Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts

Monday, October 27, 2014

#HaleNo



Some may not be aware of the recent post in TheGuardian by YA author Kathleen Hale which detailed her stalking of a blogger who didn’t love her book and the varied reactions to it. Some book bloggers, reacting to a subset of authors who see Hale as their hero, have chosen to have a blackout. What that means varies from site to site, the most common being not publishing new reviews for some period of time. For those who are learning about this for the first time here, this post at Bibliodaze and the several links it contains, will send you as far down the rabbit hole as you care to go.

We won’t be participating in the blackout. (If you want us to, pretend that we’ll be refusing to review any books published by Harper Teen, Hale’s publisher. Forever. Not that we ever would have any way.)


I’m not going to go into my rationale for not blacking out. However, I will say that despite that, we support those who are doing so, and thought a quick post expressing solidarity with our fellow bloggers was in order.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Vote, Listen, and Vote Some More

Photo Credit: User:RadioFan

It’s been a long time since we’ve had one of these catchall posts that discussed several things instead of a review. We must be past due for one.

A Kind Voice on Books

This past weekend I recorded a segment for the BlogTalk Radio show called “A Kind Voice on Books.” For those who aren’t familiar with A Kind Voice, this organization runs crisis hotlines as well as having multiple associated radio shows on BlogTalk Radio. The one I did is, obviously, about books. For those who would like to listen to my segment, it will air tonight. The details are below:

BookLove, a special episode of A Kind Voice on Books, brings you recommendations for books you could fall for.  Five book blogger/reviewers will review a book they are passionate about and chat about the wider world of book blogging and writing. Our featured reviewers include:

Katie Cross of  KCross Writing



Guinevere Tomas of Twinja Book Reviews

Libertad Tomas of Twinja Book Reviews

BookLove airs Wednesday, February 12th at 7pm (EST) and will be available for download for later listening at:http://tinyurl.com/qgkqory

2013 Indies Unlimited Excellence Awards

Over at Indies Unlimited they’re currently voting for their Excellence Awards. Books and Pals is a nominee in the Best Book Review Site category. We have our work cut out for us if we hope to make a decent showing. If you read the fine print, the winner will be decided using an arcane formula involving the number of votes (that’s where you hopefully come in), the site’s Alexa score, and something to do with a Ouija Board. The net effect is, we need a lot of votes.

Voting ends February 21st at 5 PM Pacific Time. Click here to vote.

Even if you don’t vote for us, Indies Unlimited is a site you should become familiar with if you aren’t already. It has content aimed at both indie authors and those who read them. I’m one of the many contributors there. Unfortunately that doesn’t give me any influence over who wins the awards. Since none of us have any influence over Mr Ouijia or Ms Alexa, our only chance is begging all of you for your vote.

2014 Readers’ Choice Awards

Just as we did last year, we’ll be giving out our own awards this year, waiting until the 2013 awards season has finally died down and getting a jump on the new year. We had lots of great nominees and a list of winners that, if you haven’t read them, you need to. (Look for the link on the upper right of each page of the site to see the winners and nominees from last year.) The pals and I are in the process of determining this year’s nominees. Authors of nominated books will be notified the last week of February with voting tentatively set to begin March 2nd.

And last …


Thanks to all our readers. Without you, there would be no point in doing what we do.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Doubling Up: A Bonus Post from BigAl




From time to time I've had suggestions from a reader or one of the pals to have two people review the same book. The reasoning was sound. Doing this would give two perspectives on a book. Even if two reviewers were in agreement about a book's merit and ranked them comparably, their thoughts and justifications might be much different. (Even if what they say is much the same, that could still be of value to a potential reader.) And if their opinions are different, comparing those difference could be the most valuable of all.

However, whenever someone floated this idea I'd look at the list of books in our review queue with the knowledge that we were never going to get to them all and respond, "nah, I don't think so." Until the day I had a lightbulb moment. Although it may be hard to believe, I don't have complete control over everything all the pals read. Some of them were reading books because they wanted to, even though another pal was reading the same book to review it. If we were both going to read it anyway, why not both review it? I also realized that there were rare situations where two reviewers with different cultural perspectives might approach a book much differently and that their different takes could be interesting.

So, although it will be a rare situation and almost always one where two of our reviewers were going to both be reading the book anyway, we're going to start occasionally running two reviews of the same book. When this is done we'll either run both reviews on the same day or at times reprise a past review so you'll have a chance to compare and contrast. The first of these is a short story which will be reviewed by ?wazithinkin this morning. This afternoon I'll give my thoughts.

Monday, November 5, 2012

"You've gotta be kidding. It keeps getting earlier every year."


I know, the Christmas season seems to start earlier every year, and I guess we're now making it worse. Our review today is Christmas themed, and we'll have several others dribbled out over the next few weeks, in time for the start of the traditional holiday season, which in the US was once sometime after Thanksgiving. Here's my thinking. If we review these now, when you're ready for a Christmas story, you'll know where to look. Click on the spot down the right hand side under labels where it says 'Christmas' and you'll be able to find them all.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

A Problem and a Solution

The Problem

Too many books, not enough time, is the essence of the main problem.

I consider our readers as well as the authors who have submitted books for review consideration to be part of a community and believe that being too transparent is better than not being transparent enough. So, this post is going to give much more detail than you might expect. Possibly more than you want.

Over a year ago (yes, it has really been that long), this blog went viral. The book submissions came rolling in and before I realized how many had been received, did some basic math, and closed submissions, there were hundreds. Many hundreds. We’ve now been closed to open submissions for almost a year.

