Showing posts with label Ezra Levant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ezra Levant. Show all posts

Sunday, 11 September 2011

Outlier - beyond the pale.

Change is not only inevitable, it is possible.
(I've fallen for a tawny Moor ... away boys, away boys, heave away.)

Up, Down, Appendices, Postscript.

Tim DeChristopher.Watch this first: Tim DeChristopher speaking at Power Shift 2011.

And then you may care to carry on into my mewling & pathetic whinge, beginning with goodbye music from Tom Waits: Singapore & Time & Ol' 55; & from Lennie Cone (not as much of a non sequitur as it might be) Closing Time; & Bob (of course) It's All Right, Ma (I'm Only Bleeding) ... And yes, I did put it into a playlist (for your easy background listening pleasure) ... or not.

The fuckin' playlist editor (be dammed forever you purveyors of correctitude!) will not permit Bob in a playlist! Doh!? So ... no more playlists then, that makes life simpler.

¡Ya basta!Some follow-up on the Washington action: A video which came to me from Duncan Meisel, and lots more videos here.

(Here is the Tar Sands Action website and the Flickr archive in case you need the links.)

Washington was just the beginning! Dig it!

Coming up: a Sit-in in Ottawa on Monday September 26 (training Sunday 25th).

And back in Washington on October 7th or 8th - visit the Tar Sands Action website for details as they are determined.

I met Gitz in Washington - eloquent, passionate and controlled - this exchange with Ezra Levant is revealing.

Safia Adem.Safia Adem.Aden Madow carries Hamza Ali Faysal.Safia Adem mourns her son Hamza Ali Faysal who died in the ex-cathedral of Mogadishu, aged three years.

(That first photograph is already becoming an icon. It was taken by John Moore.)

The cathedral was built in 1928 as part of an Italian colonial effort. Is it really any wonder that the 'Muslim fundamentalists' destroyed it?

Mogadishu cathedral.Mogadishu cathedral.Mogadishu cathedral (by Seamus Murphy).Mogadishu cathedral (by Seamus Murphy).UNHCR map of MogadishuMogadishu cathedral.I am assuming that the ruin of the remaining tower was left as a parody of a mosque.

The UNHCR map is interesting - the red triangles are IDP settlements - there seem to be lots of them. I cannot find the cathedral on the map though I know it is there somewhere - even the UN recognizing I guess, in its stolid bureaucratic way, that at least the name must be disappeared.

And on the other side I can imagine a grim & brutal ideological satisfaction in someone's mind that this child and his mother did not find the help they were hoping for there - unless of some deeply spiritual and transcendental kind.

Despair?Despair?Despair?Three screen-grabs from a movie version of On the Beach - of a message which turns out to be part of somthing from before ... cultural swamp gas ... What could Hollywood film-makers of 2000 possibly know about despair? (Though I admit Requiem for a Dream comes pretty close.)

(Some of the images above come from Seamus Murphy.)

'Beyond the pale' is an appealing phrase - I always imagined that 'the Pale' was some geographical place-name, like Pall Mall. But it comes from the same root as a word I am familiar with - paling, as in a fence-paling. So it means - outside the fence. Simple really. Outside of the territory and naturally beyond any concern or protection.

Toxic k-k-Canada.Daniel Dancer.Not everything in k-k-Canada has decayed & worn out & become toxic - just most of the official stuff.

This guy, Daniel Dancer, is from Oregon, but the video: An Alevin Sky; was made in collaboration with the Fraser Riverkeeper Society at the Hastings Elementary School in Vancouver - and it certainly does hum. His website seems to be down (?) but you can look at a few images I lifted from it a few days ago and maybe get an idea:

An Alevin Sky.Ganesha's Warning.Earth Mother.Sky Griz.Walela.The last one uses Cherokee Walela / Hummingbird - carrying on nicely from Betinho's story a few weeks ago.

Fitting in here to the (relatively rare) positive vibrations I come across is Aung San Suu Kyi delivering the BBC Radio 4 Reith lectures in July: 1: Liberty and 2: Dissent (each about an hour) - note that the second one is poorly edited and begins with some two minutes of nonsense about football, the slider will set you right.

It's not the economy, stupid!The cartoonist at the Globe, Brian Gable, is sometimes close-but-no-cigar. This one misses because - It's not the economy that's burning (stupid!), it's the environment. It's our home that's burning. And it is too much work for me to cobble 'Environment' or 'Ecology' or something into his artwork. I am never quite sure if he get's it wrong on purpose (when he does) just to keep his job, which is a plum I suppose, and to stay below the Globe's correctitude radar, or what?

To hell in a handbasket.Out of the panhandle and into the fire.In this case it doesn't matter. My trusty OED gives me: economy, adapted from the Latin œconomia, in turn adapted from the Greek οἰκονοµία, being a composite of οἶκος (house) and νόµος (manage).

So, a bit tortured - but all roads lead home. And Thomas Wolfe be damned - you can go there again.

This may be the last one reported (but not the last one stumbled upon I don't think), here's Alzheimer's
'Vantage #7: Reading a headline, "Vermont Turns Out for Its Dairies as They Take Stock and Dig Out," but this crumbling infrastructure turned it into 'diaries' - and I thought ...Gotta love it! :-)
One of the head boys ... Timothy Leary? (dearie?), Skinner? Pavlov? ... Richard Alpert was it? ... said that perceiving multiple levels of meaning in common speech is a measure of some kind of IQ? Who would have thought it would trickle down from metaphor (or was it metonymy?) to physiological mechanics?

