Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label mirror therapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mirror therapy. Show all posts

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Mirror Therapy for Stroke Rehabilitation

 Well, this is why it is so bad:

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is one of 30,000 created with generative AI and the cited references. We take care to ground generative text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback(Total failure this time!) on the overall quality of the process. We however cannot guarantee the accuracy of every summary and welcome feedback.
  • mirror therapy (129 posts to February 2016)
  • Mirror Therapy for Stroke Rehabilitation

    Mirror therapy (MT) is an innovative(You're that fucking out-of-date that you think mirror therapy is innovative? How long have you been living under a rock?) rehabilitation technique that has gained attention for its potential to aid recovery in stroke patients. This method utilizes a mirror to create a visual illusion that the affected limb is moving normally, which can stimulate brain activity and promote motor function recovery. Recent research has explored various aspects of mirror therapy, including its effectiveness for both upper and lower limb rehabilitation, the mechanisms behind its efficacy, and the potential enhancements through technology such as virtual reality.

    Recent Research

    Recent(This was all proven years ago!) studies have provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of mirror therapy for stroke rehabilitation. One study compared two methods of MT: conventional bilateral mirror therapy (BMT) and unilateral mirror therapy using a screen (UMT). The findings indicated that UMT significantly increased patients' attention to the mirror illusion, suggesting it may be a more effective option for engaging stroke patients during therapy sessions[1].

    Another study focused on the neural mechanisms of mirror therapy for lower limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), researchers found that patients who underwent mirror therapy showed enhanced motor function and increased neuronal activity in brain regions associated with motor control compared to a control group[2]. This suggests that mirror therapy not only improves physical outcomes but also facilitates functional reorganization in the brain, which is crucial for recovery.

    Moreover, the integration of technology into mirror therapy has been explored. A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial is investigating the effectiveness of robot-assisted virtual reality mirror therapy (RAVRMT) for upper limb motor dysfunction. This approach aims to activate the mirror neuron system and reward circuits more effectively, potentially leading to better rehabilitation outcomes[3].

    Additionally, research has shown that mirror visual feedback during unilateral movements can influence brain activity, specifically the desynchronization of alpha rhythms in the cortex, which is associated with movement preparation and execution[4]. This neurophysiological evidence supports the idea that mirror therapy can enhance motor function by altering brain activity patterns.

    Finally, a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that adding mirror therapy to standard occupational therapy significantly improved upper limb motor function and daily living activities in stroke patients. The results indicated that patients receiving additional mirror therapy showed greater improvements compared to those who only received conventional therapy[5].

    Technical Terms

    Mirror Therapy (MT): A rehabilitation technique that uses a mirror to create a visual illusion of movement in an affected limb, promoting recovery.

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): A neuroimaging technique that measures brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow.

    Mirror Neuron System: A group of neurons that are activated both when an individual performs an action and when they observe the same action performed by another.

    Alpha Rhythms: Brain wave patterns in the frequency range of 8-12 Hz, associated with relaxed, calm states and often involved in motor control.

    Friday, December 6, 2024

    Enhancing Hand Motor Recovery Post-Stroke: A Comparative Study of Robotic vs. Conventional Mirror Therapy.

     Ask your competent? doctor where action observation of the hand fits in. It's highly unlikely your hospital will get this robotic exoskeletal hand (RMT).

    Enhancing Hand Motor Recovery Post-Stroke: A Comparative Study of Robotic vs. Conventional Mirror Therapy.

    Steven Kurniawan, Husnul Mubarak, Nuralam Sam, Yose Waluyo

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov 28 [Epub ahead of print]

    OBJECTIVE

    This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of using a robotic exoskeletal hand (RMT) combined with mirror therapy (MT) in hand rehabilitation for post-stroke patients, compared to conventional MT.

    DESIGN

    Randomized controlled trial.

    SETTING

    Conducted from November 2023 to February 2024.

    PARTICIPANTS

    40 post-stroke subjects.

    INTERVENTIONS

    Participants were divided into two groups: one received robotic exoskeletal hand therapy combined with mirror therapy (RMT+MT), and the other received conventional mirror therapy (MT). The intervention lasted for 6 weeks.

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

    Hand motor function abilities were assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremities (FMA-UE) - Hand Motor Domain, and finger dexterity was evaluated with the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT).

    RESULTS

    The RMT group showed significant improvement in hand motor function, with a median FMA-UE-Hand Motor Domain score increasing from 6 to 14 (p = 0.000). Finger dexterity also improved significantly in the RMT group (p = 0.000). The conventional MT group demonstrated significant improvements in both the FMA-UE-Hand Motor Domain (p = 0.001) and NHPT (p = 0.000). However, the RMT group achieved greater improvements, with significant differences between the two groups in both FMA-UE-Hand Motor Domain (p = 0.038) and NHPT (p = 0.026) scores.

    CONCLUSION

    RMT is significantly more effective in restoring hand motor skills and improving finger dexterity in post-stroke rehabilitation patients compared to conventional MT.
    Source: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation

    Sunday, June 30, 2024

    The Effects of mirror therapy in postural and kinesthetic rehabilitation on stance phase of gait in subacute stroke

     Good luck trying to find out how to do mirror therapy for this, your therapists will need to have you explain this exactly.

    Sunday, June 2, 2024

    A Framework to Design Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy (VRMT) for Motor Rehabilitation in Post- Stroke Survivors: Dosage, Motivation, Task Difficulty, Feedback and Mechanism

    We haven't even gotten protocols on basic mirror therapy done in the past 12 years, why are we working on something new? Who approved this abomination?

