Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label cognitive benefits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cognitive benefits. Show all posts

Saturday, January 20, 2024

Third COSMOS study links daily multivitamin supplementation to cognitive benefits

 Does your competent? doctor follow research? Will this be prescribed in your hospital in the next week? NO? Then you don't have a functioning stroke doctor or hospital!

Third COSMOS study links daily multivitamin supplementation to cognitive benefits

Key takeaways:

  • The findings are consistent with those from two previous substudies.
  • Daily supplementation could be a “safe and accessible” approach to support cognitive function, an expert said.
Perspective from Megan Hilbert, MS, RDN

Daily multivitamin supplementation was linked to benefits in both memory and cognition, according to a study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

“Preserving memory and cognition is a major priority for most older adults,” Chirag M. Vyas, MBBS, MPH, an instructor in clinical investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital, told Healio. “This study found that multivitamin supplements show promise as a safe and accessible approach to supporting cognitive function in aging.”

 
Daily supplementation could be a “safe and accessible” approach to support cognitive function, an expert said. Image Source: Adobe Stock

According to Vyas, the findings are consistent with those previously reported in two separately conducted substudies of the Cocoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS), which examined the effects of multivitamin supplementation on cognition through telephone- and web-based assessments.

In the latest study, the researchers evaluated a COSMOS subcohort of 573 participants aged 60 years and older — known as COSMOS-Clinic — who conducted in-person cognitive assessments at baseline and at 2 years.

Vyas and colleagues also conducted a meta-analysis that included more than 5,000 nonoverlapping participants across the three substudies “to evaluate the strength of evidence.”

Among COSMOS-Clinic participants, multivitamin supplementation had “modest” beneficial effects on global cognition scores over 2 years, with a mean difference (MD) in standard deviation units (SU) of 0.06 (95% CI, –0.003 to 0.13) compared with placebo. However, they found “a significantly more favorable change” in episodic memory scores (MD = 0.12 SU [95% CI, 0.002-0.23]).

These benefits were not seen in executive function and attention, they said.

Meanwhile, the meta-analysis confirmed clear benefits of multivitamin supplementation on global cognition scores (MD = 0.07 SU; 95% CI, 0.03-0.11) and episodic memory scores (MD = 0.06 SU; 95% CI, 0.03-0.1).

The researchers explained that there is “biological plausibility” behind the findings: “combinations of vitamins and minerals interact with multiple biological pathways that support cognitive health, and nutritional and micronutrient deficiencies in older adults may elevate risk of cognitive decline,” they said.

Vyas and colleagues explained that the study had its limitations. For example, the cohort had “relatively low racial and ethnic diversity,” limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, whether the benefits derived from the multivitamin supplements used in COSMOS — Centrum Silver — can be seen in other supplements is unknown.

Vyas concluded that further research is warranted to determine who would benefit the most from multivitamins, and to identify “the specific micronutrients contributing the most to the observed benefits and to explore the underlying mechanisms.”

References:

Friday, July 7, 2023

An umbrella review of randomized control trials on the effects of physical exercise on cognition

Did hell just freeze over? Physical activity doesn't provide cognitive benefits?  But you can dispute it for stroke survivors because this was in healthy subjects. Ask your doctor if that is correct?

An umbrella review of randomized control trials on the effects of physical exercise on cognition

Abstract

Extensive research links regular physical exercise to an overall enhancement of cognitive function across the lifespan. Here we assess the causal evidence supporting this relationship in the healthy population, using an umbrella review of meta-analyses limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Despite most of the 24 reviewed meta-analyses reporting a positive overall effect, our assessment reveals evidence of low statistical power in the primary RCTs, selective inclusion of studies, publication bias and large variation in combinations of pre-processing and analytic decisions. In addition, our meta-analysis of all the primary RCTs included in the revised meta-analyses shows small exercise-related benefits (d = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.28) that became substantially smaller after accounting for key moderators (that is, active control and baseline differences; d = 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.20), and negligible after correcting for publication bias (d = 0.05, 95% confidence interval −0.09 to 0.14). These findings suggest caution in claims and recommendations linking regular physical exercise to cognitive benefits in the healthy human population until more reliable causal evidence accumulates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

Study shows no significant cognitive benefit of adhering to Mediterranean diets regardless of calorie intake

Since the Mediterranean Diet has zero specificity this research is not repeatable and thus no conclusions can be drawn.

