Internet muse.
Daring, bold, never sold. My daily weblog of politics, humor, philosophy...and a constant and nagging reminder of the existence of universal love....
Monday, June 07, 2004
See the Venus Transit tomorrow!
See the Venus Transit tomorrow!
"There will be no other till the twenty-first century of our era has dawned upon the Earth and the June flowers are blooming in 2004. What will be the state of science - God only knows."
1882 -- William Harkness, U.S. Naval Observatory
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A rare celestial event, one not seen by any person now alive. On June 8, the planet Venus will appear to cross in front of the Sun as seen from Earth. The last "Venus transit" occurred more than a century ago, in 1882, and was used to compute the distance from the Earth to the Sun.
DON'T MISS IT! [LINK1]
[LINK2]
Predictions/times to witness the transit in your city
"There will be no other till the twenty-first century of our era has dawned upon the Earth and the June flowers are blooming in 2004. What will be the state of science - God only knows."
1882 -- William Harkness, U.S. Naval Observatory
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A rare celestial event, one not seen by any person now alive. On June 8, the planet Venus will appear to cross in front of the Sun as seen from Earth. The last "Venus transit" occurred more than a century ago, in 1882, and was used to compute the distance from the Earth to the Sun.
DON'T MISS IT! [LINK1]
[LINK2]
Predictions/times to witness the transit in your city
Time To Leave Iraq - from The Nation
Time to Leave
from TheNation.com
Listen to what the Iraqis are telling us---give them back their country... and leave.
[LINK}
from TheNation.com
Listen to what the Iraqis are telling us---give them back their country... and leave.
[LINK}
Reagan, Terror, and Bush
Reagan, terror, and Bush
With Ronald Reagan as President, America felt optimistically safe to see the world in black and white. These days, as a New York Times editorial stated, "gray is beginning to look a lot more attractive".
Reminiscing with my own mother, she recalled one of the darker moments of the Reagan presidency...his decision to send our Marines to Lebanon. I recall my mother weeping that morning in October, 1983 when she learned over 240 Marines were killed by Middle-eastern terrorists.
the Reagan era brought its share of terror victims.
I also recall having Syracuse University basketball game tickets in my hand for a game to be played in late December, 1988. Just before the game came the news that terrorists connected with Libya had blown up a jet over Lockerbie, Scotland..killing 35 Syracuse University students who were coming home for the holidays. I attended that basketball game and will never forget the solemn silence which subdued the crowd that night. The terrorist bombing of Flight 103 was unquestionably an attack on the United States.*15 active-duty U.S. military members and at least 10 veterans of the United States Armed Forces and members of their families were among those who lost their lives in this tragedy.*
I implore you, dear readers, to research how President Reagan (and Bush 41 directly after him) responded to these acts of terror. I assure you that you'll find little prescience in the wisdom of whatever retaliatory moves were made by our then-President. Why did it take almost 20 years to do anything? Why was terror allowed to build up rather than to be broken down?
These acts of terror during the Reagan era were just a beginning. When I think back, I truly do not think our nation's response to these acts of terror were sufficient. Perhaps, if we'd acted with full responsibility in the 80's, there would have been no strong Osama Bin Laden to lead in 2001.
While I highly respected and liked President Reagan and trusted he was sincere in his motives, I think we should be careful in making a saint of this wonderful human being. In our big fears about Communism, I believe we fully missed the boat on the murderous treachery that would follow on the heels of its demise.
Perhaps President Reagan made us all a bit too optimistic. We went into a dreamful and exuberant "Me-decade" sleep.
Realism is criticized by some of today's NeoConservatives, but I've got to say, my dear readers, there is no more important time in American history than right here..right now for a realist to take the reins. Visionary speeches do no good when the facts on the ground are constantly working against you.
Gazing upon Utopia and shining cities on hills are lovely when the murderer isn't breathing down your neck.
I think Bush is a super-dumbed-down version of a Reagan-wannabe (without Reagan's natural gift of humor). Bush tries to imitate and emulate Reagan's historical successes. We need a clear-eyed realist who is his own man. (A man---or woman---who doesn't have to read from cue-cards and sound like a second-grader when he does). I'm sick of being faked out by cheap (and often seemingly-learning-disabled) imitations.
I believe that a good portion of the reason so many Americans have a visceral dislike for Bush is primarily due to the fact that they suspect they are far more intelligent than he is. It's frustrating when you don't share a man's ideology and you observe that he can barely squeeze three or four properly-pronounced words into one flowing sentence. Another reason for the Bush-disconnect is that so many Americans do not trust that Bush's motives are genuine. He's been caught lying to Americans too many times.
You didn't see the same distaste for Reagan, even though his ideology was oppositional to many.
We trusted Ronnie. He had a genuine-looking smile. He told us to be proud and we found something in his words to believe. He was witty..charming. He had many friends in this world..outside the borders of America. People in Europe tore down a wall with the help of his optimism. What a wonderful time for America...what a decent man.
He wasn't perfect, though. As many Christians joke, there was only one perfect man...and look what they did to him.
There were boats Reagan missed.
Ask the familes of any of these Americans and they'll tell you.
*Matthew Gross has some interesting commentary on Bush/Reagan and what Reagan's death might mean to the upcoming Presidential election.*
*There's a roundup of Reagan commentaries and farewells at Mahablog.
With Ronald Reagan as President, America felt optimistically safe to see the world in black and white. These days, as a New York Times editorial stated, "gray is beginning to look a lot more attractive".
Reminiscing with my own mother, she recalled one of the darker moments of the Reagan presidency...his decision to send our Marines to Lebanon. I recall my mother weeping that morning in October, 1983 when she learned over 240 Marines were killed by Middle-eastern terrorists.
the Reagan era brought its share of terror victims.
