Showing posts with label Attawapiskat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Attawapiskat. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 February 2013

Don't know, can't say.

(So ... why're you lookin' over your shoulder then?)                      Up, Down.              Groundhog Day 

¡Ya basta!This is lookin' more and more like a basketball game eh? Repeatedly hooped dribbled & dropped. And our Northrop warned us to avoid those imbecile euphemisms: optimistic & pessimistic. Didn't he?

Theresa Spence Thursday January 24.It's like I said about doom a while ago - and I wanted to believe Theresa Spence & Raymond Robinson too, evident shortcomings in their vision notwithstanding. What to believe now that 44 days on 300 calories did not significantly reduce her bulk? Say what you like about Zambonis, Sunshine-and-a-quarter wages, diamond mines, whatever; I find it difficult to walk around pictures like the one there? Very nourishing that fish broth.

What were they up to in the tipi then? Dunno. Doing the necessary to get their share I guess. Share of what? A soon to be worthless stake in k-k-Canadian civilization?    Interesting ... Warrior Publications offers forthcoming insights, not naive: Idle No More starts to idle ... by someone who goes by the name of Zig Zag.

"Time reveals the truth," (Seneca); veritatem dies aperit, but not unless you are A) looking for it, B) able to recognize it if you trip over it, and C) able to bear it. 
People don't like to think; they have to be driven to it (one way and another).

Even our spiritual anchorman Bob ... f'rinstance: Early on, 1965, in Love Minus Zero, No Limit (the title of which hints at a Pynchon-ian tinge), he sings (with a sneer?), "... read books, repeat quotations, draw conclusions on the wall."

He is more about expanding consciousness through ambiguous & equivocal 'possibilities' of meaning, expanding the zone of uncertainty and suspended judgement, literary; but with an anti-intellectual colour as expected from an American. Maybe this is some of what 'He' was getting at with "Judge not lest ye be judged," (or "Judge not, that ye be not judged," in Matthew 7:1).    Don't know, can't say.

And a close reading of Tempest turns up too much coded Christianity, for me anyway, though I don't hold it against him - you do what you must do (and you do it well). It does seem to be a conduit to some fairly straightforward anger (in Pay in Blood): "Come here I'll break your lousy head," and "You bastard! I'm supposed to respect you!"    (!)    Sing it Bob!

Misdirected anger? Could be, partly. No room for thought so no real decisions - you do what you are driven to do to survive, necessity. And when they have got you up there in the living-room cab of that ginormous (gynormous?) truck makin' sunshine money, well ... What're ya gonna do eh? Don't be talkin' to people like me for one thing.

[On the other hand, as is so eloquently suggested in Talking Heads/David Byrne's Once in a Lifetime ... water flowing underground. Memory processing and sorting as we sleep, the results blooming suddenly sometimes, unexpectedly like flowers. The days are already getting noticealy longer. Spring is coming. :-) ] 
Attawapiskat:
Attawapiskat from the air.Living in the garage.Living in the garage.Living in the garage.
When we were building the Terra Nova in Bull Arm it was tough to find a place to rent anywhere close to the yard, and it was too far to commute from St. John's. I wound up in a garage in Sunnyside for a year or so, not very different from the one pictured above, with 6 other guys, and no big house next door (and not cheap neither).

So ... A wheelbarrow to collect firewood and I would be satisfied.   :-) 
Gold:    I don't understand how anyone can get to know anything about anything beyond the most superficial impression without being able to visualize the ground. None of the Internet tools foster this kind of approach of course - everything is fragmented and presented at meaningless scales. So I go about and try to collect enough of it together to make sense - but a week later I can't remember where Itaituba is, so maybe I'm wrong about this too, oh well.

Belo Sun is not just interested in Volta Grande:
Belo Sun in Brazil.Belo Sun in Brazil.Belo Sun Xingu Volta Grande detail.Belo Sun Xingu Volta Grande project detail.Belo Sun Xingu Volta Grande project detail.Belo Sun Tapajós Patrocínio detail.Belo Sun Tapajós Patrocínio detail.
You can noodle around on this map if you like. Google Maps don't provide Creporizinho or the Rodovia Transgarimpeira but I have cobbled them in more-or-less. There is a bit of background on those points of interest here. "Nos anos 80, milhares de quilos ao mês eram retirados dessa região do PA. Hoje o ouro diminuiu, mas ainda é o principal meio de sobrevivência." / 'In the 80's thousands of kilos per month were taken out of this part of Pará state. Today the flow of gold is reduced but it is still the principal livelihood.'