I’ve also allowed a small trickle of books to come in since that time. In most cases, these were books that I was going to read anyway. Given that, I thought reviewing them made sense if they were within the scope of the books that we review. In a few extremely rare instances, I received queries from an author who had been referred by another author, something about the book appealed to me, and I decided to accept the submission.

In most cases, queries or submissions received after we closed them off were filed away in the “not going to review” file. My thinking was that if the author or their representative were able to find the email address for submission, they were also capable of reading the submission page and following directions. Those directions were, don’t submit. Submission inquiries went in the same file.

As of right now, we’ve reviewed a few hundred books (in excess of 250) and have more than that left. Lots of books have come out and are continuing to come out with authors who would like to have a chance to submit their book for review consideration. I’d like to give them a chance. I also don’t want to have all the books we review be those that have been out for a year, if not several. An eBook is, or at least can be, forever. Unlike a paper book competing for limited shelf space, an eBook has more than a couple weeks or months to catch on with readers. This argues against my timeliness concern, or at least tempers it.

That’s the main problem. Too many books and the desire to open for submissions again.

There are two secondary problems. The first is a desire, not just on my part, but also from the readers, to have more frequent posts on subjects other than book reviews. Our weekly author interview series is a start and has proven to be very popular. I’d like to do more. Last, given the ease of fixing problems with eBooks, making them (hopefully) better after their initial release, means that if we’re reviewing a book too long after it was released, what is being reviewed may not be what is actually for sale.


Possible Solutions

The “experts” say that a focus on a specific genre (or group of genres) is best to develop loyal followers. The “experts” may be right, but I feel like there is also a need and desire for an Indie book review site that is open to most genres. I don’t want to limit myself in that way. I like being exposed to other genres and hope our readers feel the same way.

More frequent reviews. That is a possibility and something that may or may not happen. However, I’m concerned that too many reviews are as likely to drive readers away as attract them. Certainly picking up the pace to a consistent one review every day of the week rather one most weekdays is something to aim for. The possibility of multiple reviews per day, while not impossible, presents some problems, but could possibly happen at some point.

Require some kind of qualification, such as minimum number of reviews on Amazon, before considering a book for review. This has some good arguments for it. The most obvious is removing some of the worst books from the review pool. However, I also have issues with this and would rather not limit us in this way, at least for now. I’ll keep this idea in reserve for future consideration.

An aging process that would drop a book from the review queue after some amount of time if it hasn’t been selected for review. This is at least part of the solution.

We have a lot of smart readers out there. If you have any ideas, I’m always open to suggestions.

The Solution …

… at least for now. Effective immediately, we are open for new submissions. Authors can get the details on the Submitting a Book for Review page, one of several links on the upper right of every page on the site.

For those who pay attention, there are also a few other pages that have been added or revamped, including one for anyone who thinks they might be interested in an new hobby in the wonderful, exciting, and highly non-paying world of book reviewing.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Raising the Next Generation of Readers




Today we have a guest post from author Leah Petersen

You’ve got a lot of competition these days. Kids have more to do than ever.

Mind you, I’m not of the we-walked-three-miles-to-school-uphill-both-ways generation. Technology came along in my day. We had computer games (so maybe they were DOS based,) cable TV, console games (Atari, anyone?), even handheld games (TETRIS!)

But I don’t think anyone’s going to argue that kids today don’t have much more, much cooler stuff than we did. And it’s everywhere. Kids are watching DVDs in the car, playing handheld games or games on their parents’ iPhones in line at the grocery store, even at the table in family-friendly restaurants. Everywhere there’s a TV. It’s insane.

So where, in all of this, are children ever going to pick up those non-flashy, black and white things called books that take forever to get to the end of, unlike the next level of angry birds?

The simple answer is, you have to be a mean parent. That’s right, you have to deprive your little darlings of unlimited access to all that other stuff long enough for them to realize how AMAZING books are.

Don’t get me wrong, this is a struggle. I’m raising my 2.5 kids through this time in history, and I know exactly how hard this is. And yet, my kids love to read. This was hugely important to me. I would have been devastated if they didn’t. So I put a lot of effort into it. Here are some of the things I did:
  • Limited “screen time,” the all-inclusive term for TV, computers, and any form of electronic game. They got thirty minutes a day when they were younger and an hour now. All the rest of the time they’re free to play as they choose, with toys or outside, or reading. I made sure not to set reading up as the bad guy by letting it be perceived as the reason they weren’t allowed on the screens. There were plenty of other things they were encouraged to do when screen time ended. Reading was just one of them. 

  • Read to them. I don’t just mean Green Eggs and Ham. In fact, I do it more now that my kids are into chapter books and beyond. My son’s reading Young Adult books now and my daughter is plenty old enough to enjoy them being read aloud to her. Now I get to share my favorite stories from my childhood with them. A Wrinkle in Time, the Dragonsinger trilogy by Anne McCaffrey, and on and on. 
  • Read in front of them. This one I think was a big deal. They saw me putting a high priority on my reading time and encouraging them to spend time sitting with me reading their own things. It was something people did. For fun. Even if they could have all the screen time they wanted. It was something they chose instead. 
  • Shared my excitement over a good book. As they got older, this includes reading amusing or interesting bits to them as I come across them. 
  • Didn’t allow reading to become a chore, or worse, homework. There’s this thing they do in school to teach reading, and it’s require a certain amount of reading time per night and the kids have to log this by listing the book read and having the parent sign off that they did their time. Well, I very politely told their teachers that I wasn’t going to do this. I don’t read every night myself, certainly not for a regulated slice of time and then stop because I don’t HAVE to read anymore. I want reading to be perceived as fun, as play. I worked hard enough at promoting reading as a fun activity that my kids probably ended up reading more than their peers. If it was no reading at all for two nights in a row and then a straight hour of not being able to put a book down the next night, then that’s how it was. I have never regretted this. 
  • Let them stay up late, but only to read. Maybe some won’t agree with this, because bedtime is important, but I allow them to stay up as late as they want after I tuck them in, if they are doing it because they’re reading. This wasn’t a deliberate choice I made, exactly. But one night after I’d tucked them in more than an hour before, I went to check on them and was met with a frantic hiding of books under the covers and not-that-great attempts to pretend they were sleeping. I said, “Are you two hiding books under your covers because you’ve been reading past bedtime???” They said, “Yes.” I said, “Good, I’m proud of you.” They thought that was really funny, and really cool, this thing they could do to cheat bedtime. They don’t always stay up reading, so I’m content that they’re not being harmed by this. On the contrary, they’re READING.

