[45]
The uneducated son may be excused
for not appearing at the trial on the ground that he
could contribute nothing to his father's defence: but
even the orator has no claim on the gratitude of
the accused, since the latter was condemned:1 the
man who secured the recall of his kin deserves
to receive the inheritance, while the man who
refuses to divide it with his brother, more especially with a brother who has deserved so well
of him, is avaricious, unnatural and ungrateful:
they will further note that the first and essential
question is that which turns on the letter and intention of the law; unless this is first disposed of,
all subsequent arguments must fall to the ground.
1 Sc. in spite of his own eloquence.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.