Showing posts with label Jane Austen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jane Austen. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

To read, to see, and not to see

A  couple brief reviews:

DO NOT, in whatever circumstances you find yourself, DO NOT WATCH NORTHANGER ABBEY circa 1987.  Unless you want a good laugh. This is the WORST Austen adaptation I have ever in my life encountered. How this possibly came to the screen - let alone was reproduced in video and DVD - is a bafflement to me. The actors were unattractively coiffed and hilariously melodramatic, the music befuddling (sexy saxophone? scary heavy breathing? new agey moaning?), and the script hatched and cobbled. What a farce! My husband slept, while I laughed in amazement, and my kids were, like, "What?" "Why is he saying that?" "What's happening now?" Who knew a Jane Austen movie might cause nightmares?

I should have been alerted to the travesty by the eyeshadow Catherine is wearing on the cover.

****************************

On the other hand, I finally saw Austenland, a movie I thought was going to be silly and disappointing, but I found it silly and hilarious in an entertaining way. The concept is that a young woman, down on her luck in love, decides to treat herself to a vacation at Austenland, a resort in the form of a Regency manor, offering an immersion experience replete with actors, costumes, and entertainments from the early 1800s, where Janeites can pretend to live in one of her novels for a week. A romance is guaranteed! The movie is charming and lighthearted, and while it pokes some gentle goodnatured fun at Jane Austen's obsessive fans, it does so in a way that acknowledges why people love Austen so much. I would MUCH rather go to Austenland than Disney!





Jane lies in Winchester—blessed be her shade!
Praise the Lord for making her, and her for all she made!
And while the stones of Winchester, or Milsom Street, remain,
Glory, love, and honour unto England’s Jane!
from Rudyard Kipling, courtesy: http://www.jasna.org/membership/janeites.html

******************************

And if you are tired of Jane Austen, DO read Willa Cather over and over again. I love Willa Cather. If I do ever have a daughter again, I am determined to name her Willa Jane. If I don't, maybe I will get a female dog and name her this just to say this name daily.  I am currently reading Song of the Lark again after many, many years.  It is beautiful and heartbreaking. I am reading a library copy, but I am tempted to buy my own.

This novel doesn't replace My Antonia, O Pioneers, or Death Comes for the Archbishop, as my favorite Cather novels, but reading Cather is an "immersive experience" in itself. I can understand why she doesn't have the broad appeal of Austen. Her landscapes seem to be the main characters at times.  Her heroine is hard and could be considered selfish or at least self-absorbed.  The plot plods along with little action.  Thea Kronberg is not particularly likeable, but Cather creates such memorable characters and invokes such admiration for the strength and perseverance that built the west and found beauty in hard places.  Perhaps it is her understanding of human desires that transcend sexuality, and of the capacity of the human soul for both nobility and disgrace, that makes her both brilliant and an outsider.  Cather's world is full of color and light contrasting with dark crevices, like the canyons and sand hills that nurture Thea's talent.  I haven't quite finished the book; it doesn't read quickly, but each time I dip into it, it takes me a few minutes to return, sometimes reluctantly, to the present after closing the cover.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Prescription: Jane Austen

Perhaps all the world needs to be a brighter place is an injunction to read Jane Austen once a year or so.  Ah, pastoral escapism at its finest!  I just finished  Mansfield Park, and life feels much lighter and more satisfactory.  I spent several days ignoring the news and current events and everyone else's crises, and now feel refreshed and certain that despite the conniving of shallow people, sometimes the right people end up together.

To be honest, I don't think I've ever read the whole of this novel before, although I thought at first I was rereading. I remember reading part of it years ago - high school, college? - and not finishing.  Then I watched the movie that came out in 1999 directed by Patricia Rozema. Mistake. This movie is takes egregious liberties with the original work, and gave me a mistaken impression. I should have known the film was derivative, but in my mind I had this feeling that Mansfield Park was the "dark" Jane Austen.  The characters may not be as engaging as the Bennets and the Dashwoods, and the plot a little thinner, but I'm glad I finally read it instead of thinking I knew the story from the film.  It pays to read first, watch second. I kept waiting for the dark secrets suggested in the movie to come to light in the book. Of course, they never appeared.

So why do filmmakers feel it necessary to add drama and darkness to a book that is enjoyable enough without the suggestion of perversity?  Would modern audiences really be bored with the story the way Austen tells it?

Surely the scriptwriters are mistaken that audiences want darkness. Judging by what I've read in response to some of the events on Downton Abbey, viewers would be happier if the scandals and surprises were toned down. The acting, dialogue, and cinematography are gripping enough without the writers needing to go to great lengths to keep the viewers in emotional turmoil. In fact, I haven't been watching because I read some spoilers and didn't want to be strung along for weeks waiting for resolutions.  I'd be a bigger fan of Downton if the writers DIDN'T sensationalize the script.

