with an alleged interest in historical fiction!), keep trying, and don’t give up unless you’re told that there’s no way the manuscript is publishable. A would be novelist has to have the skin of a Rhino, and not give up unless they’ve had a good deal more rejections than I ever got.

FT: In your opinion, what are the best and worst aspects of writing for a living?

AR: I don’t know, because I work for my living right now, and I’m lucky that I love my current career for the most part, but I’ll take a guess. Best aspect – not having to worry about finding time to write, what with work, family, elderly parents and so on. Possible worst aspect – having perform for your daily bread what was previously just a hobby, with all the pressures that might bring. I’m willing to have a go though, so please keep on buying the books! I’ve still got a thriller lurking at the back of my head that’s been hanging about in there since the early ‘90’s, and it’s getting increasingly insistent that it wants out!

HISTORICAL FICTION REVIEW: Empire: Wounds of Honour - Anthony Riches

BOOK BLURB:

Marcus Valerius Aquila has scarcely landed in Britannia when he has to run for his life - condemned to dishonorable death by power-crazed Emperor Commodus. The plan is to take a new name, serve in an obscure regiment on Hadrian's Wall and lie low until he can hope for justice. Then a rebel army sweeps down from the wastes north of the Wall, and Marcus has to prove he's hard enough to lead a century in the front line of a brutal, violent war.


REVIEW:

As a huge fan of Roman Historical Fiction, I’m always on the look out for something new and if possible a little different. Whilst a little disappointed by Simon Scarrow’s latest due to female characterisation I ended up wondering if perhaps, as the saying goes, if Rome had had its day. What was presented within brought back my faith.

With a gripping storyline, a top notch protagonist backed up by a descent supporting cast that felt fully realised you can understand why this novel took the author a number of years to write. Back that up with historical accuracy and a passion for the Roman war machine that just explodes from the pages and it’s a novel that will do for this period in the Roman army, hopefully what Christian Cameron has done for the Greeks. Finally add a stylish cover by the master of Historical Fiction covers (Larry Rostant) and you just know that Historical Fiction is coming back fighting fit and ready to rumble against all comers. I’ll eagerly await the second in Anthony’s series (currently entitled Empire: Arrow’s of Fury) which is currently scheduled for April 2010.