I also recall having Syracuse University basketball game tickets in my hand for a game to be played in late December, 1988. Just before the game came the news that terrorists connected with Libya had blown up a jet over Lockerbie, Scotland..killing 35 Syracuse University students who were coming home for the holidays. I attended that basketball game and will never forget the solemn silence which subdued the crowd that night. The terrorist bombing of Flight 103 was unquestionably an attack on the United States.*15 active-duty U.S. military members and at least 10 veterans of the United States Armed Forces and members of their families were among those who lost their lives in this tragedy.*
I implore you, dear readers, to research how President Reagan (and Bush 41 directly after him) responded to these acts of terror. I assure you that you'll find little prescience in the wisdom of whatever retaliatory moves were made by our then-President. Why did it take almost 20 years to do anything? Why was terror allowed to build up rather than to be broken down?
These acts of terror during the Reagan era were just a beginning. When I think back, I truly do not think our nation's response to these acts of terror were sufficient. Perhaps, if we'd acted with full responsibility in the 80's, there would have been no strong Osama Bin Laden to lead in 2001.
While I highly respected and liked President Reagan and trusted he was sincere in his motives, I think we should be careful in making a saint of this wonderful human being. In our big fears about Communism, I believe we fully missed the boat on the murderous treachery that would follow on the heels of its demise.
Perhaps President Reagan made us all a bit too optimistic. We went into a dreamful and exuberant "Me-decade" sleep.
Realism is criticized by some of today's NeoConservatives, but I've got to say, my dear readers, there is no more important time in American history than right here..right now for a realist to take the reins. Visionary speeches do no good when the facts on the ground are constantly working against you.
Gazing upon Utopia and shining cities on hills are lovely when the murderer isn't breathing down your neck.
I think Bush is a super-dumbed-down version of a Reagan-wannabe (without Reagan's natural gift of humor). Bush tries to imitate and emulate Reagan's historical successes. We need a clear-eyed realist who is his own man. (A man---or woman---who doesn't have to read from cue-cards and sound like a second-grader when he does). I'm sick of being faked out by cheap (and often seemingly-learning-disabled) imitations.
I believe that a good portion of the reason so many Americans have a visceral dislike for Bush is primarily due to the fact that they suspect they are far more intelligent than he is. It's frustrating when you don't share a man's ideology and you observe that he can barely squeeze three or four properly-pronounced words into one flowing sentence. Another reason for the Bush-disconnect is that so many Americans do not trust that Bush's motives are genuine. He's been caught lying to Americans too many times.
You didn't see the same distaste for Reagan, even though his ideology was oppositional to many.
We trusted Ronnie. He had a genuine-looking smile. He told us to be proud and we found something in his words to believe. He was witty..charming. He had many friends in this world..outside the borders of America. People in Europe tore down a wall with the help of his optimism. What a wonderful time for America...what a decent man.
He wasn't perfect, though. As many Christians joke, there was only one perfect man...and look what they did to him.
There were boats Reagan missed.
Ask the familes of any of these Americans and they'll tell you.
*Matthew Gross has some interesting commentary on Bush/Reagan and what Reagan's death might mean to the upcoming Presidential election.*
*There's a roundup of Reagan commentaries and farewells at Mahablog.
President Reagan: A poetic expression of love
President Reagan: A poetic expression of love
I don't think I have to repeat the news that he's gone.
What I choose to recall this morning is a part of what was President Reagan's heart..a part with which we can all identify.
He wrote this letter to Nancy on a Sunday..March 20, 1955.
Godspeed, Dutch.
I don't think I have to repeat the news that he's gone.
What I choose to recall this morning is a part of what was President Reagan's heart..a part with which we can all identify.
He wrote this letter to Nancy on a Sunday..March 20, 1955.
Sunday, March 20, 1955
"My darling, here it is, our day. If we were home, we would have a fire and funnies. And we would hate anybody who called or dropped in.
As it is, I'm sitting here on the top of the sixth floor, beside a phony fireplace, looking out at a gray, wet sky, and listening to a radio play music not intended for one person alone.
"Nevertheless, I wouldn't trade the way I feel for the loneliness of those days when one place was like another, and it didn't matter how long I stayed away... with all the missing you there is still such a wonderful warmth in this loneliness.
Like looking forward to a bright, warm room, no matter how dark and cold it is at the moment, you know the room is there and waiting.
I love you so very much.
I don't want--I don't even mind that life made me wait so long to find you.
The waiting only made the finding sweeter.
I love you,
Ronnie"
[LINK]
Godspeed, Dutch.
Who was Elie Hobeika? Ask Karl Rove.
Who was Elie Hobeika?
Ask Karl Rove.
On September 15, 2001, just four days after the 9-11 attacks, CIA Director George Tenet provided President Bush with a Top Secret "Worldwide Attack Matrix"—a virtual license to kill targets deemed to be a threat to the United States in some 80 countries around the world. The Tenet plan, which was subsequently approved by Bush, essentially reversed the executive orders of four previous U.S. administrations that expressly prohibited political assassinations.
According to high level European intelligence officials, Bush's counselor, Karl Rove, used the new presidential authority to silence a popular Lebanese Christian politician [Elie Hobeika], who was planning to offer irrefutable evidence that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon authorized the massacre of hundreds of Palestinian men, women, and children in the Beirut refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla in 1982. In addition, Sharon provided the Lebanese forces who carried out the grisly task.
After announcing he was willing to testify against Sharon, Hobeika became fearful for his safety and began moves to leave Lebanon. Hobeika was not aware that his threats to testify against Sharon had triggered a series of fateful events that reached well into the White House and Sharon's office.
On January 24, 2002, Hobeika's car was blown up by a remote controlled bomb placed in a parked Mercedes along a street in the Hazmieh section of Beirut.....
It is noteworthy that the State Department's list of global terrorist incidents for 2002 worldwide failed to list the car bombing attack on Hobeika and his party. The White House wanted to ensure the attack was censored from the report. The reason was simple: the attack ultimately had Washington's fingerprints on it.