So you've proven this earlier research wrong?

Modified Mediterranean ketogenic diet may improve brain health April 2023 

Mediterranean and MIND diets reduced signs of Alzheimer’s in brain tissue, study finds March 2023

 

Study shows no significant cognitive benefit of adhering to Mediterranean diets regardless of calorie intake

In a recent study published in Preventive Medicine Reports Journal, researchers performed a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to investigate whether adhering to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) with or without limiting calorie intake could improve cognition.

Study: Effect of Mediterranean diet and Mediterranean diet plus calorie restriction on cognition, lifestyle, and cardiometabolic health: A randomized clinical trial. Image Credit: ElenaEryomenko/Shutterstock.comStudy: Effect of Mediterranean diet and Mediterranean diet plus calorie restriction on cognition, lifestyle, and cardiometabolic health: A randomized clinical trial. Image Credit: ElenaEryomenko/Shutterstock.com

Background

Obesity, lifestyle choices including diet and exercise, and cardiometabolic comorbidities elevate the risk of cognitive decline. To date, there are no efficient pharmaceutical therapeutics available to prevent, retard, or manage cognitive deficits.

However, studies have shown that MedDiet and weight loss benefit cognition, and combining the two may enhance cognitive function. However, RCTs have shown inconsistent results, with either a favorable or negligible impact of nutrition on cognition, warranting further research.

About the study

In the present three-arm RCT, researchers evaluated the potential cognitive benefit of adhering to MedDiet with or without limiting calorie intake.

The Building Research in Diet and Cognition study was conducted between January 2017 and October 2020, involving 185 residents of Chicago, aged 55 to 85 years, largely female sex (86.0%), with obesity. The participants were randomly allocated to the MedDiet with calorie limitation (n=72, 25.0% kcal restriction for 5.0 to 7.0% loss of weight) intervention group, MedDiet alone group (n=72), or control group (n=36).

The period of the dietary interventions was eight months, including 26 sessions for the intervention groups and 25 sessions for the control group, and follow-up assessments were performed over 14.0 months.

The primary study outcome was a change in the cognitive assessment scores for attention, information, and processing (AIP); learning, memory, and recognition (LMR); and executive function (EF).

Secondary study outcomes were changes in body weight, cardiometabolic biomarkers, and lifestyle. The team estimated habitual dietary consumption using the Harvard food frequency questionnaires (HFFQS), and physical activity was estimated using a triaxial accelerometer worn on the non-dominant wrist for ≥4.0 days and ≥10.0 hours daily.

To assess cardiometabolic risk, blood pressure, serological levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs), insulin, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and glucose levels were measured in blood samples provided by the patients.

Individuals were recruited via presentations in senior facilities and advertisements in local neighborhoods, and they underwent telephonic and physical screening before enrollment.

Individuals with body mass index (BMI) ranging from 30.0 to 50.0 kg/m2, Mediterranean diet adherence screener score ≤6.0, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores ≥19.0, and those who could speak in English were included in the analysis.

The team excluded individuals who could not exercise according to the EASY physical activity screener, serological HbA1c values >9.0 at screening, and significant comorbidities such as autoimmune disorders or severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and hepatic diseases.

In addition, individuals using warfarin, suffering from severe psychiatric conditions, individuals with a history of bariatric surgery, individuals concurrently involved in formal bodyweight reduction programs, and those who participated in cognition-associated research activities in the previous 12.0 months were excluded from the analysis. The MedDiet-adhering individuals received one oz of almonds and three tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil daily.

The theories of social determination and social cognition were used to guide adherence to the study interventions. In addition, participants underwent hands-on (meal preparation) and didactic dietary training. All individuals were advised to attain moderate-vigorous physical activity levels at 150.0 minutes weekly. The control group participants received general health newsletters weekly.

Results

The dietary interventions did not significantly impact the LMR, EF, AIP, or MoCA scores. The mean increase in scores for adherence to the MedDiet plus calorie limitation and MedDiet alone interventions were 6.30 points and 4.80 points, respectively, in relation to the control group (+0.60 points).

