The Virginia.
[from the Examiner]
Go sport Navy Yard, March 29, 1862. Having from an article in the Richmond Inquirer, and one also in the Whig claiming the plant of the Iron clad ship.
Virginia for Lieutenant John M Brooke of the Navy.
thereby doing myself and Engineer Williams on the greatest injustice, I feel called upon to make a statement of facts in the case for the for her information of the reading public in the history of this ship. In jobs last Lieutenant Brooke made a attempt to get up a floating battery at the Navy Department. The Secretary sent to this yard for the master, ship carpenter to come up and enlist him. After trying for a week he failed to produce anything, and the master carpenter returned to his duties at the yard Secretary Mallory then sent for me to come to Richmond, at which time I carried-up the model of an iron-clad flooding battery, with the shield of the present Virginia on it, and before I ever saw Lieutenant Brooke This model may now be seen at the Navy Department.
The Secretary then ordered a Board, composed of Engineer Williamson, Lieut. Brooke and myself, to examine and report upon some plan for a floating iron-clad battery. "Justice," in his communication in the Whig, says:
‘ "After-full consultation arian proposed by Lieut. John M. Brooke was adopted, and received the approval of the Secretary of the Navy; that it was found the plan or Lieut. Brooke could easily be applied to the Merrimac; and, in fact, so other plan could have made the Marrim so an effective ship, and that a report was made to the Secretary of the Navy in accordance with these facts."
’ How, I would only ask a careful reading of this report, and see how far it agrees with the statements of "Justice?" And I would also ask any one at all acquainted with the circumstances, how Lieut. Brooks could have had anything to do with this report further than signing his name to it? What did he know about the condition of the Merrimac, or her engine, or whether there was enough of her left to make a floating battery out of or not, or anything about what it would cost, or anything else about her i for he had not ever seen her, and knew nothing of her condition really.
Navy Department,
Richmond, June 25, 1861.
The notion of the hull, boilers, and heavy and costly parts of the engine, being but little injured, reduce the cost of construction to about one-third of the amount which would be required to constructed such a vessel ansts.
We cannot, without further examination, make an accurate estimate of the cost of the proposed work, but think it will be about one hundred and ten thousand dollars, the most of which will be for labor, the materials being nearly all on hand in the yard, except the front plating to cover the shield.
The plan to be adopted in the arrangement of the shield for glancing shot, mounting guns, stringing the hull and plating, to be in accordances with the plan submitted for the approval of the Department.
Your obedient servants,
Wm. P. Williamson, Chief Engineer,
John M. Brooke, Lieutenant.
John L. Porter, Naval Constructor
The concluding part of the report states that the whole arrangements were to be made in accordance with the plan submitted. The facts are, that no plan was submitted with this report. After the report was made, I returned immediately to the Norfolk Navy-Yard, and made the plans of the Virginia myself, and, unaided by any one, placed the very same shield on her which was on the model I carried up with me before this Board met. On the eleventh day of July, I returned to Richmond with this drawing, and presented it to Secretary Mallory, who immediately wrote the following order for the work, with his own hand, and give it to me.
[copy]
Navy Department.
Richmond,
July 11, 1861.
You will proceed with all practices his dispatch to make the changes in the form of the Merrimac, and to build, equip, and fit her, in all respects, according to the design and plans of the constructor and engineer, Messrs. Porter and Williamson.
As time is of the first importance in the matter, you will see that the work progresses without delay to completion.
Lieut. Brooke is not even hinted at in this letter. After the ship had been in progress for six weeks, the Secretary wrote the following letter to Flag-Officer Forreston, the subject:
[copy]
C. S. Navy Department.
Richmond, Aug. 19, 1861.
The great importance of the service expected from the Merrimac, and the urgent necessity of her speedy completion, induces me to call upon you to push forward the work with the utmost dispatch. Chief Engineer Williamson and Constructor Porter, severally in charge of the two branches of this great work, and for which they will be held specially responsible, will receive, therefore, every possible facility at the expense and delay of every other work on hand, if necessary.
Of the great and skillful calculations of the displacements and weights of timber, and iron involved in the planning and construction of this great piece of naval architecture, and of her present weights with everything on board, no other, man than myself has, or ever had, any knowledge. If he has, 1st him show it; for while public opinion said she would never float, no one, save myself, knew to the contrary, or what she was capable of tearing. After the Merrimac was in progress for some time, Lieutenant Brooke was constantly proposing alterations in her to the Secretary of the Navy, and as constantly and firmly opposed by myself, which the Secretary knows.
To Engineer Williamson, who had the exclusive control of the machinery, great credit is due for having so improved the propeller and engines as to improve the speed of the ship three knots per hour.
I never thought for a moment that, after the many difficulties I had, to encounter in making these new and intricate arrangements for the working of this novel kind of ship, that any one would attempt to rob me of my first merits; for if there was any other man than myself who had any responsibility about her success or failure, I never knew i, only so far as the working of the machinery was concerned, for which Engineer Williamson was alone responsible.
I hope these plain statements of facts will satisfy the people of this Government as to who is entitled to the plan of the Virginia.
C. S. N. C instructor.
