Showing posts with label Bag Of Bones Mini-Series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bag Of Bones Mini-Series. Show all posts

MSN Looks At Stephen King TV The Good And The Really Bad



MSN Entertainment reports that  Under The Dome came out swinging, coming out as the second-highest rated drama debut this year (per Nielsen).  

The article, by Barbara Card Atkinson, goes on to discuss the good and the bad of Stephen King TV.

I found this note on The Dead Zone series interesting:
They did this one right, too -- at least for a while. The series starred Anthony Michael Hall as a psychic loner, and the series premiere broke records for the USA Network at the time, attracting 6.4 million viewers. The series ran six seasons, but viewer numbers had dropped enough that a seventh season was abandoned with no series finale. 
Reading the lists of Good and Worst -- I found out I like a lot of Stephen King TV that no one else does.  I thought both the Tommyknockers  and The Shining were great.  The Tommyknockers felt a bit soap operish at times and too closed in -- things Under  The Dome has avoided thus far -- but I still  like the story.  Oh, and the spaceship in Tommyknockers was a disappointment.  But that moment when the kid does a magic trick and makes his brother disappear. . . and then can't bring him back! -- that was great television.

I also liked the 2002 Carrie a lot. I thought it managed to bring new ideas to the story while remaining pretty faithful to the book.

I do think this note  on Bag of Bones was insightful on Atkinson's part:
"This miniseries ran three hours, which might have been an hour too long, or several hours too short. More time would have allowed for better character development; less time might have forced a much-needed pace tightening."
And also Atkinson gives this interesting explanation to the mediocre  response to The Shining miniseries, "it was another case where the novel was so dense with backstory and internal experiences (and audiences missing those creepy twins and bloody elevators) that it couldn't be roundly brought to the screen."

When it comes to The Shining, I've hoped for a directors cut that would restore some scenes that Garris cut out.

Even with a love  for bad Stephen King television -- I cannot offer and defense for The Langoliers.

THE GOOD:
IT
THE STAND
SALEM'S LOT
THE DEAD ZONE

THE WORST:
THE SHINING.
THE TOMMYKNOCKERS
STORM OF THE CENTURY
CARRIE
SOMETIMES THEY COME BACK
ROSE RED
THE LANGOLIERS
NIGHTMARES & DREAMSCAPES
BAG OF BONES

Ebert On King



The famous movie reviewer Roger Ebert died Thursday.  I first became acquainted with him when I was a kid and he offered movie commentary with Gene Siskel on Siskel and Ebert.  I would watch them on Sunday afternoon between morning church and evening church.  Strangely, the review I remember is Back to the Beach -- which both of them liked.  Seems Disney was really hesitant to let them review the film, thinking it would get bad publicity right from the start.  But it got two thumbs up.

In his review of Dreamcatcher, Ebert revealed that he is also a King reader, saying, "The movie is based on a novel by Stephen King, unread by me, apparently much altered for the screen version, especially in the appalling closing sequences. I have just finished the audiobook of King's From a Buick 8 , was a fan of his Hearts in Atlantis , and like the way his heart tugs him away from horror ingredients and into the human element in his stories."



In his review of Secret Window, Ebert offered this about King's book On Writing, "A lot of people were outraged that he was honored at the National Book Awards, as if a popular writer could not be taken seriously. But after finding that his book On Writing had more useful and observant things to say about the craft than any book since Strunk and White's The Elements of Style, I have gotten over my own snobbery."