I was so terribly afraid that the changes in the world and the explosion of technology in our daily lives was going to take reading away from my children. Well, rest assured, it doesn’t have to. Just make it a priority.


Have fun!

About Leah:

Leah Petersen's debut novel, Fighting Gravity, was released earlier this week by Dragon Moon Press. You can get your copy directly from the publisher or from Amazon in either paper or eBook versions (paper or eBook for those who use Amazon UK).

Author JM Frey describes Fighting Gravity as "... touching, emotional, and a comfortably domestic love story set against the backdrop of politics in an empire that spans the Galaxy."



For more, visit Leah's website, follow her on Twitter, or like her page on Facebook.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

I Want an eReader: Which one do I Get?



Last week we had a post on the pros and cons of buying an eReader, based on several factors revolving around a reader’s specific reading and buying habits. For those who decide to take the plunge the obvious follow up question is, which eReader should I buy?

There are really two questions to answer here. The first is, what brand of eReader should you buy? The second, after making the brand decision, is which specific model is best for you?

Which Brand?

I won’t even pretend to know all the brands of eReader that are available. In my mind, for most people, the brand decision should come down to the Kindle (from Amazon), the Nook (from Barnes & Noble), and Kobo.

The reason why brand matters is because this will determine which book store is the most convenient to use for the purchase of some books and will be the only bookstore available for other books. The latter is the case for the books from most of the big publishers at this time. Because of DRM issues, you’ll be tied to that store in the future if you want to protect your book investment. <link> Although all leading eReaders except the Kindle use an industry standard eBook format called ePub, the DRM still locks you into a specific bookstore and hence a specific brand. Non-DRMed books can easily be converted to work with any of the major brands.

The reason why I dismiss other brands, Sony being the biggest, is that no other brand has been able to gain a significant market share in the US or elsewhere. You’re not only buying a piece of electronic hardware, but also making some level of commitment to a retail ecosystem. For that ecosystem to be viable, you need a reasonable level of comfort that this brand of reader will be around for the foreseeable future and the parent company will not see it as a failed project (with less and less support from the company).

I should also give a disclaimer that I am very biased in favor of the Kindle, especially in my particular situation. However, that might not make it the best choice for you. Here are the pros and cons of each brand. Keep in mind that this discussion pertains only to eInk screen based (black and white) eReaders. Whether one of the color tablet computers might be a viable alternative for you was discussed in the prior post in this series.

Kobo

The biggest pro for Kobo is potentially cheaper prices from the Kobo eBook store for readers who live in some countries. Amazon charges a “delivery surcharge” (although they might no longer call it that) of around two US dollars per book above the price charged in the US to customers in some countries. This doesn’t apply to countries where Amazon has an official Kindle store. There are also some countries in which  Amazon isn’t an option at all, as they  won’t sell books to anyone in some specific countries. Those outside of the US, Canada, the countries of the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Brazil, France, Italy, Australia, and India should probably lean towards the Kobo at this time. I may have missed a country here. The key is that if you don’t have access to an Amazon store that doesn’t charge the surcharge to your country, you should lean toward the Kobo.

Nook

The main pro for a Nook is the ability to go in a Barnes & Noble store for a test drive. Note that this advantage is only truly an advantage before you’ve made the purchase. There are some chains in the US that are carrying the Kindle in store. These include Target, Best Buy, and Staples. However, the sales people at Barnes & Noble are more likely to be able to answer questions about the Nook than those in these other stores will be to discuss the Kindle.

I believe there is also a program that allows you to read books on your Nook while inside a Barnes & Noble store, but this seems like a small pro, at best. Isn’t one of the biggest advantages of an eReader to get rid of the need for those frequent trips to the bookstore?

The biggest con for many people is that the Nook is only available at this time in the US. This may be changing in the near future. Barnes and Noble has recently made a deal with Waterstones in the UK, making this a viable future option there.

There is a belief among many that Barnes & Noble’s brick and mortar bookstore business is eventually going to go under. If the history of record stores over the last several years is any indication, and it probably is, these pundits will eventually be right. However, B&N has been making moves recently to sever the Nook business from their main business. The Nook and eBooks has been a bright spot in their corporate finances. The logical conclusion to draw is that they are positioning the Nook to survive, even if the paper book business doesn’t. This is a consideration, but I don’t think it is a big one. We’ll call it a small con.

The biggest con is the many ways in which Barnes & Noble is not Amazon, the main one being in customer service, which reportedly falls well short of the typical Amazon experience.

Kindle

The pros to the Kindle are that they have more books available in their bookstore than anywhere else and they offer the best customer service in the business. There may be other companies with Amazon’s customer service commitment, but I’ve never seen one.