Likewise, Austen's book needs very little drama to be intensely readable.  Her characters and dialogue are interesting enough without excessive plotting.  There's drama in reading about Fanny Price's emotional maturing.  The suspense of wondering whether Edmund Bertram will have his eyes opened or whether Henry Crawford truly has turned a corner keeps you page turning.  Austen adds more suspense by developing her characters enough to keep you wondering whether Fanny's judgment regarding Mary Crawford's shallowness and Henry's flirtatious nature is just.  Their character flaws are masked by attractive characteristics: they're entertaining, they show compassion, they seem to do the right thing most of the time, they bring a spark of life to the party - all the things that make them easy to love, especially when countered with the sometimes dull life of the estate. It's just that every once in a while they reveal a shallowness and selfishness that will probably grow over time instead of lessen. Austen had me wondering if Fanny's goodness could make Henry into a good person, even though I knew the end of the story - would he really give up his careless flirtations if he were wed to just the right person?

Meanwhile in the movie, the characters experience little interior change.  Drama is provided by Sir Thomas' involvement in the slave trade and the suggestion that he behaved criminally to his chattel.  Where Austen suggests immoral behavior on the part of Maria Bertram and Henry, the movie shows it.  Fanny is more independent and energetic in the film than in the book. (Perhaps one change that I don't disagree with - Fanny in the book is extremely shy and unhealthy in the beginning. Does she not translate to the screen well as a heroine because she is too good?)  And the filmmakers exaggerate all the flaws of the Bertram women to make them less likable - which highlights Fanny's attractiveness. Lady Bertram appears as a drug addict. The sisters are hateful to Fanny. Tom, the older brother, is a gambler and spendthrift. And you can see Maria and Henry plotting. It's almost too obvious what will happen.  But I have to admit, the movie is easy to watch - great acting, beautiful scenery and costumes, good chemistry. It's just not Jane Austen's book.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Reading and Remembering

I began a list of books for 2014. I have only finished one: Lord of the World (discussion at Reading for Believers.)  Meanwhile, I have started many.  Can't seem to find time or attention to finish them.  And maybe the fact that I fall asleep while reading or saying prayers with the kids at about 8:30 has something to do with it. Last night I couldn't finish our chapter of Charlotte's Web. I fell asleep with my mouth open on the couch.  I heard my older boys comimg in from their Tuesday night Bible Study, chatting with my husband, getting something to eat. I hadn't seen them all day. But I just couldn't move. My brain was still halfway functioning, but my body was paralyzed in its slouch. In my half dreaming state,  I invented a conversation with the boys. I wondered what their impression of pregnancy is from my slide into indolence. Earlier in the evening, I neither helped make dinner or clean-up, but let my husband heat up leftovers while I sat riding shotgun on my 9 year old so he would finish up his mission scrapbook.  Guilt and discomfort finally pervaded my consciousness enough for me to roll my body off the couch, prop open my eyes, and pose some obligatory questions about the day to the boys before going to get on pajamas and get into bed. Such is the state of affairs of this pregnant 40 year old.

These kinds of nights happen more often when I spend the day away from home, as I did yesterday.  Had field trip duty for the fourth grade - they went to see a one-man play about bullying called "I am Jack."  It made me wonder about how easy it is to take a mediocre storyline, some emotional and slightly naughty dialogue (jokes about underpants), and make money off of it if it is about a touchpoint issue.

After my chaperoning duties were over, I ran some errands, including checking out some books at the library with the intention of finding something EASY to read.

The books I have going: Mansfield Park. It's been some time since I read any Jane Austen. This one I downloaded on the Nook last year, but only looked at after finishing Benton's Lord of the World early enough one evening that I still had energy to read. Reading Austen is pure pleasure, especially since I'm defecting right now from Downton Abbey. I'm just a few chapters in, but it's enough to highlight the superiority of Austen's dialogue over DA's. Probably going to switch from the Nook to my copy in the Penguin collected works of Austen; although it's a cumbersome object, I have very pleasant memories of my grandfather purchasing it for me at a little bookstore in the town where we vacationed in Michigan. Although I was perhaps too young to really appreciate the tensions in Austen, I was attracted to the book's size and pretty pink cover. The pink cover is now falling off, but it is a book that has been well-loved for its content and provenance.

Number two: The Reef by Edith Wharton. Again I am not far along, but already enchanted by the dialogue, even though Wharton's book is tinged by melancholy that threatens to get worse, while the early melancholy of Fanny Price in Mansfield Park promises to be relieved.  I was looking for another E. M. Forster book when I came across this book in a drawer of my desk. I don't know when I bought it. A surprise, like finding $10 in the pocket of your winter coat when you first put it on for the year.

Number three: St. Francis de Sales' Thy Will Be Done.  This is one of those spiritual books that I have started more than once and never finish. Like spinach, it is sure to be good for me to read, but it's written in a style that's hard to digest in its certainty and sweetness.