99% biology, 1% intellect (mostly gone astray and at odds), and some infinitesimal fraction of something else; which, whatever it is, will not save us. If it wasn't so funny it would be ridiculous (a certain redundancy there which I also have to smile at) ... Hail Bokonon!

(Re: "may be the last one reported" - every time I think I may finally end this stupid blog, something comes along to keep me at it - maybe after the Ottawa sit-in then ...)

Toxic k-k-Canada.More around not-everything-in-k-k-Canada-is-toxic:

Ikram Syed.Ikram Syed.Shazia Malik.A medical team from Islamic Relief Canada, comprising nurse Hodan Ali, Dr. Shazia Malik and Dr. Ikram Syed are(were?) in Somalia working at a clinic.

This short video of some of their activities.

Hodan Ali.Hodan Ali.Hodan Ali.Hodan Ali.Hodan Ali happens to live in Hamilton (which is why she came across my screen I guess), and she wants to go back to Somalia (has gone back?). There are several reports in the Hamilton Spectator but the upshot is not clear to me ... that is, beyond the (very clear) fact that they need donations which can be made here.

This is a story, as simply put as I can put it:

I was on a bus from New York to Toronto, returning home from Washington last week, an all-nighter. In the second row of seats, just a few rows ahead of me, were a beautiful young black woman, about six months pregnant, on one side of the aisle, and on the other side, across the aisle, a black man, maybe about 40. And they talked! I could not make out what they said but it went on hour after hour until I wondered what there could be left to talk about?

My seat was a torture. I could not sleep. So I listened though I could not hear. I began to think that he must be hustling her somehow? Or vice versa?

Then we got to Buffalo for a short stop. The man she had been talking to got off. One of the other bus drivers in the station, was having a conversation with her, an intimate conversation, they were hugging. It turns out he's her husband.

Our driver changed in Buffalo. A young man got on, a trainee, a 'penguin' as she later explained, who said, "Just sit back and relax folks and we'll soon be in Toronto." But we were hardly out of the station when he asked over the PA, "I've made a wrong turn - does anyone know where we are?"

Uh oh (!)

And up stepped the young woman, "Yes, I think I know," and she moved into the front row of seats. She got her husband on her cell phone, carefully verified the landmarks and exactly where we were, and proceeded to guide the bus to the Rainbow Bridge border-crossing in Niagara Falls.

I managed to fall afoul of the first border guard who saw me. He was explaining that we should not have gotten off the bus yet - so I asked if he wanted us to get back on again and he blew up at me. It was a straight question - at 4AM. I said so. He got even madder. Eventually I grovelled and apologized enough for him to let us go ahead.

Then there was a period when we were not allowed to get back onto the bus. Then the little waiting area became too obviously full and we were told to get back on.

We were hung up though for several hours because apparently one Chinese woman on the bus did not have the proper paperwork (although I suspect the border guards of making entertainment for themselves - who can say?) and she did not speak English, or very little. Luckily one of the men on board could translate. The negotiations went on and on - the entire cadre of border guards, eight of them, versus the woman and the translator and the bus driver.

It was against the law to keep the bus running and the humidity and temperature were intense - so we were soon all outside chatting.

I said to her, "Certainly all of us on this bus will be asking for blessings on your child." Later on I overheard her telling the story of my run-in with the guard to someone, referring to me as 'the white man'.

Finally, the Chinese woman was left behind, weeping, and in another hour or so we got to Toronto and everyone disappeared into the crowd. I asked the driver if he thought there would be problems coming out of the night's adventure and that I could think of several positive things to say about him if he needed me to - but he thought not.

I was tired. I got into a taxi.

That's it. Simply put maybe, but not simple ...

Did I say that neither the driver nor the young woman were obviously stressed at all? That nevermind not raising their voices, they were calm as calm as could be from start to finish? Of course I was impressed by her 'infinite resource and sagacity' and by his cool head ... but that's not it - something changed in me, not sure what yet exactly. I feel the tectonic plates shifting ever since - the furniture is being rearranged in here and I'm not sure who is in charge?

Ah, I think, change is not only inevitable ... but possible.

A question.A question.
(These photographs come from Thorsten Jankowski . The model is unnamed - but if I were casting for Ariel she would be it. There is obviously some kind of real communication going on there to get the curves & lines so perfectly.)


Come unto these yellow sands, and then take hands: courtsied when you have and kiss'd the wild waves whist, foot it featly here and there; and, sweet sprites, the burthen bear. Hark, hark! [Bow-wow] The watch-dogs bark! [Bow-wow] Hark, hark! I hear the strain of strutting chanticleer cry, cock-a-diddle-dow.

       
(The Tempest Act 1, scene 2)

Lean back.Lean back.


Full fathom five thy father lies; of his bones are coral made; those are pearls that were his eyes: nothing of him that doth fade but doth suffer a sea-change into something rich and strange. Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell. [Ding-dong] Hark! Now I hear them, —ding-dong, bell.

       
(The Tempest Act 1, scene 2)

Where the bee sucks, there suck I: in a cowslip's bell I lie; there I couch when owls do cry. On the bat's back I do fly after summer merrily. Merrily, merrily shall I live now, under the blossom that hangs on the bough.