The cons to a Kindle are few, but they do exist. The first is the possibility of a lack of availability of some books from some publishers due to squabbles between Amazon and the publisher. This has happened in the past and could happen in the future. In most instances, these books not being available from Amazon, but still being available as eBooks from other sources not compatible with the Kindle (primarily Barnes & Noble) has been temporary. I would expect the same in the future.

There is also a possibility that Barnes & Noble or some other retailer might have individual titles available exclusively, potentially for a long period. This cuts both ways, with many indie titles being exclusive to the Amazon store.

Last is the concern that Amazon will become a monopoly. If enough buy elsewhere, that helps alleviate that possibility. (I would counter that the competitors need to actually compete. That is the best way to prevent this.)

But which model?

This really does come down to taste and preference. I’m only going to compare offerings from the Nook and Kindle lines here. The basic technology and reading experience is not going to be much different on any of these, either Nook or Kindle.

There is currently only one model of Nook that is eInk based. This is the Nook Simple Touch. Kindle models comparable to this include the basic Kindle (called the Kindle Mini by some), and the Kindle Touch in four variations. The main difference between the basic Kindle and the Kindle Touch models is the amount of space available for books and the battery life. Both Kindle models have more storage than the Nook, with battery life of the Nook being equivalent to the Kindle Touch. If you prefer a touch screen, one of these should be your choice.

The Kindle Touch also has variations based on whether it has 3G (cell phone signal) access with WiFi, or is WiFi only. The Nook is WiFi only. The question of WiFi or 3G access is mostly only pertinent when you want to buy or download new books. This is only a concern if you don’t have wireless WiFi at home or you travel a lot and want to be able to get books regardless of where you are without having to find WiFi access. The Kindle Touch also has variations based on whether it is with or without “special offers.” Special offers are ads that come up as screensavers and on the home screen. Although my current Kindle is without special offers, from what I’ve heard since getting it, I probably wouldn’t pay the extra to avoid the ads if I was making the decision today. Many find the special offers to be more positive than negative.

The Kindle family also has the Kindle Keyboard model. This model has WiFi only and WiFi with 3G variations, as well as with and without special offer variations, like the Kindle Touch. The main difference between this and the Kindle Touch is the presence of a small keyboard and the use of buttons on both sides of the eReader to change pages rather than using a swipe of the touch screen. If you don’t like touch screens or for easier one-handed reading, this model is preferable. If you take a lot of notes while reading, this model might also be preferable to using a Touch model, although note taking is possible on the Touch using an on-screen keyboard to enter your notes.

The Kindle line also includes the Kindle DX. This is a large screen version (9.7 inch compared to 6 inch screens on all the other models). Although this might have changed, the last I heard, this model was using older screen technology which didn’t have as much contrast as what is currently being used for the smaller models. If a large screen is a requirement, I would advise waiting or considering a larger tablet computer.

One late breaking addition is a new version of the Nook which is now available for pre-order and is scheduled to start shipping May 1st, 2012.  This is a “glow screen” version of the Nook Touch. The “glow screen” appears to be small lights that light up the screen for reading in the dark without a separate book light (or cover with a built-in book light) which is now needed for any of the eInk based eReaders, regardless of brand. Amazon has announced their own variation on the glow screen model, but it won’t be available for several months.

As I said near the top, I’m biased towards the Kindle line. While I believe the Nook hardware is on par with the Kindle, Amazon’s superior customer service made the decision easy for me. But I know we have some Nook owners out there. I’m interested in seeing what reasons I’ve missed to choose a Nook over a Kindle.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Should You Buy an eReader?



I keep seeing questions on Twitter and elsewhere with a variation on the query, “should I buy a Kindle?” This isn’t a question that can be answered in 140 characters, nor is it a question with one answer that is right for everyone. Even among regular readers of this blog, there are some who don’t have an eReader, yet.

My intent with this post is not to give the definitive answer, since it doesn’t exist, but to lay out the questions to ask yourself in making the decision and present you with some of the pros and cons. Making the proper decision about almost anything is a matter of weighing positives and negatives for the possible decisions

Over the next few weeks, I plan to follow this with additional posts delving deeper into some of the follow-up questions that might be raised, including the big question: which eReader should I buy?

The Big Questions

There are eight sets of questions to ask yourself. The answers will largely guide your decision. Many of these questions, for most people, won’t have a definitive answer. For example, many people read a mix of fiction and non-fiction. The percentage of each will help guide you to the answer that is right for you.

1)   How much do I read? Would I like to read more?

2)   What do I read? Is it primarily fiction or non-fiction?

3)   If I primarily read fiction, are the books I choose predominately those at the top of the bestseller lists? Do I like to read non- bestsellers, either current books written by “mid-list authors” that don’t make the bestseller lists, or backlist books (those that may or may not have been bestsellers in the past, but are no longer “new releases”)? Do I read a lot of “classic literature,” especially books published in the early 1900s or prior such as Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, or the Bronte sisters?

4)   If I read non-fiction, are those books mostly straight text or do they have a lot of pictures, tables, and footnotes? If footnoted, do I refer often to the footnotes while reading?

5)   Where do I normally get my reading material: library, new bookstore, used bookstore, or some other retailer with a book section? When I buy a book, is it usually as a paperback or hardcover?

6)   Do I borrow books from friends? Do I loan books to friends? Do members of my immediate family borrow books or lend me books? If either of these is true: how much does this happen? Is this done with a few friends or many friends? Do any of these friends have an eReader or other means of reading eBooks?

