Showing posts with label planetstrike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label planetstrike. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Raging Inferno: Feb 2012 Army List Challege

Welcome to the first Army List Challenge of 2012.  If you've not had a go at these before, the idea is to design a themed army list from the codex of your choice to take on a specific challenge.

This month's challenge is inspired by one of the missions in Planetstrike (you remember that 40k expansion, right?  the one where daemons are awesome as they can charge on the turn they appear?).  The game itself will be played using regular 40k rules, using killpoints to determine the victor (explicitly: its an annihilation mission, with spearhead/table quarters deployment) with the following amendments.

(a) The battlefield that you are fighting over is a raging inferno.  All difficult terrain (of which there is a fair bit) is treated as being both dangerous and difficult terrain (everything is on fire!).  All of the difficult terrain blocks line of sight through it (there's lots of thick, black, acrid smoke coming out of it!).  There is, however, a singular stronghold on the battlefield - a robust bastion that has withstood the test of time and is not subjected to this rule.  Naturally, said bastion is situated in the centre of the battlefield.  Controlling this bastion is worth two further killpoints in the final analysis for the controlling player.

(b) Additionally, at the start of each player turn, that player may launch two firestorm (infinite range, S9, AP3, Ordnance 1, Barrage) weapons.  It is going to be a true raging inferno...

Rules
(1) Design a 1500 points army list from any codex to take on this challenge.
(2) Post your army lists as a comment to this posting and suggest why the army list is effective and themed to the scenario.
(3) Entries close at 01:00 GMT on Feb 14th.
(4) On that same day, I'll open a poll for Warpstone Flux readers to judge which army list they consider to be the "most effective army list that also best articulates the theme" (whatever readers interpret that to mean) out of all entrants.
(5) The winner will be tallied and announced on Feb 21st (and entered in to the hall of fame!).
(6) One entry per person please.

Remember that there are no prizes for these contests, beyond kudos, honour and entry in to the hall of fame.

Good Luck!

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Ork Bastion

Taken at Games Workshop, Camberwell (Melbourne, Aust.), this is an orky adaptation of Imperial Ruins, suitable for use as a planetstrike bastion perhaps.  

I like the way that the orkification makes it look like an ork face.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Poll Result: Which Expansions You've Played Recently

Thank you to everyone who took part in the poll on which expansions you played recently. The results were as follows:

Apocalypse: 40%
Cities of Death 25%
Planetstrike 14%
Spearhead 3%
Battle Missions 44%
Kill Team 48%
Linebreaker 1%
Planetary Empires 4%
Other 3%

As predicted by a few commentators in the original posting, Battle Missions performed wonderfully well, probably in large part due to the fact it is a simple bolt-on to regular 40k, particularly for those bored of standard missions. Unsurprising to me (but perhaps surprising to other folks) is how well Kill Team performed -- better than Battle Missions even(!) Such a strong performance from 200 point games is great.

Also performing well is Apocalypse. The long-term impact of the "use everything" game is still looking strong.

Planetstrike gained 14% -- not as much as I thought it might. Perhaps this is indicative that Apocalypse is the most favoured variant 40k game.

Spearhead hasn't done well at all with 3%. Especially given it is the most recent "release". Even Planetary Empires is doing better than Spearhead (I confess that I am a fan of Planetary Empires myself!).

Okay, those are my thoughts. Anyone else want to add anything?

Friday, September 3, 2010

Night Fighting Note to Self

Note to self: Night fighting rules apply to game turn 1 in a Dawn of War deployment.

Secondly, a couple of strategems in Planetstrike (Darken the Skies, and Dawn Assault) can also provide night fighting rules if purchased. (Anyone out there still playing Planetstrike regularly? See the Warpstone Flux poll here)

Night fighting rules can help daemon armies on the turn they arrive survive against incoming firepower...

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Poll: Which Expansions Have You Played Recently?