     A Framework to Design Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy (VRMT) for Motor Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Survivors: Dosage, Motivation, Task Difficulty, Feedback and Mechanism


    Bethany Strong
    Department of Psychology
    University of South Wales
    Pontypridd, Wales
    bethany.strong@southwales.ac.uk
     
    Ali Roula
    Faculty of Computing, Engineering and
    Science, University of South Wales
    Pontypridd, Wales
    ali.roula@southwales.ac.uk
     
    Biao Zeng
    Department of Psychology
    University of South Wales
    Pontypridd, Wales
    biao.zeng@southwales.ac.uk
     
    Liucheng Guo
    Capital University of Physical Education
    and Sports
    Beijing, China
    guoliucheng@cupes.edu.cn
     
    Peter McCarthy
    Faculty of Life Science and Education
    University of South Wales
    Pontypridd, Wales
    peter.mccarthy@southwales.ac.uk

    Abstract

    The primary goal of mirror therapy is to alleviate symptoms and improve motor function and perception. It involves using a mirror to create a visual illusion that the affected limb is moving regularly and painlessly. Mirror therapy is often used in conjunction with traditional physical and occupational therapy methods and has been studied for post-stroke rehabilitation. However, mirror therapy effectiveness can vary among individuals(It shouldn't if you had EXACT STROKE PROTOCOLS based upon the EXACT DAMAGE DIAGNOSIS!). Virtual reality mirror therapy (VRMT) is an advanced application of mirror therapy that utilises virtual reality technology to enhance rehabilitation. While traditional mirror therapy uses a physical mirror to create the illusion of movement in the affected limb, VR mirror therapy takes advantage of immersive digital environments to provide a more engaging and customizable experience. This approach is particularly beneficial for stroke rehabilitation. The paper summarises four key design factors: e dosage, motivation, task difficulty and sensory feedback. In addition, it indicates the potential role of mirror neurons in both mirror therapy and VRMT and highlights three areas for future VRMT studies

    Friday, May 17, 2024

    Use of Robotic Assisted Mirror Therapy for Hand Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Patients: A Narrative Review of Literature

     With no picture of the soft robotic glove it is impossible to tell if spastic hands/fingers could ever get the glove on.

    Use of Robotic Assisted Mirror Therapy for Hand Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Patients: A Narrative Review of Literature

    Hemanshi N. Vekariya1, Vivek H. Ramanandi2, Rumana Khatun A. Pathan 3,
    Roshni G. Kachhadiya 4
    1,3,4Post graduate Student, SPB Physiotherapy College, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, India.
    2Associate Professor, SPB Physiotherapy College, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, India.
    Corresponding Author: Dr. Vivek H. Ramanandi
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20240523

    ABSTRACT

    Background: 
     
    Recovery of hand function is very important for the independence of patients
    with stroke. Standard mirror therapy is a well-established therapy regime for severe arm
    paresis after acquired brain injury. Soft robotic glove along with mirror therapy (i.e., robotic
    assisted mirror therapy) have been employed recently to assist the recovery of hand function
    during activities of daily living (ADLs) in stroke patients. This study aims to review available
    literature related to use of robotic assisted mirror therapy for hand rehabilitation in post stroke
    patients.
     
    Methodology: 
     
    Full texts of scientific literature published in English language between 2011
    to 2022 were searched on various online databases. Total 3 publications related to use of
    robotic assisted mirror therapy for hand rehabilitation were found. Based upon the selection
    criteria, 2 full texts were included for review. Randomized control trials (RCTs), pre-
    test/post-test, pilot & non-RCTs were included.
     
    Result: 
     
    Both articles reported that combining effect of mirror therapy with robotic glove
    therapy was more beneficial when compared to the conventional mirror therapy alone to
    improve glove functions.
     
    Conclusion: 
     
    It can be concluded that clinically combination of mirror therapy with robotic
    glove will be promoted for better outcomes related to hand rehabilitation in post-stroke
    patients.

    Wednesday, March 6, 2024

    Efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program Using Mirror Therapy and Cognitive Therapeutic Exercise on Upper Limb Functionality in Patients with Acute Stroke

    Here is CTE; 

    The effects of cognitive exercise therapy on chronic stroke patients’ upper limb functions, activities of daily living and quality of life

    Mirror therapy has been out there a long time. Hasn't your competent? doctor been using mirror therapy for years already? NO? So you don't have a competent doctor? Why are you seeing them and why haven't they been fired?

    Efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program Using Mirror Therapy and Cognitive Therapeutic Exercise on Upper Limb Functionality in Patients with Acute Stroke

    1 and 1
    1
    Department of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain
    2
    Faculty of Health Science, University Isabel I, 09003 Burgos, Spain
    3
    BioVetMed & SportSci Research Group, Department of Physical activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, San Javier, 30720 Murcia, Spain
    *
    Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
    Healthcare 2024, 12(5), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12050569
    Submission received: 13 December 2023 / Revised: 26 January 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 29 February 2024

    Abstract

    Applying evidence-based therapies in stroke rehabilitation plays a crucial role in this process, as they are supported by studies and results that demonstrate their effectiveness in improving functionality, such as mirror therapy (MT), cognitive therapeutic exercise (CTE), and task-oriented training. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of MT and CTE combined with task-oriented training on the functionality, sensitivity, range, and pain of the affected upper limb in patients with acute stroke. A longitudinal multicenter study recruited a sample of 120 patients with acute stroke randomly and consecutively, meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into three groups: a control group only for task-oriented training (TOT) and two groups undergoing either MT or CTE, both combined with TOT. The overall functionality of the affected upper limb, specific functionality, sensitivity, range of motion, and pain were assessed using the Fugl–Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale validated for the Spanish population. An initial assessment was conducted before the intervention, a second assessment after completing the 20 sessions, and another three months later. ANCOVA analysis revealed statistically significant differences between the assessments and the experimental groups compared to the control group, indicating significant improvement in the overall functionality of the upper limb in these patients. However, no significant differences were observed between the two experimental groups. The conclusion drawn was that both therapeutic techniques are equally effective in treating functionality, sensitivity, range of motion, and pain in the upper limb following a stroke.