Oh, and there are three zones of interest for Belo Sun in Volta Grande: Ouro Verde, Grota Seca, and South Block. 
Recent 'hearings' in Senador José Porfírio, 'information sessions' something like that:

ISA solicita declaração de inviabilidade de projeto de mineração na região do Xingu, copied the next day by Amigos da Terra; a replay from September 2012: Senador José Porfírio discute projeto de lavra de ouro em audiência pública.

Audiência pública Senador José Porfírio 2012.Audiência pública Senador José Porfírio 2013.A beautiful young woman (at the centre of the photograph) evidently caught the eye of ISA photographer Marcelo Salazar.

The ISA (Instituto Socioambiental) material is here: Análise do Licenciamento Ambiental do Projeto Volta Grande da Belo Sun Mineração. In point form: I. Inability to analyse feasibility in the context of environmental instability (from Belo Monte); II. Defects in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) a. Factually incorrect, b. Impacts on indigenous lands not properly considered; III. Defects in licencing authority (wrong bureaucrats involved).

This news is not well reported (or at least I can't find it) so I still don't know when The MPF (Ministério Público Federal) will make its mind up. 
Stan Bharti.Stan Bharti w Hannele.Stan Bharti.Stan Bharti with BSX at TSX.The Stan Bharti connection:    I noticed him on the board at Belo Sun and wondered who he is? ... And depite Google's latest revisions to the Image Search interface I was able to fossick about a bit and find him on the garbage heap.

He runs Forbes & Manhattan Inc. aka F&M, a private merchant bank headquartered in Toronto. Pierre Pettigrew calls it a 'junior', Stan calls it 'one of the largest in the world certainly in Canada', so, something in-between I guess.

Five Year gold price.He's a mining engineer, hale-fellow-well-met (I am sure the guy is a hero up at the Granite Club); sometimes talks (what amounts to) truthfully: on CNBC in September 2011 when gold was about $1,800 he was hoping for $2,500 (it just managed to break $1,900); in an interview with Jargal Dambadarjaa it comes out that Forbes & Manhattan has invested close to 4 billion $ in Brazil; and that gold is profitable at 2 grams per ton @ 400$/ounce (extraction cost $300/ounce) ... and so on, tidbits.

He is also into Peruvian gold with his sidekick Pierre Pettigrew in Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd.; and coal too: Forbes & Manhattan (Coal) Inc. aka Forbes Coal in the KwaZulu-Natal region of South Africa (east coast around Durban). 
So what?    The most revealing is an epistle to the graduating students of his Bharti School of Engineering at Laurentian University in Barrie (the name - at least the name - purchased for ten million in 2011): 6 minute video. Aficionados of the politically correct may think I am being critical because of his use of sexual analogies. Not so, don't mind 'em at all - it is the casual way he recommends that the graduates project a constructed personality and kiss ass as necessary.

Is it any wonder that they mostly seem to do just that? 
Guyana update:    There is a wee bit of news about the court case: Joan Chang, gold miner, versus Isseneru Village Council, Janette Bulkan, January 21; and, Miners win ruling over indigenous groups in Guyana, Jeremy Hance, January 29.

But in k-k-Canada the latest news from that zone has a different point of view: Guyana Goldfields' Aurora Gold project to cost US$205 million to build, January 11. An interesting tidbit - profitable at $527/ounce cost (?).

More Canadian players: Guyana Goldfields Inc. in Toronto going for the Aurora & Aranka projects on the Cuyuni River in central Guyana; and, Columbus Gold Corporation in Vancouver (approximately? or is that conveniently?) in the Paul Isnard project north of St. Laurent in French Guiana.

I imagine the some of the mis-spelling around Guyana Guiana French Guiana French Guyana etc. is intentional (see Omnibus below) and some of it is due to Canada's devolving educational system.

Here's a map.


[Just to remember the acronyms: EIA Estudo de Impacto Ambiental; RIMA Relatório de Impacto Ambiental.] 
Damn Google!    Changed their Image Search interface again !!!!!!! AND the Blogger interface again again !!!!!!! If it ain't broke don't fix it. Doh! 
Nomenclature:    Omnibus is an adjective, like 'dirty', so you can have an 'omnibus bill' but not an 'Omnibus Bill' unless for some reason the government decided to name it thus officially (which they generally don't I think).

Eminent k-k-Canadian parliam-m-m-entarian - Alfred E. Newman.The key to understanding is comprising unrelated components. The intention is confusion & social paralysis through complexity.