There are now a number of Warhammer 40,000 expansions to the core game. Cities of Death, Apocalypse, Planetstrike, Spearhead, battle missions (I'm listing both kill team and linebreaker as distinct from the core battle missions), and even Planetary Empires can all have a place in the greater context of the game.

I'm interested to know which of those you play? Do you play some expansions more than others, and some not at all?

I'm starting up a poll (right hand column) to see which of the expansions you play, and what ones are popular vs. unpopular. Please only tick the boxes for the ones that you played recently (I'll leave it up to your good selves to determine what you each mean by "recently"). If you've long since stopped playing a certain expansion despite having the capacity to play said expansion, leave a comment below and tell everyone why.

This poll will close in 2 weeks time.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Some Assorted Thoughts on Daemonettes of Slaanesh

Daemonettes of Slaanesh have some awesome plastic models and historic metal miniatures to represent them on the Warhammer 40,000 battlefield. Having played a good few games with them in a mixed Codex: Daemons army list, I felt it was time to have a look at what tactics generally worked for me and what didn't.

A Matter of Scale.
In my experience, Codex: Daemons is a matter of scale when playing mixed daemons. What works at a low points value may not be so effective at a large points value (and vice-versa).

In that regard, I've only been tempted to play daemonettes of Slannesh at larger points values in mixed daemons armies. In mono-Slaanesh armies, they will (of course) have to be there since they are the core troops. At lower points values, I find that daemonettes are not so worth while in mixed armies. Why?

The main problem with daemonettes is their general frailness to points value ratio. With toughness 3 and a 5+ save, they will be toasted by most armies. That, and coupled with the fact that they cost 14 points each; compare that points cost to a standard ork or chaos space marine and their overall frailness is obvious.

In larger armies (i.e. bigger points value games), daemonettes can be much more deadly. The principle reason for this is that any opposing general should be targetting other parts of the daemonic army in preference to daemonettes if they know what they're doing. Bloodletters of Khorne, Screamers of Tzeentch and Daemon Princes all seem to get prioritized over daemonettes for various reasons (e.g. hellblades; the ability to melta bomb tanks; simply being big and bad monstrous creatures respectively). Hence in a larger points value game, daemonettes can readily be over-looked. However, by not paying attention to them, the daemonettes can more readily get stuck in to their opposition.

Advantages of Daemonettes.
There are benefits to spending 14 points on a daemonette. Principle amongst them are the sheer number of attacks each (3 base; 4 on the charge), high initiative, rending attacks, fleet special rule and sheer other-worldly mind-altering beauty aura (variously known as Aura of Acquiescence, or assault and defensive grenades).

On top of that, they can take icons (probably not worth it outside of mono-Slaanesh armies); instruments of chaos (again, probably not worth while - see my previous discussion on this matter); and transfixing gaze.

Let's have a brief look at transfixing gaze. Mechanically, it reduces the number of attacks from an opponent in base-to-base contact with the daemon by one. This can be useful with a carefully positioned charge (e.g. against a power fist space marine) or against a monstrous creature / independent character. But otherwise might not be worthwhile. It is cheap though, so if you have the spare points and can't find another valuable place to spend them, then I think its better than spending the points on an instrument for the daemonettes.

An example combat.
A unit of 10 chaos space marines is facing off against 10 daemonettes (with transfixing gaze and an instrument - to make it equal points value).

The daemonettes have the charge (which they should always be aiming to have regardless given their fleet special rule). That means they have an impressive 40 attacks. Statistically, 20 of them will hit their mark.

Of the 20 hits, 3.33 will result in a rending wound and 3.33 ordinary wounds will be scored. That results in 4.44 dead chaos space marines on average (only a third of the chaos marines will fail their power armour 3+ save against the ordinary wounds).

The chaos marines now strike back at lower initiative. Each has two attacks apart from one of them in base-to-base contact with the transfixing gaze daemonette. That yields approximately 10 attacks back in total. That results in 6.67 hits and 4.44 wounds. About 1.5 daemonettes pass their saving throws which result in about 3 daemonettes fleeing back to the Immaterium. The daemonettes have won, but only by 1.44 wounds.

