[51]
How did I prove that he had committed robbery in the contract for
those pillars? Chiefly, I think, by this fact, that he had put forth an unjust and
unprecedented law. For who ever attempted to change all the rights of people, and
the customs of all men, getting great blame for so doing, except for some gain? I
will proceed and carry this matter further. You sold the tenths according to an
unjust law, in order to sell them for more money. Why, when the tenths were now
knocked down and sold,—when nothing could now be added to their sum total,
but much might be to your own gains,—why did new edicts appear, made on a
sudden and to meet an emergency? For I say, that in your third year you issued
edicts, that a collector might summon a man before the court anywhere he liked; that
the cultivator might not remove his corn from the threshing-floor, before he had
settled the claims of the collector; that they should have the tenths delivered at
the water-side before the first of August. All these edicts, I say, you issued after
the tenths had been sold. But if you had issued them for the sake of the republic,
notice would have been given of them at the time of selling; because you were acting
with a view to your own interest, you, being prompted by your love of gain and by
the emergency, repaired the omission which had unintentionally occurred.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.