[26]
Great
ingenuity may be exercised with regard to properties
and differences, as for instance in the question
whether a person assigned to his creditor for debt,1
[p. 99]
who is condemned by the law to remain in a state
of servitude until he has paid his debt, is actually a
slave. One party will advance the following definition, “A slave is one who is legally in a state of
servitude.” The other will produce the definition,
“A slave is one who is in a state of servitude on
the same terms as a slave (or, to use the older
phrase, 'who serves as a slave').” This definition,
though it differs considerably from the other, will be
quite useless unless it is supported by properties
and differences.
1 cp. III. vi. 25.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.