The mean reductions in weight among individuals in the MedDiet plus calorie limitation group, the MedDiet alone group, and the control group were 4.60 kg, 2.60 kg, and 0.60 kg, respectively.

The dietary interventions showed no significant influence on the physical exercise and cardiometabolic biomarker levels, although lower fasting insulin levels and lower body weight values were observed in the MedDiet plus calorie limitation group participants compared to the other groups.

Particularly, a significant decrease in visceral adiposity was observed; however, the percentage of total body fat did not differ significantly among the groups post-intervention. Both intervention group participants had similar attendance for group sessions, and 67.0% of the study participants were hypertensive.

Conclusions

The study findings showed that MedDiet adherence with or without calorie limitation had no significant influence on cognition. However, the MedDiet interventions significantly reduced central obesity and body weight and improved dietary quality.

The cognitive benefit of adherence to MedDiet with or without limiting calorie intake could be associated with preventing or retarding pathological cognitive aging instead of maintaining normal cognitive aging.

Alternatively, the strength of the effect could have been lowered due to the use of different cognitive assessment scores instead of one composite score. Moreover, the limited sample size and short duration of interventions could have lowered the impact of the dietary interventions.

Further research must be conducted using objective dietary evaluations, larger sample sizes, and longer intervention durations for accounting for the alteration in the nutritional intake of processed food items in MedDiet.

Journal reference:
Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Written by

Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Dr. based clinical-radiological diagnosis and management of oral lesions and conditions and associated maxillofacial disorders.

Wednesday, April 12, 2023

Cognition Boosted by Thinking Positively About Aging

 How positive can you be when your doctor knows nothing and does nothing to get you 100% recovered?  I'm positive I'm going to live to 100 which means I'll be disabled half my life.

Part of my Hunter S. Thompson journey;
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”

Therapy gets in the way of living, so I stopped attempting it until somebody comes up with EXACT protocols. I can't waste my time on guidelines.

 I'm not afraid of dying. I'm afraid I haven't been alive enough. It should be written on every school room blackboard: Life is a playground — or nothing.
— "Mr. Nobody," 2009

"Your body is not a temple: It's an amusement park. Enjoy the ride." Anthony Bourdain

Oops, I'm not playing by the polite rules of Dale Carnegie;  'How to Win Friends and Influence People'. 

Telling supposedly smart stroke medical persons they know nothing about stroke is a no-no even if it is true. 

Politeness will never solve anything in stroke. Yes, I'm a bomb thrower and proud of it. Someday a stroke 'leader' will try to ream me out for making them look bad by being truthful, I look forward to that day. 

 The latest here:

Cognition Boosted by Thinking Positively About Aging

Adults with mild cognitive impairment more likely to recover if they held positive age beliefs

A photo of a senior couple looking at a photo album in their living room.

Older adults with mild cognitive impairment were more likely to regain normal cognition if they held positive beliefs about aging, a cohort study showed.

Across 1,716 participants with mild cognitive impairment and a mean baseline age of 78, those with positive age beliefs had a 30.2% greater likelihood of recovery than those with negative age beliefs, reported Becca Levy, PhD, of the Yale School of Public Health, and Martin Slade, PhD, of the Yale School of Medicine, both in New Haven, Connecticut.

This recovery advantage persisted regardless of how severe mild cognitive impairment was at baseline, they said in a JAMA Network Openopens in a new tab or window research letter.

People with positive age beliefs also had a faster transition from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognition (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08-1.46, P=0.003) and recovered cognition up to 2 years earlier than people with negative age beliefs.

Nearly half of older adults with mild cognitive impairment can regain normal cognitionopens in a new tab or window. "Little is known about why some recover while others don't," Levy said in a statement. "That's why we looked at positive age beliefs, to see if they would help provide an answer."

"Our previous research has demonstrated that age beliefs can be modified," she added. "Therefore, age-belief interventions at the individual and societal levels could increase the number of people who experience cognitive recovery."