    1. Introduction

    Stroke, also known as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), is one of the most severe and common medical emergencies worldwide. It is of vascular origin, causing signs of neurologic deficit with rapid onset. These clinical signs can be focal or global, and if they last more than 24 h, without a clear cause that can cause death [1,2]. Since 1990, the incidence of strokes has increased by 70%, and deaths from strokes has increased by 43%, with a worrying rising trend in those under 70 years of age [3]. Today, this disease is the second leading cause of death worldwide and ranks third in terms of mortality and disability [2]. In 2019, there were 12.2 million strokes and 101 million prevalent strokes [4,5]. The vast majority of stroke cases occur due to potentially modifiable risk factors, which demonstrates the huge work that remains to be done to improve the prevention of this disease by reducing exposure to risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, tobacco use, sedentary lifestyle, and abdominal fat [5,6]. In Spain, stroke is considered the leading cause of disability in adulthood and the second cause of dementia, significantly reducing the quality of life of patients and therefore that of their close social circle, directly affecting the health system [2].
    One of the main sequelae resulting from a stroke is the loss of functionality, which can be significant, especially concerning the affected upper limbs. Following a stroke episode, it is common to experience a decline in function in the upper limbs, characterized by difficulties in performing activities of daily living (ADLs) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) [7,8]. This loss of function may be related to muscle weakness, lack of motor coordination, or an inability to control movements. Motor impairment in the upper extremities occurs in approximately 80% of survivors, with 50% reporting pain in the upper limb during the first 12 months after the episode [9,10,11].
    Furthermore, sensitivity in the affected limb can also be altered. Issues with tactile sensitivity may arise, such as decreased or loss of touch sensation, along with changes in temperature or pressure perception. These sensory changes can hinder precise movement execution or object recognition through the sense of touch. Similarly, the range of motion, i.e., the ability to move the joints of the upper limb, may also decrease after a stroke. This might manifest as restricted natural movements in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or fingers, further complicating the performance of everyday tasks [12,13].
    Pain affecting the upper limbs is another common outcome after a stroke. Pain can be neuropathic or related to posture, movement, and muscle stiffness. The presence of pain can negatively impact rehabilitation and the ability to perform exercises or therapies aimed at recovering limb functionality [12,14].
    All of these factors together can trigger hemiplegia or hemiparesis, common conditions after a stroke involving paralysis or muscle weakness on one side of the body, primarily affecting an upper and lower limb on the same side. This signifies a change in the ability to achieve a normal level of muscle strength, including sensory alteration, loss of motor control, and spasticity [15,16]. This condition can significantly impact a person’s functionality. Hemiplegia can range from mild weakness to complete paralysis on one side of the body, affecting the ability to move and perform daily tasks.
    Collectively, these effects can complicate daily life and the recovery process after a stroke. Rehabilitation in these cases usually aims to address these challenges, seeking to improve function, sensitivity, and range of motion and to manage pain to regain the maximum possible functionality of the affected upper limb. This post-stroke rehabilitation period should commence as early as possible, with function recovery predominantly occurring in the first few weeks [17], although there are studies indicating that patients go through a phase known as spontaneous recovery during the initial weeks [18].
    Before initiating rehabilitation, conducting a thorough assessment to determine the stroke’s aftermath is crucial. Understanding where to begin is vital for implementing quality rehabilitation. To achieve this, there are several instruments used to assess the functional state of stroke survivors. The Fugl–Meyer Assessment—Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale is currently the most widely used quantitative evaluation to measure functionality and motor recovery post-stroke [12,19,20].
    Regarding rehabilitation, therapies supported by scientific evidence play a crucial role in this process, as they are backed by studies and outcomes demonstrating their effectiveness in improving functionality and recovering lost skills. Some of these include mirror therapy (MT), cognitive therapeutic exercise (CTE), and task-oriented training.
    MT is a rehabilitation technique that utilizes visual illusion to enhance motor function in individuals who have experienced strokes, limb injuries, or lost functionality in a limb. This therapy involves using a mirror to create the illusion that the affected limb is functioning normally [21]. A mirror is positioned to reflect the unaffected limb, while the affected limb remains hidden behind it. Moving the unaffected limb creates a reflection in the mirror, simulating movement in the affected limb, tricking the brain into perceiving normal movement. This therapy focuses on repeating controlled and specific movements, which may promote neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to reorganize and adapt through experience and repetitive practice. It is believed that this therapy could help restore motor function, enhance coordination, and alleviate chronic pain associated with the affected limb [11,22,23].
    As for CTE, also known as the Perfetti method, is a neurorehabilitation approach offering personalized and specific treatment for each patient. Its goal is to recover lost or altered movement due to central nervous system damage. This method involves assigning the patient a specific problem-solving task that can be resolved through fragmented movement of body segments guided by the therapist. CTE aims to improve the specific motor deficit in the hemiplegic upper limb by addressing patterns such as abnormal reactions to stretching, abnormal irradiation, motor mobility of elementary schemes, and promoting efficient and high-quality motor recruitment. Essentially, it aims to reactivate and strengthen neural connections damaged by stroke [24,25].
    On the other hand, these patients can benefit from task-oriented training, which is an effective way to encourage and develop motor skills and brain plasticity through the repetition of specific and functional tasks. It relies on tailored and personalized activities that mimic daily actions. Therapists design specific training programs for each patient, considering their individual needs, motor deficiencies, and recovery goals. These programs focus on activities resembling the tasks the patient needs to perform in their daily life. The effectiveness of task-oriented training lies in its emphasis on functionality and practical application of motor skills in real-life situations. This approach aims not only to restore motor function but also to improve the patient’s independence in daily activities, which can have a significant impact on their quality of life [26].
    Recent studies have demonstrated that the combined use of these therapies activates central nervous system plasticity more effectively than when used individually, to improve motor function [27,28,29,30]. However, to date and to the authors’ knowledge, there is no article comparing if any of these combinations (MT or CTE combined with task-oriented training) are the most effective in improving upper limb function after a stroke.
    Therefore, the aim of the present study is to verify the effectiveness of combining these techniques on upper limb functionality after a stroke and to determine which of them yields better results.
     
