This little cutie is all over country radio with his single Somebody's Heartbreak.
The song is really fun, catchy and well, it is good. But how does it pass for country?
It is kind of like Taylor Swift?
There's no country left to that girl anymore. (If there ever was).
Now I'm not knocking his music, because the song is good. It is what pop music should be like for the most part, a little bit of cheesy fun, that anyone can listen too.
But country?
There's not one bit of country sound to the song. And if you listen to clips from his album, you'll see, not much country there?
So why is he an up and coming Country singer?
I don't know.
Maybe because country music needs a few tweenybopper cuties?
Whatever, at least his music is worth listening to.
Showing posts with label wtf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wtf. Show all posts
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Something To Ponder
I watched the 25 years of Dollywood special on Hallmark last night.
Shut up! I love Dolly, she's an awesomely sweet and talented lady, plus how can you not love someone like her? She's open and honest about herself. Good on ya Dolly!
What really got me was when Dolly did her duet with her god-daughter Miley Cyrus. They sang Jolene, and it made me rethink how I felt about Miley.
She's got a voice, but I really don't think she should be singing pop music in the vein of Britney etc. She really should stick with country pop, a'la Taylor Swift and Gloriana. When she sings that, she sounds natural.
There isn't a full clip of the performance up, but I did find an E! clip with a snippet of the duet.
Miley, give up pop and go country where you belong!
Shut up! I love Dolly, she's an awesomely sweet and talented lady, plus how can you not love someone like her? She's open and honest about herself. Good on ya Dolly!
What really got me was when Dolly did her duet with her god-daughter Miley Cyrus. They sang Jolene, and it made me rethink how I felt about Miley.
She's got a voice, but I really don't think she should be singing pop music in the vein of Britney etc. She really should stick with country pop, a'la Taylor Swift and Gloriana. When she sings that, she sounds natural.
There isn't a full clip of the performance up, but I did find an E! clip with a snippet of the duet.
Miley, give up pop and go country where you belong!
Monday, February 1, 2010
Tubesday Top 3: Weird Stuff edition
Tubesday Top 3: Weird Stuff edition
Happy Tubesday! This week's theme is the ever ambiguous "weird stuff." First up, a video that combines three of my favorite things: birds, installment art, and Rock & Roll. Check out the zebra finch at 0:40, who's either trying to make a nest or a whammy bar.
Next up may be the creepiest children's show I've seen. And I scour the internet specifically for awful children's shows. Between the bad production values, the Rasta Rooster, and the super awkward host, this amounts to one heap of weird.
Our last video turns up on the endangered species list of dark yet funny SNL sketches. John Hamm of Mad Men and Michael Buble make a commercial for a pork and champagne restaurant called Hamm & Buble. Then things get weird. Never knew that Michael Buble was such a funny dude.
Happy Tubesday!
Happy Tubesday! This week's theme is the ever ambiguous "weird stuff." First up, a video that combines three of my favorite things: birds, installment art, and Rock & Roll. Check out the zebra finch at 0:40, who's either trying to make a nest or a whammy bar.
Next up may be the creepiest children's show I've seen. And I scour the internet specifically for awful children's shows. Between the bad production values, the Rasta Rooster, and the super awkward host, this amounts to one heap of weird.
Our last video turns up on the endangered species list of dark yet funny SNL sketches. John Hamm of Mad Men and Michael Buble make a commercial for a pork and champagne restaurant called Hamm & Buble. Then things get weird. Never knew that Michael Buble was such a funny dude.
Happy Tubesday!
Saturday, January 2, 2010
The Decadent Sinful Lyrics of...Spandau Ballet?
The Decadent Sinful Lyrics of...Spandau Ballet?
One of my friends recently gave me a kick-ass present that she found while cleaning out her attic, a book called "The Original Rock Music Rating System" by Eric Barger. From what I gathered, Barger was a late 80s/early 90s rock critic turned evangelist of the Hyper-Calvanist "Oh Noes, the Children!" type. I'm fairly sure one of his books was the reason I wasn't allowed to watch Thundercats growing up, but that's a whole 'nother story.
Anyway, in this book Barger and his crack team of researchers pour through albums and interviews a variety of groups from the late 80s so that "parents know exactly what they're buying." Honestly? I don't have much against that idea. In fact, with all the parents that let their kids consume pop culture carte blanche (and ruin my damn movie going experience by taking their four year old to Silent Hill), I think it's a pretty good one. I'm all for sites like Kids in Mind so that Little Sally doesn't end up in therapy and I end up out $8.
This ratings system, though, has its bags packed for Crazyville. Sure, I can see the merit of telling parents about drug references, cursing, and violence. But when the criteria for "cultic" influences is "glorification or participation" in a non-Christian religion, that's when my warning bells go off. (and I'd almost put money on the fact that the author would consider a lot of mainstream Christan denominations "cultic" too). And is there really a need to rate a band for "surreal fantasy"? I guess one minute you're listening to They Might Be Giants, the next you're mainlining Salvador Dali paintings with dirty needles in an underground arthouse.
That last example is my biggest WTF with this book. I can understand 80s fundie parents railing against Ozzy and Poison and Alice Cooper (even though - big pointing arrow - he's a Christian!), but were enough teenagers listening to the Toy Dolls or Nick Cave to warrant their inclusion?
And seriously? CCR? Devo? For fuck's sake, Bananrama? If your 80s-era crotchfruit commits unspeakable acts against nature or God under the influence of Madness or Camper Von Beethoven, I think you have more to worry about than what the local Ladies Auxillary thinks of your kid's music purchases. And methinks thou doth protest too much if you think your kids' faith is going out the window when they buy a Hall and Oates album.
At any rate, the book is campy good fun. Use it for a fun party conversation starter or, for the more sadistic, apply to your child's life to end up with a serial killer or a nerdy, jittery pop culture junky. See exhibit A for proof. (of the latter example... at least until I finish more than season 1 of Dexter).
One of my friends recently gave me a kick-ass present that she found while cleaning out her attic, a book called "The Original Rock Music Rating System" by Eric Barger. From what I gathered, Barger was a late 80s/early 90s rock critic turned evangelist of the Hyper-Calvanist "Oh Noes, the Children!" type. I'm fairly sure one of his books was the reason I wasn't allowed to watch Thundercats growing up, but that's a whole 'nother story.
Anyway, in this book Barger and his crack team of researchers pour through albums and interviews a variety of groups from the late 80s so that "parents know exactly what they're buying." Honestly? I don't have much against that idea. In fact, with all the parents that let their kids consume pop culture carte blanche (and ruin my damn movie going experience by taking their four year old to Silent Hill), I think it's a pretty good one. I'm all for sites like Kids in Mind so that Little Sally doesn't end up in therapy and I end up out $8.
This ratings system, though, has its bags packed for Crazyville. Sure, I can see the merit of telling parents about drug references, cursing, and violence. But when the criteria for "cultic" influences is "glorification or participation" in a non-Christian religion, that's when my warning bells go off. (and I'd almost put money on the fact that the author would consider a lot of mainstream Christan denominations "cultic" too). And is there really a need to rate a band for "surreal fantasy"? I guess one minute you're listening to They Might Be Giants, the next you're mainlining Salvador Dali paintings with dirty needles in an underground arthouse.
That last example is my biggest WTF with this book. I can understand 80s fundie parents railing against Ozzy and Poison and Alice Cooper (even though - big pointing arrow - he's a Christian!), but were enough teenagers listening to the Toy Dolls or Nick Cave to warrant their inclusion?
And seriously? CCR? Devo? For fuck's sake, Bananrama? If your 80s-era crotchfruit commits unspeakable acts against nature or God under the influence of Madness or Camper Von Beethoven, I think you have more to worry about than what the local Ladies Auxillary thinks of your kid's music purchases. And methinks thou doth protest too much if you think your kids' faith is going out the window when they buy a Hall and Oates album.
At any rate, the book is campy good fun. Use it for a fun party conversation starter or, for the more sadistic, apply to your child's life to end up with a serial killer or a nerdy, jittery pop culture junky. See exhibit A for proof. (of the latter example... at least until I finish more than season 1 of Dexter).
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
WTF, Louboutin?!
WTF, Louboutin?!
So shoe designer Christian Louboutin is the first fashion outlaw in a few months that has decide to use Barbie as an inspiration and give her a makeover. No news there, right? Except that Louboutin thinks that Barbie has fat ankles. Barbie, whom in real life would have no space for internal organs, has friggin' cankles.
Now I'm not one of those people that are anti-Barbie. In working in the childcare industry and also from my own memories, I've found that kids are pretty creative and usually destructive about the doll. Yeah, there are the select few kids who are all about Barbie having the cute outfits and looking all prim, but most kids just destroy/eat/make ill-conceived almost-porn with the doll. (I used to chop off all their hair and give them grocery bag parachutes.)
Nope, what bugs me is what this says about my age bracket. I mean, if Barbie "has cankles," then what does that say about RL women? For starters, I guess it means that we aren't supposed to wear Louboutin shoes, but come on! Way to boost my self-esteem, douchebag! If Barbie has fat ankles, then I'd hate to think of how you view most of the women in this country!
Gah, and people wonder why I like my Birkenstocks so damned much. At least Birkenstocks don't make me feel like a cow. Or look like they could kill a person if used in combat.
So shoe designer Christian Louboutin is the first fashion outlaw in a few months that has decide to use Barbie as an inspiration and give her a makeover. No news there, right? Except that Louboutin thinks that Barbie has fat ankles. Barbie, whom in real life would have no space for internal organs, has friggin' cankles.
Now I'm not one of those people that are anti-Barbie. In working in the childcare industry and also from my own memories, I've found that kids are pretty creative and usually destructive about the doll. Yeah, there are the select few kids who are all about Barbie having the cute outfits and looking all prim, but most kids just destroy/eat/make ill-conceived almost-porn with the doll. (I used to chop off all their hair and give them grocery bag parachutes.)
Nope, what bugs me is what this says about my age bracket. I mean, if Barbie "has cankles," then what does that say about RL women? For starters, I guess it means that we aren't supposed to wear Louboutin shoes, but come on! Way to boost my self-esteem, douchebag! If Barbie has fat ankles, then I'd hate to think of how you view most of the women in this country!
Gah, and people wonder why I like my Birkenstocks so damned much. At least Birkenstocks don't make me feel like a cow. Or look like they could kill a person if used in combat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)