       
(The Tempest Act 5, scene 1)


Meanwhile, back upon the divine fulcrum of uncertainty: hardly a word from new friends made in Washington (yet); limited and mostly qualified approbation on what happened there (except from my children); no response to offers of support made to the organizers of the Ottawa sit-in (maybe I will have to offer again). Still and all, sittin' here humming Home Home on the Range.

An outlier. A singleton nutbar.

Did I somehow imply that I am the kind of self-realized being who walks the border-country asking for no dime and no quarter? I never meant to. Or if I did it must'a bin ... uh ... uh ... a momentary slip-up? the Alzheimer's kickin' in?

(Wat a fuckin' asshole eh? Beats up on the pore string-bean McKibben fer braggin' an' then brags hisself! He's no better! Damm self-right-e-us ol' hippie!)

So, falling back, retreating in the dark and feeling about with my toe for firm footing ... to the shopworn sentimental & maudlin standards: "Because their words had forked no lightning ... ," and so on. Awake in the middle of the night and up at 3AM with music running through my head: "The gates of love they budged an inch; I can't say much has happened since," and "I loved you when our love was best, I love you now there's nothing left."

And wondering on one of the very few ultimates that count - public humiliation: Riding the 501 car at rush hour, forced to stand and sweat, wondering if I have shat myself? But still able to consider laughing if I have. Do farts have lumps?

It could be worse gentle reader - I could be going on about bourgeois role-models like Don Quixote.

Who's in charge here! I wanna speak to the manager! :-)Just a spectator here - having to wait and see if I will make it to Ottawa on the 26th or not ... stay tuned folks, and,

Be well.

9/11 Tribute in Light.Postscript:

It is 10 years since 9/11: "Peace work is done at a micro level, one to one," says Peter Schweitzer, a New York rabbi - he certainly got that right - read this.

Every week, about the time that I am publishing and tidying-up this blog, I get an email from Dicionário inFormal with half a dozen new words. Learning to speak Portuguese was one of those times when my mind really expanded into new realms - this is standard experience when you are learning a new language. There are spaces between what you can say in one language and what you can say in another. As Leonard Cohen says, "There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."

You may have noticed that my posts often end with something in Brazilian. This is the reason. And the emails are well crafted - you see the word, a definition, and an example. That a good number of them are scurrilous is another attraction.

This week it's:

montar no porco - Ir embora, puxar o carro. / Monteiro não aguentou a encheção de saco do Bruno e resolveu montar no porco e sair batido.


beleléu - 1. sm. Lugar distante, além; 2. (Ir para o) Morrer, falecer; 3. Desaparecer, sumir; / 1. Maluco, o cara deu um bico tão forte na bola que ela foi parar lá no beleléu. 2. Sabe aquele cachaceiro do boteco da esquina? Foi pro beleléu, o funeral vai ser hoje. 3. Se você esqueceu a bolsa no banheiro e alguém pegou, a essas alturas já deve estar no beleléu!


boa pinta - Pessoa com boa aparência, apresentável. Usado quando um homem quer dizer que outro homem não é tão feio assim. / Ele só conseguiu ficar com a garota porque até que é boa pinta, senão ela daria um fora nele.


curuba - Escabiose, Sarna. Bicheira, ferida feia que se espalha pelo corpo. / Janaina esta com uma curuba na cabeça.


independência - s.f. Ausência de dependência; liberdade. Condição de uma pessoa, de uma coletividade, que não se submete a outra autoridade e se governa por suas próprias leis / Dom Pedro I proclamou a independência do Brasil no dia 7 de setembro de 1822. "Independência ou Morte!"


olho grosso - Uzurento, invejoso / É bom não espalhar que ganhei na mega-sena, pois tem muito olho grosso por aí.


kuduro - O kuduro é um gênero musical e sobretudo um gênero de dança surgido em Angola. Hoje em dia é praticada nos subúrbios de Lisboa (Portugal) e das cidades do Rio de Janeiro e Salvador. As letras são caracterizadas por sua simplicidade e humor; são escritas em português, mas usam têrmos da língua angolana, por exemplo o quimbundo, que é uma das línguas mais faladas em Angola (do grupo linguístico banto). / O estilo da dança kuduro pressupõe que o quadril fique duro, não se mova.



No, they don't give the English - it would be better for me if they did since I am a beginner and most of the words do not make sense to Google Translate. BUT, if you have lots of time, you can plug the definitions and examples into the Google machine, and eventually a dim light may emerge.

The words this week, especially the last one, kuduro which is a kind of dance originating in Angola (and maybe a dance that my Ariel, above, might know), fill my brain with things to say around today's ruminations ... too many thoughts to put down ... Beleléu, something far distant, like the New Jerusalem that some Christians think they are building; the second meaning defined with falecer, to get sick and die, brings to mind my friend Bilica, who died in the infamous chacina/massacre of Nova Iguaçu/Queimados in 2005 (see here: English BBC and here, a more complete: reporting in Portuguese (but with some of the links gone dead, and here: in Portuguese).

It just goes on and on ...


Appendices:

1. In the Land of Denial, NYT Editorial, September 6 2011.


2. A Boy’s Bar Mitzvah Lessons Bridge a Cultural Chasm, Samuel Freedman, September 9 2011.




In the Land of Denial, NYT Editorial, September 6 2011.

The Republican presidential contenders regard global warming as a hoax or, at best, underplay its importance. The most vocal denier is Rick Perry, the Texas governor and longtime friend of the oil industry, who insists that climate change is an unproven theory created by “a substantial number of scientists who have manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects.”