Bill C-38 is officially “An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures.” It is also known as (also officially because this is the official 'short title') the “Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act”. It passed and became law in June 2012.

Inside it is a revised Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, aka CEAA.

THE ombibus bill many people are thinking of when they say it lately is Bill C-45, “A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures” aka “Jobs and Growth Act, 2012” passed etc. in December 2012.

Keep in mind that the bill numbers start again with each new session. Information can be found at LegisInfo run by the government & Open Parliament which bills itself thus: "This is not a government site. Not even sort of."

[If it had been me and not Jim Flaherty I would have arranged it to table those bills on February 29 not March. Shame to waste a perfectly good leap year.] 
Across this table lately:
Nicholas Stern.
Nicholas Stern.
Nicholas Stern ramps up his mea culpa's:

1) Lord Stern: developing countries must make deeper emissions cuts, reported by Fiona Harvey Tuesday 4 December 2012 (and listed here before); and,

 

2) Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' reported by Heather Stewart & Larry Elliott from Davos, Saturday 26 January 2013.

 

3) Some background if you want it at Wikipedia. Everything about him seems tentative (?) I don't know why.

 
 
Activists you say?
Trent Hawkins, Australia.
Michael Brune, US.
John Bennett, Canada.
Q6. If Sierra Club Canada were to participate in non-violent civil disobedience I would be ?? to continue to make a financial contribution.
Sierra Club Canada National Board.
Sierra Club BC Chairman Doug McArthur.

1) Rebuilding optimism of will for effective climate activism, Trent Hawkins, 24 January 2013: "So where do we begin? It is the imperative of the climate movement leadership to rebuild optimism ..." (?) If the leadership could build anything wouldn't it be there already? Dunno.

 

2) Sierra Club's Michael Brune on Keystone XL and civil disobedience, David Roberts, Tuesday 29 January 2013; this applies to the US more-or-less.

 

3a) {642 words} Sierra Club Canada to review ban on civil disobedience, with B.C. pipelines in mind / U.S. club announces end of prohibition on peaceful law-breaking, Peter O'Neil, Vancouver Sun January 23, 2013, with a picture.

 

3b) {860 words} Sierra Club to review ban / Organization considers lifting its prohibition on civil disobedience, January 24.

 

4) A few days later I get an email (a copy of this blog post: CD or not CD, that is the question ... , John Bennett, Tuesday January 29 2013) asking me to take a survey. An important question on the survey (and the last of six) is to ask if I will continue to donate and if so, more? A quandary.

 

5) Board meeting January 31; outcome - "at the appropriate time." Here's the Media Release, February 1 2013. I think the real answer is in here: Supporter views on non-violent civil disobedience, January 31; viz. 'the money question' - the troops were soft on Question #6 - not really really soft but ... About 10,000 members in Canada so two in ten answered the survey - except that you didn't have to prove membership to vote.

 

6) Sierra Club BC - Milquetoasts! Their statement: We are doing all that we can. Bollocks! Not by half! Also reported by Stephen Hui in Georgia Straight, February 1.

 

7) Some references: Sierra Club US - Wikipedia, website; Canada - Wikipedia, website. Interesting that the National Board of Sierra Club Canada is about anonymous - can't find a list of their names anywhere and no bigger picture of them than that. (?)

 
 
Eric Dooh holds up a hand covered in oil from a creek near his former home, the now abandoned village of Goi.
Shell Allard Castelein.
Judge Henk Wien.
Eric Dooh formerly of Goi.
Nigeria Shell verdict:

1) Before: Shell verdict will determine whether other firms could be tried for oil spills, John Vidal, Tuesday 29 January 2013.

 

2) After: The CBC uses Dutch court rejects Nigerian farmers' claims against Shell from the Associated Press wire, but with a sub-headline "Subsidiary Shell Nigeria forced to pay village in landmark ruling."

 

3) An Engineering News website uses Dutch court says Shell partly responsible for Nigeria spills.

 

4) Bloomberg: Shell Not Liable for Most Nigeria Spill Claims, Dutch Court Says, Fred Pals, January 30 2013.

 

5) Dutch court rejects most of Shell spill case, Mike Corder, San Francisco Chronicle/Associated Press, Wednesday January 30.

 

6) A while ago I cobbled up this map showing Goi (approximately). That judge has got clean hands eh?

 
 
Cap & Trade vs Carbon Tax (vs Fee & Dividend not even mentioned?):

1) Should we stop worrying about the environmental impact of flying?, Leo Hickman, Thursday 31 January 2013.

 
C02 Transportation Emissions Calculator.