7)   Are there physical factors to consider? Examples would be eyesight issues such as difficulty reading smaller type or a tendency for your eyes to get tired after a long reading session, or physical weaknesses or disabilities that make reading a book difficult.

8)   Is it possible that moving from paper books to eBooks, but using an alternative to an eReader would be right for me?


Weighing the Factors

This section will discuss each of the questions above and how your answers might impact your decision.

1)   The more you read, the easier it might be to justify an eReader. However, eBooks don’t always cost the same as their paper counterparts. The financial tradeoffs depend, in part, on your answers to questions 3, 5 and 6 as well as some of the items in the “other things to consider” section below. Other factors may be sufficient to sway you in one direction or another even if financial considerations would indicate a different decision.

Many people find an eReader much easier to carry with them than a book, while others use a combination of eReader at home and an app on their Smartphone. This can make times that were previously dead, spent waiting at the hair salon, doctor, in long lines, or while commuting on public transportation productive reading time. Many people find they read more after getting an eReader, either because of these or other reasons, including the ability to buy a book directly from their eReader and have it immediately available.

2)   If you primarily read fiction, an eReader is more likely to be a good fit than if you read mostly non-fiction.

3)   Most books copyrighted prior to the 1920s are now in the public domain, with eBook editions of the most popular readily available for free from Project Gutenberg. These were created by volunteers who scanned and proofed them to create eBooks. If your reading diet is heavy on the classics, and you are currently spending a significant amount on paper editions, this would tend to push you towards an eReader for financial reasons alone.

If you tend to read bestsellers, especially when first released (in either hardback or paperback), then you’ll find the paper editions are often available from Amazon or your local store cheaper. This is because the pricing scheme used by the largest publishers doesn’t allow retailers to put the eBook edition on sale. Even though the eBook is normally priced less than the paper, retailers often discount the paper edition to less.

If you read lots of mid-list or backlist books, especially if you find you often have to special order these from the bookstore or order them from Amazon or BarnesAndNoble.com, this would argue for an eReader, because these books could be available to you instantly and normally cheaper than the paper edition. However, you should be cautioned that not every backlist book available in paper is available yet in an eBook edition. Also, some books that are out-of-print can still be obtained, either new or used, from online retailers.

The flip side is that many authors of previously out-of-print books are making them available as eBooks. If this is a significant portion of your reading and you search out specific books, it might make sense to check the availability of a sample with the online retailers to get a feel for what is and isn’t available. Also, many authors, both those previously traditionally published, especially mid-list authors, and those previously unpublished are “Indie” or self-publishing eBooks. These are generally priced somewhat cheaper than those from the bigger publishers are.

4)   Non-fiction books with tables and diagrams don’t often translate as well to understanding on an eReader. Some publishers do better than others in formatting these for an eBook version. Also, the size of the majority of eReader models makes these difficult to see. While it is possible to format an eBook with readily accessible footnotes, publishers are hit and miss in how well they do this.

5)   If you currently buy books new, either in hardback or paperback, the relative pricing discussed in #3 above should be considered. eBook prices generally come down the longer a book has been out. You shouldn’t expect to buy an eBook version at a paperback price until the paperback is released.

If your purchases are largely used books, it is possible to maintain your budget buying backlist or Indie books; however, you might do well to compare recent purchases to get a better idea of the financial impact for your specific situation. If you sell books back to your used books store to offset some of the cost of buying more, you’ll no longer be able to do this with eBooks.

Some libraries now loan eBooks to their patrons. This has the advantage of not having to go to the library to check out a book, instead doing it through the library’s website. However, many of the larger publishers are limiting or not allowing libraries to lend eBook versions of their books. If not being able to borrow eBooks from the library is a deal breaker for you, a wait and see stance is probably the way to go at the moment.

6)   eBooks can be a positive or a negative as far as lending books among family and friends goes, depending on your specific situation. While this discussion is specific to Amazon and Kindle eReaders, much of it is the same or similar with Barnes & Noble and their Nook devices.

Sharing of books among Kindles (both apps and devices) registered to the same account on Amazon is unlimited and in most situations several devices can have the same book on them at a time. (Multiple readers reading the same book isn’t something you can easily do with a paper book.) Setting up an account for all family members or even a group of friends (assuming they are financially trustworthy) can facilitate this. Many books also can be lent one time for a limited period to another Kindle owner or someone with a Kindle app on their Smartphone, computer, or tablet computer.

7)   eInk based eReaders are very close to reading a book, at least in how your eyes will react to reading on them. They have the added advantage of allowing the reader to change the size of the font. For those who need large print books or who find their eyes tiring after a long reading session, an eReader is the answer. Also, eBook versions of books are going to be easier to find and possibly cheaper than large print paper editions.

The physical act of reading on an eReader is easier in some ways than reading a paper book. The weight is much the same, but there is no need to hold the book open. One handed and a certain amount of no handed (by laying the eReader on a flat surface) reading is possible. Even those without physical limitations may find an eReader beneficial for these reasons. For example, I’ve been known to empty the dishwasher while reading, which is much easier with an eReader.

8)   Some people may prefer just dipping their toe into the eBook world as a start. One way to do this is an app on a Smartphone, PC, or tablet computer. Any of these provide a way to experiment with the eBook world without investing in an eReader. The primary difference is that each of these has a backlit screen, which isn’t as easy on the eyes, isn’t optimized for the reading experience, and other than the phone, isn’t as portable.