Here are some of his reviews of Stephen King movies:

CARRIE (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
The scariest horror stories -- the ones by M.R. James, Edgar Allan Poe, and Oliver Onions -- are like this. They develop their horrors out of the people they observe. That happens here, too. Does it ever.                                        
THE DEAD ZONE (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
No other King novel has been better filmed (certainly not the recent, dreadful "Cujo"), and Cronenberg, who knows how to handle terror, now also knows how to create three-dimensional, fascinating characters. (writing circa 1983)
MISERY (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
The material in "Misery" is so much Stephen King's own that it's a little surprising that a director like Rob Reiner would have been interested in making the film.  . . .What he does with "Misery" is essentially simply respectful - he "brings the story to the screen," as the saying goes.
THE MIST (rogerebert.suntimes.com)

THE GREEN MILE (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
By the end, when he is asked to forgive them for sending him to the electric chair, the story has so well prepared us that the key scenes play like drama, not metaphor, and that is not an easy thing to achieve.
And I think this is a very important quote, since he links King to Dickens.  This is something I've  been doing for a while.  (Stephen King A Mordern Charles Dickens)
Stephen King, sometimes dismissed as merely a best-seller, has in his best novels some of the power of Dickens, who created worlds that enveloped us and populated them with colorful, peculiar, sharply seen characters. King in his strongest work is a storyteller likely to survive as Dickens has, despite the sniffs of the litcrit establishment.
SILVER BULLET (rogerebert.suntimes.com)  I like the opening line:
Stephen King's "Silver Bullet" is either the worst movie ever made from a Stephen King story, or the funniest. It is either simply bad, or it is an inspired parody of his whole formula, in which quiet American towns are invaded by unspeakable horrors. It's a close call, but I think the movie is intentionally funny.
 DREAMCATCHER (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
"Dreamcatcher" begins as the intriguing story of friends who share a telepathic gift, and ends as a monster movie of stunning awfulness. What went wrong? How could director Lawrence Kasdan and writer William Goldman be responsible for a film that goes so awesomely wrong?
SECRET WINDOW (rogerebert.suntimes.com)

CAT'S EYE (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
 The crazy unreality of the situation has a "Twilight Zone" sort of appeal, and indeed "Cat's Eye" is a superior Twilight-style anthology of three stories that are held together by the adventures of the cat. It's a small, scrappy tabby that survives not only electric shock (actually only special effects, so don't call the ASPCA), but also city traffic, falls from high buildings, one-way tickets to the pound, and a duel to the death with a gremlin who lives behind a little girl's bedroom wall.
APT PUPIL (rogerebert.suntimes.com)

HEARTS IN ATLANTIS (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
Rarely does a movie make you feel so warm and so uneasy at the same time, as Stephen King's story evokes the mystery of adolescence, when everything seems to be happening for the very first time.
NEEDFUL THINGS (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
"Needful Things" is yet another one of those films based on a Stephen King story that inspires you to wonder why his stories don't make better films. (INDEED!)
THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION (rogerebert.suntimes.com)
The word "redemption" is in the title for a reason. The movie is based on a story, Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption, by Stephen King, which is quite unlike most of King's work. The horror here is not of the supernatural kind, but of the sort that flows from the realization than 10, 20, 30 years of a man's life have unreeled in the same unchanging daily prison routine.
BAG OF BONES (www.suntimes.com/entertainment)
‘Stephen King’s Bag of Bones” is a bag of something, and it ain’t bones. Based on King’s 1998 thriller (which I trust is better than the two-part miniseries starting Sunday on A&E), “Bag of Bones” boils down to a hokey horror story that relies on cheap tricks — nightmares! sudden bursts of loud music! animal in the attic! — to deliver most of its chills. Worse yet, some of the characters are so cartoonish, they’re more “Scooby-Doo” than Cujo.  (OUCH!!!)
CHILDREN OF THE CORN (rogerebert.suntimes.com)  -- this one is great!
By the end of “Children of the Corn,” the only thing moving behind the rows is the audience, fleeing to the exits. (well said, sir)

Riding The NEWS Bullet



This pictures has nothing to do with this article
except it is what I NEED
my wife should take out a loan and buy this for me

Hey, there is a lot of really cool news out there right now. Let me offer some bullet points to several interesting stories out right now:

I really enjoyed the article at Lilja's Library titled "Did You Catch Stephen King?" (HERE).  He recounts Kings various on screen appearances, from small roles to large -- country bumpkin to loveable trucker.  He even notes one non Stephen King project in which you can spot King's voice!  It's a very nice summery.

