My sister visited this past weekend. My husband took the kids beach camping with his brother, so we both had sibling time. My sister and I went out for coffee and sat in the sun, went out to lunch and sat in the sun, went to the beach and sat in the sun. We also woke up one morning and went on a hike because it was such a nice sunny day. Our conversations were sometimes on the heavy side, but usually those kinds of conversations are enlightening! We also met up with friends for wine one night, so we felt sunny after that fun. By the end of the weekend, I had had so much sun - plus a lot of good conversation - my insides felt light, too. So on Sunday, when my husband was talking to his parents and mentioned to them that I had had a rough week and would tell them about it, I couldn't remember everything that had happened last week, except that I was being much better about wearing sunscreen. So it was a wonderful visit, a brief retreat from reality.
We did do some reading while we sat in the sun. I didn't get very far with my current book, Washington's God, by Michael Novak, which I'm reading for book club. It's not one I would have picked, but it does have some interesting parts and some points that might make for good book club discussion. For instance, Washington sometimes wrote or spoke of Providence protecting him and his troops during the Revolution, and of Providence favoring the founding of our nation. Does this mean that God favors democracy, and the project of the United States in particular? Does it mean He is on the side of those who take up the cause of justice and liberty? Do we think He is still favoring our nation, which has even more liberties now that the abolition of slavery, women's rights, and the gay agenda have made advancements? We don't usually get very political at book club - this is a Catholic women's group - so I doubt we'll talk too much about what God thinks about political movements, but it is an interesting question, and in my own heart, I might tend to be more Deist sometimes to the extent that I question whether God does favor one nation over another. It is an interesting thought experiment, however, to try to unravel the workings of nations and the workings of God. And part of the adventure of a book club is picking up books you wouldn't normally choose.
Other books I've read this Lent I've found easier to read. My morning readings are coming from Between Midnight and Dawn, by Sarah Arthur, a book of meditations which are primarily poems and short stories about faith and God's work in the world. Scriptures are suggested to accompany the readings, but I have been very lax about looking them up, despite a weak intent to read more Scripture. Maybe that can be an Easter resolution.
I did read along with the readings in the sample issue of Give Us This Day that I picked up. It seems to be a Magnificat alternative, complete with a similar font and paper size, color, and weight. It doesn't have all the extra readings that Magnificat provides, but is only a few dollars cheaper to subscribe.
I brought home an armload from the new books shelf at the library a month ago and consumed them all with delight. Some of Annie Dillard's essays have been collected in The Abundance. My interest in Annie Dillard began in 1991 when I had to write an essay in response to Pilgrim at Tinker Creek for a college admissions essay. I checked out the book, read it, and felt kinship for her descriptions of the Virginia Valley where she lived because it mirrored my own love for the woods of Michigan, where we spent a week every summer. I wrote about lombardy poplar trees, got into college, and met and married my husband, and the rest is history, as they say. And in college, one of my professors was Michael Waldstein, whose name came up in a conversation recently, because he taught Humanae Vitae and Familiaris Consortio and directly influenced the openness of our marriage to children. So many webs.
Dillard's essays in this book continue to look closely at nature and our relationship to it, but often as a metaphor for seeing and observing and creating. Several selections in this collection have a broader scope. "A Writer in the World" was my favorite. In this essay, she writes that the writer "studies literature, not the world," which is interesting from an author sometimes considered a nature writer, or a world watcher. (See this article for interesting description of how Dillard came to write Pilgrim.)
I liked this paragraph: "Why are we reading, if not in hope of beauty laid bare, life heightened, and its deepest mystery probed? Can the writer isolate and vivify all in experience that most deeply engages his intellect and heart - and our own? Can the writer renew our hope for literary forms? Why are we reading if not in hope that the writer will magnify and dramatize our days, will illuminate and inspire us with wisdom, courage, and the possibility of meaning, and will press upon our minds the deepest mysteries, so we may feel again their majesty and power? . . . We still and always want waking."
And this: "The artist is willing to give all his or her strength and life to probing with blunt instruments those same secrets no one can describe in any way but with those instruments' faint tracks.
190 A British journalist,[Malcolm Muggeridge?] observing the Sisters of Charity in Calcutta, reasoned: 'Either life is always and in all circumstances sacred, or intrinsically of no account; it is inconceivable that it should be in some cases the one, and in some the other.'
