Showing posts with label esotericism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label esotericism. Show all posts

Monday, May 20, 2013

"The occult orders are full mostly of people who are for the time being in revolt against or not at home with Christianity." (Was/Is the Golden Dawn Christian?)

.
"Theorists have not been at a loss to explain; but they differ."
Book Four, Part One

It has been observed that the groups and individuals comprising the Western Mystery Tradition can be roughly divided into two streams according to their relationship with Christianity: (1) those whose beliefs and practices are (at most) "only Christian in that they contain some Christianity but do not stress it", as opposed to (2) those who are "primarily Christian but draw on other pre-Christian sources."

The words in quotes are attributed to Gerald Yorke by way of Kathleen Raine's 1969 article Yeats, the Tarot, and the Golden Dawn. So far as I know, Raine's article is the only source for this quote, which she states is from a letter written by Yorke.

Here is the full text of the footnote from Raine's paper containing the quote:

On the question of the degree to which the Society was Christian the experts differ. Mr. Geoffrey Watkins believes that it was strongly so from the first. Mr. Gerald Yorke that A.E. Waite who rewrote the ritual extensively when he broke away from the original Order, was mainly responsible for the Christianization. "Where the G.D. called itself a Hermetic Order, Waite called his version a Roscirucian Order, and the Rosicrucians were always more Christian than the Hermetists. In the original G.D. the Christianized Rosicrucian material did not come until the 5=6 degree in the Inner Order. Here for the first time you find the Calvary cross, but with a rose on it instead of the figure of Christian." This quote from a letter fro Mr Yorke; who further writes: "Now Hermetic Orders as such are only Christian in that they include some Christianity but do not stress it. Rosicrucian orders on the other hand are primarily Christian but draw on other pre-Christian sources. In other words the Hermetists always try to become God in his anthropomorphic or in some instances theriomorphic form. They inflame themselves with prayer until they become Adonai the Lord ... whereas the Christian approached God the Father through Christ (Adonai) but never tried to become Christ, only to become as Christ. Thus the Hermetic (or pagan) approach is as Adonai to order the averse hierarchy about, the Roscirucian approach is to order them about through the grace of Christ or through the power of His name ... Now the G.D. used the pagan formule, the Hermetic formulae and pre- or non-Christian names of power, take from the Hebrew, Greek, Coptic, Egyptian and Chaldean sources. The Rosicrucian substitutes names from the Christian system, from the Christian Trinity, etc. Both systems combine when it comes to the archangels Gabriel, Uriel, Michael and Raphael. They also agree on the Cherubim, Seraphim, etc. The G.D. way of becoming the god is the dangerous one, as it leads at once to inflated ego, witness Mathers and Crowley, et al. The occult orders are full mostly of people who are for the time being in revolt against or not at home with Christianity. When they find that the occult, Hermetic pre-Christian way of doing things at its best is no better than the Christian way, they often find their final home back in Christianity or in Islam, Buddhism or Hinduism. For the major religions are major because they have stood the test of time better. Thus my conclusion is that the Hermetic way of the Golden Dawn is primarily Hermetic and not Christian, since it is reverting to pre-Christian methods and attitudes, but some of the members will have done it all in a Christian way way. I am fairly certain that these were the minority at any given moment and seldom remained in the Order all their lives. But this of course is a personal opinion."

I quote this valuable opinion of Mr. Yorke for the light it throws on the impoderables of an ambience, and emphasis within an Order at best ambiguous. Mr. Watkins's view of the predominance of the Christian emphasis may be founded on the fact that two of the founder-members (not Mathers) were members of the English Rosicrucian Order. As regards Yeats, we must be left wondering, as Thomas Butts wondered about Blake, whether his angels were black, white, or gray; but the colour of the angels themselves may perhaps lie in the eye of the beholder. In any case, from a Catholic point of view the Oder of the G.D. would stand condemned if only on the grounds of the vow of secrecy imposed upon its members.

In my own (decidely inexpert) opinion, the Golden Dawn was so unstable and short-lived precisely because its members included partisans of both camps, as well as others who wavered between the two. And the long term influence of the G. D. might also be due to this chimeric quality, which allows would-be adepts the freedom to project their own attitudes concerning the cult of Jebus onto the theological Rorschach test that was the original Golden Dawn.


Thursday, July 19, 2012

Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa

[Below is a copied and pasted version of an online biography of Agrippa that has been around for quite some time. I am posting it here because I just discovered that it is now only available through the Wayback Machine (link). I think it is a valuable resource, and therefore I am posting here in order to help preserve it.]

-------------------------------------------


Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim
(Henricus Cornelius Agrippa ab Nettesheym)


"Recent historical investigation... assigns him a central place in the history of ideas of the Middle Ages; he is seen as characterizing the main line of intellectual development from Nicholas of Cusa to Sebastian Franck. Modern opinion evaluates him on the basis of his Platonic, Neoplatonic, and Hermetic influences - primarily in the De occulta philosophia..."
Agrippa von Nettesheim. In.: Dictionary of Scientific Biography. American Council of Learned Societies. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York 1970; vol. I, 79-81
"In his influential work De occulta philosophia libri tres (1531), Agrippa combined magic, astrology, Qabbalah, theurgy, medecine, and the occult properties of plants, rocks, and metals. This work was an important factor in the spread of the idea of occult sciences." ; "The magical interpretation of Qabbalah reached its peak in Henri Cornelius Agrippa of Nettesheim's De occulta philosophia.".
Encyclopedia of Religion, Mircea Eliade ed. in chief, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York 1987, article on Occultism by Antoine Faivre (Director of Studies at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Section des Sciences Religieuses, Sorbonne University; Professor of Germanic Studies at the University of Haute-Normandie. You may have noticed that he used the term occult sciences) XI:38 ; article on Qabbalah by Moshe Idel (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) XII:120


Biography, based on his Epistles:
(with comments from my foreword to the Bulgarian translation of De occulta philosophia,
Aratron Publishers, Sofia 1995, ISBN 954-626-007-X)