2) Private provision of public goods in a second-best world: Cap-and-trade schemes limit green consumerism, Grischa Perino, January 24, 2013. The title is subtly misleading - the argument is more that green consumerism has little effect.

 

3) Elsewhere in The Guardian, Luca Taschini, Simon Dietz & Naomi Hicks of the Grantham Research Institute at LSE ask Carbon tax v cap-and-trade: which is better?

 

4) What about Fee & Dividend Gawdammit?! Storms of My Grandchildren, Chapter 9 An Honest, Effective Path, James Hansen, 2009.

 

5) A Useful tool: CO2 transportation emissions calculator.

 
 
Al Gore:

1) The Future by Al Gore – review, John Gray, Thursday 31 January 2013. I can't afford to buy it; lineup at the library but I guess that has to be the way (damned union un-librarians!). Interesting ... the audio book has a lineup too?

 
 
Beyoncé by Devil(e)m.Obama Fiddles While Planet Burns:

1) Obama Immigration Reform Speech: 'The Time Is Now', Elise Foley, Tuesday January 29 2013. Last time it was Health Reform, now it's Immigration. "An economic and moral case," she writes. Bah! He is just avoiding the real issue, marking time.

 

2) Beyoncé chose to lip synch national anthem with US Marine Band at Obama’s inauguration, Associated Press, Tuesday January 22 2013. Apt. Perfectly symmetrical. Beyoncé? ... Never heard of her. I wonder how she does orgasms? Ah, she was at Super Bowl too. QED.

 
 
I went to a day-long conference thing on Enbridge's Line 9 reversal a while ago. A lunch was provided which was delicious and cheerfully served up. So I went looking for the providers of this lunch - turned out to be an amorphous group called Food Not Bombs but after a dozen emails I could not find anyone willing to accept a donation - cash mind you and no receipt required, spend it on Tequila was my recommendation but they didn't want it. (?)

About the same thing happened again trying to find out who did the lunch at the recent OCAP rally. (?)

Obviously I am doing something wrong. I wish I could figgure out what it is. 
As I was thinking about John Bennett and Sierra Club Canada, and Elizabeth May of course who came up through that organization, this was on the front page of the website:
Hungry for Climate Leadership.Hungry for Climate Leadership.
Long story about that banner ... another time, doesn't matter.    A short story then: Early on in this Toronto Odyssey I tried to get beside the Green Party - it seemed the natural vehicle, outlet, conduit - whatever. The candidate in my riding didn't wash, so I sniffed around next one over. Seemed to be made-in-heaven, Portuguese spoken and all (which I was longing for). As part of the indoctrination they joined me into an email group. The topic on the go was what to do about nutbars who show up and ... disrupt the flow? I was throwing in ee cummings "staggered banged with terror through a million billion trillion stars" etc., but after a while I noticed that everyone was writing and no one was reading. I withdrew more-or-less quietly. (Boo Hoo. :-) Anyway ... they still don't know how to deal with 'em; and it still seems to me that this would be a good thing for the movement to figgure out.

I did meet someone quoting Milton at the recent OFL rally: "They also serve who only stand and wait." All perfectly derivative; who cares?

"I just don't care what happens next; looks like freedom but it feels like death. It's something in between I guess. It's closing time."

I trust this is useful to some one some where some when. Be well.
 
Beyond the Zero:    I am slowly getting deeper into Pynchon's Against The Day; excerpts:
                     Lew Basnight becomes a detective (One, 5), and,
                     Lake Traverse marries Deuce Kindred (Two, 12).
Anarchists vs The Machine, all very topical.
Tullio Crali - Nosedive on the city, 1939.Tullio Crali - Nosedive on the city, 1939.Tullio Crali - Nosedive on the city, 1939.Tullio Crali - Nosedive on the city, 1939.Tullio Crali - Nosedive on the city, 1939.Tullio Crali - Nosedive on the city, 1939.
The cover of the edition I have includes this image - well, not quite like any of these actually, but maybe closest to the last one on the right. Tullio Crali, an Italian futurist; entitled 'Nosedive on the city'; probably intended no irony when he painted it. No idea if Pynchon had anything to do with selecting it for the cover.

It seems like 300 pages or so is about it for many ... the author of this diagram in Wikipedia a few years ago didn't even get that far. The women come and go, talking of Michelangelo ... greatest living writer in English, whatever. I find it hard to remember what's s'pose t'be goin' on - must be the Alzheimer's.