In the next round of combat, things get tougher for the daemonettes. They get a mere shadow of their previous number of attack: 21 from 7 surviving daemonettes. Of these, 10.5 will hit and 1.75 will rend alongside 1.75 ordinary wounds. That means there will be 2.33 more dead chaos space marines.

They're probably going to need some help in the next round to finish off these pesky chaos space marines in their shiny power armour.

Making best use of daemonettes.
Okay, daemonettes do very well in the first round of combat on the charge. No doubt about that. But later on, they will struggle as their numbers get whittled down very fast. So the first rule of thumb that I discovered about using daemonettes is that they need to be supported or they should be the support unit of something else. Bloodletters of Khorne spring to mind - they make a remarkably good tag team together regardless of whether the daemonettes get stuck in first (the most likely scenario) or the bloodletters do.

Heralds of Slaanesh can also help out somewhat, but are expensive (compared to the sheer number of attacks you could have purchased for the same points value of daemonettes).

Depending on the exact points value of the game that is being played, having large squads of daemonettes can be a boon or a draw-back. The boon is that they really optimize the first turn number of attacks they get (especially when charging). The draw back to a large squad size is that they get more noticeable and are more likely to be targeted. In a number of my army lists, I've tried running a single unit of about 10 daemonettes to provide extra support for other units (bloodletters and plaguebearers). They've been deadly when deployed as the bloodletters usually come in for the rapid fire bolters rather than the daemonettes. Opponents are often surprised by 4 rending attacks by charging daemonettes.

Daemonettes also have to make the most of cover saves and terrain to make them more survivable. Deep strike nearby to cover. Use turn 1 to run in to (or behind of line of sight blocking) cover. And then use said cover to get in to combat as quickly as possible on the next turn. Either that, or hide behind a bunch of (cover save providing) bloodletters.

Tank Busting?
I should note that daemonettes can also be used for a little bit of light-tank busting in a pinch. But this should only be attempted if desperate and there are still a good number of daemonettes in a squad since they only have strength=3. Here's an example:

Ten daemonettes charge a rhino (rear armour value=10) that moved in the previous turn. Of their 40 attacks, 20 will hit. Out of these hits, only armour penetration rolls of a 6 will have any effect -- there will be 3.33 of these. Thanks to rending, these 3.33 hits add an extra d3 to their armour penetration value. That means there will be an average of 1.11 glancing hits and 2.22 penetrating hits from the 40 attack! I'll let you figure out if you think that result is worthwhile or not. It might work out well!

A Small Nod to Planetstrike.
With planetstrike, I think I've also rediscovered a new love of daemonettes. With a fortunate deep strike in followed by an assault, these daemons are looking wickedly good, first-choice first-wave troops.

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Planetary Empires Gets Closer

With all the recent publicity given over to Planetstrike (did anyone catch the direct order chaos bastion?!), it might be easy to overlook the other expansion that appears on the horizon and to be coming out soon: Planetary Empires.

Bell of Lost Souls has pictured a French Language advertisement for this expansion set. For one, I'm pretty enthused about this expansion. Being fully compatible with Mighty Empires, Planetary Empires basically allows a hexagonal campaign to be played out using warhammer 40,000.

Whilst the paint scheme used in the advert is a little bit gritty-bombed-imperial-planet orientated, I'm sure that other paint schemes will bring out different flavours of planets with ease. I'm thinking of a verdant planet with ancient ruins of a forgotten civilization that have been overgrown with wild xeno flora. Although, the bits look like they'd lend themselves to desert world (red like Mars, or sandy yellow), lava cracked planets (perhaps with some conversion work), ice-covered deathworlds and zero atmosphere moons that have been extensively cratered over billions of years. Plenty of possibilities await!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Facebook

Sequestered Industries