Hollywood Reporter has a Sundance Film Review of Room 237.  (HERE)  The bottom line, " A wacky, sometimes hilariously esoteric deconstruction of the subliminal messages and hidden meanings in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining."

*  Matt at Stephen King Fancast has posted an interview with Christopher Birk, director of Willa. (HERE)  Also catch my interview with Matt (HERE).  And the nice things Matt said about me, even though I picked on him and Bryant, are (HERE).

Playbill.com has a article titled: PHOTO ARCHIVE: Carrie Musical, Original Photos and Playbill.  (HERE) "As the infamous musical Carrie — based on the Stephen King novel — prepares for its first-ever New York revival at MCC Theater, we look back at the original UK and NYC productions and offer a glance through the pages of the Broadway Playbill."

The original final chapter of 11/22/63 has been posted on stephenking.com (HERE).  Though posted at stephenking.com, I first saw it at Lilja's.

DVD File has posted the final specs for the Bag Of Bones DVD's.  (HERE)  I might be the only constant reader who enjoyed this mini-series a lot! 

Summer Dawn Hortillosa at The Jersey Journal has a story titled, "Lincoln, Holland tunnels subject of exhibit at Hoboken Historical Museum."  (HERE)  She discusses Angus Gillespie, who served as a consultant for the exhibit's design.  Gillespie has written a book, “Crossing Under the Hudson: The Story of The Holland and Lincoln Tunnels" in which she notes various media references to the tunnels, including Stephen King's novel The Stand.  Worth noting, since I think the trip through the Lincoln Tunnel is one of the most memorable -- if not one of the scariest -- scenes in any Stephen King book.  Rank it right up there with those two women hacking each other to death in the middle of the street in Needful Things, eh!

*  Finally, Matt at Stephen King Fancast introduced me to the Discordia 19 website.  Very well done!  You can find it (HERE)  Check out the post, "Mark Geyer Remarqued King Illustrations" (HERE).

Friday: Bag Of Bones Complete

Tonight A&E is running both episodes of Bag of Bones back to back.  So if you missed it the first time, here's your chance to see the whole thing.  Then, if you miss that -- they're running it again.  That's 8 hours of Bag of Bones!

Bag Of Bones Boosts Ratings For A&E

Philiana Ng at The Hollywood Reporter has posted the ratings for Bag of Bones.  Not bad!  The first night drew 3.4 million viewers, which makes it the top cable telecast for the night.  Ng writes, "on the following evening, Bag of Bones retained a strong 88 percent of its premiere audience, delivering 3 million viewers."

The article is HERE.

The Girl Who Loves Horror: Review Of Bag Of Bones

A while back The Girl Who Loves Horror told us that Bag Of Bones was her favorite book.  I've been looking forward to her review of the mini-series -- be it good, bad, or something in between.  This is reposted from her blog, which I highly recommend!  (http://thegirlwholoveshorror.blogspot.com/)
 
Resposted with permission.
 
Review Of Bag Of Bones Miniseries
by Michele (TheGirlWhoLovesHorror)
 
 

Oh-kay. How to talk about "Bag of Bones"? It's always hard for me to review an adaptation of a book I love so much and have such a strong connection to, and Bag of Bones is definitely one of those books. Most people would probably say that you have to look at the book and adaptation as two separate entities. To a point, I agree. Movies and books are different mediums and therefore must be dealt with in different ways. But when a movie has such strong source material, how can one not judge the movie based on its ability to effectively recreate what was presented in the book? Let's see how Mick Garris and crew did with my favorite Stephen King book.

Part One Review: Honestly, not much has happened so far. Jo Noonan died, Mike Noonan grieved, Mike went to Sara Laughs (even though it was never mentioned in the miniseries that Sara Laughs was the name of his lake house but whatever), Mike found out that Sara Laughs is haunted by Jo and Sara Tidwell, Mike met Mattie and Kyra, Mike got involved with Kyra's crazy grandfather Max Devore. There's still much to be covered and since they didn't get very far in the first two hours, a lot of story and action is going to have be crammed into the last two hours. Good or bad? We'll see.