A-and Beyond the Zero, the first chapter of Gravity's Rainbow, has been coming to mind for obvious reasons (the Vanishing Point mentioned last time etc.). That Against The Day cover image establishes a bit of a connection there; and with the conclusion of Gravity's Rainbow too for that matter. Hansel & Gretel ...

¡Ya basta!"Into the blue again, after the money's gone," and that won't be long now, longer if I could quit smoking. :-)

The importance of spatial continuity, Umwelt ... Could it be that obsessive/compulsive habits are vain attempts at compensation? The mental rats, unable to leave the ship and so trying to balance the cargo? Do you think?
 
Down.

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Totally Different (Not!)

It's midnight and I really should come clean.                                         Up, Down. 
CALL TO ACTION!   NO LINE 9!
 
 
Saturday, January 26, 2013.

1) Toronto City Hall, Queen & Bay, at 10:30 am.

2) Allan Gardens at 12:50 pm.
     Gerrard Street East at Sherbourne Street, details.
350.org     (See also: OFL Rally.)

3) Yonge St. and Hendon Ave. at 1:00 pm.
     1 block north of Finch on Yonge, details.
 
[Trying to hold onto that positive LUCKY '13 energy gentle reader ... and it is a struggle (in an Aikido 'avoid-the-thrust' sort'a way) but ... it's midnight and I really should come clean.]

I believe this nonsense about humanity's doom because I want to. Simple as that. Rhetorically I might say, "I have to believe it," implying something positive about both the strength of the evidence and the depth of my knowledge and understanding; but no. It was about the same quasi-transcendent language when I believed in Jesus in a magical way. I am a stupid knucklehead, silly; and I can prove it (beyond the obvious proof that almost no one speaks to me anymore).

Patrick White, 1980, a face consumed by wondering.Miles Davis, 1985.Mind you, less stupid as time goes on - f'rinstance, the recent article in Nature: 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C; reported in The Guardian, showing that the peak in CO2 emissions must be 'round about 2015 to avoid a 3° or 4° world (or apocalyptic catastrophe, 'doom' as I call it, Ragnarök). Consider what is necessary to accomplish such a flattening of the Keeling Curve by 2015. (Do you really think a letter to your MP is enough? And how silly is that? :-)   
[I exaggerated somewhat; please see the note on the Nature article below.]

There is a lot more to wonder about here: the function of bourgeois forbearance & euphemism; Ubuntu vs individualism in a thoroughly atomized society; and so on. Another time.

And of course that damned 13th fairy in the story of Sleeping Beauty: righteous anger at not being on the guest list, and that because there were not enough golden plates to go 'round. Doh!
 
I was chatting one day last April, towards the end of a short fast, with Adriana Mugnatto (the Green Party environment critic) and Daryl Hemingway (a leader of the anti-wind movement from Scottsdale, Arizona) and threw in a comment about wind supplying base load requirements. A gaffe, a faux pas - she shut me up quickly. I acquiesced because I do in fact humbly bow to her superior knowledge; but I was clever enough to keep the business card he gave me and subsequently the three of us had a lengthy email exchange ... which eventually ended on all sides.

I have a theory of stupidity (particularly supported by idiots) that we are all numbskulls at one moment or another (and often most of the time) and that we can forgive, remember or not, and get on with it if we choose to (see Matthew 18-15).

So it didn't cut me, not really, until later when she refused steadfastly to even entertain what I have come to call 'the question' viz. "Why can the environmental movement not get its thumb out?"
Adão Iturrusgarai: Amor ... precisamos conversar! / Sweetie ... we need to talk!Adão Iturrusgarai: Amor ... precisamos conversar! / Sweetie ... we need to talk!

Anyway, QED on 'stupid knucklehead'. 
This belief in general doom, 1) suits my age; 2) suits my situation; and 3) suits my brand of guilt (on at least several axes):

You get old, inevitably, and mortality, from being an off-hand acknowledged bromide, gets very specific and comes into focus. You can't get it up; you can hardly piss with it ... and so on. It can be comforting to know that it happens to everyone in the end; but more satisfying by far to believe that it is the fate to be shared with one's entire species.

I walked away from a fat position when I finally realized that my efforts supported the kind of thing going on in Fort Chipewyan. It was not noble - I was overcome by cognitive dissonance not conscience. Even so I thought I might contribute to the counter force somehow - but all that has happened is a slow downward spiral into ignominy. So, as "the seasons tear off and condemn" it is a vestigial sweetness to imagine the simultaneous stopping of the whole infernal shebang.

