According FRS 139, investment in shares can be classified as either:
1. Held for trading securities (“HFT”); or
2. Available for sale financial assets (“AFS”).
Investments HFT are acquired principally for the purposes of selling in the near term or to take advantage of fluctuation in price. They are short term investments in shares / bonds.
If the share investment is not HFT, then it is AFS. Example of AFS investments is long term investments in shares.
Why is it important to determine the classification of the investments?
Both HFT and AFS investments are measured at fair value (or current market value).
But if it is HFT, the changes in market value will be recognised in P&L;
whereas for AFS investments, the changes in market value will NOT be recognised in P&L, it goes to Equity in Balance Sheet.
See, this is the difference – one impacts P&L and the other will not; but both will have the same impact on the Net Assets.
如果你不做,機會是零。做的話,即使千萬分之ㄧ也是機會 / 愛要耐心等待仔細尋找感覺很重要 / 停損是一種美德,"貪"跟"貧"只差一劃而已 / 如果你接受不到,那你應該不要開始,而不是在開始了之後,才去覺得辛苦,不開心,而妄想去改變事情。/ 你不會作期貨的時候,你就想想撲克牌要怎麼打,期貨就是那樣作。/ 常常有投資人會問 現在適不適合買進 其實真正要問的是 適合買進就真的可以買進了嗎 不要期望得到別人的答案 因為別人的風險不是你能夠所承擔的 也不是一買進後馬上就會飆漲 你把你自己的帳戶損益 交給別人”建議”是很不切實際的 更何況當您得知適合買進的時候 可能只是在幫人抬轎 交易要對自己負責 因為買進也是有風險的
nuffnang
Showing posts with label Accounting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Accounting. Show all posts
Friday, October 29, 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
FRS140 对公司财报的影响
以下取自 Hunza properties berhad 2010-3Q 季报。
The amendment that has material impact is FRS 140, Investment Property.
Following the amendments to FRS 140,
the property under construction or development for future use as investment property is now accounted for as “investment property”,
as compared to “property, plant and equipment, construction-in-progress”, previously.
See Notes A10 and A11.
A10. Valuations of Property, Plant & Equipment
The value of land and buildings, stated at 2010 valuation, has been brought forward after a revaluation exercise carried out on 21 May 2010 by an independent firm of professional valuers using “open market value with existing use” basis. This was in line with our policy that freehold office units and apartments and buildings (held for own use) stated at valuation are revalued at regular intervals of at least once in every five years.
Upon adoption of “Improvements to FRS 140, Investment Property”, the property under construction or development for future use as investment property is now accounted for as Investment Property (refer A2). Hence, Gurney Paragon mall and office, which are under construction and another piece of land were transferred from previous classification of Property, Plant & Equipment to Investment Property during the current period.
A11. Valuations of Investment Properties
The value of such lands are based upon a valuation exercise carried out on 20 January 2010 and 21 May 2010 by independent firms of professional valuers and/or directors. The valuations were arrived at by reference to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties. This was in line with our policy upon adoption of FRS 140, that investment properties are revalued at regular intervals of at least once every year. Gain on revaluation of the lands that were transferred out from Property, Plant & Equipment (refer A10 above) amounting to RM22.7 million was recognised in current period.
The amendment that has material impact is FRS 140, Investment Property.
Following the amendments to FRS 140,
the property under construction or development for future use as investment property is now accounted for as “investment property”,
as compared to “property, plant and equipment, construction-in-progress”, previously.
See Notes A10 and A11.
A10. Valuations of Property, Plant & Equipment
The value of land and buildings, stated at 2010 valuation, has been brought forward after a revaluation exercise carried out on 21 May 2010 by an independent firm of professional valuers using “open market value with existing use” basis. This was in line with our policy that freehold office units and apartments and buildings (held for own use) stated at valuation are revalued at regular intervals of at least once in every five years.
Upon adoption of “Improvements to FRS 140, Investment Property”, the property under construction or development for future use as investment property is now accounted for as Investment Property (refer A2). Hence, Gurney Paragon mall and office, which are under construction and another piece of land were transferred from previous classification of Property, Plant & Equipment to Investment Property during the current period.
A11. Valuations of Investment Properties
The value of such lands are based upon a valuation exercise carried out on 20 January 2010 and 21 May 2010 by independent firms of professional valuers and/or directors. The valuations were arrived at by reference to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties. This was in line with our policy upon adoption of FRS 140, that investment properties are revalued at regular intervals of at least once every year. Gain on revaluation of the lands that were transferred out from Property, Plant & Equipment (refer A10 above) amounting to RM22.7 million was recognised in current period.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)