[12]
when
we should omit the statement of facts altogether;
when we should begin by dealing with the arguments
advanced by our opponents, and when with our own;
when we should place the strongest proofs first and
when the weakest; in what cases we should prefix
questions to the exordium, and what preparation is
necessary to pave the way for these questions; what
arguments the judge will accept at once, and to
what he requires to be led by degrees; whether we
should refute our opponent's arguments as a whole
or in detail; whether we should reserve emotional
appeals for the peroration or distribute them throughout the whole speech; whether we should speak first
of law or of equity; whether we should first advance
(or refute) charges as to past offences or the charges
connected with the actual trial;
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.