For balance, at the library yesterday I picked up Anne Lamott's new book Stitches:A Handbook on Meaning, Hope, and Repair.  It is a long essay on finding meaning.  Sometimes I like Lamott's writing better than other times.  I've only read the first chapter while hiding in the bathroom, but so far it lacks the charm and originality that the other books of hers I've read (Bird by Bird, Traveling Mercies) have had. Maybe she overemphasizes the uncertainty? Or as the reviewer said in the link above, maybe it's the weariness detectable even in the first few pages that colors the idea that we carry on through tragedy by relating with others.

The engaging, easy book I started reading at breakfast is a new memoir, "The World's Strongest Librarian," by Josh Hanagarne (his blog here).  It's the story of his struggle with Tourette Syndrome and finding work and love, intertwined with a memoir of his life with books. I prefer life with books memoirs over most other kinds of memoirs, perhaps because, with my infinitely ordinary childhood, I identify with them more than with narratives about difficulty and distress. (This morning on the way to school my kids asked me if I said "duh" much growing up in the 80s. I know I did to my siblings, but I  think I was too nerdy at school to pose that kind of sarcasm to fellow classmates.  I don't even remember many conversations with classmates. I could never write a memoir.)  Hanagarne's tone is engaging - and his description of his early years spent falling in love with books and libraries encourages empathy -- a desire to say, "me too!"  Except I wonder, how much does he remember from those years before first grade? I do vaguely remember the branch library near the house where we lived until I was seven, but I don't recall any specific books that I loved at that early of an age, except Tasha Tudor books, Are You My Mother?,"and the illustrated, abridged version of Bambi and the Little Golden books at my grandparents' houses - in particular, The Tawny, Scrawny Lion, the Pokey Little Puppy, Eloise Wilkin's little prayer book, and Rudolph. Richard Scarry books, A Prayer for a Child, and Margaret Wise Brown books were a part of our baby library, too, but they are so familiar, I'm not sure I remember anyone reading them to me, as I recall my mom's dad reading the Pokey Little Puppy and my dad's mom using a deep voice to invoke Bambi's father, as much as I recall them being around and reading them to my little brother who was born when I was almost eight.

This book also brings back sketchy memories of a summer during high school when I took government and economics during summer school.  The summer classes were populated mostly by students who had failed these prerequisites for graduation, plus a couple overachievers like my friend and myself who wanted to get ahead in credits so we could take more electives.  The econ class was taught by a business man, not a professional teacher, and he had us bring in a couple of dollars to invest in a real stock for the duration of the class.  He was engaging in a way that most teachers ground down by the daily struggle to instill some facts in recalcitrant students weren't.  He treated us like we had ideas, even though we were an odd mix of flunk-outs and nerds.  In between his unusual, casual style of teaching, and the several hours that the condensed class consumed on summer mornings, my other overachieving friend and I made friends with a couple of boys who, during the normal school year, usually hung out in the back of the school parking lot where other members of the Future Farmers of American parked their pick-up trucks. (Rural Indiana Public School, remember.) We checked the stock market readings in the business section of the newspaper together to see how our stock was performing.  One of these boys had Tourette's.  He had odd facial tics and would sometimes let loose a string of profanities.  I remember him confiding this to me - at first I thought he was just telling me a story to elaborate about why he used such bad language, but then the profundity of his confidence sunk in. He was telling me he had a disability, which back then was not a label you wore with pride.  I had always judged him to be a misfit by choice, someone who got in trouble because he didn't care about school and spurned authority figures. But I realized by the end of the six weeks or so (over which we each made about $1 on our stock choice), that he might have been someone else, if he wasn't embarrassed and angered by his body's inability to be controlled.

By the end of the class, he was calling me to talk, not just to ask about class, and would show up places where my friend and I were hanging out.  Eventually I asked him to stop calling and following me around.  Shadowy memories of being almost of afraid of him when I saw him punch a wall in frustration have been locked away for decades in the odd spaces of memory.  I have the same deep shame about the way I treated him - rarely acknowledging him on the rare occasions when our paths crossed once the regular school year began -- as I do about the miserable selfishness I displayed when I asked one of my orchestra classmates not to tell anyone I had gone to the symphony with him one weekend.  How and why was I so mean?  I read a lot of books about misfits and empathized with independent characters in books, but in real life I was just as concerned with "reputation" and being liked as most other teenage girls. An ugly stage.

So anyway. I'm reading this book and intend to enjoy it, despite its ability to resurrect painful memories. I expect it will also help me recall pleasant associations with Books I Have Read. I'm also interested in his experience of Mormonism, which fascinates me. Now if I can just stay awake to finish some of these books.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Happy Birthday, Jane Austen!

UK google users got to see this:



Today also marks nine days before Christmas - time to start praying the O Antiphons.
Veni, O Sapientia,
quae hic disponis omnia,
veni, viam prudentiae
ut doceas et gloriae.

Gaude, gaude, Emmanuel
Nascetur pro te, Israel.

**************************************************
O come, Thou Wisdom, from on high,
and order all things far and nigh;
to us the path of knowledge show,
and teach us in her ways to go.


Rejoice! Rejoice!
Emmanuel shall come to thee, O Israel!

Reading is one form of escape. Running for your life is another.
-Lemony Snicket