[42]
This affair, as I imagine,
came to trial. Certainly. Who was the plaintiff? Fannius. Who the defendant? Flavius.
Who was the judge? Cluvius. Of all these men I must produce one as witness who can say
that the money was paid. Who of these is the most authoritative witness? Beyond all
controversy, he who was approved of as judge by the sentence of every one. Which of the
three then will you look to me for as a witness? The plaintiff? That is Fannius; he will
never give evidence against himself. The defendant? That is Flavius. He has been dead
some time. The judge? That is Cluvius. What does he say? That Flavius did pay a hundred
thousand sesterces to Fannius on account of Panurgus. And
if you look at the rank of Cluvius, he is a Roman knight; if at his life, he is a most
illustrious man; if at your own opinion of him, you chose him as judge; if to his truth,
he has said what he both could know, and ought to know.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.