In 1462 Cosimo Medici gave a villa to Marsilio Ficino near Florence together with some scrolls, containing the works of Plato. Ficino started translating them when a monk named Leonardo da Pistoia brought from Macedonia a corpus with 15 manuscripts in Greek. Their Latin translation was ready within the next few months. Humanism began its journey beyond human nature - the Great Plato bowing down before the Thrice Greatest Hermes.
Ficino published his Latin translations of the Corpus Hermeticum in 1463, of Plato's Dialogues in 1467, his Commentarium in Convivium Platonis de amore in 1469, and his Theologia Platonica in 1482. Pico de la Mirandola published his Conclusiones in 1486.
16.IX.1486. Agrippa was born in Cologne within the Holy Roman Empire (Colonia Agrippina in the Roman Empire, its inhabitants were called Agrippinenses) where Albertus Magnus professed and died 200 years ago. Cologne was an important academic and publishing center in the Empire and in his youth Agrippa became famous in his native town for refusing to speak anything but Latin. Afterwards he often referred to himself with the Latin part of his name, i. e. Cornelius Agrippa.
1493. Emperor Maximilian I succeeded his father Friedrich III. He was to become the main patron of Agrippa. In the same year Paracelsus was born in Einsiedeln, near Zürich.
1494. Johannes Reuchlin published his De verbo mirifico (On the Word that makes miracles) in Germany.
22.VII.1499. Agrippa enrolled in the Faculty of Arts at Cologne University and received his License in Arts on 14.III.1502. By 1506, as we read in his Epistles, he was a secretary to the Emperor Maximilian I and studied in the University of Paris where he organised a secret society - a brotherhood of students interested in alchemy and magic. Its members were to help and play an important role during his whole life. In the same town, exactly 300 years before the first rosicrucian societies of that kind appeared, Jacques de Molay was burnt alive in 1314 thus proving what Agrippa wrote on the qualities of fire "alterum comprehendens, incomprehensibilis, et lux omnibus vitam tribuens". Landulfus became Professor at the University of Pavia, Germain became historian to Charles V. During the same year Reuchlin published his Hebrew grammar and dictionary.
1508. Agrippa travelled to Spain (Barcelona etc.), the Balearic Islands and Italy (Naples etc.) and then to France (Avignon).
1509. He lectured in the University of Dôle on De verbo mirifico, with the support of the University's chancellor and Archbishop of Besançon Antoine de Vergy. The courses were free of charge. They were attended even by Parliament councillors, which made him quite, maybe too famous (which was very dangerous and still is, even without the Inquisition). Lectures were dedicated to Princess Margaret, daughter of Maximilian I (she was governor of Netherlands etc., incl. Dôle). Agrippa became Professor of theology at the University of Dôle. He wrote De Nobilitate et præcellentia to gain favour of Margaret, but his efforts met a fierce opposition from the Franciscan order of Burgundy and he could not publish it until 1532.
End 1509. Agrippa was 23 years old when he sent the manuscript of De occulta philosophia to his friend and teacher Johannes Trithemius, abbot of Spanheim, near Würzburg (Trithemius was also Paracelsus' teacher of alchemy). Ficino was 23 when he finished translating Plato, Pico was also 23 when he set his Conclusiones and Trithemius was 23 when he became abbot of Spanheim. Inside the walls of his abbey was the furnace where, after Pico, Renaissance humanism melted with Ancient magic to revive hidden Tradition in Europe. The manuscript of Agrippa may now be found in the Würzburg Universitätsbibliothek (ms. M. ch. q. 50). The huge collection of Trithemius, consisting of magical treatises and manuscripts, came into the hands of Agrippa after his teacher's death, not without the care of Trithemius.
1510. In his answer to Agrippa, concerning De occulta philosophia (8.IV.1510), Trithemius wrote: "I wonder... that you, being so young, should penetrate into such secrets as have been hid from most learned men, and not only clearly and truly, but also properly and elegantly set them forth". The words of Paracelsus' teacher are still valid in the XXth century. He knew that the young Agrippa was on a way Tradition reserved to few after Orpheus, he also knew what it meant and warned him: "Unum hoc tamen te monimus custodire præceptum, ut vulgaria vulgaribus, altiora vero et arcana altioribus atque secretis tantum communices amicis: da foenum bovi, saccarum psitaco tantum - intellige mentem, ne boum calcibis (ut plerisque contingit) subiiciaris.". Many scholars knew Trithemius as a prophet, and his words were to become immediate reality - Jean Catilinet, head of the Franciscan order of Burgundy, delivered at Ghent a sermon before Princess Margaret, against Agrippa's lectures at Dôle. Agrippa had to leave the continent, accused of judaicising heresy. Emperor Maximilian I sent him as ambassador to Henry VIII, as Agrippa wrote in his Epistles - on an occultissimum negotium. Shortly after this mission (by the end of 1511) Maximilian I left Louis XII and united with Henry VIII against France. Agrippa stayed in the house of Erasmus' friend John Colet, pupil of Ficino, who by that time lectured at Oxford on the Epistles of Saint Paul. On the basis of the Epistles, Agrippa wrote an Expostulatio to the accusations of the Franciscans.
1511. Agrippa returned to Cologne and resumed lecturing, this time at the Cologne University. By mid 1511 he entered the Army and soon became Captain - a position (much higher than it is today) which showed his influence, as well as his belonging to (at least) middle nobility. In late 1511 he took part in the Council of Pisa, as a German theologist, where he was excommunicated together with other "defiants". Shortly after, the pope died and the new pope Leo X revoked his excommunication in February 1513. The Emperor assigned a new patron for Agrippa - William IX Paleologus, Marquis de Monferrat.
1512. Agrippa lectured in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Pavia on Plato's Convivium. Till 1515 Agrippa stayed in Italy as a soldier and diplomat under the Duke of Milan. He studied Ficino and Pico de la Mirandola. By mid 1515 Agrippa lectured at Pavia University on Pimander (Ficino's Latin translation of the Corpus Hermeticum). Eventually here he made his doctorates on both laws and medecine. By the end of 1515 he dedicated his De triplici ratione cognoscendi Deum to his patron William. But then Francis I, king of France, invaded Pavia. Agrippa lost his fortune and had to leave the town.
1516. He gave lectures of theology at the University of Turin, probably based on the Epistles of Saint Paul.
mid 1517. He became court physician to Charles III, Duc de Savoy who was close to Margaret of Austria and William Paleologus, but the payment was so low that he refused it and the next year left for Metz where he became orator and advocate of the town. By this time he wrote his De originali peccato, On Geomancy and a treatise on the plague. In 1519, while in Metz Agrippa defended Jacques Lefèvre d'Etaples from Claudius Salini, prior of the Celestine monastery and also won a case, defending a woman accused of witchcraft by the Inquisitor of Metz. Agrippa even succeeded in removing the Inquisitor from that case. Of course, he again became too famous and there was no more place left for him in Metz.
1520. He returned to Cologne where he got the magical part of the Trithemius library. By that same year Charles V succeeded Agrippa's patron, the Emperor Maximilian I. In 1521 Agrippa went to Geneva and showed ultimate interest in Martin Luther. In October 1522 he went to Friburg (Switzerland) where he worked as town physician but often helped magistrates and used his diplomatic skills.
May 1524. He went to Lyon as court physician to Louise de Savoy, Queen mother of Francis I. There he wrote his Commentary on Ars brevis of Raymond Lully. During the same year began an impressive conjunction of planets - the Big Parade, which rose dramatically the interest in astrology and it became the celebrity of the day. All authorities and influential people amused themselves in ordering horoscopes even for the most trivial decisions. Astrologers were overwhelmed with work, often did not care about the lengthy calculations and simulated - this golden mine resulted in a total abandoning of the old Chaldean principles in astrology and had its destructive impact on all mantic arts. By mid 1526 Agrippa was still not paid for his court duties and when the Queen mother asked him to make a horoscope for her son the king Francis and his war with Charles V and the Bourbons, he refused with bitter comments on Louise in a letter which she somehow managed to read. Moreover, he predicted a triumph for the Bourbons. Thus Agrippa was forced to stay in Lyon without pension and without the right to leave the town. He did it only in December 1527. This was the perfect background and the right time for Agrippa's attack on the astrologers and magicians of the day in his De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium.
July 1528. After problems with leaving France, Agrippa went to Antwerp where he tried successfully to regain the favour of Margaret of Austria and in January 1529 she appointed him as Archives Councillor and Historiographer to the Emperor Charles V. Agrippa also obtained the print license and copyright to publish his works. In Antwerp Agrippa settled and again became too popular. He had many pupils, including Johann Wierus and as may be seen from his writings, resumed alchemical experiments in his laboratory. But in August 1529 the plague raged in Antwerp and all physicians left the city. Agrippa stayed and treated the sick. After it was over, the physicians returned and accused him of practicing without a proper diploma, trying to keep him away from their rich patients. Eleven years ago he wrote a treatise named Securest antidotes against the plague on a request of Theodoric, Bishop of Cyrene.
IX 1530. Agrippa published his De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum. By the end of the year his patron Margaret of Austria died and Agrippa was again not paid for his duties at the court, Charles V obviously being against the former court physician of Francis I's mother. De incertitudine "helped" much in that direction.
II 1531 Agrippa published the first edition of De occulta philosophia from the press of John Grapheus at Antwerp. As he intended to put the whole work to the press, he included all the index in the first book. It was dedicated to Hermann von Wied, Archbishop of Cologne. Now against him were the Emperor, the monks of Louvain and the scholars of the Sorbonne, as we may read in his last work (1533) Complaint against the Calumny of the Monks and Schoolmen. By mid 1531 Agrippa left Antwerp for Brussels and settled in a little house in Mechlin. The next year, upon the invitation of Hermann, he went to Poppelsdorf, then moved to Bonn. The Dominican Conrad Köllin, Inquisitor of Cologne, delayed the other 2 volumes but with the Archbishop's influence, after some compromise, publication was resumed and the whole book appeared in 1533 without information on place, publisher etc., with fragments from De incertitudine.
July 1533. Agrippa's correspondence suddenly ended and the next events were described according to his pupil Johann Wierus. The Dominicans continued their prosecution and urged Charles V who sentenced Agrippa to death for heresy. He fled to France despite his relations with Francis I, who put him immediately in prison for the old offense with the horoscope. Then Charles V changed the sentence to exile. Agrippa was soon released by friends, made his way towards Lyon but did not appear there. He was last seen in Grenoble, Rue des Clercs, in the house of the Ferrand family, owned by Vachon, governor of Grenoble, son of M. Vachon - Receiver General of the Province of Dauphine. His manuscripts and letters in secure hands, he had nothing else to do in this world. And he departed. In 1545 we read a little note: "Henricus Cornelius Agrippa ab Nettesheym a conciliis et archivis Indiatrii sacrae Caesareae Maiestatis armatae militiae equitis aurati et utriusque iuris doctoris qui intra decennium aut circiter Gratianopoli in Gallia ad summam paupertatem redactus obiit". Where, when, did anyone help (his body resting in a Dominican convent), did the yellow serpent help the Little Prince, does it matter? It does not matter. Because he is part of a Tradition holding the foundation of a whole human civilisation with a Teaching - the mortality of the body, the greatness of the Spirit, the immortality of the Soul and the freedom of human choice - to be conquered by Sin and Punishment or to conquer them attaining the One in the multitude.
... After that, we know nothing of Agrippa's wife and sons. All we know is that his manuscripts and letters made their own way to the publisher in Lyon. And when you ask them who was that man who put life in them, De incertitudine, from its first page, will always assert:

"...Ipse Philosophus, daemon, heros, Deus et omnia".