High level European intelligence sources now report that Karl Rove personally coordinated Hobeika's assassination. The hit on Hobeika employed Syrian intelligence agents. Syrian President Bashar Assad was trying to curry favor with the Bush administration in the aftermath of 9-11 and was more than willing to help the White House. In addition, Assad's father, Hafez Assad, had been an ally of Bush's father during Desert Storm, a period that saw Washington give a "wink and a nod" to Syria's occupation of Lebanon. Rove wanted to help Sharon avoid any political embarrassment from an in absentia trial in Brussels where Hobeika would be a star witness. Rove and Sharon agreed on the plan to use Syrian Military Intelligence agents to assassinate Hobeika. Rove saw Sharon as an indispensable ally of Bush in ensuring the loyalty of the Christian evangelical and Jewish voting blocs in the United States....
[LINK-Online Journal]
Prior thought about Hobieika:
--The Assassination of Elie Hobeika
--Elie Hobeika's Assassination: Covering Up the Secrets of Sabra and Shatilla
--BBC Profile
--Robert Fisk- The Man Who Would Testify Against Sharon Is Blown Up
--Dawn.com
--Michael Young commentary
--Stark Portrait of Sabra & Shatila & Sharon depicted in World Premier Film "2000 TERRORISTS"..
--Jafi.org Info on Kahan Commission
Ask Karl Rove.
On September 15, 2001, just four days after the 9-11 attacks, CIA Director George Tenet provided President Bush with a Top Secret "Worldwide Attack Matrix"—a virtual license to kill targets deemed to be a threat to the United States in some 80 countries around the world. The Tenet plan, which was subsequently approved by Bush, essentially reversed the executive orders of four previous U.S. administrations that expressly prohibited political assassinations.
According to high level European intelligence officials, Bush's counselor, Karl Rove, used the new presidential authority to silence a popular Lebanese Christian politician [Elie Hobeika], who was planning to offer irrefutable evidence that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon authorized the massacre of hundreds of Palestinian men, women, and children in the Beirut refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla in 1982. In addition, Sharon provided the Lebanese forces who carried out the grisly task.
After announcing he was willing to testify against Sharon, Hobeika became fearful for his safety and began moves to leave Lebanon. Hobeika was not aware that his threats to testify against Sharon had triggered a series of fateful events that reached well into the White House and Sharon's office.
On January 24, 2002, Hobeika's car was blown up by a remote controlled bomb placed in a parked Mercedes along a street in the Hazmieh section of Beirut.....
It is noteworthy that the State Department's list of global terrorist incidents for 2002 worldwide failed to list the car bombing attack on Hobeika and his party. The White House wanted to ensure the attack was censored from the report. The reason was simple: the attack ultimately had Washington's fingerprints on it.
High level European intelligence sources now report that Karl Rove personally coordinated Hobeika's assassination. The hit on Hobeika employed Syrian intelligence agents. Syrian President Bashar Assad was trying to curry favor with the Bush administration in the aftermath of 9-11 and was more than willing to help the White House. In addition, Assad's father, Hafez Assad, had been an ally of Bush's father during Desert Storm, a period that saw Washington give a "wink and a nod" to Syria's occupation of Lebanon. Rove wanted to help Sharon avoid any political embarrassment from an in absentia trial in Brussels where Hobeika would be a star witness. Rove and Sharon agreed on the plan to use Syrian Military Intelligence agents to assassinate Hobeika. Rove saw Sharon as an indispensable ally of Bush in ensuring the loyalty of the Christian evangelical and Jewish voting blocs in the United States....
[LINK-Online Journal]
Prior thought about Hobieika:
--The Assassination of Elie Hobeika
--Elie Hobeika's Assassination: Covering Up the Secrets of Sabra and Shatilla
--BBC Profile
--Robert Fisk- The Man Who Would Testify Against Sharon Is Blown Up
--Dawn.com
--Michael Young commentary
--Stark Portrait of Sabra & Shatila & Sharon depicted in World Premier Film "2000 TERRORISTS"..
--Jafi.org Info on Kahan Commission
Iraq hostage Matt Maupin family statement
Iraq hostage Matt Maupin family statement
Where is Pfc. Keith Matthew Maupin?
I would hope none of us have forgotten that Pfc. Keith Matthew (Matt) Maupin, a 20-year-old Army reservist, has been held hostage by insurgents since April 9 somewhere in Iraq.
I don't see very much about Matt in the mainstream news.
The silence is absolutely deafening.
For those who haven't forgotten, a recent statement from Keith & Carolyn Maupin (parents of Matt):
The Maupin family would like to thank everyone for supporting all soldiers as well as our son, Spc. Matt Maupin. The Yellow Ribbon campaign for our soldiers has been truly amazing and our spirits are lifted each time we see a new yellow ribbon displayed. Please continue to keep the yellow ribbons flying and candles lit to light their way home. A special thanks to the many people who have brought meals, provided religious support, established websites and for the many campaigns and vigils throughout the community and country. The outpouring of support and sentiment towards our family has been incredible, from both the military and civilian community. The emails, letters, cards, and prayers continue to arrive daily with well wishes for the safety of our son. Each one has touched our heart deeply during this difficult time. Although Matt has been captured for some time, we continue to pray daily for his safe return and the safe return of all soldiers to their loved ones. Our faith will never diminish and we ask that you keep all soldiers in your prayers and wish them a safe and speedy return.
Keith and Carolyn Maupin
[LINK-ChannelCincinatti.com]
Where is Pfc. Keith Matthew Maupin?
I would hope none of us have forgotten that Pfc. Keith Matthew (Matt) Maupin, a 20-year-old Army reservist, has been held hostage by insurgents since April 9 somewhere in Iraq.
I don't see very much about Matt in the mainstream news.
The silence is absolutely deafening.
For those who haven't forgotten, a recent statement from Keith & Carolyn Maupin (parents of Matt):
The Maupin family would like to thank everyone for supporting all soldiers as well as our son, Spc. Matt Maupin. The Yellow Ribbon campaign for our soldiers has been truly amazing and our spirits are lifted each time we see a new yellow ribbon displayed. Please continue to keep the yellow ribbons flying and candles lit to light their way home. A special thanks to the many people who have brought meals, provided religious support, established websites and for the many campaigns and vigils throughout the community and country. The outpouring of support and sentiment towards our family has been incredible, from both the military and civilian community. The emails, letters, cards, and prayers continue to arrive daily with well wishes for the safety of our son. Each one has touched our heart deeply during this difficult time. Although Matt has been captured for some time, we continue to pray daily for his safe return and the safe return of all soldiers to their loved ones. Our faith will never diminish and we ask that you keep all soldiers in your prayers and wish them a safe and speedy return.