Never mind that nearly all the world’s scientists regard global warming as a serious threat to the planet, with human activities like the burning of fossil fuels a major cause. Never mind that multiple investigations have found no evidence of scientific manipulation. Never mind that America needs a national policy. Mr. Perry has a big soapbox, and what he says, however fallacious, reaches a bigger audience than any scientist can command.

With one exception — make that one-and-one-half — the rest of the Republican presidential field also rejects the scientific consensus. The exception is Jon Huntsman Jr., a former ambassador to China and former governor of Utah, who recently wrote on Twitter: “I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy.” The one-half exception is Mitt Romney, who accepted the science when he was governor of Massachusetts and argued for reducing emissions. Lately, he’s retreated into mush: “Do I think the world’s getting hotter? Yeah, I don’t know that, but I think that it is.” As for the human contribution: “It could be a little. It could be a lot.”

The others flatly repudiate the science. Ron Paul of Texas calls global warming “the greatest hoax I think that has been around for many, many years.” Michele Bachmann of Minnesota once said that carbon dioxide was nothing to fear because it is a “natural byproduct of nature” and has complained of “manufactured science.” Rick Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania, has called climate change “a beautifully concocted scheme” that is “just an excuse for more government control of your life.”

Newt Gingrich’s full record on climate change has been a series of epic flip-flops. In 2008, he appeared on television with Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker, to say that “our country must take action to address climate change.” He now says the appearance was a mistake.

None of the candidates endorse a mandatory limit on emissions or, for that matter, a truly robust clean energy program. This includes Mr. Huntsman. In 2007, as Utah governor, he joined with Arnold Schwarzenegger, then the governor of California, in creating the Western Climate Initiative, a market-based cap-and-trade program aimed at reducing emissions in Western states. Cap-and-trade has since acquired a toxic political reputation, especially among Republicans, and Mr. Huntsman has backed away.

The economic downturn has made addressing climate change less urgent for voters. But the issue is not going away. The nation badly needs a candidate with a coherent, disciplined national strategy. So far, there is no Republican who fits that description.


A Boy’s Bar Mitzvah Lessons Bridge a Cultural Chasm, Samuel Freedman, September 9 2011.

Right on time for his 3 p.m. appointment, Sam Botwin climbed the stairs of Dave Hall’s row house in Brooklyn, making his way to the rehearsal room on the second floor. There he stood at a makeshift lectern in his baggy shorts and floppy shirt and mop-top hair, a boy of 13, and began to read from a speech about the Jewish martyrs of Masada.

Sam was practicing for his bar mitzvah on Oct. 15, the ritual that elevates him to Jewish manhood. Over a period of three months, it has been and will be Dave Hall’s job to train him to speak with the best possible cadence, projection and pronunciation. Just now, Mr. Hall sat on a piano bench following the text and reminding Sam, not for the first time or the last, to slow down.

Mr. Hall was working with Sam Botwin in part because, as a musician and composer, he had developed a sideline over the years of helping Jewish children chant the Torah portion and haftara passage for their bar and bat mitzvah ceremonies. He was working with Sam because he was a friend of his parents and had instructed Sam’s younger brother, Sasha, on the piano for several years.

One floor beneath the rehearsal room, a family photograph rested atop the living-room piano. It showed a middle-aged man with the same black hair and olive skin of Mr. Hall. The man was his grandfather and immigrant ancestor, Yusef Lahoud, an Arab Christian from Lebanon.

Ten years after the Al Qaeda attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, amid a climate of suspicion of Arab and Muslim Americans, the partnership between Mr. Hall and Sam Botwin serves as a gleaming, redemptive example — an anomaly, to be sure, but one that shows that ethnic and religious chasms can be breached.

“I personally refuse to be the Other to anyone else, and I refuse to see anyone else as the Other,” Mr. Hall, 50, said after a recent session. “We’re all in the same path. As proud as I am of my heritage, I never want us to think of ourselves as so different that we can’t all appreciate the bounty and sacredness of the earth.”

Peter H. Schweitzer, Sam’s rabbi at the City Congregation for Humanistic Judaism, has noted the process with particular satisfaction. Several weeks before Sam’s ceremony, in fact, the congregation will mark the bat mitzvah of a girl with a Jewish mother and Muslim father.

“There’s so much rancor and mistrust and anxiety out there, and I’m sure it goes in both directions,” Rabbi Schweitzer said of the national mood. “Fanatical voices tend to get heard the most, and they squelch or silence those that are looking for a way to come together. But peace work is done at a micro level, one to one. When a boy like Sam can meet a man like Dave, it goes a long way.”

For much of his life, Mr. Hall had not identified so deeply with the Arab side of his ancestry. Growing up in vanilla Vermont, carrying the surname and lineage of English forebears who reached America in 1630, he put no special energy into either affirming or denying his maternal roots. Only once during college in Burlington did two graduate students from Kuwait ask, “Are you Lebanese?”

Moving to New York as a young musician, curiosity began to displace indifference. Mr. Hall picked up Arabic working in a Middle Eastern restaurant in Greenwich Village. He sought out a Lebanese Maronite church in Brooklyn Heights. He traveled several times to the Levant.

Meanwhile, he built a freelancer’s life — writing music for cabaret shows and children’s theater, developing a choir in a public-housing project, teaching voice in an after-school program at a private school in Park Slope. In the late 1990s, two of the girls he instructed there became his first bat mitzvah students.