Some remarks:
(from my Bulgarian translation and foreword)
1. On the first English translator of De occulta philosophia

The current identification of the translator as J[ames] F[reake] is based on the 2 vol. Oxford English Dictionary. In the 9 vol. specialized Dictionary of Anonymous and Pseudonymous English Litterature (D.A.P.E.L., Halkett & Laing) there are 29 authors enumerated with those initials and the translation of De occulta philosophia is attributed to John French, M.D. - after due textological analysis Ferguson made the same conclusion in his Bibliotheca Chemica (I, 293). D.A.P.E.L. explicitly notes that the translation is wrongly attributed to J. F[reake] obviously meaning the Oxford English Dictionary. I have read some alchemical treatises, translated around 1650 by the same John French and completely share Ferguson's view.

2. On phrase inequalities in De occulta philosophia

Such utilizations of words are common in Agrippa. He often used techniques to emphasize something, relying on "quod curiosus lector ex ipsius phrasis inaequalitate facile deprehendere poterit" (De occ. ph., Ad lectorem). We should not underestimate a man who was friend of John Colet and Erasmus and as a mere boy became famous by refusing to speak other language than Latin. He wrote but did not mean only posterior insertions - polishing a phrase would be easy for him, unless he aimed much deeper. In my footnotes I commented one of his "phrase inequalities" (De occ. ph. I, Ch.13) "Benedicte Dominum universa..." and immediately after "... maxima Dei sunt miracula" when writing (NB!) about the Sun, referring to Old Testament miracles (Josue 10:12-13; Isaias 38:2-8) - God does not take back the Sun but only the shadow, the Sun returns by itself. If you replace God with Sun, the texts will retain the whole of their original meaning. This is not a "phrase inequality". In the times of Inquisition this is simply a key for reading the Bible, impossible to publish in explicit form.

3. On the relationship between De occulta philosophia
and De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium.

In my opinion, there is no contradiction between these books. As we know, after 1526 Agrippa passed through difficult times and had to manage somehow without financial (and royal) support. Then eventually he could use, but he never used "rejecto" when explaining De occulta philosophia in terms of De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium. Instead, he used "recanto" (Ep.5:28 "... nunc cautior hac palinodia recantatum volo") or "retracto" (De occ. ph., Ad lectorem "... in libro nostro De vanitate... hunc librum magna ex parte retractavi"). There is, of course, a meaning of rejection. But these two terms are quite ambiguous and on a common semantic level they mean "to redo something" - the Latin "retracto" means also "to treat again" and "recanto" means also "to sing again". These positive meanings have completely disappeared in modern languages, which is partly the basis of the actual confusion. Modern languages, as children of the Latin father, seem destituted of his patrimony because of their insolence, I wrote in my foreword to the Bulgarian edition. Agrippa never rejected whatsoever from De occulta philosophia. As we can see, he used Picatrix as a source in the first manuscript (1510) and in posterior insertions up to the final version in1533. He confessed he made mistakes, but when you try to "treat again" or "sing again" something, the mistakes are expected to disappear.
Moreover, in his criticism, Agrippa was not alone. Nicholas of Cusa said in a sermon: "Fatui sunt astrologi cum suis imaginationibus" but in his "De docta ignorantia" (Bk. 2, ch. 12) he explicitely showed his belief in the power of the stars. Leonardo da Vinci wrote in his "Trattato della pittura" on the vanity of astrologers, abusing human stupidity, but in other places he showed ultimate confidence in astrology (Codex Atlanticus v-a: "Ancora si po djre delli influssi de pianeti edjdjo", or in Trivulzi Bequest 36b "Il corpo nostro è sottoposto al cielo, e lo cielo è sottoposto allo spirito"). All three and many others were not against astrology as a science, but against the science of astrologers.

4. On the harmony between De occulta philosophia
and De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium

"In my view, it is the most important function of art and science to awaken this feeling and keep it alive in those who are receptive to it.". This is a quote from an article, written for New York Times Magazine (November 9, 1930, pp. 1-4). A couple of lines above, its author described this feeling with the following words: "The individual feels the futility of human desires and aims at the sublimity and marvelous order which reveal themselves both in nature and in the world of thought. Individual existence impresses him as a sort of prison and he wants to experience the universe as a single significant whole. The beginnings of cosmic religious feeling already appear at an early stage of development, e.g., in many of the Psalms of David and in some of the Prophets.". A year before this article, its author sent a letter to Boris Georgiev, a famous Bulgarian painter, with these words: "...Your art made me feel in those orbits where, far from earthly hardship and suffering, the soul finds peace. After concentrating in contemplation on the portrait you made of myself, I felt the need to thank you from my heart. As the weak shadows of a transient reality, we feel home-sickness and unfulfilled love towards a different, intangible world..." The author of this article was widely known as a passionate violinist. He also ranks among the greatest scientists ever born on this Earth. Nine years prior to this article, he won the Nobel Prize in physics. His name is Albert Einstein.
Lynn Thorndike was a Professor of history in the Columbia University. His capital work on the history of Magic consists of thousands of pages and its 8 volumes had been published by his University within more than 30 years (1923-1958). To the curious reader wishing, in his respect for science, to enrich his vocabulary while penetrating in the harmony between De occulta philosophia and De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum, we heartly recommend the works of Thorndike. The chapter dedicated to the founder of the Florentine Academy and author of Theologia Platonica Marcilio Ficino, was called by the above Professor of history (not philosophy) "Ficino - the philosophaster". You can count on your hand the works on Magic which the weapon of the Professor's analysis had not caught up with "syntheses" like "hodge-podge" and others of the same calibre. We may consider the above fact in the light of some other, seemingly isolated facts. Thoutmos IV corrected the Sphinx near Gizeh leaving his name on it and confessed it stood there from time immemorial. More than a thousand years later, during the Roman rule, the right shoulder of the Sphinx went through some restoration. In the XXth century, only a couple of decades ago, with the resources of modern science the Egyptian Department for Ancient Monuments undertook the same by filling the cavities with high quality portland cement. But in the middle of the desert, the cement showed other properties - after the first rain it inflated and the restoration endured only for several months, ending in the break of a fragment from the Sphinx. Only then the authorities tried to restore it, using the Roman method, by inserting stone blocks which they took from (NB!) the stratum, where in the 50-ies was found the vessel of the Pharaoh Cheops. Knowing this, the Pyramid and the Sphinx strangely remind the Coliseum and a military engineer at the office of Lodovico Moro, who in 1506 wrote that he had created a submarine which he would never describe "because of the malign nature of men, who could use it for massacres at the bottom of the sea (Leonardo da Vinci, Codex Leicester, 22v)" and while having a rest from the burden of his projects, immortalized his noble indulgence towards coming centuries in the smile of Mona Lisa...
For in its regardless course, groping its way with trials and errors, science looks too much like a stubborn blind man convinced that he will see through the beauty of the Eagle's flight by improving his walking-stick.
For those who forget the Path, lose their way and return back in the middle of thoughts of sand, reasonings of stone, deductions of rock, and work of wind. But now our plane has broken down in that desert and to come back home we shall soon need a Little Prince who, by the irresistible thoughtlessness of innocence, will remind us that there is not a long way to the Well.
For the Little Prince was taught: "On ne voit bien qu'avec le coeur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.". And those who look at these two books beyond the eyes of everchanging science, with a heart of everlasting innocence, will see perfect harmony.


Works of Agrippa:

"Three Books of Occult Philosophy" (the first English translation, London, 1651) or its 624 pages - scanned and uploaded, starting at 001.gif through 624.gif
Of Occult Philosophy or Magic, Twilit Grotto
Opera II, Lugduni : per Beringos fratres, [ca 1600]. Download the second volume of Agrippa's Opera from Gallica, Gallica is an excellent web resource, where you can download thousands of precious books, in tiff or pdf format (to download from gallica.bnf.fr - click "Recherche" then in the field "Auteur" insert Agrippa, then "Rechercher", then click the book and then "Telecharger".
De incertitudine & vanitate scientiarum & artium, apud Joannem Petrum, 1531
De l'incertitude, vanité, & abus des sciences, trad. en françois par Louys de Mayerne Turquet,... Reprod. de l'éd. de, Genève : impr. P. Chou, 1630
Della nobilta et eccelenza delle donne, dalla lingua francese nella italiana tradotto : con una cratione di M. Alessandro Piccolomini in Iode delle medefume / Reprod. de l'éd. de, Vinegia : G. G. de Ferrari, 1549
Henrici Cornelii Agrippae De nobilitate et praecellentia foeminei sexus, Antverpiae : apud M. Hillenium, 1529 : Expostulatio cum Joanne Catilineti super expositionem libri Joannis Capnionis ″De verbo mirifico″. De sacramento matrimonii declamatio... De triplici ratione cognoscendi Deum liber unus... Dehortatio gentilis theologiae... De originali peccato... declamatio. Regimen adversus pestilentiam
Les oeuvres magiques de Henri-Corneille Agrippa, par Pierre d'Aban, latin et français, avec des secrets occultes : Liége : [s.n.], 1788 "Heptaméron, ou Les éléments magiques de Pierre Aban, philosophe, disciple de Henri-Corneille Agrippa"
Déclamation sur l'incertitude, vanité et abus des sciences, trad. en françois du latin de Henry Corneille Agr. Reprod. de l'éd. de, [Paris] : I. Durand, 1582
De triplici ratione cognoscendi Deum, De nobilitate et praecellentia etc., Antverpiae : apud M. Hillenium, 1529
Opera omnia: Lugduni : per Beringos fratres, [ca 1600]. (the two volumes, coming in the near future)
Female Pre-eminence, Engl. transl. of "De nobilitate et praecellentia" by Henry Care, London 1670
Of Geomancy, Engl. transl. by Robert Turner, London 1655
On Calling Spirits, attributed to Agrippa