Keith and Carolyn Maupin
[LINK-ChannelCincinatti.com]
Sunday, June 06, 2004
Iraq Weekend Updates
Iraq Weekend Updates
Thursday:
Tom Clancy: "Is Wolfowitz working for our side?"
[LINK-Informed Comment]
*Note- see my own recent comments [LINK] about the seemingly anti-American activities by some of the NeoCons.*
Friday:
The situation in Iraq acutely threatens Israeli security
[LINK-Informed Comment];
Iran Leader Slams Caretaker Government in Iraq [LINK];
Iraq as Failed State [LINK]
Saturday:
5 US Troops Killed in Iraq, 5 wounded,New Accord in Najaf
[LINK-Informed Comment]
Sunday:
Sistani Meets Muqtada; Ceasefire Taking Hold
[LINK-Informed Comment]
Thursday:
Tom Clancy: "Is Wolfowitz working for our side?"
[LINK-Informed Comment]
*Note- see my own recent comments [LINK] about the seemingly anti-American activities by some of the NeoCons.*
Friday:
The situation in Iraq acutely threatens Israeli security
[LINK-Informed Comment];
Iran Leader Slams Caretaker Government in Iraq [LINK];
Iraq as Failed State [LINK]
Saturday:
5 US Troops Killed in Iraq, 5 wounded,New Accord in Najaf
[LINK-Informed Comment]
Sunday:
Sistani Meets Muqtada; Ceasefire Taking Hold
[LINK-Informed Comment]
Who Is Francis Brooke?
Who Is Francis Brooke?
--Ahmed Chalabi's right-hand man in Baghdad
--An American consultant
--An Iraqi National Congress lobbyist
--Worked with the shady Rendon group on the Iraq project, a London-based C.I.A.-funded program to influence global opinion on Saddam Hussein.
--An evangelical Christian
--Ex-CIA consultant
--A recent consultant for BKSH and Associates, a company run by Charlie Black, a Republican Party veteran.
--A man who has boasted of engineering the war on Iraq by providing the United States the "evidence" it was seeking on (apparently non-existent)weapons of mass destruction along with Saddam's supposed ties to terrorists.
Where is Francis Brooke now?
--It's thought he scrambled back to Washington D.C.
Who wants to know?
An Iraqi judge...Judge Zuhair Al-Maliky of the central criminal court in Baghdad, to be precise.
Why?
Francis Brooke allegedly obstructed the Iraqi police from conducting a legitimate raid on Ahmed Chalabi's place. They say Brooke stopped the Chalabi raid by telling the police they didn't have the legal power to do it because "he was an American and they were Iraqis."
Reports from Iran suggest Francis Brooke acted as an intermediary between Washington and Tehran, passing letters between the two governments, which do not have diplomatic relations.
Brooke is trying to pass the buck and blame it all on a fellow by the name of Arras Habib, who is Chalabi's security chief.
[LINK]
More on Francis Brooke:
--Telegraph: Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi
--Disinfopedia
--New Yorker- The Manipulator
--MSNBC- Chalabi-A questionable use of U.S. Funding
--Washington Post- Chalabi Aides Suspected of Spying for Iran; Raid at Leader's Home Targeted His Associates
--Ahmed Chalabi's right-hand man in Baghdad
--An American consultant
--An Iraqi National Congress lobbyist
--Worked with the shady Rendon group on the Iraq project, a London-based C.I.A.-funded program to influence global opinion on Saddam Hussein.
--An evangelical Christian
--Ex-CIA consultant
--A recent consultant for BKSH and Associates, a company run by Charlie Black, a Republican Party veteran.
--A man who has boasted of engineering the war on Iraq by providing the United States the "evidence" it was seeking on (apparently non-existent)weapons of mass destruction along with Saddam's supposed ties to terrorists.
Where is Francis Brooke now?
--It's thought he scrambled back to Washington D.C.
Who wants to know?
An Iraqi judge...Judge Zuhair Al-Maliky of the central criminal court in Baghdad, to be precise.
Why?
Francis Brooke allegedly obstructed the Iraqi police from conducting a legitimate raid on Ahmed Chalabi's place. They say Brooke stopped the Chalabi raid by telling the police they didn't have the legal power to do it because "he was an American and they were Iraqis."
Reports from Iran suggest Francis Brooke acted as an intermediary between Washington and Tehran, passing letters between the two governments, which do not have diplomatic relations.
Brooke is trying to pass the buck and blame it all on a fellow by the name of Arras Habib, who is Chalabi's security chief.
More on Francis Brooke:
--Telegraph: Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi
--Disinfopedia
--New Yorker- The Manipulator
--MSNBC- Chalabi-A questionable use of U.S. Funding
--Washington Post- Chalabi Aides Suspected of Spying for Iran; Raid at Leader's Home Targeted His Associates
Elvis chicken at Google Blog
Elvis chicken at Google Blog
I borrowed this recipe for fried chicken from Charlie Ayers at the Google Blog. It was a recipe he summoned up the nerve to extract from a southern cook named Robert Brown who had allegedly fried the stuff up for Elvis Presley at one point in time.
[LINK]
Buttermilk Fried Chicken Elvis Loved
*Google-sized portions; read all the way through to get the total amounts needed*
1/2 c thyme
1/4 c oregano
1/4 c basil
1/2 c onion powder
1/2 c garlic powder
1/2 c dry mustard
1/2 c paprika
1/4 c chili powder
1/2 c celery seed
2 Tbsp salt
1/2 c coriander
1/2 c cumin
1/3 c kosher salt
1/4 c cayenne pepper
1/2 c ground black pepper
1/4 c ground white pepper
3 gals. buttermilk
3 cases organic free range chicken (roughly 30 chickens, divided into 1.5- to 2-lb. sections)
Mix these amounts of the dry ingredients together in a large bowl, then whisk in the buttermilk until it's thoroughly mixed.