While Mr. Hall knew no Hebrew, he readily grasped the similarities between the liturgical music of the synagogue and of Arab Christian churches, most of which use a cantor as a remnant of Jewish tradition. In the Torah and haftara portions, he could hear the musical foundations of the Gregorian chants he knew from a part-time job with a Roman Catholic congregation in Westchester.

His quirky little sideline remained his quirky little sideline until a Tuesday morning 10 years ago. He walked out the door of his home in Boerum Hill to vote in the primary election but couldn’t get down the block through all the dust. Driven back indoors, he turned on the television and saw why. Later that day, borne on the wind from ground zero, a page from a legal pad, charred at its edges, landed in his front yard.

Ten years after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, a special report on the decade’s costs and consequences, measured in thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and countless challenges to the human spirit.

When Mr. Hall ventured out, he noticed that the Arab-American stores along Atlantic Avenue were deserted. Police officers were standing guard outside a nearby Arab-American social-service center. Mr. Hall went inside to volunteer on the phones, continuing for several days, each evening jotting down the most vivid comments.

One caller told him, “Death to all Arabs now.” Another caller asked him, “Do you love America?” A third caller offered to help frightened Arab-Americans shop for groceries, promising, “I’ve got a car, I’ll drive you, no matter how far.”

The supportive words heartened him, and the rest made him yearn for Sept. 10, when he was still an unhyphenated American. “People who look like me, or who had visa stamps like mine, were liable to be profiled,” Mr. Hall said. “It was unsettling to hear people questioning the loyalty of people like me.”

On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Sam Botwin was 3 years old and enjoying Grandparents’ Day at his preschool. Only in third or fourth grade, upon seeing a photograph of the Twin Towers aflame, did he ask his parents what happened. At some point, he learned that his father, Neil, had lost a friend in the attack.

Then, about the time of the Sept. 11 commemorations last year, Sam began paying attention to all the outrage about the “ground zero mosque.” When he recalls the rallies against it, he uses the word “riot,” which is accurate in describing the opponents’ rhetoric if not their physical acts.

Against such hate, he and Mr. Hall hold their weekly lessons, and Sam tries to slow down, and to not stumble on tricky words like “Pharisees,” and to nearly shout out the passage he’s quoting from the Jewish leader at Masada, saying death as free people is better than life as slaves.

“This is why your parents engaged me,” Mr. Hall told him. “You’re delivering important stories — not only historically but in a spiritual way. These are stories that bind people together. And it’s your honored role to be the one who expresses them. Your bar mitzvah should be a holy thing.”


Down.

Sunday, 16 January 2011

Character (?)

or Who ARE these people? or even just Feet of clay.
Up, Down, Appendices, Postscript.

¡Ya Basta!This debate is on in Ottawa, Thurday 20th at 7pm: Green Growth or No Growth: Charting a sustainable economic future.

'Feet of clay,' comes from Daniel 2 in the King James here; more on the KJV after a while maybe ...

Here's my proposition: If you are smart enough to write a book and get it published ... then you are smart enough to know it is shite.

Sunday January 30: I think this all happened pretty much as I said - except that when the books I ordered came and I began to read The Spirit Level I found that I more-or-less agree with it - so far that is - I have now read all the prefaces and what-not and three chapters.

The first time I saw it I was definitely infuriated. I now have no idea why? I remember it clearly; but now, with the book in my hands I can find no clue? Upsetting as you may understand ...

[?]

Not funny eh? ... but funny as can be. :-)I am literally staggering. Maybe this joking around Alzheimer's is some kind of prescient psychological slip? Given what I know about Alzheimer's this seems unlikely.

My sincere apologies to Richard Wilkinson & Kate Pickett. No one reads this anyway I guess but that's no excuse. I am glad I decided to follow through and order the book.

More on this later ...


I tuned into this discussion last spring sometime, before any references to The Spirit Level Delusion were added. Eventually one of the Toronto Library copies came my way. I didn't read the whole thing; it was maddeningly obvious bullshit and lest I be tempted to hurl it against the wall once too often and wind up having to pay for it, I turned it back in to the library.

If wishes were horses beggars would ride.

Then last week I came upon the discussion at Rabble again ...

Sometimes I scan the offending bits of books for future reference - but in this case I hadn't; and I cannot remember exactly what infuriated me - except that it was a transparently fabricated tissue of 'tendentious statistics'. The only excerpt I have been able to find (below) has not refreshed my memory ... So I have now ordered cheap second-hand copies of both The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett; and The Spirit Level Delusion by Christopher Snowdon.

Richard WilkinsonRichard Wilkinson & Kate PickettRichard Wilkinson & Kate PickettKate PickettKate PickettSo ... Who are these people? Impossible to say with certainty; except to say they are definitely not street-corner nutters (like myself).

Wilkinson is Professor Emeritus of Social Epidemiology at the University of Nottingham, and Honorary Professor at University College London. Pickett is a Professor of Epidemiology at the University of York. The resumés of both are sprinkled liberally with the word 'scientist'. Christopher Snowdon (and here) is a writer; no particular pedigree.

All of them out there just trying to sell books I suppose ... and we always look better in older photographs don't we?

My interest here is really to somehow distinguish fakers & pretenders & snake-oil opportunists from 'the real meal deal'. I am critical of both Tim Jackson & Peter Victor for example, on minor points - but I believe them. Why?

That german philosopher socialist guy, wazizname? ... oh yeah, Axel Honneth, has a whole chapter in Pathologies of Reason on why personality is not the be-all.