Images of Agrippa:

"HENRICUS CORNELIUS AGRIPPA Med & IC. EQU."
"Henri Corneille Agrippa"
"Cornel. Agrippa à Nettesheim"
From De Occulta Philosophia 1533 ed.
191x215
Front cover from the 1567 Paris ed. for the library of the Duke of Brunswick


Images from De occulta philosophia
[1533 ed.] - from the original edition, published in 1533, reviewed by Agrippa
[1600 ed.] - from the Lyon edition of Agrippa's Opera
[1651 ed.]- from the London edition of Agrippa's Three Books of Occult Philosophy
[III, 11] - Book III, Chapter 11

Title page of De occulta philosophia [1533 ed.]
Title page of De occulta philosophia [1600 ed.]
Title page of Three books of occult philosophy [1651 ed.]
Seal of Agrippa (against diseases/griefs) [1533 ed.; III, 11]
Seal of Agrippa (against evil spirits/men) [1533 ed.; III, 11]
Seals of Agrippa (Constantine/Antiochus/Judas) [1533 ed.; III, 11]
Seal of Agrippa (against diseases/griefs) [1600 ed.; III, 11]
Seal of Agrippa (against evil spirits/men) [1600 ed.; III, 11]
Seal of Agrippa (against diseases/griefs) [1651 ed.; III, 11] 1, 2
Seal of Agrippa (against evil spirits/men) [1651 ed.; III, 11]
Man in square with signs [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Man in square with numbers [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Man in square with serpent/eye [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Man in circle with pentagram/planets [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Man in circle with two pentagrams [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Man in circle with planets [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Hand in circle with planets [1533 ed.; II, 27]
Man in square with signs [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Man in square with numbers [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Man in square with serpent/eye [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Man in circle with pentagram/planets [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Man in circle with two pentagrams [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Man in circle with planets [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Hand in circle with planets [1651 ed.; II, 27]
Planets, signs, elements/Alphabets [1600 ed.; I, 74]
Planets, signs, elements/Alphabets [1651 ed.; I, 74]
Alphabet of Honorius of Thebes [1533 ed.; III, 29]
Alphabet of Honorius of Thebes [1600 ed.; III, 29]
Notaricon/Rosicrucian alphabet[1600 ed.; III, 30]
Michael's seal in Hebrew/Greek/Latin [1600 ed.; III, 30]
Alphabet of Honorius of Thebes [1651 ed.; III, 29]
Notaricon/Rosicrucian alphabet[1651 ed.; III, 30] 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Michael's seal in Hebrew/Greek/Latin [1651 ed.; III, 30]
Agrippa's astrological/magical Numbers [1533 ed.; II, 19]
Agrippa's astrological/magical Numbers [1651 ed.; II, 19] 1, 2
Scriptures Celestial/Malachim/Pass of the River [1533 ed.; III, 30]
Seals of the Sun, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of the Sun, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of the Moon, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of the Moon, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22] 1, 2
Seals of Saturn, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Saturn, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Jupiter, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Jupiter, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Mars, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Mars, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Venus, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Venus, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22] 1, 2
Seals of Mercury, its intelligences and demons [1533 ed.; II, 22]
Seals of Mercury, its intelligences and demons [1651 ed.; II, 22] 1, 2
Geomantic Characters of the Moon [1533 ed.; II, 51]
Geomantic Characters of the planets [1533 ed.; II, 51]
Geomantic Characters of the Moon [1651 ed.; II, 51]
Geomantic Characters of the planets [1651 ed.; II, 51] 1, 2
Magical/astrological signatures of planets/signs/stars [1533 ed.; II, 52]
Magical/astrological signatures of planets/signs/stars [1651 ed.; II, 52] 1, 2, 3, 4


Bibliography:

For a comprehensive bibliography, see Nauert, Charles G., Jr, (1965): Agrippa and the Crisis of Renaissance Thought, Urbana (Illinois).
For recent publications on De occulta philosophia see the excellent and authoritative work of Dr. ssa Vittoria Perrone Compagni (Department of Philosophy, University of Florence). De occulta philosophia libri tres. Studies in the history of Christian Thought; 48. Leiden [etc.], E. J. Brill, 1992.
For some of his other works see Poel, Marc van der. Cornelius Agrippa, the Humanist Theologian and his Declamations. Leiden ; New York : Brill, May 1997.(Series: Brill's studies in intellectual history ; vol. 77)
see also in: Totok, W. Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Bd. III, Lfg. 2, S. 397-400
and also my bibliography on Agrippa.
Last, but not least, see Donald Tyson's English edition, based on the first English translation of 1651, together with his excellent commentaries.


Referrers:

Britannica (by the editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica), or in Britannica-Newsweek)
"The Telegraph" (in "Education" and "News")
Philosophers A-H/Agrippa (review of this site @ Philosophy.MiningCo.com)
Philosophers/Agrippa (review of this site @ StudyWeb - the Learning Portal)
Philosophers A-C/Agrippa (review of this site @ Excite.com & Webcrawler, Education Directory)
Philosophers (review of this site @ Social-Studies.com, site for teachers in humanities etc.)
Agrippa von Nettesheim (review of this site @ Hermetic Net)
Cornelius Agrippa and Cabalistic Language (review of this site @ Danyon Cole Investigative Services, Blair Witch Project)
Agrippa - bio and critique (review of this site @ LookSmart Categories)
Philosophers/Agrippa (review of this site @ Yahoo Categories)
Famous Esoteric Personalities (review of this site @ Netscape Directory & AOL Categories)
Famous Esoteric Personalities (review of this site @ Open Directory Project)
Famous Esoteric Personalities (review of this site @ Lycos Directories)
Philosophers A-C (review of this site @ MSN Categories)
Agrippa (review of this site @ AvatarSearch.com, the Occult Internet search engine)
Alchemy & Hermeticism (review of this site @ Accessnewage.com)
Esotericism (review of this site @ Esoterism.com, the Esotericism search engine)
Art/Philosophy (review of this site @ Gyuvetch, in Bulgarian)
Culture/Art/Philosophy (review of this site @ Dir.Bg, in Bulgarian)
Philosophy Resources on the Internet (EpistemeLinks by Thomas Ryan Stone, linking to this site)
Hermeticism (Occultopedia, linking to this site)
Cornelius Agrippa (AskJeeves.com, redirecting to this site)
Agrippa von Nettesheim (James Joyce Internet Resources, linking to this site)
Altheo, the Greek site of esoteric links(in Greek & English, linking to this site)
Esoterism, historical background (students' resource site, in Swedish, linking to this site)
Dr R. W. Serjeantson's Early Modern links (Cambridge students' resource site, linking to this site)
Agrippa von Nettesheim (a site in Japanese, for studies on the history of alchemy and Renaissance occult philosophy, by Dr. phil. H.HIRAI, linking to this site)
Agrippa and Renaissance astrology (Comprehensive Renaissance astrology site, by Christopher Warnock, Esq., linking to this site)
Philosophy Links [fambof] (Over 200 annotated links about philosophers and philosophy, linking to this site)
Hermetic Kabbalah - the Big Picture (Colin Low's Kabbalah site. Extensive material on Kabbalah and related topics incl. Internet's largest Kabbalah links page, linking to this site)


Links on Agrippa:

Rudolf Steiner's "Mysticism at the Dawn of the Modern Age", Ch. VII. Agrippa and Paracelsus
Agrippa, Heinrich Cornelius von Nettesheim
Agrippa in "The 1911 Edition Encyclopedia"
Agrippa, Heinrich Cornelius [Agrippa von Nettesheim]
Agrippa, Heinrich Cornelius von Nettesheim
Cornelius Agrippa
Agrippa von Nettesheim in the Catholic Encyclopedia ©
Agrippa von Nettesheim in the Encyclopædia Britannica © (The text from E. B. in English, together with his biography in Russian, from www.astrologos.ru)
agrippa.htm (in French, with bibliography)
Alchemical Manuscripts in the British Library
Archives of Western Esoterica, Twilit Grotto. Uploading of the Occult philosophy started in September 2000, at www.avesta.org/agrippa, now at www.esotericarchives.com
Project Gutenberg's Etext of Extraordinary Popular Delusions
Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley
Elemental Correspondences of the Pentacle, by Graelan Wintertide
Esoteric Links Page: Villa of the Mysteries
Theosophy article: "Cross and Fire" by Blavatsky
Theosophy article "Stars and Numbers" by Blavatsky
Theosophy article "Posthumous Publication, A" by Blavatsky
Isis Unveiled by H. P. Blavatsky -- Vol. 1, Chapter VIII
Isis Unveiled by H. P. Blavatsky -- Vol. 2, Chapter I
Unpublished letters of H. P. Blavatsky
Chinese Spirits, article by H. P. Blavatsky
Bulwer-Lytton, by John S Moore
The Impact of Freemasonry on Elizabethan Literature, by Ron Heisler
Oxford University Conference on Kabbalah and the English Esoteric Traditions
La Clef des Grands Mysteres
Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim
Agrippa in Prokofiev's "Fiery Angel"
Analysis and summary of Prokofiev's Fiery Angel, by William K. McHenry
History of Magic
Alchemy and Magick at Levity.com
Geomancy, by Anthony Glenn Agee
The Neoplatonic Revival, Theosophy Magazine, Volume 26
Kabbalah Unveiled, By S.L. McGregor Mathers
Review of Fr. Yates: Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, by Donald Korycansky
Review of Fr. Yates: Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, by Michael Lumish
Frigate's forum on Agrippa searching for moderators
Astrologers_Personalities, in Russian (Zdravstvujte, ruskie kolegi-astrologi. Proshu, chitajte ochen' ostorozhno ruskij perevod Agripy ("Zolotoj vek"). Perevodchiku vse ravno esli rech idet ob "ecliptic" ili "eclipse" (Ok. Fil. t. 1, g. 2)
History of Magic by Borce Gorgievski Ambitious in the right direction, after some corrections.
Bibliotechka Astrologosa In Russian. (Soderzhit teksty mnogih okul'tnyh knig na ruskom jazike. Chto kasaetsja "Okul'tnoi filosofii", chitajte zametku vyshe.)
Alexis Dolgorukii's "Celtic Knot". Highly polemical "Thorndike" style. The author totally ignores such things as Agrippa's defense of magic in De occulta philosophia and the destiny of his manuscripts. After the works of Prof. Lynn Thorndike, it is another excellent ex adverso tribute to magic.


A mail-list on Agrippa:

This mailing list is dedicated to Cornelius Agrippa. If you have questions, or like to share ideas, or just want to tell something on Agrippa, then

Join our mailing list!
Enter your email address below,
then click the 'Join List' button:
Powered by ListBot | View List Archive

Sign my GuestBook
View my GuestBook
About the author
If you have any comments, this is my new mail.

Thursday, July 12, 2012

"The Forbidden Book": Sex, Death, Love, Religion, Politics, Magic, and all that

Sex, death, love, religion, politics and magic are the main ingredients in The Forbidden Book, the new novel by Joscelyn Godwin and Guido Mina di Sospiro. Only true adepts are capable of transforming such an explosive admixture into a pleasing and harmonious whole that still retains the white-hot energy of its separate components.

For those with little or no knowledge of or interest in such things as Alchemy, Traditionalism and Classical literature, The Forbidden Book can be read and thoroughly enjoyed as a finely crafted mystery novel, a romantic adventure, or even as social commentary "ripped straight from today's headlines". In other words, the novel succeeds admirably on the mundane level as a page-turner, complete with terrorist bombings, transgressive sexuality, and a voyeuristic inside look at the shockingly decadent lifestyles of the rich and famous.

But this truly Hermetic book will be most deeply appreciated by those who have cultivated a relationship with Mercurius, as the Romans called him, the Pagan God who is both the patron saint of the modern Western Mystery Tradition, and also the most liminal of the ancient Olympians (as both the God of boundaries and the God of crossing boundaries, not to mention the God of thieves and liars, and the reputed father of Eros).

Like all good Alchemical yarns, this story revolves around a fated couple: professor Leonardo Kavenaugh, a tall, dark and handsome classical scholar; and the young and beautiful Baronessa Orsina Riviera. Almost from the beginning we are given to know that the 50-something Leo has been madly in love with the 20-something Orsina since the time, barely two years before the story begins, when she was still one of his students at Georgetown University, but that Leo has not acted on these feelings. So, does Orsina in any way requite the politically incorrect amore of her former professore? The answer to that question will not be divulged in this review, although I will say this: the interested reader should play close attention to the various attempts by the Hero and Heroine of this Chemical Romance to communicate their True Feelings to each other in writing.

Besides the professor and the Baronessa, the other two major players are (1) the unapologetically elitist, coldly analytical, and fabulously wealthy patriarch of the Riviera clan: Baron Emanuele Riviera della Motta, and (2) Orsina's younger sister, Angela, a charmingly out-of-control underaged party-girl who manages to be simultaneously genuinely sweet-natured and flippantly self-involved, and whose favorite past-time is "villa-hopping". Importantly, these two form a very different kind of couple, and the contrast between the Baron and Angela, on the one hand, and Leo and Orsina, on the other hand, is key to unlocking the heart of this story. The central plot is certainly the Alchemical dance of the professor and the Baronessa, but the all-important sub-text is to be found in the Jungian shadow of that dance played out by Angela and the Baron.

I must address an important question regarding the true identity, so to speak, of the character Emanuele della Motta. There can be little doubt that "the Baron", as he is usually referred to throughout the book, bears at least a superficial resemblance to that towering figure of modern (and, most especially, anti-modern) Esotericism, Julius Evola. As a matter of fact, one of the authors (Godwin) is among the world's leading scholarly experts on all things pertaining to Julius Evola, and Godwin also has extensive up-close-and-personal knowledge of and acquaintance with the contemporary Evolian "movement". One peer-reviewed academic journal has even published the (patently ridiculous) accusation that Godwin is a leading member of a secret international crypto-fascist conspiracy inspired by the writings of Evola!

The Baron of The Forbidden Book starts out as a distant, indeed haughty, enigma. Much of the plot of the novel revolves around peeling away the successive layers of the onion that is the Baron's secret, inner life. The more this unpeeling proceeds, the less, in my opinion, does the Baron della Motta resemble the Baron Evola.

I cannot claim to know with any certainty what Godwin and di Sospiro intend to say regarding the real Baron Julius Evola, although it is very likely, it seems to me, that this is one place where the authors have drawn a bright line dividing fiction and reality. In particular, the conspicuous consumption that characterizes Baron Riviera della Motta's standard of living as well as his physical vigor, both contrast starkly with the monkishly ascetic Evola who was wheelchair bound for the last three decades of his life. Also, Riviera's strong identification with his fabulously wealthy, aristocratic family lineage, another defining quality of the fictional character, has no parallel in Evola's biography, in which one finds, to be sure, passing assertions about the "nobility" of the Evola family, but nothing more.

My (necessarily tentative) conclusion on this point is that "the two Barons" are meant to be a study in superficial similarities masking profound contrasts. Indeed, the superficial similarities between the fictional della Motta and the very real Evola are perhaps intended to emphasize the pathetic superficiality of most of what passes for Evola's contemporary "following".

The Forbidden Book is a novel to be both enjoyed and pondered. When reading this story one should allow oneself to be taken up by it. "Enraptured" is not too strong of a word for the effect it had on this reader. During this process, one should hold (gently) in the mind whatever images, thoughts, questions, or other impressions may linger there. Some of these psychic visitors will stay on as inner "house guests" that one can engage with again and again, like some Zen koan, as objects of meditation and spurs to further inner inquiry.

The Forbidden Book is nothing less than a valuable aid to the process of spiritual evolution, that concept which forms the beating heart of all genuine Perennial Philosophy, prisca theologia, Tradition, what-have-you. The authors have drawn deeply from their vast combined stores of Esoteric knowledge to provide material for us to reflect upon and experiment with in our ongoing quests, regardless of what stage or phase we happen to be in right now. The authors are eager to lend a hand, but they are also meticulously respectful of the very personal and highly individualized nature of what Sri Aurobindo and others have rightly called sva-dharma: one's own path. No one can walk this path for us, but The Forbidden Book is a very welcome reminder that there is good company along the way, and that much can be learned from our fellow travelers.


Linkages:

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

"The Core Of All Magickal Work" (On Ivo Dominguez' new book)

"In it's fullness, a Circle can contain a richness so complete that if all of Wicca were lost except for the way to cast a Circle, and its symbolism, the faith would renew itself from that one seed."

Ivo Dominguez is a true Renaissance Man among modern Pagans, Witches, and Magicians. And the full range of his expertise and experience as a teacher, elder, adept, researcher, writer, and visionary all come together in his book Casting Sacred Space: The Core of all Magickal Work.

