Showing posts with label traffic calming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traffic calming. Show all posts

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Shreveport City Council Begins to Take a Look at Neighborhood Speeding

According to KTBS, the public safety committee of the Shreveport City Council is taking a look at addressing speeding through residential neighborhoods.  This is a move in the right direction and long overdue:

One of the hottest topics at the meeting is the need to crack down on speeders through residential streets. "It's one of the top complaints that we get and it's something that affects public safety quite a bit," said Councilman Jeff Everson.

My personal experience with this is as a resident on a street that is a cut-through between two major arteries in Shreveport.  After watching people flying down our street at speeds well over the posted 25 mph speed limit, we began a campaign to get some help from the Shreveport Police Department and city officials.

We began with an open letter to various officials to simply come sit out in our yard, have a glass of tea, and watch the races.   We got some response from our Caddo Commission member, Matt Linn, which helped get the ball rolling toward some action.  I began doing some research on traffic calming techniques that have been used in other communities.  Then KTBS did a story on our Operation Checkered Flag campaign and by mid-October we had a stealth box on one of the utility poles which began gathering data for SPD.  Immediately after placing the box, we had radar officers writing tickets  -- a lot of tickets.  But then it stopped.  They wrote tickets for a few days and then left.

So I wrote another letter on December 8 to Chief Willie Shaw and asked that the radar officers please keep us in their rotation and noted that the speeding is still a major problem.  I acknowledge that this is a city-wide problem and we certainly don't expect to have an officer here 24/7; we just want to be kept in the rotation.  I also challenged other city officials to find a viable option in conjunction with the radar such as speed tables or rumble strips.  (Speed tables are not the same thing as speed bumps.)
In response to my second letter, SPD wrote to tell me that only 10% of the cars on my street were going ten miles per hour or above over the speed limit; I was told that 119 tickets were written by those radar officers but "not all of them were for speeding."  But, they did place another stealth box.

I wrote again questioning this data and requesting to see what the stealth box collected and posed ten other questions:

1. I find it simply stunning that only 10% of the traffic on our street is going “over ten mile per hour over the speed limit.” Is this for a certain time period? Which data box does this statistic come from? Is this statistic derived over 24 hours, a certain time of day, or a general average? Ten percent is a very low number based on what I’m observing. I would like to see the data collected from both boxes. Please let me know when would be a good time that I might come pick that up from you.
2. If the officers wrote 119 tickets, but “not all of them were speeding violations,” what was the probable cause for pulling those cars over? Were they speeding? What were the citations for? My neighbors and I saw officers here on average about 3 hours a day – sometimes two, sometimes four, so say three hours on average. Each time the officer wrote one ticket after another, seldom able to reposition his car before pulling over another violation. That squares with your 119 number, but not with the 10% number. I’m curious about that.
3. Your letter indicates that “approximately 10% …were driving ten mph above the posted limit” with one vehicle over 60 mph. Was that one vehicle the only one between October 4 and December 8 that was going sixty or above? Again, that doesn’t square with what I’ve seen. What time period was this? Is ten mph over the speed limit the acceptable speed? So the speed limit on my street is really 35 mph (the posted speed is 25 mph)? If that’s the case, what would we need to do to lower the speed limit? I’m fine with five mph over, really – thirty isn’t so bad, but 35 is excessive on this narrow street that has neighborhood kids and pets outside and street parking.
 (The number of drivers who don’t understand “failure to yield to oncoming traffic” is astonishing – sometimes this narrow street is a three-laner.

Some of my questions were, of course, outside the purview of the police department such as why 18-wheeler trucks are allowed to come through a narrow residential street.  This is where the City Council must be involved.

I received a very nice letter in response from Captain Cleat Temple who answered every one of my questions that he was able -- again, some were outside his area of enforcement.  But, we did get another radar officer for a couple of days who wrote a who bunch more tickets.

I'm glad to see that the City Council is at least recognizing that neighborhood speeding is a problem.  On October 7, Mrs. Jessie Bradley was killed by someone driving over 100 mph on a residential street; the driver ran into Mrs. Bradley's car as she was driving to a National Night Out gathering.  Simply tragic.  How many more lives must be lost or threatened before action is taken?

In Bossier City, I know that some neighborhoods have double fines for speeding in residential neighborhoods.  This is one action I proposed that the City Council examine for Shreveport.  There are many other traffic calming measures that can be taken depending on the street.  There is plenty of research out there that other communities have done that our City Council can draw upon.  According to KTBS:

City leaders want to increase the traffic fines in residential neighborhoods to deter those speeders. "Our neighborhoods are where our children play and where our elderly members are working in the yard, and there's a lot of people who are close to the street," Everson said. "If you have someone driving through at 60 miles per hour, it presents real danger. We get a lot of calls about certain areas, especially cut through streets."  
 Everson said many of Shreveport's neighboring communities have already made their traffic fines higher in residential areas, which has helped to cut down on instances of speeding in neighborhoods. "We're paying attention to that and looking at what we can do help keep our neighborhoods safer and keep those speeds at a level that works better within areas that people are living and calling their home."
I encourage the City Council to be vigilant in their study of this problem and to take quick action.  In our neighborhood, for example, our neighbors are outside daily working in yards, watching children play, socializing, and just doing things that people do outside in suburban neighborhoods. There are joggers on the road, bicyclists, and families pushing strollers.  We sit outside daily and see drivers obliviously flying down the street; sometimes we can even see them holding up their cell phones and texting while driving.  It's only a matter of time until another tragedy occurs in some neighborhood, a tragedy which we should make some attempt to avert.