I must say that the first part felt a little slow, and not necessarily suspenseful. Mike's dreams and his ghostly encounters felt like the filmmakers were just recycling the same old horror movie cliches, when in the book the mood was creepy but much more subtle. I loved the inclusion of the refrigerator magnets and Bunter's bell as how the ghosts communicate, though. Pierce Brosnan's crazed laughing about these incidents was a little weird, but Mike expresses in the book about how he is both terrified by the ghosts and a little excited at what he is experiencing as well, so I guess that fits.

I'm still not sold on Brosnan as Mike. He's a bit older looking - though that doesn't matter much - and he doesn't have Mike's sarcastic sense of humor or overall way with words (he's a writer, remember). The actors playing Max Devore and his yet-unnamed "assistant" Rogette are also quite good so far, though they haven't had much to do. Max has just the right amount of cunning and evil behind his eyes, just how I pictured him from the book and Rogette is perhaps even creepier looking than I pictured.

The big change I got pissed off about noticed was how Jo died. In the book, she has a brain aneurysm in a parking lot and Mike wasn't there. In the show, she gets hit by a fucking bus. I understand the need for making things a little more dramatical or whatever but this is going a bit far. And to have Mike running out and holding his bleeding and dying wife? I don't know that they should have gone for that big of a change for the sake of drama. It was too gruesome for me, but I admit that it did manage to hurry the story up a bit and get Mike to Sara Laughs, so I'm letting it slide for the moment.

A couple things I did like: Really liked the dream sequence where Mike kisses Sara, Jo, and Mattie. It set up for the audience who the important players were in this piece and was quite beautifully shot. Also really liked the actress playing Sara Tidwell. She's absolutely gorgeous, and if that was really her singing in that one scene, then she's pretty freaking talented, too. Though Part One is starting out a bit dull, I'm excited to see how the dramatic events of the conclusion play out. Time for Part Two!

Part Two Review: NO! No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Part One may have taken a few liberties with the story and changed things around a bit, but Part Two done messed the whole thing up. What I'm complaining about though, is not just that they changed stuff (although, yes, I was very annoyed at some of the changes). The real problem with this was the way everything was handled. All the action went down too quickly and they seemed to treat the audience like they were stupid.

What I mean by this is that at several parts, they had characters literally spell out what was happening instead of revealing it in a better way and letting the audience figure it out for themselves. The worst part was in the scene of what happened to Sara Tidwell. They actually had a bloody Sara say to the men, "I curse you! You will kill your daughters! Your sons will kill their daughters! And so on and so forth!" before she died. Ri-donk-ulous. What, is she a witch now or something? Mattie had to actually say to Mike, "That's why Jo didn't tell you she was pregnant! She knew about the curse!" What about the fact that all the children's names that the men killed started with a "K" like Sara's daughter Keisha (in the book, it was a son and his name was Kito)? All those little facts just make the mystery seem more involved and bigger and more powerful than the miniseries made it out to be.

I did love that they included one of my favorite parts from the book, which was when Mike met Rogette and Max on The Street and Rogette starts throwing rocks at Mike in the lake. It was a much longer scene in the book and always felt a little ludicrous to me, but also very funny and showed how crazy those two were. I actually had an actress in my mind for Rogette while reading the book - Marian Seldes.


I'm telling you, when that chick gets angry, she is the scariest-looking person on the planet. The other lady is great in the role, though, and she has a great look with that black hair and costuming.

I admit that Bag of Bones was probably a hard novel to adapt. Much of it centered on Mike alone and his inner monologue which is not only difficult to translate to film but it also would have been very boring to watch Pierce Brosnan get scared at ghosts for a couple hours. Some scenes were great, like the dream sequence of Mike and Kyra at the fair but other important scenes were either watered down for TV or hyped up too much to make them more exciting.