Ivo has the (almost unheard of) ability to combine very practical and accessible instruction in the basics of Magick with just the right amount of theory and background. The result is that the student is able to slowly build up an understanding of Magick without being overwhelmed by mystagogical arcana. And what makes Ivo's magickal teachings even more valuable (and unusual) is that he not only grounds his magick solidly in the Pagan tradition, but in the most well-known and arguably most widespread tradition of modern Paganism: Wicca. This book could (dare we hope?) go a long way toward eradicating the (all-too-often, it must be admitted, all-too-well-deserved) stereotype of Wiccans as "Fluffy-Bunnies", "McWitches", "Playgans", "One-Book-Witches", etc. In a word, Ivo shows how you can have it all: Wicca plus real Magick and real Paganism.

But don't take my word for it: here is what T. Thorn Coyle has to say in her Forward to the book:
"A strong Magician or Witch fully shoulders her responsibility. This book of castings is not only an amazing compendium of innovative ways to move and shape energy forms; it also serves as a comprehensive primer on how to change the individual in order to better change the world. The work is placed in the context of other systems of magick should one wish to broaden one’s scope of knowledge and mastery, while providing enough information for beginning these unique practices from any level of experience and study. There are many treasures here. I hope that the magick held in this book not only intrigues you with its sheer novelty, but also spurs you onward and inward with its potential. If we read carefully and practice diligently, we will learn to change and be changed, in accordance with our ever-strengthening knowledge and will.
And here is how Ivo describes what he sets out to do in the book (from the Introduction):
"Casting Sacred Space is meant to provide a safe and sane introduction to the knowledge and techniques needed to embark upon journeys into magick. The first half of the book supplies some philosophical and theoretical underpinnings in order to make the castings offered in the second half of the book accessible and effective. Hopefully, a balance between theory and practice has been struck that will encourage the development of both understanding and proficiency in the creation of sacred and magickal space . . . .

"This book explores a number of approaches to the creation, delineation, and understanding of ritual that open the way to sacred space. The entry into sacred space is one of the most direct routes to the fountainhead of spiritual and metaphysical experience. For most of us, the thrill of the experience that called us to our paths is heralded by crossing the borderline into a wider universe. When you took your first step onto your path of magickal and spiritual development, did you not long for the strange skies of the otherworlds, conversations with the Shining Ones, keys to the gates, or the smell of flowers in a Faerie glade?"

Here is the book's page at the publisher's website: The Casting Sacred Space page at Redwheel/Weiser.

Of course the best way to buy the book is from a Pagan owned and operated local bookstore, like Bell, Book and Candle in Dover, Delaware; or The Crystal Fox in Laurel, Maryland.

Oh, and while I'm listing links, here is the author's Facebook page: Ivo's Facebook Page.

And, finally, here are some reviews of Casting Sacred Space: The Core of all Magickal Work (the review from DailyOm has more of Thorn's Forward and more of Ivo's Introduction):

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The Not-So-Occult Foundations of Nazism

.
Introduction


The Latin verb occultare (occulto, -are, -avi, -atum) means to conceal or hide. In English, "the Occult" refers to spiritual teachings and practices that are (at least in their details) concealed from public view and only available to the initiated, that is, teachings that are esoteric as opposed to exoteric. In popular usage, references to Occultism conjure up in the mind things mysterious and unexplainable, and, most importantly, things that are different from our ordinary experience of reality. Occult things, in the popular sense, are not normal, rather they are aberrational.

It seems that there is something comforting in the idea that the Nazis came to power with the aid of "Occult" forces, and/or that the racist and antisemitic ideas at the core of Nazism arose from small, secretive Occult groups lurking on the fringes of society. This reassures us that Nazism was just a terrible aberration appearing suddenly out of nowhere, or, more precisely, that the origins of this aberration were themselves also aberrational. (Why, look, it's aberrations all the way down!) The appeal of this comforting explanation has led to the great popularity of books, articles, websites, and made-for-cable schlockumentaries on the subjects of "Nazi Occultism", "Nazi Pagans" and so forth.

The problem is that, like many comforting explanations, this is a lie. There was nothing hidden or secret or "Occult" (or Pagan) about the roots of Nazism. Virulently racist and antisemitic ideas were extremely popular in mainstream German society (and throughout Europe and also in the United States) long before the Nazi party ever existed, and these ideas were expressed openly and, indeed, proudly. No secret cults were needed for formulating the racial theories that paved the way for the Final Solution, nor was there anything "esoteric" about how these ideas were spread, or how those who supported these ideas came to power.

The non-occult origins of Nazism are personified in the man who was hailed by the Nazi's themselves as the author of their "gospel": Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Not only was Chamberlain lauded in the official Nazi press and even in Hitler's own Mein Kampf, he had also been a friend and trusted advisor to the leader of the Second Reich, Kaiser Wilhelm II. And the book that the Nazis embraced as their "gospel" also won high praise from less likely fans, such as Theodore Roosevelt and George Bernard Shaw.

Chamberlain's "Foundations"

In the year 1900, Houston Stewart Chamberlain published Foundations of the Nineteenth Century. The book was an instant best-seller, and it's previously little known author became an overnight sensation.

Although an Englishman by birth (b. 1855 in Portsmouth), Chamberlain spent most of his life on the Continent. His earliest published works (on both biology and literature) were in French, but starting in 1888 he published mostly in German, the language in which he wrote Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts (which was only translated into Chamberlain's native language a full decade later).

Chamberlain was a true polymath who studied botany, history, astronomy, physiology, languages, literature, music and philosophy with equal ease and enthusiasm. He was strongly influenced by Kant, Wagner, and Nietzsche, but it was the racialist theorizing of French aristocrat Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau (author of An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, first published in 1853) that was to play the decisive role in shaping Chamberlain's own thinking. Although Gobineau is also considered an important figure in the intellectual genealogy of Nazism in his own right, he never achieved the level of popular success and influence that Chamberlain did, and Gobineau's racism was deficient in one crucial way: he was not an antisemite.

I will say more about the actual content of Foundations below (especially in the section on "Key Ideas of Nazism"). For now it is important to emphasize the great success and acclaim of the book. It went through numerous printings and sold 60,000 copies in the first 10 years after it was published. It was translated into English in 1910 and was favorably reviewed in a number of publications, including the London Times Literary Supplement, in which Chamberlain was hailed as "Kant in the 20th Century", and the anonymous reviewer stated that "we wholly believe that Mr. Chamberlain has the root of the matter in him."

An early fan of Chamberlain's Foundations was the Emperor of Germany and King of Prussia, Kaiser Wilhelm II. Wilhelm was so impressed with the book that he invited the author to meet with him privately at his palace in Potsdam in 1901. That first meeting was the beginning of a lasting and close friendship between the two men. The Kaiser declared to Chamberlain: "God sent your book to the German people, just as he sent you personally to me." The author was no less profuse in praising his Emperor: "May you save our German Volk, our Germanentum, for God has sent you as our helper!" Chamberlain urged the Kaiser to forge a renewed Germany that was "racially aware" and that would "rule the world." The two exchanged dozens of letters, and material from Chamberlain's letters often ended up in the Kaiser's speeches.

For many years after WWII historians had been (not merely woefully, but willfully, it now appears) ignorant of the depth and breadth of Kaiser Wilhelm's antisemitism. This started to change only in 1987 (over four decades after the fall of the Third Reich) with the publication of John C. G. Röhl's book-length study The Kaiser and his Court, in which Röhl devotes the concluding chapter to the subject of "Kaiser Wilhelm II and German Anti-Semitism." But today there continues to be little appreciation of just how significant a role Wilhelmenian antisemitism played in preparing the way for the Final Solution.

Wilhelmenian Racism and Antisemitism

As early as 1888, the future Kaiser Wilhelm II was already referring to the doctors attending his father, who would soon be dead of throat cancer, as judenlümmel, a standard antisemitic slur meaning "Jewish louts". Moreover, Wilhelm suspected these Jewish doctors of "racial hatred" ("Rassenhaß") against Germans. [link, auf Deutsch] This means that a year before Adolf Hitler was born, the man who was about to become Kaiser was not only already giving voice to paranoid accusations of Jewish plots against the German Reich, but was articulating his antisemitism in explicitly racial terms.