You can simply blame others, 'project' guilt as it were. And it doesn't have to be entirely simple - there are so many clever redirecting fallacies to employ - I'll leave it to others to mark & precisely delineate this territory. It's a 'suffices-to-say' thing - I have used more than a few of them. At least I do not blame God - not the easiest 'out' but a common one - or the inverse, think that God will save us. (You can submerge into the warm bath of shame too - but it doesn't wash :-)

Just one thought, implied in Martin Buber's so eloquent "he must lay his hand in the wound of the other and learn: this concerns you," that it takes at least two, working together to get anywhere with anything - or (and my 2nd ex-wife so hated it when I would say this :-) "It takes two to tango." 
Alas, contrary to popular perception, ostriches don’t actually bury their heads in the sand – this is just an optical illusion caused when they put their very small heads to the ground to feed.   
[Thanks to The Daily Maverick for this nugget.]

Paul Ehrlich 1974.Many eminent (and otherwise) minds long ago turned, and more are now beginning to turn towards the question of how to get the collective thumbs out and humanity off its stump and away from this problématique cliff-hanger.

The latest I have seen is the Ehrlich's - who provided early impetus with 'The Population Bomb' in 1968. In this recent essay: Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? they conclude with a "Yes" though they qualify it so heavily as to mean "No." Even these two are equivocal - they don't want to bring their readers to the point of vomiting in fear (I guess) - so they hedge, using hope to counter collapse ... 
... when it's either collapse, mitigated by as much resilience as we can muster or nothing (and I believe they know it) and hope has nothing to do with it.


When a-a-all of, your advisers heave their plastic
At your feet to convince you of your pain
Trying to prove that your conclusions should be more drastic

(Bob Dylan, Queen Jane Approximately, 1965)
 
Last year saw the IEA & World Bank trying to shift the greed-heads out of the ditch (or trough or whatever it is); trying desperately even. We could call them 'rightards' to couple with the 'leftards' you often read about - because they too imagine that there is a gradual, tweaking, change of course to steer us away from the abyss - but ... there's not.

Your Cadillac
Has got a wheel in the ditch and a wheel on the track

(Neil Young, Alabama, 1972)
 
Hope as a bourgeois value dies hard (see the Ehrlich's essay), and despite many converts to Lester Brown's way of thinking and a gradual colouring of economic thought with the hues of décroissance, the shift to a 'war regime' is not happening - neither at all nor quickly enough.

The gates of love they budged an inch
I can't say much has happened since
But closing time

(Leonard Cohen, Closing Time [watch out for the ad], 1992)
[No. And not fast enough neither.] 
I came across this the other day: "Criminals, like the rest of us, aren’t much influenced by things they might have to experience far in the future."    (a New York Times pundit)

But for some reason I am. (?) Maybe it is an extension in the virtue of Frye's observation on Thomas Pynchon: that his vision is driven by paranoia (of a polite and inoffensive kind). Ditto Will Self when he writes about Kafka (or is it Kafka writing about Will Self?). Dunno.

The positive energy of LUCKY '13 - This is the year we are going to turn it around! morphed into trying to see what, precisely & exactly, has to become 'totally different' in the environmental movement for it to ... move. That effort is still mostly mired in beholding the mote that is in my brother's and sister's eyes (although the beam in my own is also getting some attention :-). I'm sorry gentle reader, I'm just not a very nice person.

Glen's hand.A prof of mine used to stand up on a chair which was up on a desk at the front of the class and (perilously) bend over and look at small models and drawings between his legs - "trying to look at things differently" he would say. That's his hand in the picture there.

So it goes.

Three examples: Idle No More, 'The Media', and Blogger: 
Idle No More, Theresa Spence & Raymond Robinson:     I have never gone hungry for very long, a few days at most and then intentionally fasting - but enough to know what it feels like; so my admiration for Theresa Spence & Raymond Robinson is large.

There is a continuum of protest that runs from letters to the editor, letters to your MP, attending rallies and marches, civil disobedience, (maybe sabotage and destruction of property fits in here), symbolic fasting, hunger strike ... and so on to insurrection, revolution, and war. It seems (to me) that such situations evolve, quickly or slowly, and that participants tend to move along the continuum one step at a time.
  [This may seem elementary - I am really just making notes here.]

Two videos: Chief Spence interview December 18, 2012 (15 minutes); and, Raymond Robinson interview on his way to sit in solidarity with Theresa Spence December 31, 2012 (10 minutes).

Not Ghandi: Canadian chief is no Gandhi, but hard truths are being revealed (and here). And this: Do Not Disturb.