For those who don’t read as much and already own or need a tablet computer, the tablet combined with an app might be a reasonable compromise. Apps are available for both Kindle and Nook books. Although they are branded as eReaders, the Kindle Fire and Nooks with color capability fall in this category or possibly a category all their own. While they are good for books in color, they don’t have the advantages of the eInk screen.

Other things to consider

DRM or digital rights management: If you don’t know what DRM is, read this post for an explanation. Many books have DRM and are not currently available from legitimate sources without. This will tend to tie you into a single vendor to protect your book investment. How important this is to you will be dependent on how often you refer to or re-read books you’ve already read. Although removing DRM is possible with minimal technical knowledge and some research, this is also illegal in many places, including the US.

Not having a physical book has implications, both positive and negative. People don’t know what you’re reading from looking at the cover, which can be good or bad. This is good from a privacy standpoint, but don’t expect someone to initiate a conversation about the book you’re reading if they don’t know what it is. That could be a pro or con, depending on your preferences, or maybe depending on the person initiating the conversation. Some people also enjoy showing off their book collection while others would prefer visitors not know what they’ve read or are reading. eBooks use less space, don’t attract the bugs and dust that paper books do, are much easier to deal with when you move, and traveling for an avid reader is much easier with an eReader rather than a stack of paper books.

There are those who claim the smell of paper, glue, and (sometimes) dust from a book and the feel of the paper are a critical part of the reading experience for them. I’ll admit, I don’t get this. For me, it is about the story. Maybe you’re different.

My concern before experiencing an eReader was that it would be just like a computer, not only the screen, but with a device getting in the way of the story. I discovered that wasn’t the case and within a short time reading on the eReader felt more natural than reading a paper book. This has been the experience for most people I’ve talked to, but a small minority disagree.

Most experts agree that in the long run more and more books, especially fiction, are going to be sold as eBooks. This will affect availability of paper formats and prices, with paper books, when available, becoming a “specialty” item, not unlike vinyl records. There is a case to be made that you’re going to make the move eventually anyway, so why not now?

Just like cell phones, technology has and will continue to advance and eReader capability will grow. Upgrades (if you’ve got to have the latest) and device replacement (just like any other gadget, they don’t last forever) need to be considered.

And then

As long as this post is, I’m sure there are things I haven’t thought about. Those of you who have made the jump, tell me and other readers what they are in the comments.


Update: For a discussion on making the decision of which eReader to buy, see this post.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Etc., etc.


This post is going to discuss several different subjects related to the world of the eReader. While at first glance they seem unrelated, they really aren’t.

“If the book was any good a publisher would have picked it up.”

If you haven’t seen or heard anything like this in reference to an Indie book, you are either new to the Indie book world or you haven’t been listening. This attitude is based on the assumption that a publishing house decides whether to offer a publishing contract based on the quality of a book. Good, “sign here;” bad, “no thanks.” If only anything in life was this simple.

Readers and publishers have different goals. Decision makers at a publishing house may look at many factors before giving a thumbs up or down, but the ultimate question is whether a book will make them money. Quality is often in the eye of the beholder, but only the most diehard Jersey Girl would point to Snooki’s book as an example of quality in literature (the average Amazon reviewer gives it three stars). However, the publisher had reason to believe it would make them a profit, and it probably has. If you’re a fan of an out-of-favor genre, say the western or any genre that doesn’t typically have paranormal creatures, you might feel underserved, but the publishers may not see the market for these selections as being large enough. An author might be the Zane Grey of his generation, but, chances are, nothing is going to get him a publishing contract.

Then you have the tastes of the individuals making the decisions at the publishers’. There are questions of capacity; not every book with potential can be published, and the infrastructure each publisher has in place can only accommodate a finite number of books each season.

None of this means that there aren’t bad Indie books, even horrible ones. Those are out there, and the percentages of these are higher amongst Indie books than amongst those traditionally published.

However, for anyone who persists in believing that, if a book is good enough, it will find a home, I think you’re kidding yourself. For evidence, I present this blog post. Read it and come back.

Yes, this book finally found a home at a publisher. Had the author or her agent given up (and they had every reason to do so), it wouldn’t have been. Note the positive reactions received prior to release and then the feedback, often contradictory, received from the many publishers who rejected it.

“There is a lot of crap out there.”

Yes, there is. In this section, I’m going to talk about one specific kind. I’ll use the same term as was used by the person who brought it to my attention and call it a “scam.” It definitely scams any reader who buys the “book,” and may have a negative effect on a legitimate author.

All of these book are partially (probably almost completely) excerpts of Wikipedia articles on a particular subject formatted and published as a book, either an eBook or a paper book. These books don’t violate any copyright law, because Wikipedia uses a “creative commons” license, which allows this if properly attributed. Those instances I’ve seen so far have always mentioned in the description that the book is primarily Wikipedia articles and are all non-fiction, although this might not always be clear. A little due diligence up front will prevent you from being taken in.

These scams have two variations that I’ve seen. The one I first saw is the mysterious case of Ira Krakow, “author” extraordinaire. <link to author search on Amazon> As I’m writing this, Mr. Krakow has 128 “books” available on Amazon, some co-written by Dr. Samuel Krakow (brother, son, or long dead grandfather?). Most are priced between $2.99 and $4.99. All appear to be participants in the KDP Select program, which means they are eligible for borrowing from the Kindle Lending Library. They will sometimes show up on the list of free books, which serves to bump them up on the various bestseller lists. I suspect there are others, just like Mr. Krakow, following this pattern. If you’re interested in sampling one of Krakow’s books, I might suggest The Story of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.