Murky ... it is all as murky as fuck ...

Ezra LevantEzra LevantEzra LevantEzra LevantEzra LevantEzra LevantBut it is sort of important too. Dipshits like Larry Solomon and The Deniers, and worse lately; Ezra Levant and his Ethical Oil which is taken quite seriously in some quarters - except that the book is nothing but a half-baked rant, misinformation & rhetoric. Don't believe me? Get it and read it for yourself: here, at the Toronto Public Library.

And Levant's ridiculous construct is currency at the highest levels in the land. We see Stephen Harper & his jackanapes poppet Peter Kent parroting these nonsense notions. We have pure pundit poop driving what passes for a national Canadian environmental and energy policy? Unbelievable!

I have read both of these books. They are not worth the paper they are printed on. Look at this guy Levant - he has one expression, which he appears to me to have perfected for his Grade 8 school photograph. A poser hoser. The Globe calls him a 'muse' ... much as I dislike him and his kind I would have stopped short of questioning his sexuality.

Peter Kent & Stephen HarperThank you OED; maybe poupette expresses the essence of Peter Kent better than 'poppet' - though both are apt.

I tell you what: With people like this at or near the helm
We are well & truely FUCKED!

This January 6 interview with Evan Solomon is still on-line and still the best introduction to our Peter.

It's not as if these people will rule forever; and (don't be afraid) it won't take armed revolution to lose them. Sooner or later people will wake up; a well organized campaign, someone charismatic, the sounds of the second, third, fourth &etc. shoes dropping BIG time ... They may be gone within, say, five years - but by then there will be enough CO2e in the air to write climate history for the next 500 or 1,000 years and it will be all over but the weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth.

I was going to say 'very Old Testament imagery' but a quick search finds all the weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth going on New Testament; go figgure?!
The fat lady is singing already.
Dig it.

Lancelot AndrewesLancelot AndrewesThe King James Version and the brothers Andrewes, Lancelot (1555-1626) & Roger. I can't find dates for Roger. I have a book coming: God's secretaries : the making of the King James Bible by Adam Nicolson which may have more information. Just curious if he is the younger or older brother ... no portrait of Roger either ... both of the images on the left are of Lancelot. There's a whole collection of portraits of Lancelot at the National Portrait Gallery in London.

The OED gives me calumny: 1. False and malicious misrepresentation of the words or actions of others, calculated to injure their reputation; libellous detraction, slander. 2. A false charge or imputation, intended to damage another's reputation; a slanderous report. The preface to the KJV, The Translators to the Reader, makes it clear that calumny was right up there in their list of concerns.

From the little I can glean about them here and there on the Internet; their characters too are murky at best.

A big TS Eliot connection here that I was not aware of ... Eliot's For Lancelot Andrewes: essays on style and order is coming from the library after a while, maybe I will find more to say about this all later.

Jackson PollockJackson PollockYou have to laugh. Reaching back in time, airbrush in hand, the baffled bureaucrats are afoot.

NO SMOKING! Not now nor never ...

Burnley Allan 'Rocky' JonesNO SAYING 'FAGGOT'! Nevermind who you are, nevermind what your bona fides may be, nevermind the context. The complainant is a woman apparently (at least for now) of the LGBT 'community' - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender. She got the ear of the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC) who did their homework. The man pictured at the right, Burnley Allan "Rocky" Jones, being the Vice Chair of the Atlantic Regional Panel, must have helped them concoct this decision. Two questions:
Is this a fit occupation for a man of his stature?
and; Why on earth would he lend his good name to this shite?

These are what you call 'rhetorical' questions. It's best not to try imagining answers for them. He is not likely to confirm any of your guesses; and no matter how you proceed - your estimation of the man is bound to slide.

Alan GribbenGable cartoon 11-01-14NO SAYING 'NIGGER'! Not now and not 100 years (and more) ago! There is a rationale (naturally); here's an excerpt.

Even the Globe is wringing its little hands.

Well, I'm from the PFAYMMB community; that's Please Fcof All You Meddling Mindless Bureaucrats; and I'm offended at how you waste your time & energies. Is this the best you can do with the education and consciousness your culture has invested in you?

When you can fall for chains of silver you can fall for chains of gold;
You can fall for pretty strangers and the promises they hold.
You promised me everything; you promised me thick and thin.
Now you just says, "Oh Romeo, yeah you know I used to have a scene with him."

          Mark Knopfler, Romeo and Juliet.

In comes Romeo, he’s moaning, “You belong to me I believe,” and someone says, “You’re in the wrong place my friend, you better leave.”
          Bob Dylan, Desolation Row.

Sleeping GiantSleeping GiantYou have your Coyote trickster and your trickster Fox (Foxy Loxy as it were, bringing this whole rambling Chicken Little fable full circle) ... and here you have Rabbit trickster, Nanabijou, the sleeping giant up on the north shore of Lake Superior. He wakes up eventually; she, it wakes up, whatever ... Nanabijou wakes up one day and (no slouching this time) banishes the psychotic pundits & politicians and their petty bureaucrats ... to wash dishes in all-night restauraunts somewhere.

Décroissance Anishinaabe style. :-)But it's too late. Sure enough the feet of clay are washed away; and like Daniel says, "... it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever." Good story, except, as it turns out ... it's all a kingdom of blue-green algae & cockroaches by that time (God bless 'em).

Cyanophyta (maybe)Cyanophyta (maybe)Cyanophyta baby!