My offer from October stands:  any one of the City Council members, or all of them, are welcome to come sit, have a glass of tea, meet the neighbors, and watch the races.  They're still speeding with abandon even as we speak.

Sunday, October 18, 2015

Residential Raceway Update

We've had a responsive week on our traffic problem on the residential raceway.  We've had Caddo Commission member Matthew Linn out twice, Gerry May from KTBS out several times, and we've had a radar cop for two days for a total of about five or six hours.

And yet, they speed on.

KTBS did a story on our checkered flag campaign.

The radar box that SPD attached to a utility pole is still hanging out, gathering data.  I sure wish I could see the reports it generates.

The officer sat out and ran radar Thursday afternoon for about three hours and he wrote tickets as fast as he could.  He didn't sit idle more than one or two minutes between tickets before another zoomed by.  Same on Friday: he was here about two hours on Friday. I don't think they run radar weekends or after five because he hasn't been back.  We hope he returns tomorrow -- with friends.  I know how shorthanded SPD is and we appreciate their response and hope it continues.

We've backed off the checkered flag action now that SPD is running radar.  I think most people generally don't realize how fast they are going but there are a few that speed by incredibly fast and when we wave at them or yell at them to slow down, they just go faster to prove they can.  The only negative comment we got on the KTBS piece is that we are control freaks.

I'm continuing my efforts at slowing people down in absence of the radar man. I thought about traffic shaming.  This car, for example...



...is going well over 40.

So is this one.


And this one.



And this one.



And this one.



I could do that all day long.  All of those (and more) were taken in one hour's time this morning and they're all over 30.  But you can't tell how fast they're going in a still photo, and you really can't tell in the videos I did, either.  That's what that data box is for that SPD installed.  And that's why I sure wish I could see those reports!

In the end, I guess people are just going to continue to use the street as a raceway.  I hope that it doesn't take a tragedy to get them to slow down.  One of my neighbors puts orange traffic cones a couple of feet off his curb when his kids play outside, just to warn people to slow down.

I'm doing more research on traffic calming and various ways to get people to slow down.  The biggest factor will be getting my neighbors to stand up and fight this battle with us.  The old Squeaky Wheel rule, you know.

Meanwhile, the race is on.

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Update on Residential Drag Races: Only one response from my pleas to city officials

Last week I posted an open letter (and mailed hard copies) to SPD Chief Willie Shaw, Councilman Oliver Jenkins, Caddo Commission member Matthew Linn, and Otis Jones, Jr., Director of Transportation for Caddo Parish School Board, regarding the speeding issue on my residential street.

The only person who has bothered to respond is Matthew Linn - a courtesy for which I'm very grateful.

From the others?  Crickets.  Nothing.  Not an email, not a letter, not even a phone call.

Meanwhile, the drag races along my residential street continue.

So I've started doing some research because I think if you're going to gripe about a problem then you should at least be able to offer a solution.

There is something called Traffic Calming which works quite well in cities both in the U.S. and Europe.

Some of the genius of Dutch and other European methods is not the use of signage and enforcement to slow traffic, but literally a different road design, and that includes putting s#! in the way. 

It is, in essence what my friend across the street was doing when she placed the huge green city garbage can in the middle of the road.  And truthfully, that's the only thing that has worked so far.

In addition to excessive speeds, we also have a huge volume of traffic as this street is used as a cut through to avoid traffic on two major arteries nearby.  I've been counting cars through the day - taking five-minute interval counts every half hour to get an average of about 1800 cars a day.  This is about the same number of cars that Ockley gets, just off of Kings Highway.  Ockley is wide and zoned for 35 mph, with painted center lines. There are four lanes which in practice is two wide driving lanes and a parking lane on each side.

In contrast, our street is zoned for 25 mph, is a narrow two lane blacktop with no center line and has numerous residents who park their cars in the road.  (I can't even tell you how many of these have been hit.)    So, the volume of traffic is a problem.

In addition to the 1800 cars, trucks, and SUVs that zoom through here, we also have 18-wheeler trucks come through to make deliveries to the business areas that border our once quiet neighborhood.  There is no way an 18-wheeler should be zooming down this street, yet there is no signage that says not to, so what's to stop them?  There also seems to be a large number of lawn service companies with trailers full of equipment that have no qualms about swerving around parked cars dragging their loads behind them.

Yesterday we came VERY close to seeing a collision between a UPS truck and a sky blue BMW.

So, given all this, and the lack of support from city officials, (with the exception of Mr. Linn- God bless him), perhaps my neighbors and I need to get more vocal about our problem.  Perhaps we need to appear at City Council meetings and engage the media to make ourselves heard.  Perhaps my neighbor needs to continue putting things in the road to forcibly slow the traffic down and maybe some tree limbs need to "fall" into the street.  Some natural speed bumps.

We've taken to standing on the curb with checkered flags just to let the speeders know they "won the
race" and can slow down.

(As I write this a taxi cab just flew down the street at 55 mph).

As I've been talking to people about this problem, I've learned that it's a city-wide problem.  Do they even write tickets anymore?  Why are drivers in such a hurry?  Slow down!  Life is passing you by fast enough -- at least slow down and enjoy the view.  Quit zooming down my street while texting.  Watch out for children and animals.

What to do?

To help us out, I suggest that the city post officers here at random times to run radar.  Rumble strips might help, and speed tables would help.  In some areas, roundabouts help, but I don't think that's viable for my street.

Until the city gets on board to help us, there may just be some civil disobedience going on.  Nothing harmful, mind you.  No spikes in the road or anything like that.  But maybe a big green trash can.