Since 1998, the fourth Saturday of November has been
commemorated in Ukraine as the day honouring the memory for victims of
Holodomors, i.e. numerous attempts by the Soviet regime to kill
Ukrainian peasants en masse by starvation. Of all the starvations of
1920s, 1930s and 1940s, that of the Great Famine of 1932-1933 remains
the most horrifying and tragic. Here are a few things to help you to
understand this tragedy.
What is the Holodomor? The Holodomor is a Ukrainian word meaning “death by starvation” or “killing by starvation”, from holod (famine, starvation) and mor
(mass death, epidemics). It is used to define a number of policies
aimed at killing huge numbers of people, in particular the Great Famine
of 1932-1933, which targeted peasants in various parts of the Soviet
Union, but most drastically in Ukraine.
Number of victims. There is a continuing debate
among historians as to the number of victims who perished during the
Holodomor. Today, historians mostly mention about 4 million Ukrainian
victims (i.e. about one fifth of 25 million Ukrainian peasants at that
time). However, this figure is not a final one and it subject to review
in the future; moreover, some studies also take into account the
“demographic echo” (The Holodomor’s more general influence on child
birth and demography), which can result in higher figures.
Was the Holodomor a Genocide? Raphael Lemkin, the
inventor of the concept “genocide”, which he first applied to describe
the Nazi Holocaust, considered the starvation of Ukrainian peasants as
an act of genocide. In his article “Soviet Genocide in the Ukraine” (1953)
he speaks about “the destruction of the Ukrainian nation” as the “the
classic example of Soviet genocide”, with its “familiar tools of mass
murder, deportation and forced labour, exile and starvation”. The
inventor of the “genocide” concept, therefore, believed that the
Holodomor was a genocide. Even though it is more difficult to
get the Holodomor recognized as a genocide in legal terms in accordance
with the definitions of the United Nations Genocide Convention, the
convention’s wording (specifically defining genocide as “acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical,
racial or religious group”) can still be applied to the Holodomor too.
However, the Convention’s wording, influenced by Soviet pressure, does
not include the non-national or non-religious (for example,
class-linked) aspects of mass killings present in the Holodomor’s
tragedy.
Famine as a policy. The Great Famine of 1932-1933
was not only starvation of a massive number of people; it was also a
conscious policy by the communist party aimed at exterminating millions
of people. The following were elements of this policy: grain and other
food was confiscated from peasants; peasants were even deprived of seed
grain; villages were encircled in order not to let people flee the
famine; peasants were not able to receive internal identity passports
which would enable them to travel around the country; the borders of the
Ukrainian SSR were controlled and blocked, not to let peasants escape
to other republics; so-called “black boards” were distributed among
local party committees to designate villages or even districts that
should be physically blocked and led to starvation.
Famine as part of wider repressions. Famine was the
most tragic but not the only instrument used against Ukrainians by
Stalin’s regime. The Ukrainian intelligentsia was largely exterminated
in the 1930s (the concept of “Executed Renaissance” emerged in 1950s
thanks to Polish intellectual Jerzy Gedroyc and Ukrainian writer and
literary critic Yuriy Lavrinenko, to define hundreds of Ukrainian
artists who were executed before or during the political repressions of
the Great Terror in the 1930s). Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians were
arrested, sent to camps or deported. From late 1920s onwards, the
Soviet prosecution machine fabricated numerous cases against Ukrainian
“counter-revolutionary forces” (the trial against “The Union for the
Liberation of Ukraine” (SVU) in 1930 was among the most notorious).
Later, the communist party line aimed at developing a “soviet people”
encompassed the gradual marginalization of the Ukrainian language, which
linguists have called a “linguocide”.
Famine as experience. Over the past decades
Ukrainian historians collected numerous testimonies from people who
survived the Holodomor. From these testimonies we know, for example,
that party brigades came to homes and confiscated all the food,
including grain or bread that peasants hid on garrets, in hearths or
yards; when food was nowhere to be found, people cooked soups from a
couple of beans or crepes from nettle; they ate toads, hedgehogs, mice,
cats and dogs, sparrows and dead horses. Those who “stole” spikelets
from the field were facing arrest, as were those who tried to help
people who were starving. Many died outside their houses and the bodies
laid on the ground for days, with no one able to bury them; brigades
went around villages to collect dead bodies and throw them into common
graves; sometimes the living were mistaken for the dead and buried
alive, in some cases they succeeded in escaping; stories of cannibalism
were also widespread, as were stories of madness; some peasants
succeeded in traveling to cities but many died there; people had a
chance of survival only if they cooperated with their repressors or if
they worked for state institutions (at factories, schools or railways).
Two Holodomors. Some historians, including Andrea
Graziosi and Anne Applebaum, suggest that there were two different
famines in 1932-1933. One, in 1932, was targeted against Soviet peasants
in general, including Ukrainian peasants, and whose nature was focused
on social class. The other one, in 1933, was targeted specifically at
Ukrainian peasants, and had a national focus.
Ideology behind the Holodomor. Bolshevik ideology
was remarkably anti-universalistic. From Lenin to Stalin, Bolsheviks did
not believe in the idea of “humanity” in general, or in the idea that
every human being has inalienable rights and freedoms. They believed, in
contrast, that throughout history there has been “progressive” and
“regressive” groups of people (which they called “classes”), and that
only “progressive” classes should have their genuine rights and
freedoms, at the expense of “regressive” groups. Individual peasants
were considered as “remnants of the bourgeoisie” and, therefore, had no
place in the future Soviet society. This attitude is reflected in
Stalin’s speech, “Results of the first 5-year plan”, in January 1933, at
the peak of Holodomor, in which he used Gorky’s concept of “former
people” (byvshie liudi) to define individual peasants, “kulaks”, former
capitalists, party opposition, etc. All of them, he believed, should be
exterminated, as the more invisible they are, the more dangerous they
become. The pejorative Stalinist concept of “former people” is
remarkably similar to Nazi “underpeople” (Untermenschen), but with an
important difference: while the Nazi’s concept was focused on biology,
the Stalinist concept was focused on history.
Holodomor as memory. The Holodomor has become the
key “memory topos” in Ukraine over the past decades. Its commemoration
on the fourth Saturday of November has become more visible than many
other commemorative day, including the World War II memory day. This can
be seen as a sign that the Ukrainian historical memory has been
shifting from a “winner’s narrative” (still present in Russia and
Russian-controlled territories) to a “victim’s narrative”. It has
certainly become more humanistic (the victim’s narrative is noted by the
idea that every human life counts and cannot be sacrificed for any
“bigger goal”). Its danger, however, lies in the construction of a
victimized national memory in Ukraine, which possesses the danger of
closing its eyes to historical situations when Ukrainians were not
victims but perpetrators.
Where to learn more. There are a number of books available in English about the Holodomor: the pioneering The Harvest of Sorrow by Robert Conquest; chapters on the Holodomor in Bloodlands by Timothy Snyder; Red Famine. Stalin’s War on Ukraine by Anne Applebaum; articles by Andrea Graziosi like this one
and many others, works by James Mace and others. Scholarship on the
Holodomor in the Ukrainian language are already vast and growing,
including works by Stanislav Kulchytskyi, Yuriy Mytsyk, Hennadiy
Yefimenko, Yuri Shapoval, Vasyl Marochko, Olha Movchan and many others,
as well as books collecting oral history testimonies, like the 10-volume
Ukrainskyi Holocaust and others.
Prepared by Volodymyr Yermolenko for UkraineWorld.
Немає коментарів:
Дописати коментар