A couple random comments: Rogette kissing Max in the bathtub before she killed him? Ew! She's supposed to be his daughter! They don't say that in the show but for people who've read the book and know that fact, this was a very weird little scene. Also liked the reference to Lisey's Story when Mike mentions "Booya Moon." Liked Mattie's death scene - that bullet wound in her cheek was horrendous. Did not like the scene where Mattie Devore appears to her daughter formed out of water. Too silly for my tastes.

On the whole, though, "Bag of Bones" was a complete failure. There was too much information that they tried to cram into the last two hours and the result was something very sloppy. This book is really so much better than the miniseries made it out to be. I know that must be annoying to hear, but I have mad love for this novel - it is probably my favorite book, period - and I think the story is so beautiful and heartbreaking and this adaptation does it no justice. Mick Garris, you are hereby banned from adapting anymore of King's work. Leave it to Frank Darabont, because believe me, he does a helluva better job than you.

EW: Bag Of Bones The Movie v. The Book

Stephen Lee has an article at Entertainment Weekly's Pop Watch discussing Bag of Bones he mini-series and Bag of Bones the book.  The kind of stuff the only really excites Constant Readers. 

Lee objects to the "tone" of the movie, suggesting it has a different feel from the book.  His only major noted derailment from the book itself had to do with the circumstances of Jo Noonan's death.  But Lee hastens to say that this was probably a necessary change.

Lee admits that "The creepiness of the book - translated well to television. . ."

The full article is HERE.

Garris Gives Us A HOME-RUN


Custody has its responsibility.  Giving Mick Garris custody of Bag Of Bones made a few people nervous. . . people who have never quite gotten over Sleepwalkers!  Well, my opinion only here, but I thought Bag Of Bones was a home run! 

Now I must admit to a few nervous moments in the first half.  I liked it, but found myself asking, "Where's this going?"  But the second half -- of my!  Everything comes together.  The story works as a cohesive whole.  My only complaint is that it had to be broken into two parts, since it relies so heavily on the second part to move things forward.

The acting was great!  The plot was a gift from Stephen King.  The mini-series gave us both story and gore, action and drama.  I was surprised at the amount of gore and violence, especially toward the end, that A&E allowed to hit the air waves.  Cable s a good venue for the Stephen King mini-series.

Bag Of Bones was a full embrace of the Stephen King universe.  This was especially true in the first part and in their promotion.  A lot of the publicity was obviously aimed at us constant readers!  (Any #1 fans out there?!) 

Though I am sure someone will say the movie was too slow, dragged and could have used more editing -- I think it was very well paced.  You do have to give the movie time to unfold, but that's the way a Stephen King story works!  King is not an action writer, he gives us drama and horror, and to do that takes a little time.  If you just want cut-em ups from beginning to end, they have those, but King doesn't write them.  King gives us thoughtful drama/horror that is deeply character driven. 

I thought Brosnan and the entire cast was great.  Brosnan did a good job showing us the inner struggles of a grieving man.  There are moments he is overcome by waves of emotional pain, but he doesn't allow it to crush him.

For King on the small screen, I would put this up there with The Stand -- among the very best.  Garris has shown himself to be a worthy steward of the King property on screen.  He is faithful to the flow of the story, the characters behavior and the tone of the book itself.  Quite simply, I look forward to seeing more Garris / King collaborations.  . . . so time to get to work on Cell!

Always interested in your opinion.

Does Bag Of Bones Hint At A Bachman Return?



Speculation has been buzzing for a while now that Richard Bachman might have left more manuscripts behind. 

We all know that Bachman made an appearance in the Bag Of Bones photo releases. Just check out those book shelves.

Tonight, in episode 1 of Bag Of Bones, Mike Noonan is told, "There's even talk of a newly discovered Bachman book."

Kevin Quigley at Charnel House said back in November, "For those of you who thought Bachman's posthumous novels had dried up with Blaze, worry not! It looks like the old dairy farmer still has some afterlife in him yet."