    More at link.

    Wednesday, February 14, 2024

    Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders Part Two: Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

    Hopefully your doctor is well versed in everything here. Nothing here tells you the effectiveness of these treatments so I can only assume they barely work!  If they worked they would be shouting it from the rooftops!

    Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders Part Two: Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

    Disease/disorder

    See Cerebrovascular Disorders Part 1.

    Essentials of Assessment

    See Cerebrovascular Disorders Part 1.

    Cutting Edge/emerging and Unique Concepts and Practice

    Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT)1,2

    Traditional CIMT involves restraint of the unaffected limb for 90% of the waking hours for 14 days while intensively training the use of the affected arm during 4-6 hour sessions. A modified version exists (mCIMT) during which the unaffected arm is only restrained for 5-6 hours per day; it is less time consuming and a more appealing option for patients and therapy team members. A number of studies have shown that CIMT induces a use-dependent increase in cortical reorganization of the areas of the brain controlling the more affected limb.3,4 Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in motor and functional outcomes, although there have been mixed results. CIMT is shown to be effective in patients who have active wrist extension (at least 20 degrees), active finger extension (at least 10 degrees), good cognition, limited spasticity, and preserved balance. CIMT has shown effectiveness in improving motor function in both the acute and chronic phases of stroke recovery, but studies have been limited by small sample sizes.  High volume CIMT combined with electrical stimulation with task-specific training and strength training have been shown to be the most effective interventions in improving upper limb motor function in individuals with stroke. 5

    Bilateral upper extremity training

    This training is a stroke rehabilitation technique that has been applied to patients in both acute and chronic post-stroke phases. Investigators have recommended that patients in the chronic phase poststroke who retain at least a minimal degree of corticospinal integrity (as reflected by, e.g., active finger movements) should receive unilateral training, and those with little or no distal movement might benefit more from bilateral training. For those stroke patients without corticospinal tract integrity, targeting the contralesional hemisphere using bilateral training is expected to be more appropriate, although the functional gains are expected to be small.6

    Body-weight-supported (BWS) therapy7

    This modality allows stroke patients to safely participate in task-specific gait training. A harness provides support of body weight over a treadmill or other surface, while a therapist can observe and correct any unwanted gait pattern. BWS treadmill training can be done with or without visual feedback however no significant difference in functional improvements have been found with the presence or absence of visual biofeedback.8 BWS gait training has been shown to improve ambulation in hemiparetic stroke patients producing a more symmetric, efficient hemiparetic gait pattern. However, superiority of BWS therapy over conventional post-stroke gait training therapies has not been established.

    Robotics9

    Robotic devices are ideal for the repetitive exercises that are often used to facilitate motor relearning and strengthening after stroke. Used for both upper and lower limb rehabilitation, newer robotic software makes previously tedious and repetitive tasks more engaging by incorporating gaming and other challenges. Many newer robotic devices have the added benefit of being able to collect data for the rehabilitation team. Similar to most emerging therapies, there are barriers to use which include limited studies supporting benefit, high cost, and limited knowledge of using the technology.

    Brain-computer interface (BCI)10–12

    BCI’s have evolved from assistive technologies allowing those with severe motor impairments (e.g., locked-in syndrome, stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) avenues to control devices for mobility and communication to newer neurorehabilitation tools allowing patients with severe motor deficits to participate in the rehabilitation process. BCI involves developing neuroprosthetic devices and technologies to bypass damaged brain tissue via adaptive neuroplasticity of uninvolved distal brain areas. Parts of the nervous system not involved in specific tasks can be harnessed to reconstruct the neural substrate that interacts with a BCI-driven devices. A brain-machine interface uses brain signals to drive external devices without the use of peripheral physiologic activities. Barriers to use are high cost and unreliable technology.

    Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) – Transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation13-15

    This therapy involves applying mild magnetic or electric stimulation to the scalp. The benefit is thought to be achieved by neuromodulation of plasticity and cortical excitability. A growing number of studies support its therapeutic potential and safety in stroke rehabilitation and have shown to improve motor function, gait, language (aphasia) and cognitive (neglect) deficits, and mood. A meta-analysis reported that even though there are gait, balance, and lower limb function improvements across NIBS, the results vary based on the type of stimulation technique, the location of stimulated area, as well as the protocol used, warranting further in-depth research.15

    Mental Practice (MP)/Motor Imagery13

    This refers to mental rehearsal of a movement. Imaging studies have shown that this motor imagery stimulates overlapping cortical areas as the actual movements. Most studies have shown a positive effect on upper extremity function. A recent Cochrane Review found MP in combination with routine rehabilitation is more effective in restoring arm function compared to rehabilitation alone.17 A recent systematic review concluded that MP/MI used on its own is not effective, but it is shown to be effective in recovering upper limb motor movements, speed and coordination of such movements when used in conjunction with conventional and non-conventional therapies. There is still further research needed to establish assessment tools to analyze the efficacy of this therapy as well as to quantify the progress being made when used on its own.18

    Mirror Therapy13,19

    Initially applied to amputation patients, this therapy involves placing a mirror in the mid-sagittal plane, allowing the patient to visualize the reflection of the non-paretic limb as if it were the paretic limb. The underlying theory is that there is cortical activation of the injured region of the brain from the perception of movement via interhemispheric communication.  Though there are studies have showing gains in motor function, there is limited evidence in the stroke population prompting routine use.16

    Virtual reality (VR)20

    Virtual environments and objects provide the user with visual feedback and repetitive skills practice. The interface may be through a head-mounted device, projection systems, or involving sensations of hearing, touch, movement, balance, or smell. The user interacts with the environment by devices, such as a mouse or joystick, or more complex systems using cameras, sensors, or haptic feedback devices. A 2017 Cochrane review20 found evidence that VR and interactive video gaming may be beneficial in improving upper limb function and ADL function as an adjunctive therapy or when compared with the same amount of standard therapy. There was insufficient evidence to make conclusions about the effect on grip strength, gait speed or global motor function. A randomized control trial observed a significant improvement in cognitive flexibility and shifting skills, selective attention/visual research, and quality of life with regard to perception of mental and physical state in stroke patients when VR and robotic exoskeleton were used in combination.21

    Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

    Current treatment guidelines(Survivors don't want useless guidelines! They want EXACT PROTOCOLS THAT DELIVER 100% RECOVERY! GET THERE!)

    The American Heart Association (AHA) & American Stroke Association have published guidelines for the management and rehabilitation of stroke.22–25

    Acute stroke management

    • Emergency noncontrast computerized tomography (CT) scan of the head is performed to differentiate between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
    • Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) is indicated for adults with diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the absence of contraindications, provided it can be administered within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.23,26
    • Endovascular techniques (e.g., thrombectomy or intra-arterial fibrinolysis) are recommended for selected patients within 16-24 hours for those with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation > 6 hours.13,23,26 rTPA should still be administered in eligible patients.1,7 Intracranial vascular imaging (CT angiogram or MR angiogram) is recommended if endovascular therapy is contemplated.27
    • Initiation of aspirin within 24-48 hours is indicated for ischemic strokes.23 Patients with acute ischemic stroke who are allergic to or intolerant of aspirin should be given an alternative antiplatelet agent (e.g. clopidogrel).
    • Initial management of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) includes reversal of any identified coagulopathy and monitoring/lowering of intracranial pressure, if increased. Surgical evacuation is generally not indicated for supratentorial hemorrhage but is recommended for cerebellar ICH with brainstem compression or hydrocephalus.26
    • Comprehensive stroke centers and stroke systems of care(NOT RESULTS OR RECOVERY! So useless!) improve(NOT GOOD ENOUGH!) outcomes through prevention and treatment of stroke, as well as post-stroke rehabilitation.23,24,26

    Acute and post-acute stroke management and rehabilitation16,24

    Early initiation of rehabilitation after acute stroke is associated with shorter rehabilitation length of stays and improved functional outcomes.24

    The goals of rehabilitation include prevention of complications, minimizing functional impairments, and maximizing function recovery. Initial rehabilitation efforts should start as soon as possible in the acute care setting then transition to the inpatient rehabilitation setting. Other levels of post-acute care include sub-acute inpatient rehabilitation, day rehabilitation programs, outpatient programs, and home therapy programs.

    Rehabilitation involves a multidisciplinary team that is often led by a rehabilitation physician. Depending on functional impairments and patient needs, the team often includes:

    • Physical therapy: evaluation and rehabilitation of mobility including stretching, range of motion, strengthening, balance, endurance, transfers, standing, and ambulation
    • Occupational therapy: evaluation and rehabilitation of self-care skills including treatment of impairments related to activities of daily living and upper extremity impairments
    • Speech and language pathology: evaluation and rehabilitation of cognitive, language, and swallowing impairments
    • Neuropsychology: Psychological support and cognitive assessment and interventions
    • Nursing: Assistance with bed mobility and positioning, bowel and bladder management, skin care, education
    • Recreational therapy: community integration, functional cognitive tasks (games, music, social interaction, etc.)
    • Social work/Case management: Discharge planning, resource and benefits counseling, and guidance/education
    • Other disciplines: vocational rehabilitation specialist, dietician, pharmacist

    The rehabilitation physician and team play a significant role in minimizing complications