Pour the batter over the chickens and marinate for up to five days - keep refrigerated, of course.
For frying
Now mix another 4x the above dry ingredients, and add:
2 lbs. cornstarch
8 qts. all-purpose organic whole wheat flour
Dredge the marinated chicken pieces in the dry herbs/flour/cornstarch mixture mix.
Fry the dredged chicken in a large skillet with hot peanut oil @ 375 degrees. Once chicken has reached a golden brown color, finish cooking it in the oven.
Thanks for sharing, Charlie!
I borrowed this recipe for fried chicken from Charlie Ayers at the Google Blog. It was a recipe he summoned up the nerve to extract from a southern cook named Robert Brown who had allegedly fried the stuff up for Elvis Presley at one point in time.
[LINK]
Buttermilk Fried Chicken Elvis Loved
*Google-sized portions; read all the way through to get the total amounts needed*
1/2 c thyme
1/4 c oregano
1/4 c basil
1/2 c onion powder
1/2 c garlic powder
1/2 c dry mustard
1/2 c paprika
1/4 c chili powder
1/2 c celery seed
2 Tbsp salt
1/2 c coriander
1/2 c cumin
1/3 c kosher salt
1/4 c cayenne pepper
1/2 c ground black pepper
1/4 c ground white pepper
3 gals. buttermilk
3 cases organic free range chicken (roughly 30 chickens, divided into 1.5- to 2-lb. sections)
Mix these amounts of the dry ingredients together in a large bowl, then whisk in the buttermilk until it's thoroughly mixed.
Pour the batter over the chickens and marinate for up to five days - keep refrigerated, of course.
For frying
Now mix another 4x the above dry ingredients, and add:
2 lbs. cornstarch
8 qts. all-purpose organic whole wheat flour
Dredge the marinated chicken pieces in the dry herbs/flour/cornstarch mixture mix.
Fry the dredged chicken in a large skillet with hot peanut oil @ 375 degrees. Once chicken has reached a golden brown color, finish cooking it in the oven.
Thanks for sharing, Charlie!
Tie-runn-eee
Tie-run-eee
Bush said today, in tribute to former President Reagan, that he had saved the world from an "era of fear and tyranny".
Ronald Reagan never would have pronounced the word 'TYRANNY' as TIE-RUNN-EEE.
Good heavens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"My father crapped bigger ones than George Bush."
--Ronald P. Reagan
Bush said today, in tribute to former President Reagan, that he had saved the world from an "era of fear and tyranny".
Ronald Reagan never would have pronounced the word 'TYRANNY' as TIE-RUNN-EEE.
Good heavens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"My father crapped bigger ones than George Bush."
--Ronald P. Reagan
Saturday, June 05, 2004
President Match
President Match
Go here to take the test.
My results were:
1. Kucinich Score: 90%
2. Kerry Score: 74%
3. Bush Score: 5%
Go here to take the test.
My results were:
1. Kucinich Score: 90%
2. Kerry Score: 74%
3. Bush Score: 5%
Abu gah rabe abu gaaa rabe ahb ahb abuuuu gaaaaaah
Abu gah rabe abu gaaa rabe ahb ahb abuuuu gaaaaaah
Oh, please, please listen to this!
*..the first two minutes are all I'm asking!*
Oh, please, please listen to this!
*..the first two minutes are all I'm asking!*
Friday, June 04, 2004
Col. Dana Pittard: A Gentleman Among Occupiers
Col. Dana Pittard: A Gentleman Among Occupiers
Army Col. Dana Pittard's name crossed my path again today. I've come to the conclusion that he is a gentleman.
Being a gentleman, even when faced with the hardest decisions, is a reflection of what I believe we're missing today in our American leaders. It's reassuring to know there are men like Dana Pittard on America's side.
With corresponding gentlemanly leadership in Washington D.C., I think this mission may have been a winning success by now. I realize now that this is the component we've been missing. There are few in the Bush administration that have acted with discernible grace as gentleman. The greater world knows it and has reacted accordingly by leaving us, for the better part, to our own (ugly) political devices in Iraq. They see we've made our own disgraceful bed, and it's in that bed we sleep while men like Dana Pittard put a decent face on some downright indecent policies.
I am convinced Col. Pittard is doing his personal best for this country. I pray for equally decent leadership to help him succeed...leadership that will be seen by Iraqis as having genuine motives with prompt follow-through on important promises.
Let's face it..thanks to President Bush, we unnecessarily broke Iraq and now we've bought it. We are at their service now, if we look at this as ethical business (and we must). The overall personal customer service in Iraq stinks so far. An ethical businessman is always a gentleman (or lady).
I wish Bush was a gentleman. He's a chickenhawk, a shifty-eyed liar, an inexperienced and irresponsible Texas-tough talker (double-daring killers to attack our troops), a bumbling buffoon.
We need more Dana Pittards. If anyone can win this war, it will be the men and women who come forth with a force of genuine compassion and respect.
In the following story, an Iraqi Shi'ite cleric claims that a decent gesture by Col. Pittard did not change his views on the occupation. You simply cannot recognize a friend when you and your brothers and sisters are being assaulted.
I put myself in that Muslim cleric's place. My own current views on our occupation of Iraq aren't much different than his.
I believe, however, that Col. Pittard's described gesture and kindness is something that will not soon be forgotten by the cleric.
It's small gestures like these (along with larger gestures such as securing world cooperation) that will eventually, (with better leadership in Washington), change the hearts of freedom-seeking Iraqis.
The story:
[A senior Shiite Muslim cleric, Ali Abdul Kareem Madani] has his own reasons for disliking the U.S. occupation. He returned to Baqubah on May 25 after nearly 10 months in seven different Army detention centers, where he was taken after being accused of promoting anti-U.S. violence early in the occupation.
