Two yarns, spun to 3360 yards per pound. Are they the same? Will they behave exactly the same in the cloth?
One of the definitions of 'insanity' is doing the same thing, over and over and over again, and expecting different results.
Also, that people who do not know history are bound to repeat it (while those of us who *do* know history watch them do it.)
We have been inching towards today's 'reality', while historians have been warning us, and climate scientists have been warning us, and somehow, too few of us were paying attention.
Another post I saw yesterday was someone making the observation that ignoring what we don't like doesn't prevent what we don't like from happening.
All of these things are applicable to present day politics, but also? Weaving.
I don't think there is another, better, metaphor for life than weaving. Maybe it is why I find it endlessly fascinating.
As I have explored the craft for 50 years (next month), I have tried various things, read loads of books, taking classes with various instructors.
I learned that all of the 'best' advice was based on very specific circumstances, not necessarily 'true' in every way that can be found when dealing with fibre, string and cloth.
Over the years I became less rigid, more open to other possibilities. allowing for unique specific aims and objectives of the weaver.
And this is what I have found endlessly fascinating about weaving - the width, yes, but also? The depth. The information can be interpreted in so many different ways, depending on the aim, or intention, of the weaver.
It was the challenge of writing books. Pick a set of circumstances, then give as much information and possibilities as I could think of. As I look at the literature surrounding the craft, I see other authors have made similar conclusions, and moved to address them in the way that made sense to them.
But that's the thing - we all process information in different ways. We all respond to circumstances according to who we are, our core values, and our level of knowledge and/or understanding of what it is we 'know'.
Because we don't know *what* we don't know until we finally know that we didn't know it.
A new weaver expressed frustration about learning to get consistent results - "Well, it seems like you just faff around and find out!". Yes, my dear, that's exactly what *I* do. But I do it based on the layers of knowledge that I have already figured out. And then, every time I learn something new, that information gets installed into my foundation of knowledge. So I'm not beginning from square one, now, but much further down the rabbit warren, with 50 years of knowledge, practice and experience, to extrapolate from. And the 'failures'. Because finding out what *doesn't* work teaches you where to look next for answers.
There are very few 'clear' answers in weaving (and I suspect in other crafts that rely on natural materials) and my goal now is to try to present as much as I can for anyone who wants to be exposed to my experience.
There is a meme that says a good teacher will tell you where to look, not what to see. I try to be 'that' teacher. (so, what is it you 'see' in the above photo????)
Books available at blurb
Classes available at Sweet Georgia and Long Thread Media
My Ko-fi shop - for towels and such
Soon to come - articles in WEFT