Be well.

Postscript:

Stupid old fart! :-)Ballard Street: Lowell has no idea his dog was once trained to sniff out questionable characters.Oops! That pesky Alzheimer's is at it again! I forgot to define 'character'. In this case the OED is not quite 'on', not quite up to the mark (it seems to me). More than a dozen definitions before you get to, "The sum of the moral and mental qualities which distinguish an individual or a race, viewed as a homogeneous whole; the individuality impressed by nature and habit on man or nation; mental or moral constitution." And the nut of it (for me) is only hinted at with the use of 'habit'.

I was well more than 20 years old when a hippie friend, surprised to find that I did not know already, told me, "Character is the sum of qualities proven over time."

So, there you go.

Ai ai ai! Forgot the music too! OK, here's Brook Benton with The Boll Weevil Song.


Appendices:

1. The Spirit Level, 2010, excerpt from the introduction.
2. Review of The Spirit Level, Boyd Tonkin, January 29 2010.


The Spirit Level, 2010, excerpt from the introduction.

It seems likely that environmental constraints on economic growth will dominate world politics for the foreseeable future. A pessimistic view would be that this is the beginning of the end of the most prosperous chapter in human history, and that business activity will be submerged – if not by storms and rising sea levels – then by a rising tide of government restrictions. A more optimistic response is to view the necessary constraints on economic growth as an opportunity to create a new and better post-consumerist society.

As the quality of life is so often defined in terms of material living standards and national income per person, it might seem paradoxical to claim that environmental restrictions on economic growth need not involve sacrificing our quality of life. But if instead we define the ‘quality of life’ in terms of life expectancy, happiness and well-being, then the data clearly shows that we, in the rich market democracies, no longer benefit from increasing affluence.

Although economic growth has been the most important driver of human progress in the past and still has a crucial role to play in improving lives in developing countries, we in the developed world must now look elsewhere for further improvements in the real quality of life.

We are social epidemiologists; people who usually spend their time trying to understand how social factors affect population health. Our work has focused on different aspects of wellbeing in rich market democracies. Rather than looking at subjective measures, such as happiness, we have looked at objective measures, such as life expectancy, homicide rates, drug abuse, child well-being, levels of trust, involvement in community life, mental illness, teenage birth rates, children’s math and literacy scores, and the proportion of the population in prison.

Instead of finding that each society does well on some of these outcomes and badly on others, we found that countries tend to be consistently good or bad performers, across the board. If a country has high life expectancy, it also tends to have stronger community life, a smaller proportion of its population behind bars, better mental health, fewer drug problems and children doing better in school.

The differences in the performance of more and less equal countries are very large. Rather than things being just a bit worse in more unequal countries, they are very much worse. More unequal countries have three times the rates of violence, of infant mortality and of mental illness. Their teenage birth rates are six times as high, and rates of imprisonment are eight times higher.

What could account for such huge differences in performance, spread across so many outcomes?

The answer turned out to be surprisingly simple – inequality. The bigger the income differences between the rich and poor in a country, the worse it does. The relationship could not have been clearer: the greater the inequality the more socially dysfunctional societies become – regardless of their overall economic performance. Whether a country is as rich as the USA or, like Greece, only half as wealthy, seems to have no bearing on levels of health and social problems.

The measure of inequality we used was the ratio of the incomes of the top 20 percent compared to the incomes of the bottom 20 percent in each country. In the less unequal countries (such as Japan, Finland, Norway, Sweden) the top 20 percent have 3.4 to 4.0 times as much. In the more unequal countries (USA, Portugal, UK) they have between 7 and 8.5 times as much. By this measure they are twice as unequal as the more equal countries.

In case people thought that our findings – despite very high levels of statistical significance – reflected nothing more than the vagaries of national culture and political history, we decided to use the 50 US states as a separate test bed, and look to see whether more unequal states also perform less well. We found that for the US states, as for countries, the greater the income differences the greater a society’s burden of health and social problems. And again, average incomes were unimportant.

Aware of some of the political sensitivities round inequality, we thought we should also check our results against someone else’s measure of wellbeing. The UNICEF Index of Child Wellbeing in Rich Countries, which combines data on 40 different aspects of children’s lives, seemed like a good alternative yardstick. It includes everything from whether children feel they can talk to their parents, to immunization rates, to measures of bullying at school. We found that child wellbeing too, was strongly associated with the size of the gap between rich and poor, but unrelated to national levels of average income per person.

This research, outlined in our book, The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger (Bloomsbury, 2009), brings together many years of our own and other people’s research devoted to trying to understand why some rich countries are healthier than others. There are now over 200 studies of income inequality and health. A recent study covering 60 million people concluded that inequality affects population health, even after adjusting for individual incomes in each society. There are also many studies showing that homicide rates are lower in more equal countries.

Throughout the centuries, there have always been those who have believed that inequality is divisive and socially corrosive. That intuition seems to be borne out by our data. In the more unequal countries and US states, only about 15 or 20 percent of the population feel they can trust others, compared to around two-thirds in the more equal ones. More equal societies are also more cohesive, with stronger community life. Coupled with the evidence on violence, this confirms that inequality damages the social fabric of society. If you have to walk home alone late at night, you’d feel easier about it in a more equal society.

