[45]
The remaining alternative is for him to
contend that Cluvius told a falsehood to Luscius and Manilius. And, if he does that, how
great is his impudence! Will he throw discredit on that man as a witness whom he
approved of as a judge? Will he say that you ought not to trust that man whom he has
trusted himself? Will he disparage the credit of that man as a witness to the judge,
when on account of his opinion of his good faith and scrupulousness as a judge, he
brought witnesses before him? When I produce that man as a witness, will he dare to find
fault with him, when if I were to bring him as a judge even, he would be bound not to
decline him? Oh, but says he, he was not on his oath when he said that to Luscius and
Manilius. Would you believe him, if he said it on his oath?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.