I’ll illustrate a variation using the example of Rashi’s Daughters, available in paper form from Barnes & Noble. The price, while high, isn’t out of line for many legitimate non-fiction books on specialized subjects. The description and even a sticker on the front of the pictured cover make it clear where the contents came from. In this case, the title is shared by a legitimate work of historical fiction, also available from B&N, which could cause confusion and lost sales of the other book. 


There is a theory, as yet unproven, that this may actually be a money laundering operation. Apparently, Amazon has banned this and other related publishers for not including the Wikipedia citation as well as publishing copyrighted material. If you’re interested in more on this, start with this article or this one, which talks about the money laundering potential with this variation of the scam using higher priced books.

“How do I wade through this crap?”

With so many more books to choose from and no sign of a slowdown, naysayers seem to think they won’t be able to separate the wheat from the chaff. I’ve seen many answers to this question. One of my favorites is author J.A. Konrath’s response, which is that people don’t seem to have any problems finding the best videos on Youtube. His point, as I see it, is twofold.

First, there have always been more books available than anyone could ever read. Yet we’ve always managed to make our picks. Some grab whatever jumps out at them from the racks at the grocery store or in the pyramids just inside the door of the bookstore. Those people can go to the Kindle or Nook homepages and have their choices narrowed to the same basic selections for them. Those who used The New York Review of Books or one of the many bestseller lists still have those options available. Word of mouth is still the most powerful and, I suspect, most common, and this still works.

Second, is that new methods to zero in on books you might like keep appearing. Many of these I view as an extension of word of mouth. I see Books and Pals and similar blogs this way. Simon Royle’s website, The Indie View, has an index of reviews from several different blogs. Sites like Goodreads and Library Thing are other examples. Amazon’s various recommendation algorithms are part of the answer. The latest tool I’ve become aware of is a new site called Yasiv. This site takes data based on Amazon’s recommendation engines and aggregates it in a visual display. On the blog associated with the site, examples show how this can be used to find the best books on a specific non-fiction subject. This same technique can find books you might enjoy based on another similar book that you liked.

You really think these are related?

Yes, I do. What do you think (on the individual subjects and whether they relate to each other)?

Thursday, February 9, 2012

FYI: A Little about Yanks, Brits, and Sex


I find the noted English spellings/slang particularly annoying. Europeans simply deal with Americanisms without making a fuss about them. We don't find it worth mentioning. Why can't Americans do the same?

We received the comment above in our recent survey. It is a reasonable complaint. If I was from the UK, Ireland, Australia, Canada, or any other non-US, English speaking country, I might also find this annoying. Although I’ve explained the rationale for why we highlight this and other items in the past, it has always been in the comments of a specific review, and I thought it might be a good idea to do so in a post.

While I’ll concentrate on language, this post is really about the entire FYI section of our reviews.

On Language

England and America are two countries separated by a common language. – George Bernard Shaw

My initial inclination was to apologize for my compatriots. I’m well aware of the stereotype of the “ugly American,” and know we are sometimes perceived as insular, with a sense of entitlement. I’ve experienced firsthand the greater knowledge that the average Canadian has about the world outside of their country- and even current events in the US- as compared to my peers. I’ve been guilty of some of these faults myself. It would be easy to view this section as more of the same. But none of this is the reason for why our reviews mention this. My main reason for including this is, and always has been, one of education.

To understand this, a brief explanation about how traditional publishing has worked in the US for as long as I’ve been reading might help. When a publisher contracts with an author for a book in English, it is typically for rights to publish and distribute the book in a specific region. While I believe this can vary, the US (or North America) is one of those regions, with Australia, the UK and other English speaking European countries, and potentially Canada as others. US publishers routinely re-edit books from other regions, changing spelling to US conventions and often changing the wording to remove regional slang, generally Americanizing the book. Some people have described the process as akin to a foreign translation.

I won’t even attempt to justify this process. I’m sure the publishers see it as a good marketing move, aimed at satisfying the lowest-common denominator of readers. The result has been that while many, if not most, Americans are familiar with some British and Australian slang, it is almost entirely from TV and movies, and limited. Their exposure to spelling differences between different English speaking countries is often non-existent.

With Indie authors publishing their own books, this regionalization is no longer happening. Personally, I see this as a positive, with the language differences adding character and color, giving a much stronger sense of place. However, for readers who haven’t experienced this before, it is easy to perceive the spelling and sometimes the differences in language usage as being in error. I’ve seen many Amazon reviews complaining about just these kind of things on books that I know are virtually error free, but use Australian or UK spelling conventions.

Educating readers and setting expectations for those who don’t realize there are differences is my primary reason for mentioning this in our reviews. I realize there might be some readers who aren’t willing to buy a book that hasn’t been Americanized for them. While my decision would be different, and I think they are missing out, it is also not my decision to make. Knowing has helped that reader, and helping as many readers as possible is the reason for our reviews, and has benefited the author who might otherwise have an unhappy customer that might give a negative review for a bogus reason.

What language differences are not okay?

As I mention above, I think the language differences add to the character of a book. When one of Vicki Tyley’s characters in Fatal Liaison is looking for a car park or Naomi Kramer’s Maisy May says, “no you can’t have my bloody bag,” it helps put me in Australia. When Helen Smith, in her book Three Sisters, describes coloured lights as “like Midget Gems,” I’ll suspect I’m no longer in Kansas, even if I have no idea what Midget Gems are. (If you’re interested, they are small chewy sweets, or candy to we Yanks.)