Participants came from the national longitudinal Health and Retirement Studyopens in a new tab or window (HRS), were 65 or older, and had mild cognitive impairment. They had at least one follow-up cognition assessment measured by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICSopens in a new tab or window) and a positive age-belief measure assessed by a subscale of the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scaleopens in a new tab or window, which gauged disagreement with the statement "the older I get, the more useless I feel."

Levy and Slade dichotomized participants based on whether they had positive or negative age beliefs. Age, sex, race, education, marital status, smoking history, APOE status, depression, cardiovascular or diabetes diagnosis, social isolation, sleep issues, and physical inactivity were covariates in their analysis.

The primary outcome was cognitive recovery, defined as the first transition from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognition based on TICS cut points. Seven data collection waves were performed in the study, every 2 years from 2008-2020.

Of 1,716 participants in the primary analysis, 55.5% were women. Most participants (74.2%) were white; 21.5% were Black and 11.5% were Hispanic. About half (51.6%) were married at baseline.

A total of 609 (35.5%) people were in the positive age-belief group and 1,107 (64.5%) were in the negative age-belief group. At baseline, participants in the positive age-belief group were less likely to have chronic disease (77.3% vs 83%), depression (8.3% vs 24.0%), or to often feel isolated (2.4% vs 10.9%) than those in the negative age-belief group (all P<o.05).

In a secondary analysis that included a wider sample of HRS participants with normal cognition at baseline, those with positive age beliefs were less likely to develop mild cognitive impairment over the next 12 years than those with negative age beliefs, regardless of baseline age and physical health.

A limitation is that the study did not examine mechanisms of positive age beliefs and cognitive recovery, Levy and Slade acknowledged. "However, previous studies have reported that cognition is predicted by stress levels and health behaviors, both of which can be improvedopens in a new tab or window by positive age beliefs," they noted.

  • Judy George covers neurology and neuroscience news for MedPage Today, writing about brain aging, Alzheimer’s, dementia, MS, rare diseases, epilepsy, autism, headache, stroke, Parkinson’s, ALS, concussion, CTE, sleep, pain, and more. Follow

Disclosures

This study was supported by the National Institute on Aging.

Levy and Slade reported no disclosures.

Primary Source

JAMA Network Open

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowLevy BR, Slade MD "Role of positive age beliefs in recovery from mild cognitive impairment among older persons" JAMA Netw Open 2023; DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7707.

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Effect of Vitamin D on Cognitive Functions in Older Adults: 24-Week Follow-Up Study

So it didn't work. What is your doctors' Plan B improving cognitive functioning? 

Effect of Vitamin D on Cognitive Functions in Older Adults: 24-Week Follow-Up Study

First Published January 1, 2019 Research Article
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of vitamin D replacement on cognitive function in older adults. A total of 560 patients who underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment including Global cognitive assessment, Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) twice in 6-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Oral cholecalciferol was replaced to patients with vitamin D deficiency routinely. In baseline cognitive scores, BADL-IADL scores were lower in the severe deficiency group than in the deficiency and adequate groups (P < .05). With regard to the relation between changes in cognitive functions, BADL-IADL scores on the 6-month versus baseline, no difference was determined in patients with and without dementia (P > .05). Vitamin D replacement may not improve cognitive performance in older adults, even if vitamin D is raised to adequate level, suggesting that longer term replacement therapy may be needed to improve cognitive function.

Thursday, May 31, 2018

1-Hour Exercise, 3 Times a Week Boosts Cognition in Older Adults

How is your doctor making sure you can accomplish this post stroke? This is your doctors' responsibility, don't let them weasel their way out of it.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/dementia/73179?