    • Early mobilization: Minimizing deconditioning and its associated effects on fatigue, orthostatic hypotension, and endurance.
    • Evaluation and treatment of dysphagia: Dysphagia is common and increases risk of pneumonia. A formal swallowing assessment is standard of care for determination of the safest diet consistency/texture to minimize risk of aspiration; aspiration is missed on bedside swallow study in 40-60% of patients. Screening should be performed before any oral intake. Dynamic instrumental assessment with a videofluoroscopy swallowing study (VFSS) or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) can help guide rehabilitative techniques.
    • Nutrition status: Adequate nutritional status, including adequate hydration, should be ensured by monitoring intake (consider formal calorie counts), body weight, and laboratory tests (e.g., albumin or prealbumin).
    • Blood glucose levels: Monitor for at least 72 hours post-stroke. Hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia should be treated adequately. Blood glucose should be maintained between 140-180 mg/dl.
    • Blood pressure management:25,26,29–31 There is controversy about optimal blood pressure levels in the acute stage and concern about adverse effect on collateral circulation in the brain with rapid lowering of blood pressure. It is reasonable to restart or initiate antihypertensives during acute hospitalization with pressures greater than 140/90mmg HG once neurologically stable and it is suggested that lowering blood pressure no more than 15% during the first 24 hours is reasonable when values are significantly elevated (greater than or equal to 220/120mmHG).
    • Spasticity: Prevention and early detection are important. Prevention measures include early mobilization, range of motion, proper positioning, and use of braces, if needed. Medications include tizanidine, dantrolene, and baclofen.  Botulinum toxin or intrathecal baclofen should be considered for selected patients. Contractures can be treated using splinting, serial casting, or surgical correction. Diazepam and other benzodiazepines should be avoided during the stroke recovery period because they may delay recovery. Those who have spasticity in their upper or lower limbs after stroke should not be treated with electrical stimulation to reduce spasticity unless after botulinum toxin injection to wrist or fingers as an adjunct to splinting.32
    • Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis: Preventative measures include early mobilization, pharmacological prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin or low molecular weight heparin (unless contraindicated), and pneumatic compression devices or graduated compression stockings. An inferior vena cava filter may be considered in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism if anticoagulation is contraindicated.
    • Shoulder pain: Prevention of post-stroke shoulder pain and subluxation is done through careful monitoring, proper positioning, hemiplegic limb support including use of wheelchair arm trough, shoulder harness/sling or taping, trauma prevention, avoidance of uncontrolled abduction and overhead pulley use, and precautions during transfers. Shoulder subluxation and pain may be treated with oral medications, intra-articular steroid injections, shoulder support, arm trough or lap tray, stretching, thermal modalities, functional electrical stimulus, spasticity management, or referral for suprascapular nerve block.33
    • Bladder management: Urinary incontinence is a common post-stroke complication but often resolves over time. Urinary retention can be assessed with use of a bladder scanner or an in-and-out catheterization. Timed voids and temporary use of external or intermittent catheterization may be helpful. Indwelling catheters increase risk of urinary infection and prolonged use should be avoided whenever feasible.
    • Bowel management: Incontinence is less common than constipation or fecal impaction. Discussion regarding improved diet, fluid intake and exercise as well as medication review for constipating medications is encouraged. A bowel regimen involving the use of laxatives, stool softeners, and bowel training should be initiated.
    • Skin: Skin integrity should be assessed on admission and monitored daily. Skin breakdown risk may be assessed with standardized tools, such as the Braden Scale. Preventative interventions include special mattresses, frequent turning, proper positioning, transfers, lubricants, barrier sprays and ointments, spasticity management when appropriate and protective dressings.
    • Medication considerations: Central nervous system (CNS) depressants, such as neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates, may be associated with poorer outcomes and should be avoided whenever feasible.
    • Post-stroke depression: Up to 1/3rd of all stroke patients will experience depression during their recovery process. Early diagnosis and treatment is recommended as stroke outcomes have been shown to be negatively affected and may even increase risk of recurrent stroke.31 Depression may be related to neurotransmitter depletion from stroke lesions and/or psychological response to physical/personal losses associated with stroke. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the preferred medication when appropriate and should not be given routinely for prevention of depression without evidence of increased risk due to increased potential of adverse effects.34 Several studies suggest neural mechanisms of recovery may be facilitated by certain antidepressants.28 Other emerging treatment approaches include electroconvulsive therapy, acupuncture, music therapy, and nutraceuticals.29 Further studies are needed in these emerging areas.
    • Fall risk: Fall risk should be assessed using established tools and prevention strategies utilized. Strategies include low beds, bed alarms, wheelchair belts, and patient/caregiver education.
    • Infection: Fever should be reduced promptly. Pneumonia and urinary tract infections should be prevented and promptly identified and treated if they occur.
    • Specific rehabilitation interventions: Rehabilitation interventions are based on comprehensive, standardized assessments for impairments (motor, sensory, cognitive, communication, swallowing, psychological, and safety awareness) and prior/current functional status.
      • Motor assessment should be at both the impairment and functional level. Components should include strength, active and passive range of motion, tone, gross and fine motor coordination, balance, apraxia, and mobility. Motor function is addressed with strengthening, balance and gait training, orthoses, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), robot-assisted movement therapy, constraint-induced movement therapy, and body-weight-supported treadmill training, and upper extremity interventions in order to improve activities of daily living.6 Functional electrical stimulation may help facilitate movement or compensate for lack of voluntary movement.
      • Sensory assessment should include an evaluation of different sensations (sharp/dull, temperature, light touch, vibratory and position), a vision exam, and a hearing exam if hearing impairment is suspected. Compensatory techniques for sensory impairments should be included in the stroke patient’s individualized rehabilitation program.
      • Cognitive assessment should address arousal, attention, visual neglect, learning, memory, executive function, and problem solving.
      • Psychosocial assessments should be made of psychological factors (e.g., pre-morbid personality, level of insight, loss of identity concerns, sexuality), psychiatric illnesses, available resources, social support, patient goals, life situation, and social roles. A home assessment may be needed.
      • Management of dysphagia includes postural changes, increased sensory input, modified swallowing maneuvers, active exercise programs, and diet modifications. Non-oral feeding may be required in some instances, including consideration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding.
      • Aphasia management includes early recognition and development of a multidisciplinary focused treatment plan to increase gains during spontaneous recovery and use of compensatory techniques for persistent communication problems. Dysarthria treatments include interventions to improve articulation, fluency, resonance, and phonation, compensatory techniques, and use of alternate/augmentative communication (AAC) devices. Personalized, telerehabilitation programs as supplementation to in person rehabilitation as shown to be beneficial for those limited by insurance, transportation or limited providers.35
      • Cognitive deficits are common and can include impaired memory, concentration and executive function. Deficits can be managed through patient, family, and staff education of deficits, teaching compensatory strategies and structured feedback.
      • Measures to address visual and spatial neglect should be integrated with other therapies, and may include prism glasses, increased awareness of deficits, and compensatory techniques.
      • Neuropsychiatric sequalae should be identified and treated. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or the NMDA receptor inhibitor, Memantine, can be considered for patients with vascular dementia or vascular cognitive impairment.27 Amphetamines are not recommended to enhance motor recovery.27
      • Patient, family, and caregiver education is an integral part of rehabilitation, as are appropriate advocacy and identification and help with securing of available support and resources. Assessment findings and expected outcomes should be discussed with the patient and family/caregivers.

