References
Cuenod CA, Balvay D. Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI. Diagn Interven Imaging 2013; 94:1187-1204. (Good review of basic mechanisms; some terminology is slightly different than abbreviations used in Tofts models).
Frackowiak RSJ, Lenzi G-L, Jones T, Heather JD. Quantitative measurement of regional cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in man using 15O and positron emission tomography: theory, procedure, and normal values. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980; 4:727-736.
Ito H, Inoue K, Goto R, et al. Database of normal human cerebral blood flow measured by SPECT: I. Comparison between I-123-IMP, Tc-99m-HMPAO, and Tc-99m-ECD as referred with O-15 labeled water PET and voxel-based morphometry. Ann Nucl Med 2006; 20:131-138.
Prinzen FW, Bassingthwaighte JB. Blood flow distributions by microsphere deposition methods. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 45:13-21.
Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaigng 2009; 2:412-424. (comparison of different imaging methods for myocardial perfusion measurement)
Zhang K, Herzog H, Mauler J, et al. Comparison of cerebral blood flow acquired by simultaneous [15O]water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34:1373-1380.
Cuenod CA, Balvay D. Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI. Diagn Interven Imaging 2013; 94:1187-1204. (Good review of basic mechanisms; some terminology is slightly different than abbreviations used in Tofts models).
Frackowiak RSJ, Lenzi G-L, Jones T, Heather JD. Quantitative measurement of regional cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in man using 15O and positron emission tomography: theory, procedure, and normal values. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980; 4:727-736.
Ito H, Inoue K, Goto R, et al. Database of normal human cerebral blood flow measured by SPECT: I. Comparison between I-123-IMP, Tc-99m-HMPAO, and Tc-99m-ECD as referred with O-15 labeled water PET and voxel-based morphometry. Ann Nucl Med 2006; 20:131-138.
Prinzen FW, Bassingthwaighte JB. Blood flow distributions by microsphere deposition methods. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 45:13-21.
Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaigng 2009; 2:412-424. (comparison of different imaging methods for myocardial perfusion measurement)
Zhang K, Herzog H, Mauler J, et al. Comparison of cerebral blood flow acquired by simultaneous [15O]water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34:1373-1380.
Related Questions
Can myocardial perfusion be accurately quantified?
What are the differences between DSC, DCE and ASL perfusion methods used in MRI?
Can myocardial perfusion be accurately quantified?
What are the differences between DSC, DCE and ASL perfusion methods used in MRI?