The charges against him have not been dropped, U.S. officials said. But Army Col. Dana J.H. Pittard, who recently took command here and realized Madani's position of influence, helicoptered to Umm Qasr -- about 325 miles to the southeast, at the head of the Persian Gulf -- to secure his release from prison and escort him home, according to Iraqi and U.S. sources.
Pittard has shown himself to be a gentleman, Madani said, but the gesture did not change his views on the U.S. occupation.
[LINK]
*For insight into the security mess in Ba'qubah, read Eric Jewett's ("Baghdad Eric's") entry about his frustrating experience there. Mr. Jewett has been working for the Coalition Provisional Authority as an advance representative and special assistant to Paul Bremer.
Army Col. Dana Pittard's name crossed my path again today. I've come to the conclusion that he is a gentleman.
Being a gentleman, even when faced with the hardest decisions, is a reflection of what I believe we're missing today in our American leaders. It's reassuring to know there are men like Dana Pittard on America's side.
With corresponding gentlemanly leadership in Washington D.C., I think this mission may have been a winning success by now. I realize now that this is the component we've been missing. There are few in the Bush administration that have acted with discernible grace as gentleman. The greater world knows it and has reacted accordingly by leaving us, for the better part, to our own (ugly) political devices in Iraq. They see we've made our own disgraceful bed, and it's in that bed we sleep while men like Dana Pittard put a decent face on some downright indecent policies.
I am convinced Col. Pittard is doing his personal best for this country. I pray for equally decent leadership to help him succeed...leadership that will be seen by Iraqis as having genuine motives with prompt follow-through on important promises.
Let's face it..thanks to President Bush, we unnecessarily broke Iraq and now we've bought it. We are at their service now, if we look at this as ethical business (and we must). The overall personal customer service in Iraq stinks so far. An ethical businessman is always a gentleman (or lady).
I wish Bush was a gentleman. He's a chickenhawk, a shifty-eyed liar, an inexperienced and irresponsible Texas-tough talker (double-daring killers to attack our troops), a bumbling buffoon.
Because human beings are prone to illusion, the sounds and sights of battle—the groans of the wounded, the maimed bodies of one’s comrades—may remain in the mind for many years, like a cloud that confuses judgment. Hence, a man who has fought on the battlefield and has later risen to high office may be fearful of leading his people to war. Such weakness does not afflict the armchair warrior, who at all times is firm in his resolve.
--Evan Eisenberg
--Evan Eisenberg
We need more Dana Pittards. If anyone can win this war, it will be the men and women who come forth with a force of genuine compassion and respect.
In the following story, an Iraqi Shi'ite cleric claims that a decent gesture by Col. Pittard did not change his views on the occupation. You simply cannot recognize a friend when you and your brothers and sisters are being assaulted.
I put myself in that Muslim cleric's place. My own current views on our occupation of Iraq aren't much different than his.
I believe, however, that Col. Pittard's described gesture and kindness is something that will not soon be forgotten by the cleric.
It's small gestures like these (along with larger gestures such as securing world cooperation) that will eventually, (with better leadership in Washington), change the hearts of freedom-seeking Iraqis.
The story:
[A senior Shiite Muslim cleric, Ali Abdul Kareem Madani] has his own reasons for disliking the U.S. occupation. He returned to Baqubah on May 25 after nearly 10 months in seven different Army detention centers, where he was taken after being accused of promoting anti-U.S. violence early in the occupation.
The charges against him have not been dropped, U.S. officials said. But Army Col. Dana J.H. Pittard, who recently took command here and realized Madani's position of influence, helicoptered to Umm Qasr -- about 325 miles to the southeast, at the head of the Persian Gulf -- to secure his release from prison and escort him home, according to Iraqi and U.S. sources.
Pittard has shown himself to be a gentleman, Madani said, but the gesture did not change his views on the U.S. occupation.
[LINK]
*For insight into the security mess in Ba'qubah, read Eric Jewett's ("Baghdad Eric's") entry about his frustrating experience there. Mr. Jewett has been working for the Coalition Provisional Authority as an advance representative and special assistant to Paul Bremer.
Tenet Should Not Be Bush Sacrificial Lamb
Tenet Should Not Be Bush Sacrificial Lamb
Knowing Porter Goss is the likely replacement for George Tenet and knowing Porter Goss is the Republican chair of the Intelligence Committee who is skewering George Tenet seems a definite conflict of interest.
It seems the Bush administration would love to make Tenet the fall guy for "misleading them about WMD".
If Bush's motive for war on Iraq was actually WMD, I'd understand.
From their standpoint, WMD was not the Bush administration's reason for the Iraq war.
WMD was just the way the President Bush (and his cabinet) conned the public..using George Tenet's bad advice knowing fully-well they shouldn't have. (per Bob Woodward's "slam-dunk" account).
Tenet was the most convenient of all people to leave his post.
One resignation does not come close to resolving the problem in Iraq or relieving Bush of his complicity in leading us to a totally unnecessary war in Iraq.
The smelliest skunks remain firmly in place and perhaps they will only be removed when we eject them from their undeserved positions in November.
If Bush doesn't have the guts to do it, we Americans will do it (provided Diebold hasn't already arranged the electoral swindle).
Knowing Porter Goss is the likely replacement for George Tenet and knowing Porter Goss is the Republican chair of the Intelligence Committee who is skewering George Tenet seems a definite conflict of interest.
It seems the Bush administration would love to make Tenet the fall guy for "misleading them about WMD".
If Bush's motive for war on Iraq was actually WMD, I'd understand.
From their standpoint, WMD was not the Bush administration's reason for the Iraq war.
WMD was just the way the President Bush (and his cabinet) conned the public..using George Tenet's bad advice knowing fully-well they shouldn't have. (per Bob Woodward's "slam-dunk" account).
Tenet was the most convenient of all people to leave his post.
One resignation does not come close to resolving the problem in Iraq or relieving Bush of his complicity in leading us to a totally unnecessary war in Iraq.
The smelliest skunks remain firmly in place and perhaps they will only be removed when we eject them from their undeserved positions in November.
If Bush doesn't have the guts to do it, we Americans will do it (provided Diebold hasn't already arranged the electoral swindle).