Our interpretation of these findings is that bigger income differences lead to bigger social distances across the status hierarchy, increasing feelings of superiority and inferiority, and adding to status competition and status insecurity. Some of the causal links between greater inequality and adverse outcomes are well known: the physiological effects of low social status, lack of social support and of stress in early childhood are now understood: chronic stress has profound effects on all biological systems. Similarly, the reason why violence is more common in more unequal societies is because high levels of inequality make status even more important, and the most common triggers to violence are, of course, disrespect, loss of face and humiliation.

But there is a more fundamental explanation of why we are so sensitive to inequality. Because individuals within any species have the same needs, the greatest potential for conflict is almost always between members of the same species. The 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes regarded this as the central problem of politics. Because we all have the same needs, the competition “of each against all” would, in the absence of a sovereign power to keep the peace, make life “nasty, brutish and short”. But, of course, unlike other species, human beings also have the potential to be each other’s best source of cooperation, assistance, love and learning.

This is why other people can be heaven or hell – our best sources of security and support, or our most feared rivals. Everything depends on the quality of the social relationships between us. Sharing food is deeply symbolic because of the stark opposition between reciprocity and competition over access to necessities. Throughout both human history and pre-history, gifts have been symbols of friendship and in some societies refusing a gift is close to a declaration of war. Because gifts assert that giver and receiver recognize each others needs and will not compete over access to scarce resources, the exchange of gifts affirms friendship, sharing and reciprocity.

It is because our long evolution as social animals has sensitized us so acutely to the quality of social relations that studies now find social status and friendship are such powerful psychosocial protectors of health and wellbeing, while inequality and social exclusion are so damaging.

The powerful effects of inequality are also transmitted from parents to children. Different parenting styles can be understood as expressions of a social structure in which an adult’s lifelong experience of adversity, inequality and low status, is passed on to children and serves to prepare them for the kind of social reality they are likely to have to cope with. Growing up in a society in which you must fight for what you can get and cannot trust others, requires a very different emotional and cognitive development from what would be needed if you were growing up in a world in which you depended on cooperation and mutuality, in which your security depended on the goodness of your relations with others.

People often assume that the benefits of greater equality are confined to the poor. Not so. The differences in the performance of more and less equal societies is so large because the vast majority of the population benefit from greater equality. Our research shows that even the well-off, well-educated, middle classes benefit from living in more equal societies. Whilst the benefits of greater equality are largest lower down the social ladder, even at the top of society people live longer and do better in more equal societies.

The reason why the benefits of greater equality are not confined to the poor is, of course, because we are all caught up in status competition. We all worry about keeping up appearances, about what others think of us, and how we are judged.

So whatever the political and moral arguments, the evidence shows that inequality damages us all and imposes huge costs on our societies, as they struggle to cope with the fall out.

But what about the transition to sustainability? Greater equality contributes to the ability of societies to reduce carbon emissions in two different, but important, ways. First, coping with climate change is a major test of people’s willingness to accept policies for the sake of the common good – for humanity at large. Greater equality is a crucial determinant of how societies measure up to this test. Because people in more equal societies feel they can trust others, are more involved in community life, and less out for themselves, those societies are also able to be more public spirited: they spend more on overseas development aid; they recycle a larger proportion of waste materials; they score higher on the Global Peace Index, and their business leaders think it more important that their governments abide by international environmental agreements.

One of the most important obstacles to reducing carbon emissions is consumerism. Here too greater equality has an important role to play. The pressure to consume is driven substantially by status competition, which is in turn increased by inequality. People in more unequal societies work much longer hours and are more likely to get into debt -because money and status are even more important. But what people wish for, and consistently express in national surveys, is more time with family and friends, and less ‘materialism’. Greater equality reduces the need to strive – against our better judgment – for material wealth to the detriment of our relationships with one another.

And finally, our research shows that there are quite different roads to greater equality. Not only are there ‘big government’ solutions, involving redistributive taxes and benefits, but there are also ‘small government’ solutions, involving smaller earnings differences even before taxes. Sweden is an example of the ‘big government’ approach. It has large differences in earnings but then redistributes income through taxes and benefits. In contrast, Japan has smaller earnings differences to start with, does less redistribution and has a much smaller welfare regime. We find rather the same contrast among US states. Compared to many states, Vermont has high taxes and social expenditure, but its next-door neighbor, New Hampshire, has amongst the lowest. But, in their different ways, both are among the more equal states and, like Sweden and Japan, they enjoy better health and fewer social problems. The implication is that it doesn’t matter how you get your greater equality, as long as you get there somehow. Societies, politicians and policy makers can follow a range of pathways to lower inequality – but reduce it they must. Our future quality of life, and our ability to live within the environmental constraints, depend upon it.


Review of The Spirit Level, Boyd Tonkin, January 29 2010.

The Spirit Level, By Richard Wilkinson & Kate Pickett reviewed by Boyd Tonkin.

An intellectual flagship of post-crisis compassion, this reader-friendly fusion of number-crunching and moral uplift has helped steer a debate about the route to a kinder, fairer nation. To the authors, "more equal societies almost always do better" for all.

Flatter incomes, stronger communities and a more level playing-field of life-chances help every citizen, rich and poor alike, since our species "enjoys co-operation and trust".

As Wilkinson and Pickett roll out graph after graph to prove that the ultra-competitive Anglo-sphere wallows in misery and crime while Scandinavia and Japan enjoy egalitarian bliss, some sceptics might worry about an overload of tendentious statistics.

Purely as an ethical manifesto, the book hits far harder. Yet in Britain it still seems as hard as ever for politicians to stand up to "the tiny minority of the rich".


Down.