Quigley quoted King as saying: "I would like to write a Bachman novel that had some of that Charles Willeford feel. The dark side of American life ... I would like to start a book about a crazy private eye, a guy who is really on the dark side. I see the scene: this guy sitting in his office in an unnamed American city, the sky grey, the rain grey and hitting the window. That is it ... But I know the rest of it would follow pretty nicely with that hard-boiled voice like Raymond Chandler. Think of Philip Marlowe, only a total fucking degenerate.” (Charnel House)

I also liked Jo Noonan's comment, "have fun with Annie Wilkes" when the guy announced he was his number one fan.

Tell Us What You Thought Of Bag Of Bones



Tonight was the first part of Bag Of Bones.  I thought it was great!  Did it light y'all up, or let you down?

Bag Of Bones Explodes All Over The Web



WOW!  Bag of Bones is all over the place!  Here are some links that discuss tonight's A&E miniseries, "Bag Of Bones."

Pierce Brosnan on The Ellen DeGeneres Show

Ellen calls Bag Of Bones a "scary scary thing."

Pierce Brosnan, who plays Mike Noonan in Bag of Bones, was Ellen's first guest on Thrusday.  They discuss Brosnan's family; wife, kids and house.  My favorite part was when his phone rang on live TV.

The clip they showed from Bag Of Bones was great!  Brosnan takes a moment to explain the movie theme, saying, "There's something for everyone."  Ellen adds, "It's not a feel good movie."  ! 

Asked if he likes scary movies, Brosnan said he does, and then said, "I love Stephen King.  He is a dude!  He such an amazing story teller."

Jam: "Bag Of Bones Holds Attention"

Photo Credit HERE
HERE is a positive review of Bag of Bones.  Bill Harris notes how "aggressive" it is for A&E to put this out while most channels are packing in the Christmas programming.

He says Bag of Bones is "well done" and that "apparently this isn't an era for trashy-slashy horror, but rather a time for lush, quality horror."

As anyone who has read the book will say, Harris urges viewers to read the book!  He says,
"With any story of this nature, a rather robust "suspension of disbelief" is required by the viewer. And while this is of no consequence to anyone who hasn't read the book, if you have read it you'll notice some little leaps of logic that aren't explained at all in the TV mini-series but were fully fleshed out in the novel."

Fangoria: Garris Discusses King's Bag Of Bones Involvement



Abbie Berstein at Fangoria has a great article/interview about Bag of Bones with director Mick Garris.  (HERE)

There article is rittled with interesting things.  For instance, this is the first project that King and Garris have done together that neither have written the script for.  In fact, Garris says that King's involvement was completely unofficial. 

About King's relationship to the mini-series, Garris said,
“[King is] not a producer on this.  He’s not officially involved, but because of our relationship, I would run all these things by him. He didn’t really give script notes, but I sent him first the feature screenplay and then the teleplay after that happened, and he obviously did have director approval and two or three of the leading actor approvals. Other than that, he wasn’t really involved, except as a friend.”
Garris also shares:
  • The project went from being a feature to a TV miniseries.
  • Brosnan also starred in NOMADS and THE LAWNMOWER MAN.  (I didn't know that.  I guess I should try watching Lawnmower Man again.)
  • Garris calls the movie more than horror, he calls it "a very passionate ghost story."
The article also reveals how they came upon Brosnan, and what he thinks of the Fangoria readership.  All worth checking out!

Bag Of Bones Tie-In Book


Simon and Schuster has released the movie tie-in for Bag of Bones.  Buy it HERE (for under $10). 

A friend of mine decided to buy all movie tie in books.  Created great concern when he realized some books have multiple movies!  Like Different Seasons.

Dorsey: Bag Of Bones Is No Twilight



Patrick Dorsey at xfinity has a great article titled "A look inside Stephen King's Bag Of Bones."   (here)   It seems important to Dorsey to remind us that Bag of Bones is no Twilight.  By that, I assume he means a lame romance instead of a good solid ghost story! 

Dorsey notes that this was Garris' first time working with James Bond himself, Mr. Brosnan.  Garris said about Brosnan, “I’d never seen him do this kind of a role where it’s so raw and emotional, where he really breaks down. And he was terrific. And he’s also such a gentleman. We got along great.”  Garris says that Brosnan was "a little reserved" about some of the supernatural scenes, but eventually he dived right in.