John C. G. Röhl writes, in his The Kaiser & His Court: "When Wilhelm acceded to the throne in 1888, anti-semites from Paris to Vienna crowed: 'All those who are truly Christian-German are devoted with their entire soul to Kaiser Wilhelm II and cheer him along the paths that he has chosen to go.'" According to Röhl, the infamous Austrian antisemite Georg Ritter von Schönerer was especially adulatory toward Wilhelm: "Germans had only one hope of salvation from the Jewish yoke, he [von Schönerer ] declared, and that hope was Kaiser Wilhelm II." [p. 202]

Röhl also writes: "By the mid-1890s, Kaiser Wilhelm II had adopted a thoroughgoing racism as a central element of his Weltanshauung and lost no chance of proclaiming the need for a pure and exclusive Germanic race." But Wilhelm was a little unsure about just where to focus his racism. In this, however, Wilhelm was displaying a common trait of racists, who often have long lists of "enemies". The Kaiser's enemies list included not just the Jews, but both the Slavs and the English as well. Wilhelm also had a lifelong obsession with the Asiatic "yellow peril," and he even proudly claims to have invented that term (a claim that is probably true). [pp. 202-203]

But by the late 1890s Wilhelm was focusing increasingly on the Jews: "Wilhelm's visceral anti-semitism of the the 1880s resurfaced .... From around the turn of the century, under Chamberlain's influence, and unnerved by the rising tide of democracy and socialism at home and Germany's increasingly exposed position internationally, Wilhelm II gave voice ever more openly to antisemtic convictions." [pp. 204-205] During this time, Röhl characterizes Wilhelm's attitude as "wavering between pogrom antisemitism and extermination antisemitism." That is, Röhl, probably the world's leading expert on Kaiser Wilhelm II, claims that, "under Chamberlain's influence," the Second Reich was already moving in the direction of "extermination antisemitism" while Adolf Hilter was still ein Schuljunge.

After the war, Wilhelm focused his embittered rage not on the Allied Powers who had defeated Germany on the battlefield, but on the "internal enemy": the Jews. In 1919, the deposed Kaiser wrote "Kein Deutscher darf das je vergessen noch ruhen, bis diese Parasiten von deutschem Boden vertilgt und ausgerottet sind! Dieser Giftpilz an der deutschen Eiche." ("No German can ever forget or rest until these parasites have been destroyed and exterminated from German soil.") He even speculated as to the best method to accomplish this wished for extermination: "ich glaube, das beste wäre Gas." ("I think gas would be best.") Wilhelm wrote these words in his own hand in a letter to General August von Mackensen (link). In the same letter Wilhelm called for a "regular international all-worlds pogrom à la Russe". In other words, Wilhelm had stopped his "wavering" and had now fully succumbed to the mentality that would eventually lead to the "final solution" to the Jewish problem.

"Key Ideas" of Nazism

Now lets look a little more closely at the substance of Chamberlain's book, Foundations of the Nineteenth Century. Richard Evans (Regius Professor of Modern History at the University of Cambridge) in his 2004 study The Coming of the Third Reich investigates the various writers and thinkers who helped to shape the racist and antisemitic ideological core of National Socialism. Evans singles out Chamberlain for particular attention:
"It was Chamberlain who had the greatest impact, however, with his book The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, published in 1900. In this vaporous and mystical work Chamberlain portrayed history in terms of a struggle for supremacy between the Germanic and Jewish races, the only two racial groups that retained their original purity in a world of miscegenation. Against the heroic and cultured Germans were pitted the ruthless and mechanistic Jews, whom Chamberlain thus elevated into a cosmic threat to human society rather than simply dismissing them as a marginal or inferior group. Linked to the racial struggle was a religious one, and Chamberlain devoted a good deal of effort to trying to prove that Christianity was essentially Germanic and that Jesus, despite all the evidence, had not been Jewish at all. Chamberlain's work impressed many of his readers with its appeal to science in support of its arguments; his most important contribution in this respect was to fuse antisemitism and racism with Social Darwinism . . . . Here were assembled already, therefore, some of the key ideas that were later to be taken up by the Nazis."
[pp. 33-34]
Below are five of these "key ideas" of Nazism, referred to above by Richard Evans, to be found in Foundations:

(1) Human history can only be understood in terms of race, and, in particular, in terms of the struggle of the Teutonic race.
"The leitmotiv which runs through the whole book is the assertion of the superiority of the Teuton family to all the other races of the world." [Introduction by "Lord Redesdale", aka David Mitford]

(2) The races of humanity are not equal.
"[T]he most learned gentlemen in Europe have solemnly protocolled the fact that all the races bear an equal share in the development of culture . . . . It provokes a smile! But crimes against history are really too serious to be punished merely by being laughed at; the sound common sense of all intelligent men must step in and put a stop to this." [Chapter Six: Entrance of the Germanic People Into History]

(3) Aryans constitute the "Master Race", and they should rule over all other races.
"Physically and mentally the Aryans are pre-eminent among all peoples; for that reason they are by right, as the Stagirite [Aristotle] expresses it, the lords of the world." [Chapter Six: Entrance of the Germanic People Into History]

(4) Jews, as a race, constitute the great, internal enemy of the Aryans.
"The Indo-European, moved by ideal motives, opened the gates in friendship: the Jew rushed in like an enemy, stormed all positions and planted the flag of his, to us, alien nature — I will not say on the ruins, but on the breaches of our genuine individuality." [Chapter Five: The Entrance of the Jews Into Western History]

(5) Jesus was Aryan, and Christianity is the natural religion of Aryan people.
"He won from the old human nature a new youth, and thus became the God of the young, vigorous Indo-Europeans, and under the sign of His cross there slowly arose upon the ruins of the old world a new culture -- a culture at which we have still to toil long and laboriously until some day in the distant future it may deserve the appellation 'Christ-like' . . . . Whoever wishes to see the revelation of Christ must passionately tear this darkest of veils from his eyes. His advent is not the perfecting of the Jewish religion but its negation." [Chapter Three: The Revelation of Christ]

Very Strange Bedfellows

Wilhelm II wasn't the only high profile fan that Houston Stewart Chamberlain had. When Foundations was translated into English in 1910, Theodore Roosevelt wrote a review that began and ended with praise for the author, although in between there was a significant amount of often quite pointed criticism, as the following passage shows:
"A witty English critic once remarked of Mitford that he had all the qualifications of an historian—violent partiality and extreme wrath. Mr. Chamberlain certainly possesses these qualifications in excess, and, combined with a queer vein of the erratic in his temperament, they almost completely offset the value of his extraordinary erudition . . . . Mr. Chamberlain's thesis is that the nineteenth century, and therefore the twentieth and all future centuries, depend for everything in them worth mentioning and preserving upon the Teutonic branch of the Aryan race. He holds that there is no such thing as a general progress of mankind, that progress is only for those whom he calls the Teutons, and that when they mix with or are intruded upon by alien and, as he regards them, lower races, the result is fatal. Much that he says regarding the prevalent loose and sloppy talk about the general progress of humanity, the equality and identity of races, and the like, is not only perfectly true, but is emphatically worth considering by a generation accustomed, as its forefathers for the preceding generations were accustomed, to accept as true and useful thoroughly pernicious doctrines taught by well-meaning and feeble-minded sentimentalists; but Mr. Chamberlain himself is quite as fantastic an extremist as any of those whom he derides, and an extremist whose doctrines are based upon foolish hatred is even more unlovely than an extremist whose doctrines are based upon foolish benevolence. Mr. Chamberlain's hatreds cover a wide gamut. They include Jews, Darwinists, the Roman Catholic Church, the people of southern Europe, Peruvians, Semites, and an odd variety of literary men and historians. To this sufficiently incongruous collection of antipathies he adds a much smaller selection of violent attachments, ranging from imaginary primitive Teutons and Aryans to Immanuel Kant, and Indian theology, metaphysics, and philosophy—he draws sharp distinctions between all three, and I merely use them to indicate his admiration for the Indian habit of thought, an admiration which goes hand in hand with and accentuates his violent hatred for what most sane people regard as the far nobler thought contained, for instance, in the Old Testament. He continually contradicts himself, or at least uses words in such diametrically opposite senses as to convey the effect of contradiction; and so it would be possible to choose phrases of his which contradict what is here said; but I think that I give a correct impression of his teaching as a whole."
But despite these reservations, Roosevelt began his review by calling Foundations "a noteworthy book in more ways than one" and ended his review on a very positive note:
"Yet, after all is said, a man who can write such a really beautiful and solemn appreciation of true Christianity, of true acceptance of Christ's teachings and personality, as Mr. Chamberlain has done, a man who can sketch as vividly as he has sketched the fundamental facts of the Roman empire in the first three centuries of our era, a man who can warn us as clearly as he has warned about some of the pressing dangers which threaten our social fabric because of indulgence in a morbid and false sentimentality, a man, in short, who has produced in this one book materials for half a dozen excellent books on utterly diverse subjects, represents an influence to be reckoned with and seriously to be taken into account."
George Bernard Shaw (social reformer, playwright, and founder of the London School of Economics) also wrote a review of Foundations. Shaw began his review like this: "This very notable book should be read by all good Fabians." The Fabian Society is a group (still in existence) that advocates moderate, non-revolutionary, Socialism. Among its illustrious members have been H.G. Wells, Annie Besant, Virginia Wolf, and Emmeline Pankhurst, as well as Labor Party stalwarts such as Harold Wilson, Tony Benn, and Tony Blair

Why did George Bernard Shaw believe that "all good Fabians" should read Chamberlain's book? Because, in Shaw's own words, "it is a masterpiece of really scientific history. It does not make confusion: it clears it away." Shaw ends his review by writing, "Meanwhile, as this book has produced a great effect in Germany, where 60,000 copies are in circulation, and is certain to stir up thought here, whoever has not read it will be rather out of it in political and sociological discussions for some time to come." Shaw would also later write that "the greatest Protestant Manifesto ever written, as far as I know, is Houston Stewart Chamberlain's Foundations of the Nineteenth Century: everybody capable of it should read it."