"Oh, she went to the meeting with Governor-General David Johnston," I thought, "That's it then." I underestimated her. "It didn't feel too good inside that house ..." she said afterwards, and I saw some of the toll that such a length of time on 200 or 300 calories a day takes. And as the days pass - more than 40 days now - Theresa and Raymond show no sign of relenting.    Good on them! 
Murray Clearsky.Murray Clearsky.The “fundamental transformation” being talked about is largely economic.    Shawn Atleo says, "a better revenue sharing model for resource development," and many other comments by chiefs echo this. There are also statements by some of the Idle No More initiators and others, that the environment is important, that what the government is doing and allowing to happen there is key; but it does not come across as being at the true centre. An exception (maybe) is Murray Clearsky who says, "It’s going to be so damn polluted none of us are going to survive."

There is also infighting & petty politics around who speaks for whom - which is mostly competition for the political salaries rather than statesmanship (it looks like to me). A text reportedly from one of Theresa Spence's supporters to Shawn Atleo on his way to meet Stephen Harper: "Since you have decided to betray me, all I ask of you now is to help carry my cold dead body off this island." Harsh.

In the disappointment and despair following the Doha COP 18 fiasco, I was coming around to thinking about hunger strike just before I learned about Theresa Spence's action. A moment of clarity soon buried in contradictory details.

Now I am thinking (and others are thinking along similar lines - see Alex Himelfarb) that Theresa & Raymond have opened a door, shown an example, made the situation liminal - and who knows where that may lead? 
Day 41:   It was a toss up whether to put this with Media or the hunger strike - somewhere in between I guess, If I am a knucklehead, what is Kevin Newman I wonder? Watch this 20 minute interview on Question Period last Sunday: Part 1 & Part 2 (originally here) and find out.

Raymond Robinson on Question Period Sunday January 20.Theresa Spence on Question Period Sunday January 20.Danny Metatawabin on Question Period Sunday January 20.He actually tries on the motherhood argument! Doh?! Every word out of his mouth reveals a sensibility so lame that one has to imagine it is entirely scripted by Stephen Harper. So then, an indication that Mr. Harper is worried; another is that he arranges for The Globe to declare in an editorial on the 21st (in rhetoric on par with Kevin Newman's): "The hunger strike has run its course," which it most evidently has not. Roger Augustine may have laid down, others not so much; even Shawn Atleo looks like he might stand up.

As for Kevin Newman, I guess he figgures, "If Peter Kent can do it, so can I." 
The (Evil) Media:     The Guardian reports: New York Times dismantles environment desk, and the same day NYT's Andrew Revkin responds & amplifies with The Changing Newsroom Environment. It ain't necessarily bad, but it don't look very good.

I have noticed The Guardian toning down their environmental coverage in the last 9 months or so. I imagine there are circulation pressures affecting all newspapers. I didn't think The Guardian covered the brouhaha around Brazil's Código Florestal last March very well, mis-translations and worse; and the headlines during and after COP 18 in Doha:

         Why the Doha climate conference was a success,
         Why a global climate treaty remains worth fighting for, and,
         Global warming talks progress is 'slow but steady';

aside from self-serving the reputations of these very well paid bureaucrats, seems too 'balanced' by far - the damned thing was an out and out flop!

Why haven't the alternative media picked up the slack? Why don't sites like Rabble & Tyee & Straight Goods work very well? Or maybe you think they do? I'll leave it to you. One that does work reasonably well by my lights is The Daily Maverick.

 
[An interesting digression from them this morning: 'stop nonsense' being a South African slang update to Robert Frost's 'good fences make good neighbours' in Mending Wall.] 
More importantly, the networking and 'social media' sites are not what they are cracked up to be.

There is a long list of networking sites, not one of which has the least idea of how to establish much of a network, nevermind foster it. But you see, networking takes place between individuals not Noms de Plume or 'Display Names' or avatars. That, and the software is generally shit. One that has promise is the comment interface at The Globe and Mail, powered by Pluck and (I believe) ScribbleLive. Of course software of any quality is not a silver bullet either - you have to have an intention to foster communication, to listen, connect, share. There are lots of case studies which I'll spare you - but here's one you can see for yourself: just compare and contrast the Occupy Wall Street (about unchanged in format from day 1) and Occupy Toronto (on its umpteenth platform) sites.

None of this is at all evil of course. These sites are just what they are, which is ill-coordinated, under-staffed, and under-funded; owned and operated by bog-standard humans ... and so on.

As for Facebook & Twitter & LinkedIn and the rest of the so-called 'social media': they are shills and barkers, paid for by advertising. There's no 'there' there. QED.

