To the same.
You need not fear my becoming a Swedenborgian.
I am in more danger of wrecking on the rocks of skepticism than of stranding on the shoals of fanaticism.
I am apt to regard a system of religion as I do any other beautiful theory.
It plays round the imagination, but fails to reach the heart.
I wish I could find some religion in which my heart and understanding could unite; that amidst the darkest clouds of this life I might ever be cheered with the mild halo of religious consolation.
With respect to
Paley's system, I believe I said in my last that if I admitted your position, the next step was to acknowledge the spontaneous growth of goodness in the human heart.
Is this what you did not understand?
In your answer
[8]
to my first letter on the subject, you say, “Is it always possible to foresee all the remote consequences of an action, so as to judge whether it is expedient or not?
And even if it were, would not the time for action be past before we came to the decision?”
In answer to that I made the above mentioned remark.
If we often-time commit good actions without time to reflect on their tendency, does it not argue a natural impulse to good which takes root in the heart before we have time to calculate its growth?
And now tell me plainly what system would you build on the ruins of Paley's?