    Chronic stroke management

    • Rehabilitation team members should provide adequate support as the patient transitions from inpatient rehabilitation to home. Team can provide assistance with ordering appropriate durable medical equipment (DME), instructions for home rehabilitation programs, arranging for home health or outpatient therapy services, scheduling follow up medical appointments, and providing information on local stroke support groups.
    • Ongoing management may include a regular exercise program, walking aids and/or wheelchair, adaptive devices for activities of daily living, home modifications, addressing return to work, driving, management of sexual dysfunction, and ongoing evaluation and management of stroke risk factors and comorbid conditions. Appropriate safety measures (e.g., fall prevention) should be instituted.4
    • Secondary prevention of stroke:30 Appropriate treatment of hypertension, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation thrombo-embolic prophylaxis, use of antiplatelet therapy in cerebral ischemia, prevention of coronary heart disease, lipid lowering therapy, exercise, and smoking cessation are all important. Blood sugar maintenance of near-normoglycemic levels (80-140 mg/dl) is recommended for long-term prevention of microvascular and macrovascular complications.

    Coordination of care

    Coordination of treatment care plans should include all involved medical specialists-including the primary care physician, home care services, outpatient therapists, and the patient and their care givers. A multidisciplinary team is essential for success.

    Patient & family education

    Education must focus on management of risk factors, maintenance of rehabilitation gains, preventing complications, community support and resources, home modifications, and community reintegration.

    Key topics for stroke prevention education (also see “Secondary prevention of stroke” section above):

    • Modifiable risk factors include hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, obesity or being overweight.
    • Recommend: smoking cessation, avoiding excess alcohol consumption, having a balanced diet, and exercise participation.

    Key topics for post stroke complication education and prevention

    • Maintain regular follow up with a primary care physician to prevent and monitor for complications.
    • Monitor for signs and symptoms of post stroke complications: depression, spasticity or contractures, shoulder pain/subluxation, DVTs, pressure ulcers, pneumonias, seizures, osteoporosis, UTIs and/or bladder control.
    • The following treatment or preventative techniques may be employed:
      • Counseling, psychotherapy, local stroke support groups, and antidepressant medications may be utilized for depression.
      • Range of motion exercises and physical therapies can help prevent limb contractures and shoulder pain.
      • Good nutrition and frequent pressure relief, including turning while in bed, will help prevent pressure ulcers.
      • Swallowing exercises and precautions, deep breathing exercises, and respiratory therapy can minimize risk of pneumonia.
      • Bladder training programs may be helpful for poor bladder function control.

    Outcome measures

    Functional status, discharge disposition (i.e., home versus facility), hospital readmissions, and mortality are important indicators to measure in the post-discharge period.

    Common scales

    • Functional Independence Measure Scale (FIM): Assesses physical and cognitive function focusing on burden of care. There are a total of 13 motor items and 5 social-cognitive items. Each item is scored from 1-7, with 7 indicating complete independence.
    • Modified Rankin Scale: A global outcome scale that runs from 0-6, with 0 being perfect health without symptoms, and 6 being death. It is commonly used for measuring the degree of disability, or dependence, and has become a widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials.