We go in the streets chanting "The people, united, can never be defeated!" But we are not united, and consequently we certainly can be defeated - sorry to tell you.

Problem is that time is so short - the old adage "fish or cut bait" is perfectly apt. 
Blogger:     I thought I would try the 'Read more »' feature in Blogger - to make more space on the first page and as a sort of natural index. But I ran into a glitch because of the black lines I use to separate this blog into lumps and skip through them more easily.  
[The struggle to make those internal jumps work properly is described somewhere else in here (at the top of this).]

I was surprised because the whole thing seems to work off a single tag "<!--more-->" BUT I failed to remember that you must be on the Compose tab (never never send cash in the mail, and never never ever go into 'compose' mode unless you want all of your Html mangled beyond recognition) to get at the button to insert the jump break. At first I was just interested, programmer to programmer, to see how it works: create a second URL, a 'token', for the continued part of the post and qualify any '<A' internal link tags (like the ones in the black lines) with the token - straightforward enough. But he or she was, you know, in a hurry I guess; the code to convert the links was supposed to work - then I noticed the mess it had made.

If someone shows up and claims to be a hot-shot programmer you can give them some simple tasks to code and then look at the algorithms they write - and their hot-shot-ness (or not) becomes immediately apparent. F'rinstance: write a loop that will turn "1, 2, 3, 4, 5" into "4, 3, 2, 1, 5" (which is what the Google image uploader does).

A confusion on how to use a variable as an index to a loop - unforgivable. This time it is more understandable - converting elements in a free-form string of text is problematic at best - but it is still shit. 
HTML has been around since 1990 but there is still no wysiwyg interface I know of that actually works. This is good for programmers because it means that you must code in HTML in order to get what you want. HTML is a rudimentary tool, but it doesn't work very well either so you need a huge kit of mostly counterintuitive tricks to accomplish even elementary formatting. No TAB f'rinstance, or try a hanging paragraph. Very comparable to SQL - still impossible to write in anything like 'natural language' (which was the intention as I rememmber it).

Try this: Do a Google News Search for anything, say 'Theresa Spence Attawapiskat' and use the Search Tools to limit it to 'Past 24 Hours'; here . This morning I get 3 pages, 30-40 items. But now change 'Sorted by relevance' to 'Sorted by date'; here. I get 9 items. (?!)

Back up a bit and consider that these guys have built a huge company, with unquestioned dominance in searching the Internet - and basic features don't work very well. I'll see your 'advanced technology' and raise you 'bungling incompetence'. 
Louis Lesosky aka Crowbird, November 2012.Louis Lesosky aka Crowbird, November 2012.There is at least one guy out there doin' it:

Louis Lesosky aka Crowbird: Occupation Apple Tree and a short video (3 minutes).

"We've gotta occupy the spaces we need to do things, that's all there is to it," and, "The whole world needs help so the thing is until we get together on it and start doing stuff that makes sense then we're all in trouble."

And a video (2 minutes) of part of an all-candidates meeting during the Canadian federal election in May of 2011 in Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca.

Meanwhile a McCain scion puts out 175,000 a month in alimony in Toronto, Berlusconi is reportedly paying 132,000 a day In Italy ... so ... just think of how much fun they're having :-)

Be well. 
Joeri Rogelj at a UNFCCC meeting in Bonn, Germany, in 2009.'2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C':   Buy it for $35 CDN from Nature; or read the commentary in The Guardian, or ask me for a copy (I have one thanks to the generosity of one of the authors, Joeri Rogelj, at ETH Zurich).

Aaron Swartz 1986-2013.Worthwhile giving a moment's thought to Aaron Swartz at this point, and maybe this comment in The Globe.

Initially I was only able to read the abstract, and the commentary; and I confused a peak in the growth of CO2 emissions with a peak in the absolute quantity of CO2 in the atmosphere. (OK-okok, I jumped to the conclusion that my twisted psychology was craving.)

Clip from Figure 1 of the report.Even then, my guesstimate of 2015 is not completely off the wall - you can see in the clip from Figure 1 that most of the trend-lines begin to go down before 2020 (though this may be just a function of tidy graphics). And anyway, what's likely to change in five years unless we get lucky and the economy collapses?

In any event, best is always to read the original and form your own understanding and judgement; as they say in the Discussion, "the range presented here contains much richer information."

Keep in mind that the models used here deal in probabilities, odds. You might ask yourself if you would cross the street on a 2 out of 3 chance that you would get to the other side eh? What about 1 in 100?
 
Down.