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Like Sunnis, Shiites Now Love the Extra (extra) Crispy
Like the Sunnis, Shiites Now Love the Extra (extra) Crispy
...and Americans are less safe than ever..
I had to quote this gem from Juan Cole. From 'Making Americans Safer':
The riots in Karachi on Tuesday, protesting a bombing at a Shiite mosque in Pakistan's major port, involved setting fire to American fast food outlets. This sort of attack had previously been common among radical Sunnis, but it is ominous that now the Shiite mobs are asking for very extra crispy KFC. Now I find that in my old stomping grounds of Lucknow, India, where the Shiite community had been so kind to me in the early 1980s, Americans are now unwelcome. Why, if the Bush administration has any more successes in the War on Terror, I just don't know how we'll be able to survive them.
[LINK]
*Actually, this won't be the first time Extra Crispy was ordered..just a batch of new customers.*
Also, be sure to see the cheery Sistani Fatwa on the New Government of Iraq!
...and Americans are less safe than ever..
I had to quote this gem from Juan Cole. From 'Making Americans Safer':
The riots in Karachi on Tuesday, protesting a bombing at a Shiite mosque in Pakistan's major port, involved setting fire to American fast food outlets. This sort of attack had previously been common among radical Sunnis, but it is ominous that now the Shiite mobs are asking for very extra crispy KFC. Now I find that in my old stomping grounds of Lucknow, India, where the Shiite community had been so kind to me in the early 1980s, Americans are now unwelcome. Why, if the Bush administration has any more successes in the War on Terror, I just don't know how we'll be able to survive them.
[LINK]
*Actually, this won't be the first time Extra Crispy was ordered..just a batch of new customers.*
Also, be sure to see the cheery Sistani Fatwa on the New Government of Iraq!
Porter Goss raised as one possibility for Tenet job
Porter Goss raised as one possibility for Tenet job
Ex-CIA Goss poo-pooed the fury over Valerie Plame outing as "partisan politics"; Claimed CIA leak was not worthy of committee action
I heard a pundit on a cable news network name Porter Goss (R-Fla), an ex-CIA-man, as a fitting replacement for George Tenet. It's out in the press, too.
I certainly am not impressed with the look of his past voting record in Congress, from a purely ideological standpoint. Look at what he said indicating his feelings about the non-importance of the treasonous outing of Joseph Wilson's wife, agent Valerie Plame. Does that matter, you ask? Nonchalance about this outing of an agent coming from an ex-CIA, I should say so! Given the fact we need to regain out trust in someone to be totally independent from partisanship and totally independent in their CIA position, I'd have to say YES--it matters a lot.
Interestingly, Juan Cole believes Tenet's resignation may have much to do with the Valerie Plame case.
I'm sure he's not the best person to put into the job at this precarious and divisive time in our nation. I have a feeling we'll wind up getting him, anyhow.
FYI, here is a question posed to Goss just after 9-11 in an interview with PBS/Frontline:
FRONTLINE: Do we need a James Bond agency that goes out and basically whacks people?
Porter Goss: No, we don't. We don't need that. ... We have been trying to redefine our defense capabilities to respond to the kinds of threats we have today, and we're trying to do the same exact thing with intelligence, change the capabilities we have. Do we need more arrows in the quiver of small "c," covert action? The answer is yes. There is no doubt about that. Is it a James Bond assassination squad? Certainly not. It's a great movie, but movies, unfortunately, are not reality.
Back in the day when James Bond was popular, that was sort of the image of intelligence. Those were, in many ways, the heydays. ... Now we're in the position where we have had to overcome this sort of bad period where intelligence is not only unfashionable, it's un-American, and we don't want to do that any more. We've had to resist that, rebuild the financing for it, rebuild the recruiting, rebuild the morale. It has been a very hard problem, and we are caught a little short, and that's one of the reasons.
So when you say, *"Was this a cultural problem that we had?" The answer is partly yes, because we decided that the world didn't need quite as much intelligence, and we weren't sure what it exactly it should be. So we backed off from some stuff. I can't say we would have prevented the tragedies of last Tuesday if we'd had more intelligence. I'd just say the odds were higher that we could have.
[LINK]
From an informative Washington Post article about Goss:
Ex-CIA Goss poo-pooed the fury over Valerie Plame outing as "partisan politics"; Claimed CIA leak was not worthy of committee action
I heard a pundit on a cable news network name Porter Goss (R-Fla), an ex-CIA-man, as a fitting replacement for George Tenet. It's out in the press, too.
I certainly am not impressed with the look of his past voting record in Congress, from a purely ideological standpoint. Look at what he said indicating his feelings about the non-importance of the treasonous outing of Joseph Wilson's wife, agent Valerie Plame. Does that matter, you ask? Nonchalance about this outing of an agent coming from an ex-CIA, I should say so! Given the fact we need to regain out trust in someone to be totally independent from partisanship and totally independent in their CIA position, I'd have to say YES--it matters a lot.
Interestingly, Juan Cole believes Tenet's resignation may have much to do with the Valerie Plame case.
I'm sure he's not the best person to put into the job at this precarious and divisive time in our nation. I have a feeling we'll wind up getting him, anyhow.
FYI, here is a question posed to Goss just after 9-11 in an interview with PBS/Frontline:
FRONTLINE: Do we need a James Bond agency that goes out and basically whacks people?
Porter Goss: No, we don't. We don't need that. ... We have been trying to redefine our defense capabilities to respond to the kinds of threats we have today, and we're trying to do the same exact thing with intelligence, change the capabilities we have. Do we need more arrows in the quiver of small "c," covert action? The answer is yes. There is no doubt about that. Is it a James Bond assassination squad? Certainly not. It's a great movie, but movies, unfortunately, are not reality.
Back in the day when James Bond was popular, that was sort of the image of intelligence. Those were, in many ways, the heydays. ... Now we're in the position where we have had to overcome this sort of bad period where intelligence is not only unfashionable, it's un-American, and we don't want to do that any more. We've had to resist that, rebuild the financing for it, rebuild the recruiting, rebuild the morale. It has been a very hard problem, and we are caught a little short, and that's one of the reasons.