When language differences are not okay is when the language doesn’t fit the character. A Brit, fresh off his British Airways flight, asking a New York doorman to point him to the elevator, is going to be suspect to many readers. An American pre-teen girl telling a friend she wishes her “bloody father would sod off,” isn’t going to fly, at least for an American reader, unless she’s watching an episode of Masterpiece Theatre, or both well-traveled and a bit pretentious. Just as subtle differences in language can enhance a book, getting them wrong can detract.

This can present a problem for an author with characters from English speaking countries other than their own. If you’re such an author, the right editor or mix of beta readers might save you from making a significant gaffe.

Let’s Talk about Sex

And politics and religion. These three subjects are hot button issues for many people. Some percentage of readers abandoned reading this post or never started reading it at all because it mentions sex. For those readers who prefer that their romances be sweet or that book characters have sex behind closed doors, we try to let them know if a book isn’t a good fit. For those who like their reading to turn up the heat, we like to clue you in, too. If strong language makes you blush or conversely if you want the characters you read about to be like real people who sometimes use salty language, we want you to know about that too. Just as with language comments, this is to help match readers to books they are more likely to enjoy, based on their unique tastes.

Conclusion

What I want to make clear is that the intention of the FYI section is not to make a value judgment. Not every reader has the same taste. This section is a place to clue potential readers into things that might be a good or bad fit for their personal taste, but are irrelevant to the quality of the book under review.

Monday, February 6, 2012

And the Survey Says …


Thank you to everyone who filled out the survey last week. Most of the results were about what I expected and I now have the numbers to prove it. A few items caught me by surprise. I also learned a bit about putting together survey questions for the future. (Note: I’m writing this based on current numbers on Saturday, January 28th, but will be leaving the survey open temporarily for anyone still interested in weighing in.)

Who are you?

Although not included in the survey, other data I’ve seen suggests that our readership is dominated by females (about 60%) with most being in the 25-45 year old age range, more to the top half of that range than the bottom half. Those outside of that age range are more likely to be older than they are younger. This seems correct for a group of recreational readers who are using new technology.

You all read eBooks, with two-thirds of you owning one of the e-ink model Kindles. Ninety percent use a Kindle product or app. Those users of the Nook or Nook apps dominate the remainder. Most have multiple ways you read eBooks, combining dedicated eReaders, tablet computers, apps for your Smartphone, and PC reading software. Four out of five read at least three books a month, with almost one out of three reading six books or more. Your preferred eBook retailer is predictable, with Amazon and affiliates as the favorite of 75%, B&N 5%, and Smashwords 12.5%, with the remainder spread among other eBook retailers.

Most read a mix of Indie and traditionally published books. However, a small number (5%) read Indie books almost exclusively and slightly more (10%) read only a small number of Indie books, with books from traditional publishers making up the majority of your reading fare. Four out of five of the respondents visit Books and Pals at least weekly.

Slightly more than half of those who responded are authors.

How are we doing?

At least in the two main questions aimed at uncovering this, I liked what I saw, although these questions were also those that were the least well thought out on the survey. It appears that most find the appraisal section, which is the heart of the review, valuable. While a slight majority of the respondents found the ranking among the most valuable sections, I was happy to see that the book description, appraisal, and genre generally scored as more valuable than the ranking. That means you’re paying more attention to what is being said than an imprecise numerical score, which is how I think it should be. Some comments validated that interpretation. A small, non-trivial number thought the Author bio was not valuable, with most people finding value in all other sections of our reviews.

What is going to change?

Of the non-review posts we’ve had in the past or might consider having, two of them (guest posts from readers and book giveaways) are only of interest to one in three people. My sense has been that book giveaways are popular with a small subset of our readers and don’t do much to attract new readers. While I’m sure we’ll continue to participate in giveaways, I expect it will continue to be somewhat rare. There doesn’t seem to be a demand to increase these.

The other categories (guest posts from authors, commentary on happenings in the eBook world, and author interviews) were all popular with 70-75% of the respondents with commentary being the most popular. The commentary, I enjoy doing. The author interviews, I think I would enjoy and, since this is something our readers are interested in seeing, would like to do. Guest posts from authors are something I’ve also liked and thought have been both entertaining and educational when we’ve had them. All book reviews all the time feels like a rut for both me and, I suspect, for our regular readers.

However, we still have hundreds of books in our backlog with authors hoping to see a review some day. I’d like to continue at the current pace of four or five books reviewed each week with a post most weekdays. I’m thinking I’ll aim to have an author interview each weekend on either Saturday or Sunday, with commentary or guests posts displacing an interview or review once or twice a month and see what the response is like. I’ll want to limit the interviews and guest posts to authors who have already had a book reviewed here. If you’re interested in an interview, contact us. I’m interested in guest posts that would be of interest to readers, like those we’ve done previously. (Click on the ‘Guest Post’ label on the right for examples of the kind of thing we would be interested in.) If you would be interested in writing a guest post, email a description of your idea for consideration.

What has me confused?

I’m not surprised that the respondents were almost half authors (who are also readers). I’ve always known the blog readers who are most engaged, those who leave comments, make frequent visits, and respond to things like this survey, included a lot of authors. Those who follow are disproportionately authors and they are more likely to comment or otherwise engage with the site. If anyone has suggestions for increasing the number of readers who are not authors or inducing those who are already regular readers to engage more, I’m open for suggestions.

Although some of the statistics I’ve seen made it appear this way, it surprised me when I saw the number of people whose visits are random (although regular), using a bookmark or typing in the name of the site, and how few are prompted to visit by a tweet or Facebook post. I have some ideas under consideration in this area, but am also open to suggestions, either in the comments or via email.

I also thought the survey was an interesting exercise and something I’ll do again, focusing on different things each time. What do you think?