But no improvement in memory


  • by Contributing Writer, MedPage Today
Exercising for 52 hours over a 6-month period may be an optimal dose for cognitive improvement in older adults, a systematic review of 98 randomized clinical trials suggested.
Interventions that averaged 52 hours over a span of 6 months -- averaging about an hour, 3 times a week -- were linked to specific cognitive improvements in adults with and without cognitive impairment, reported Joyce Gomes-Osman, PT, PhD, of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and colleagues in Neurology: Clinical Practice
.
"The constructs of cognition that were most amenable to exercise were processing speed and executive function," Gomes-Osman told MedPage Today. "This is an encouraging result because those two constructs are among the first that start to go with the aging process. "This is evidence that you can actually turn back the clock of aging in your brain by adopting a regular exercise regimen."
Interestingly, statistical associations did not hold for memory improvement, noted Art Kramer, PhD, of Northeastern University in Boston, who was not involved in the study. "Despite the fact that animal studies have found robust memory benefits from exercise, memory benefits were not consistently observed in the human studies that were reviewed."
Gomes-Osman's group searched medical databases in December 2016 for randomized controlled trials that tested the effect of exercise on cognition. After a review of 4,612 relevant studies, they included 98 trials with a total of 11,061 participants in their review. Participants had an average age of 73 and 67.58% were female. Of the total sample, 59.41% of participants were classified as older healthy adults, 25.74% had mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 14.85% had dementia.
The clinical trials assessed exercises that included walking, biking, dancing, strength training, tai chi, and yoga over spans from 4 weeks to 1 year. Most participants (58.2%) did not exercise regularly before enrolling in a study. Most studies used either high (37.8%) or medium intensity (36.7%) exercise.
Aerobic exercise, strength training, mind-body exercises like yoga and tai-chi, and combinations of exercises all were linked to improved cognitive skills in both healthy individuals and those with MCI. Only the total length of time over a 6-month period was linked to improved cognitive skills, not weekly exercise minutes.
"Although half of the exercise in the studies we assessed was in support of aerobic exercise, it doesn't mean that aerobic exercise necessarily was more effective," said Gomes-Osman. "It just means that more trials have actually studied aerobic exercise."
Within aerobic exercise interventions, the most common exercise was walking, Gomes-Osman noted. "It's encouraging to know that you don't need to be running. If you start walking, you're going to get benefit. But this is not window-shopping; this is walking. It's physical exercise, not just physical activity."
Since most participants did not exercise regularly before joining a trial, this data also "strongly supports that decreasing sedentary behavior is something associated with brain health," Gomes-Osman said.
The effect of exercise on overall cognition is not clear because so few studies have assessed this, she added. And it's possible that future trials -- ones that compare different types of exercise, or evaluate exercise in both physically fit and sedentary people -- may show different results.
Nonetheless, some cognitive benefit is clear. "I believe in giving people knowledge about outcomes," Gomes-Osman said. "If you tell people to be active, they may be less interested overall than if you say 'You can do this, this, this, or this, and you need to keep it up a couple times a week for about 6 months, and then you should get a benefit.' I think that's a better sell for patients."
The study was supported by the Evelyn F. McKnight Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
Gomes-Osman and co-authors disclosed relevant relationships with Neosync, Starlab, Neuronix, Neuroelectrics, Constant Therapy, Cognito, and Novavision.

Monday, August 28, 2017

Lower blood pressure targets for older adults may offer cognitive benefits, study suggests

See how up-to-date your doctor is on this subject.

Lower blood pressure targets for older adults may offer cognitive benefits, study suggests


Emory's Woodruff Health Sciences Center News
An Emory study published in JAMA Neurology journal examined how various systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets for older patients receiving treatment for hypertension were associated with cognitive function and whether racial differences existed in long–term cognitive outcomes.

Systolic blood pressure, the amount of pressure exerted by the heart as it pumps blood throughout the body, is the top or first number in a blood pressure reading.

"The relationship between high blood pressure and the risk for mental decline has long been established. But the ideal systolic blood pressure for older adults has been less clear, with various recommended targets ranging from 120 mm Hg to 150 mm Hg," said lead researcher Ihab Hajjar, MD, MS, associate professor of medicine and neurology at Emory University School of Medicine.

The Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC–8) recommended treating systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a target below 150 mm Hg in older adults, while the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) suggested a SBP level lower than 120 mm Hg decreases cardiovascular event rates.

In the observational study, Hajjar and colleagues studied 1,657 cognitively intact older adults from the Health Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study. A total of 908 participants were women and 784 were black, with a mean age of 73.7. All participants received treatment for hypertension and were studied for a decade, from 1997 to 2007.