As the reaction of the moderate Socialist George Bernard Shaw demonstrates, Houston Stewart Chamberlain's antisemitism was, apparently, socially acceptable in the early 20th century. And the reaction of the Progressive Republican Theodore Roosevelt demonstrates that this acceptability still held even for those who explicitly recognized Chamberlain's antisemitism for what it was and rejected it in no uncertain terms. The importance of this acceptance must be underscored. Although to the average 21st century reader, Foundations sounds like an unhinged antisemitic rant, its author genuinely hoped to reach out to and influence well-educated, serious minded, socially conscious individuals. The reactions of Shaw and Roosevelt demonstrate that he achieved some real success in doing so.

Another "strange bedfellow" is Chamberlain's longtime close friend, Adolf von Harnack, a highly influential Protestant theologian and church historian. For those familiar with modern theological trends, it is worth noting that Harnack made significant contributions to both the Higher Criticism and the Social Gospel as well as to liberal theology generally. In doing this Harnack had helped to lay the theological groundwork for what the Nazis would come to call "Positive Christianity," concerning which the official Nazi Party Program, adopted in 1920, states:
"We demand freedom for all religious confessions in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or conflict with the customs and moral sentiments of the Germanic race. The party as such represents the standpoint of a positive Christianity, without tying itself to a particular confession. It fights the spirit of Jewish materialism within us and without us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our Volk can only take place from within, on the basis of the principle: public need comes before private greed.”
Point 24, Party Program, National Socialist Workers Party of Germany
The friendship between the liberal theologian Adolf von Harnack and Houston Stewart Chamberlain is far from aberrational, as shown by George Bernard Shaw's exclamation (quoted above) that the book viewed by the Nazi's as their "gospel" was viewed by Shaw as "the greatest Protestant Manifesto ever written"! In fact the affinity between Nazism and Protestantism, and liberal Protestantism in particular, is far deeper and stronger than is generally recognized. This (very) dark side Protestantism also manifests itself in America's own unique contribution to fascism: the Ku Klux Klan. Another example is that of the Calvinist Afrikaaners of South Africa and their (now long departed) Apartheid system.

Modern liberal Protestantism, and especially the Higher Criticism and the Social Gospel, were both crucial to the version of Christianity preferred by the Nazis. The Higher Criticism, especially as it was formulated by Harnack, gave the green light to the Nazi agenda of purging Christianity of all Jewish influences and associations. For example, one of Harnack's criticisms of Luther was that he had not seen clear to dispense with the Old Testament: "What an unburdening of Christianity and its doctrine it would have been if Luther had taken this step!" [Marcion: The Gospel of the Alien God, p. 134, trans. by John Steely and Lyle Bierma, Durham, 1999 (orig. 1920).] Because of his decades long association with Chamberlain, Harnack was well aware of the appeal that such an approach had to hard-core antisemites, although Harnack himself was probably no antisemite, and even criticized, in a friendly way, Chamberlain for his excessive antipathy toward Jews.

"Only When Jews Bleed, Are We Liberated"

In the years following Germany's disastrous defeat in WWI, Chamberlain's health and spirits declined precipitously. But then in the fall of 1923, at the age of sixty-eight and increasingly frail, the author received a visitor who was at the time almost precisely half his age. Chamberlain instantly realized that he was now in the living presence of the great leader who would fulfill the grand vision of Foundations. And the name of this Führer was Adolf Hilter. The day after their first meeting, Chamberlain wrote to Hitler: "You have great things to do . . . . With one stroke you have transformed the state of my soul. That in the hour of her deepest need Germany gives birth to a Hitler proves her vitality." That letter was written on October 7, 1923. Just one month later Adolf Hitler would stage his infamous Beer Hall Putsch, at which he declared, somewhat prematurely as it turned out, "The National Revolution has begun!"

The 1923 Putsch failed, but Hitler made use of his (brief) time in prison to start writing Mein Kampf, in which he made a point of praising Houston Stewart Chamberlain by name. In 1925, on the occasion of his 70th birthday, Chamberlain was proclaimed in the official Nazi press as "the author of the gospel of the Nazi movement," in an editorial written by Alfred Rosenberg, the principle theoretician of Nazi racial science. Rosenberg wrote his own sequel to Chamberlain's work and called it The Myth of the Twentieth Century, which went on to be the second best selling book in Germany under the Third Reich (right after Mein Kampf). In 1927, Chamberlain died. Neither Theodore Roosevelt nor George Bernard Shaw attended the funeral, but Adolf Hilter did.

The year after Chamberlain died, the Nazi Party won only 2.6% of the vote in the national elections of 1928. But just two years later, in the depths of the ever deepening Great Depression, the NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) not only broke out of single digits for the first time, but rocketed to almost 20% of the popular vote to become the second largest party in the Reichstag. By 1930 Nazism was a genuine mass movement with millions in its ranks. The streets of Weimar Germany now rang out with the refrain from The Storm Trooper's Song:
"So stand our Storm Columns, for racial fight prepared.
Only when Jews bleed, are we liberated.
No more negotiation; it's no help, not even slight.
Beside our Adolf Hitler we're courageous in a fight."
Pitched street battles, especially between rival Communist and Nazi paramilitaries, were resulting in a mounting toll of killed and seriously injured. The Nazis, as they grew in numbers and influence, were now manifesting on an ever expanding scale yet another "key idea" already spelled out in Chamberlain's Foundations: the glorification of violence and "struggle".

In a section under the heading "Progress and Degeneration", Chamberlain approvingly quotes from John Fiske's work The Destiny of Man:
"It is the wholesale destruction of life, which has heretofore characterised evolution ever since life began, through which the higher forms of organic existence have been produced"
However, Chamberlain then changes his tone when it comes to what Fiske says next:
"as evolution advances, the struggle for existence ceases to be a determining factor ... this elimination of strife is a fact of utterly unparalleled grandeur; words cannot do justice to such a fact."
At this point Chamberlain plainly states that he "must beg to differ" with Fiske for the following reason:
"For what is to become of our soul, which we acquired with such honest pains? We were just informed that the struggle for existence had 'produced' the soul: will it henceforth arise without a cause? ... And why, if the struggle has already produced something so splendid, should it now cease? Surely not from sickly, sentimental horror of bloodshed. 'Death in battle,' said Corporal Trim, and thereby he snapped his fingers — 'death in battle I do not fear this much! but elsewhere I should hide from it in every crevice.' And though it is, under Professor Fiske's guidance, a 'joy to see how we have at last gained such glorious heights,' yet I can imagine and hope for something much more glorious still than what the present offers, and I shall never admit that the cessation of the struggle would mean an advance ...."
Conclusions

We have seen in the above that the "key ideas" of Nazism, including especially those ideas that led to the Final Solution, had long before been worked out at some length by Houston Stewart Chamberlain in his book Foundations of the Nineteenth Century. Both Adolf Hitler and the chief Nazi "race theorist" Alfred Rosenberg publicly and enthusiastically acknowledged their intellectual debt to Chamberlain and his book. Moreover, modern scholars of the Third Reich have also acknowledged this obvious close connection between Chamberlain and Nazism, including Richard Evans, Michael Mann, John C. G. Röhl, Roger Griffin, Richard Steigmann-Gall, and others.

It has also been shown that Chamberlain's Foundations was both well known and widely popular, including among many readers one would not automatically suspect to find in the same company as Hitler and Rosenberg, such as George Bernard Shaw, Theodore Roosevelt, and Adolf von Harnack. Of particular interest is the reception of Chamberlain's ideas by Kaiser Wilhelm II, whose own racism and antisemitism were a match for Chamberlain's, and who demonstrated that even before the founding of the Nazi Party, the long arc of European antisemitism was already undergoing a decisive transformation from mere "pogrom antisemitism" to full-fledged "extermination antisemitism".

One is left with no other alternative but to conclude that the roots of Nazism are hidden in plain sight. In other words, they are not hidden at all. Nevertheless, many insist on looking in the dark corners of the "Occult" fringes of fin de siècle European society for the origins and sources of Nazi ideology. Multiple possible explanations could be produced for this self-imposed obscurantism, but all such explanations must amount to the same thing: a willfull denial of reality has led to the fabrication of revisionist "historical" narratives whose only goal is to misdirect us away from the simple truth.

[An earlier version of this article appeared in the Lamas, 2011, edition of Pagan Friends Webzine: link. SCROLL DOWN for links to related posts from this blog.]



Related posts from this blog: