This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[10]
A second heir had
been appointed in the event of a posthumous son
dying while a minor. No posthumous son was born.
The next of kin claimed the property. Who could
doubt that the intention of the testator was that
the same man should inherit in the event of the
son not being born who would have inherited in the
event of his death? But he had not written this in
his will.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.