Another interesting essay was "For the Time Being," which examined the life of Teilhard de Chardin and his spiritual friendship with Lucile Swan. Though he wrote "Through woman and woman alone, man can escape from isolation," he apparently never broke any of his vows despite the love he felt for Lucile and the joy he experienced with her. But obedience was a more difficult vow than chastity, though that might not be everyone's struggle. The restraints placed by the Church on his writing about his archaeological research caused perhaps more pain.
Mary Oliver's new book Upstream was also on the shelf, so I snagged it and grabbed a book of her poetry, A Thousand Mornings, to accompany my reading. Oliver and Dillard both are immersed in appreciation for the beauty and transcendence of the physicality of the natural world. They share some traits as writers: they see the sacred in the ordinary, they understand writing to be a way of seeing, they live private lives but bare their souls publicly.
Oliver's book is also a collection of essays about life lived in proximity to nature in Maine. She writes, "Attention is the beginning of devotion," and then reveals the world she is devoted to. As a child, she used to run away to the woods with a backpack full of books. I used to do something similar, only the woods was the vacant lot next door to our house. Literature and nature provided her and escape when she was a child as she summarizes, "And this is what I learned: the world's otherness is an antidote to confusion, that standing within this otherness - the beauty and mystery of the world, out in the fields or deep inside books -- can re-dignify the worst-stung heart."
Oliver also writes of the creative life: Creative work as "a hunger for eternity. Intellectual work sometimes, spiritual work certainly, artistic work always -- these are forces that fall within its grasp, forces that must travel beyond the realm of the hour and the restraint of the habit. ... The extraordinary is what art is about." Discipline, a schedule, ready at all hours. anywhere, concern with the edge. , loyalty to the work. absentminded... "MY responsibility is not to the ordinary or the timely. ... My loyalty is to the inner vision, whenever and however it may arrive. If I have a meeting with you at three o'clock, rejoice if I am late. Rejoice even more if I do not arrive at all.
"There is no other way work of artistic worth can be done. And the occasional success, to the striver, is worth everything. The most regretful people on earth are those who felt the call to creative work, who felt their own creative power restive and uprising, and gave to it neither power nor time."
That last line is one to wrestle with. Is there any voracious reader who didn't at some point want to be a writer? But does everyone who wishes to write have a gift that deserves the time and attention of the sort that causes Oliver to be late or to miss meetings with other people? What will be remembered - the poem or the missed engagement?
Oliver claims to have sought knowledge as certainties and then it entertained, shaped, and failed... "now I think there is only one subject worth my attention and that is the precognition of the spiritual side of the world and, within this recognition, the condition of my own spiritual state. I am not talking about having faith necessarily, although one hopes to. What I mean by spirituality is not theology, but attitude. Such interest nourishes me beyond the finest compendium of facts. In my mind now, in any comparison of demonstrated truths and unproven but vivid intuitions, the truths lose. . . .
"I would therefore write a kind of elemental poetry that doesn't just avoid indoors but doesn't even see the doors that lead inward - to laboratories, to textbooks, to knowledge. I would not talk about the wind, and the oak tree, and the leaf on the oak tree, but on their behalf. ....
"I would say that there exist a thousand unbreakable links between each of us and everything else, and that our dignity and our chances are one. ...
"I could not be a poet without the natural world. Someone else could. But not me. For me the door to the woods is the door to the temple."
From her poetry:
"On Traveling to Beautiful Places" "Every day I'm still looking for God / and I'm still finding him everywhere, in the dust, in the flowerbeds."
"And Bob Dylan ToOo" '"Anything worth thinking about is worth singing about.' / Which is why we have / songs of praise, songs of love, songs of sorrow.'"
"The Gardener" - Then I step out into the garden where the gardener, who is said to be a simple man, / is tending his children, the roses."
Next time I find time to write: Reviews of Neil Gaiman's View from the Cheap Seats and Ben Hatke's Mighty Jack. And eventually perhaps I'll come back to the Joy of Love. So much to chew on. Since all of that meaty reading, I have done very little the last couple of weeks, in between work and other responsibilities. I did finish Ann Voskamp's One Thousand Gifts after hearing so much about it. She says Eucharisteo so often, I am surprised she is not Catholic. She does a beautiful job of tying together the connection between gratitude and trust and joy. I can see why her writing is the source of parodies, but also of many fans and I found it thought-provoking that her trip to Paris, away from her family and her world that were the source of all her thanksgiving, was the source of her apprehension of joy. Perhaps she thought of her trip as more of a pilgrimage.
Should travel through these stories count as a pilgrimage? What about the long meditative walks in the sun with my sister? I am always ready for that journey, wherever the destination.