Like Haven, Bag of Bones was filmed in Nova Scotia.  Behind the camera the article says Garris has "Cosmas Paul Bolger (“Moulin Rouge”) and Jeffrey Okun (“The Day the Earth Stood Still”) assisting, along with makeup director Adrien Morot (“300”)."  He confirms that King is not in the film. 

And here's my favorite quote from Garris: "I was really, really surprised that when we did my cut, they had no broadcast standards issues at all with it."

Now. . . for my question: Why does the A&E Banner include the line at the bottom "Real Life.  Drama."  Bag of Bones is real life?  It's Drama?  Did not one tell the advertising department that this is a horror film?

THANKS TO BRYANT BURNETTE

Dark Score Puzzles

Anyone puzzled by Darkscore Stories yet?  Michael Anderson at Wired has an article titled "Dark Score Stories Provides Puzzles for Stephen King Fans." 

Anderson calls the website is "deceptively simplistic."  Having dug quite a bit through this website, I must agree.  It is chalk full of fun stuff!  The photo's make the world of Stephen King more real than most movies based on King's work.

He points out the obvious links, Book titles, hats and so on.  But then there is stuff you have to dig a bit deeper for.  Anderson writes, "Puzzles are integrated into the experience through messages hidden within each photo essay."

So, what cool stuff have you found at the website?

Bev Vincent's Interview With Mick Garris

Director Mick Garris with 89-year-old William Schallert, who plays Max Devore
from fearnet.com
Fearnet has posted a 2 part interview with Bev Vincent.  I really like Vincent's books about King -- usually related to the Dark Tower. 

Vincent and Garris discuss the original plan for Bag of Bones to be a feature film and how it progressed into a mini-series.  Garris levels with us, saying, "the two-hour script really felt like we were missing stuff."  I love his passion for staying faithful to the King source material.  Garris also tells Vincent that there was no network censorship! 

Also discussed are filming locations and special effects.  In fact, Garris promises, "There are a lot of key visual effects.  Sara and the tree sequences. There are hauntings. They're not all over the movie, but there are some pretty extensive things in it."

Is Stephen King in Bag of Bones?  Check out the interview (the answer is in part 1)  Garris also discusses what other actor was considered for the part of Noonan.

The Interview: Part 1
The Interview: Part 2
The Interview: Part 3

FAST COMPANY: Review Of Bag Of Bones Prequel Site

Rae Ann Fera has an article at Fast Company discussing Stephen King's "Bag of Bones" creepy back story at Darkscorestories.com

So exactly who is behind Dark Score Stories?  Well, Fera answers that for us:

Created by Campfire, the creative and production team behind The Blair Witch Project and several acclaimed alternate reality campaigns, “Dark Score Stories” employs photos and audio clips to tell the tale of Dark Score Lake, an unassuming little town in the unincorporated Maine township of TR-90. But this being Stephen King and all, things are not quite what they seem.


She also says that "award-winning Danish photojournalist Joachim Ladefoged created the lush photos."

Of course, the website gives the back story to Bag Of Bones.  It is a 1 year time warp, carefully setting the stage for what is to come.

Dark Score Stories: Prequel To BAG OF BONES



So what exactly is "Dark Score Stories"?  We know its a promotional site for Bag of Bones, but there seems to be more involved here.  According to Hollywood Reporter, it's an online prequel to the Bag of Bones miniseries.

Philiana Ng states:
Dark Score Stories will serve as an interactive launchpad for the mini, starring Pierce Brosnan, Melissa George and Annabeth Gish. The online destination will delve deeper into the setting and characters of Bag of Bones through interviews, oral histories and black-and-white photographs.
Each vignette will offer a glimpse into daily life at Dark Score Lake, which is where Bag of Bones is set, and is introduced with an animated still. Visitors to the website will uncover secrets hidden in to each of the images.