During the Health ABC study, cognition was assessed using the Modified Mini–Mental State Examination (3MSE) four times and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) five times. At each visit, participants were classified as having an SBP level of 120 mm Hg or lower, 121 to 139 mm Hg, 140 to 149 mm Hg, or 150 mm Hg or higher based on the mean SBP level of two seated readings.

The Emory researchers found that a greater decline in cognitive scores was associated with patients with SBP of 150 mm Hg or higher and less decline in those with SBP of 120 mm HG or lower. The findings suggest a lower SBP target for black patients may be associated with greater cognitive benefits.

"Overall, our analysis suggests that lower systolic blood pressure levels are associated with greater cognitive protection in older adults," said Hajjar. "A blood pressure below 140 in treated hypertensive older adults is not associated with worsening cognitive function. It also suggests that a lower level is more important in African Americans being treated for hypertension."

Over a 10–year period, the greatest decline in cognitive status was seen in people with SBP levels of 150 mm Hg or higher (adjusted decrease was 3.7 for 3MSE and 6.2 for DSST). Conversely, the least cognitive decline occurred in those with SBP levels of 120 mm Hg or lower (adjusted decrease was 3.0 for 3MSE and 5.0 for DSST).

The results showed significant racial differences in the progression of cognitive function. Black participants had a greater mean 10–year decrease in 3MSE scores (–4.1 [0.4]; P<.001) compared with white participants (–2.6 [0.3]; P<.001; P<.001 for race × year) after adjusting for covariates and baseline performances.

However, similar results were not found with DSST – with the mean 10–year decrease of –5.8 (0.4) for white participants (P<.001) and –4.7 (0.4) for black participants (P<.001; P=.09 for race × year).

Additionally, compared with white participants, black participants had a greater difference between the higher and lower SBP levels in the decrease in cognition.

Hajjar and colleagues advised that future guidelines should consider this racial difference when reviewing or providing recommendations for the management of hypertension.

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Cognitive Benefits of Social Dancing and Walking in Old Age: The Dancing Mind Randomized Controlled Trial

I want every single cognitive benefit possible post stroke. What the hell is your stroke department doing to implement this? I bet nothing because your stroke department doesn't read research at all. You're screwed and your stroke department doesn't care, they aren't paid for results.
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00026/full?
  • 1School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
  • 2Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 3Centre for Research on Aging, Health and Wellbeing, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
  • 4Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
  • 5Early Start Research Institute, School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Background: A physically active lifestyle has the potential to prevent cognitive decline and dementia, yet the optimal type of physical activity/exercise remains unclear. Dance is of special interest as it complex sensorimotor rhythmic activity with additional cognitive, social, and affective dimensions.
Objectives: To determine whether dance benefits executive function more than walking, an activity that is simple and functional.
Methods: Two-arm randomized controlled trial among community-dwelling older adults. The intervention group received 1 h of ballroom dancing twice weekly over 8 months (~69 sessions) in local community dance studios. The control group received a combination of a home walking program with a pedometer and optional biweekly group-based walking in local community park to facilitate socialization.
Main outcomes: Executive function tests: processing speed and task shift by the Trail Making Tests, response inhibition by the Stroop Color-Word Test, working memory by the Digit Span Backwards test, immediate and delayed verbal recall by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and visuospatial recall by the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVST).
Results: One hundred and fifteen adults (mean 69.5 years, SD 6.4) completed baseline and delayed baseline (3 weeks apart) before being randomized to either dance (n = 60) or walking (n = 55). Of those randomized, 79 (68%) completed the follow-up measurements (32 weeks from baseline). In the dance group only, “non-completers” had significantly lower baseline scores on all executive function tests than those who completed the full program. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no group effect. In a random effects model including participants who completed all measurements, adjusted for baseline score and covariates (age, education, estimated verbal intelligence, and community), a between-group effect in favor of dance was noted only for BVST total learning (Cohen’s D Effect size 0.29, p = 0.07) and delayed recall (Cohen’s D Effect size = 0.34, p = 0.06).
Conclusion: The superior potential of dance over walking on executive functions of cognitively healthy and active older adults was not supported. Dance improved one of the cognitive domains (spatial memory) important for learning dance. Controlled trials targeting inactive older adults and of a higher dose may produce stronger effects, particularly for novice dancers.
Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ACTRN12613000782730).