So when you say, *"Was this a cultural problem that we had?" The answer is partly yes, because we decided that the world didn't need quite as much intelligence, and we weren't sure what it exactly it should be. So we backed off from some stuff. I can't say we would have prevented the tragedies of last Tuesday if we'd had more intelligence. I'd just say the odds were higher that we could have.
[LINK]
From an informative Washington Post article about Goss:
Before President Bush's election, Goss's name surfaced as a candidate for the top CIA job amid speculation that Bush would replace Director George Tenet, a Clinton appointee.
Goss supported Tenet as a holdover and has not wavered in his support amid calls by others for Tenet's resignation after 9/11. After blasting Tenet last fall, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the Senate Intelligence Committee vice chairman, also described Goss as "close to a lot of people" at the CIA, telling Roll Call, "I don't think we should be too close to anybody we have oversight of, because you can't do your job."
But other prominent Republicans -- namely Bush and Vice President Cheney -- maintain great faith in Goss. Though Goss had said he would not run again, Cheney was dispatched earlier this year and helped persuade him not to retire. Goss also recalls seeing the president on two occasions and quotes him thusly:
" 'Porter, listen, I really want you to stay.' He said, 'This intelligence stuff is important. I want you here.' " And, Bush told him, "You've got it exactly right."
[LINK]
Goss supported Tenet as a holdover and has not wavered in his support amid calls by others for Tenet's resignation after 9/11. After blasting Tenet last fall, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the Senate Intelligence Committee vice chairman, also described Goss as "close to a lot of people" at the CIA, telling Roll Call, "I don't think we should be too close to anybody we have oversight of, because you can't do your job."
But other prominent Republicans -- namely Bush and Vice President Cheney -- maintain great faith in Goss. Though Goss had said he would not run again, Cheney was dispatched earlier this year and helped persuade him not to retire. Goss also recalls seeing the president on two occasions and quotes him thusly:
" 'Porter, listen, I really want you to stay.' He said, 'This intelligence stuff is important. I want you here.' " And, Bush told him, "You've got it exactly right."
[LINK]
George Tenet Has Resigned
George Tenet Has Resigned
The CIA deputy director will serve as acting director until a replacement is found.
The singing birds in the Rose Garden were far more animated and interesting than Bush when he made shell-shocked comment on the resignation today.
[LINK TO BUSH REMARKS ON TENET- VIDEO]
[LINK]
Tenet's biggest mistake was behaving more as part of the Bush administration and less as a properly independent Director. That was not his job. He especially crossed the line on WMDs in Iraq, where he, Colin Powell, and the Pentagon all provided tainted information that was not nearly accurate and contributed to the (patently false) rationale to make pre-emptive attack.
I'll never understand why Tenet and Powell sat together at the UN and gave that faulty dog and pony show about WMDs in February, 2003.
I somehow trust, from sheer intuition, that Tenet and Powell were somehow ill-used and are truly, truly decent men at heart.
Tenet is going to spend quality time with his family. I wish him happiness.
It's odd timing....while Ashcroft stands at a podium and tells us terrorists are ready to strike domestically, Tenet walks away.
These are strange days, indeed.
Now Colin Powell (and the good Mr. Armitage) should turn in resignations and leave the worst of the liars behind to rot away.
Books should be written.
'60 Minutes' appearance schedule slots should be filled.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Robert G. Kaiser, Associate Editor at the Washington Post, thinks (perhaps) Tenet must have been livid to discover (if it's actually the case) that someone in or affiliated with the Pentagon had caused the disaster of Ahmad Chalabi telling the Iranians that their code had been broken. He says he can imagine him thinking this was the straw that broke the camel's back. [LINK]
Meanwhile, the used-up-spook Ahmad Chalabi is bad-mouthing George Tenet. I really don't think that's going to go over big with the American public now that Chalabi's been soundly trashed, sliced, and diced in the American media, deservedly or undeservedly. His credibility has been "flushed from the bathroom of our hearts", as the late singer Johnny Cash would have said.
See Miss-information for a look at reactions around the world about the Tenet resignation.
The CIA deputy director will serve as acting director until a replacement is found.
The singing birds in the Rose Garden were far more animated and interesting than Bush when he made shell-shocked comment on the resignation today.
[LINK TO BUSH REMARKS ON TENET- VIDEO]
Tenet's biggest mistake was behaving more as part of the Bush administration and less as a properly independent Director. That was not his job. He especially crossed the line on WMDs in Iraq, where he, Colin Powell, and the Pentagon all provided tainted information that was not nearly accurate and contributed to the (patently false) rationale to make pre-emptive attack.
I'll never understand why Tenet and Powell sat together at the UN and gave that faulty dog and pony show about WMDs in February, 2003.
I somehow trust, from sheer intuition, that Tenet and Powell were somehow ill-used and are truly, truly decent men at heart.
Tenet is going to spend quality time with his family. I wish him happiness.
It's odd timing....while Ashcroft stands at a podium and tells us terrorists are ready to strike domestically, Tenet walks away.
These are strange days, indeed.
Now Colin Powell (and the good Mr. Armitage) should turn in resignations and leave the worst of the liars behind to rot away.
Books should be written.
'60 Minutes' appearance schedule slots should be filled.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Robert G. Kaiser, Associate Editor at the Washington Post, thinks (perhaps) Tenet must have been livid to discover (if it's actually the case) that someone in or affiliated with the Pentagon had caused the disaster of Ahmad Chalabi telling the Iranians that their code had been broken. He says he can imagine him thinking this was the straw that broke the camel's back. [LINK]
Meanwhile, the used-up-spook Ahmad Chalabi is bad-mouthing George Tenet. I really don't think that's going to go over big with the American public now that Chalabi's been soundly trashed, sliced, and diced in the American media, deservedly or undeservedly. His credibility has been "flushed from the bathroom of our hearts", as the late singer Johnny Cash would have said.
See Miss-information for a look at reactions around the world about the Tenet resignation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)