    Gaps in the Evidence-Based Knowledge

    • Although several different forms of rehabilitation techniques have been proven effective, these studies often involve small and highly selective populations and are not generalizable to the stroke population.
    • Further studies are needed to develop optimal treatment protocols evaluating for ideal patient population(No survivor should be left behind, they all want 100% recovery! Why the hell isn't that your goal?), ease of treatment program, and combined modalities for many of the therapies, including constraint-induced movement therapy, indirect brain stimulation, and mirror therapy.
    • Blood pressure management during early stroke management continues to be an area of conflict. Larger trials with well-defined criteria are needed and appear to be forthcoming. Current guidelines should be followed until such time.25
    • The most recent AHA guidelines suggest further study is needed in specific areas of early acute ischemic stroke management, including in intravenous fibrinolysis, endovascular interventions, anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and induced hypertension.26
    • The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cardiovascular disease and stroke patients has gained in popularity over recent years and appears common. These include biological therapies such as dietary supplements, herbal medicine, and aromatherapy; mind-body therapies such as deep breathing, meditation, yoga, tai chi, and praying; manipulative and body-based therapies such acupressure, chiropractic manipulation, massage, osteopathic manipulation, and reflexology; whole medical systems which include acupuncture, Ayurveda, homeopathy, and naturopathy; and finally energy medicine which includes healing touch, light therapy, magnetic therapy, Reiki, and sound energy therapy. Biologic, mind-body therapies, and acupuncture (especially among stroke patients) are the most commonly used. Potential interactions and adverse effects may exist for biological CAM therapies. Further studies are needed, especially in regard to effects of CAM therapies on clinical outcomes and safety, particularly in stroke patients.31,36
    References at link.

    Thursday, January 11, 2024

    Effect of mobile application types on stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

     Since your doctors have known forever that stroke survivors aren't getting the required number of hours of therapy. They should have competently  created action observation videos and mirror therapy protocols in the last decade. That is assuming they were competent at all.

    Effect of mobile application types on stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

    Abstract

    Background

    Stroke is a significant contributor of worldwide disability and morbidity with substantial economic consequences. Rehabilitation is a vital component of stroke recovery, but inpatient stroke rehabilitation programs can struggle to meet the recommended hours of therapy per day outlined by the Canadian Stroke Best Practices and American Heart Association. Mobile applications (apps) are an emerging technology which may help bridge this deficit, however this area is understudied. The purpose of this study is to review the effect of mobile apps for stroke rehabilitation on stroke impairments and functional outcomes. Specifically, this paper will delve into the impact of varying mobile app types on stroke rehabilitation.

    Methods

    This systematic review included 29 studies: 11 randomized control trials and 18 quasi-experimental studies. Data extrapolation mapped 5 mobile app types (therapy apps, education apps, rehab videos, reminders, and a combination of rehab videos with reminders) to stroke deficits (motor paresis, aphasia, neglect), adherence to exercise, activities of daily living (ADLs), quality of life, secondary stroke prevention, and depression and anxiety.

    Results

    There were multiple studies supporting the use of therapy apps for motor paresis or aphasia, rehab videos for exercise adherence, and reminders for exercise adherence. For permutations involving other app types with stroke deficits or functional outcomes (adherence to exercise, ADLs, quality of life, secondary stroke prevention, depression and anxiety), the results were either non-significant or limited by a paucity of studies.

    Conclusion

    Mobile apps demonstrate potential to assist with stroke recovery and augment face to face rehabilitation, however, development of a mobile app should be carefully planned when targeting specific stroke deficits or functional outcomes. This study found that mobile app types which mimicked principles of effective face-to-face therapy (massed practice, task-specific practice, goal-oriented practice, multisensory stimulation, rhythmic cueing, feedback, social interaction, and constraint-induced therapy) and education (interactivity, feedback, repetition, practice exercises, social learning) had the greatest benefits.

    Protocol registration PROPSERO (ID CRD42021186534). Registered 21 February 2021

    Background

    Stroke continues to be a leading cause of worldwide disability and morbidity amongst all cardiovascular diseases [1]. From 1990 to 2019, strokes had a global rise in prevalence reaching 101 million people and causing a loss of 143 million disability-adjusted life years [1] at a cost of billions of dollars per year to North American economies [2, 3]. Stroke rehabilitation includes an organized interdisciplinary team approach to stroke specific therapy, and is a critical component of recovery and successful re-integration into society [4]. Compared with other acute stroke interventions, stroke rehabilitation has been found to be as effective or superior to thrombolysis or aspirin [5, 6]. On a per dollar value, the clinical benefits of stroke rehabilitation have been shown to outweigh its costs significantly [7].

    Current Canadian Stroke Best Practices and American Heart Association guidelines state that inpatient stroke rehabilitation should provide task-specific therapy (defined as physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech and language therapy), for at least 3 h per day of 5 days per week [8, 9]. Evidence supports that more therapy results in improved outcomes [10]. Unfortunately, many institutions struggle to provide this rehabilitation intensity. A 2018 Canadian study found inpatients in a stroke rehabilitation participated in 8.5 h per week of therapy, much below the guideline recommendations of 15 h per week [11]. Outside of therapy, stroke rehabilitation inpatients spend most of their days sedentary [11,12,13]. There are numerous barriers for meeting current stroke rehabilitation guidelines, including insufficient staff, timing mismatch with other patient activities such as investigations for stroke work-up (CTs, echocardiograms, Holter monitors), and a rise in the number of patients requiring stroke rehabilitation [14, 15].

    Mobile applications (apps) for stroke rehabilitation have become an emerging area of interest because of their mobility, multi-functional capabilities such as reminders and videos, and their ability to give patients autonomy over therapy [16,17,18]. A 2018 systematic review defined several mobile apps for stroke rehabilitation with the potential to be clinically effective [19]. For example, there are mobile apps designed as games to improve finger dexterity, programs to increase exercise adherence, home exercise programs for upper limb rehabilitation, and mirror therapy for facial paresis [16,17,18, 20]. Mobile apps can target different aspects of stroke rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to review the effect of mobile apps for stroke rehabilitation on stroke-related impairments and functional outcomes. Specifically, this paper will delve into the effect of varying mobile app types on stroke rehabilitation outcomes.

     

    More at link.