One of the reasons that made the government unable to solve environmental problem is the necessity. Undeniably, despite various laws that mandate the government and the Filipino people to comply with their environmental duties, there are still no clear and prevalent changes that can be seen elsewhere. Litters are still around the corner. Wastes are continuously being generated from everywhere. Carbon dioxide and lead are still on the loose while plastics are still rampantly being used in all stores.
Few years ago, the call to cut carbon dioxide emission has been mandated by the Kyoto Protocol. The Clean Air Act also dictates it. However, long years after the enactment and implementation of these laws, carbon dioxide can still be inhaled. Some companies have still failed to comply with the environmental laws governing them. Cars and public transportation vehicles are still emitting the killer gas. The rivers are also used as dumping pit for garbage. Discipline is still elusive.
For these unbearable and disappointing results, not only the government but also the whole Filipino people should be blamed of. The laws are simple yet it becomes difficult for the government to comply with the law. One simple reason is the use of plastic bags. According to research, plastic bags contributed largely to the destruction of the ozone layer. Aside from that, plastic bags are decomposable that lives lifetime occupying a considerable area in the riverbanks, esteros, canals, and dumping sites. When burnt, the plastic emits a gas that directly damages the ozone layer. Despite all these facts and warnings, the use of plastic bags elsewhere is on the loose.
On the part of the government, it failed to pass laws that will ban the use of plastic bags on the mere ground that such law will leave millions of Filipinos unemployed. The manufacture of plastic bags involves various hands before it reaches perfection. Aside from that, there are sellers, distributors, and thousands of people depending from it. Hence, prohibiting its use would eventually cripple millions of families.
Unluckily, in this kind of situation, the nature suffers. Life is certainly important and priority. But then, life would be worthless if the environment where life exists is full of junks. In this kind of situation, it would also be hard for the government to weigh among the two; however, I truly believe that there are still options available only when full potential of the natural resources is maximized.
2009-08-25
Necessity Over Necessity
Labels: environment, environmental defense, plastic bags
2009-07-06
101 REASONS TO PLANT A TREE (just to remind)
1. source of food
2. source of water
3. source of oxygen
4. provides shade
5. food for animals
6. foundation of home
7. beautifies
8. shelter for birds
9. dance with the wind
10. strengthens the soil
11. source of medicine
12. form the mountains
13. creates paper
14. builds a house
15. stands a table
16. chopsticks for the Chinese
17. protection from flood
18. protection from strong wind
19. fights global warming
20. source of life
21. improves air quality
22. protects the water
23. saves energy
24. improve economic sustainability
25. reduce greenhouse effect
26. photosynthesis
27. cuts CO2 buildup
28. remove other gaseous pollutants
29. enhance traffic calming measures
30. attract business
31. attract tourists
32. improve neighbor relationship
33. harbor wildlife
34. architectural function
35. engineering function
36. air conditioning
37. forms a bed
38. source of living
39. sculptural function
40. artistic value
41. creates relationship
42. can be forever witness of love
43. produces paper
44. builds a boat
45. satisfy job needs
46. scaffold
47. produce books
48. source of income
49. cooks food
50. OPOSA vs. FACTORAN
51. charcoal
52. organic pesticides
53. experimental purposes
54. source of oil
55. beauty products
56. organic medicine
57. organic foods
58. whitening
59. foundation of a building
60. helps the pasture
61. food chain process
62. tooth pick
63. protects the environment
64. home for orchids
65. home for other parasitic organisms
66. livelihood
67. wood carvers
68. inspiration
69. component of a park
70. creates a comfortable seat
71. “bakya”
72. home for bees
73. home for hamsters
74. “Joyce Kilmer”
75. verdantness/ lushness
76. balance and healthful ecology
77. deforestation
78. water shortage
79. drying up of rivers, brooks and streams
80. massive soil erosion
81. loss of soil fertility
82. loss of agricultural productivity
83. extinction of unique flora and fauna
84. disturbance of cultural communities
85. increasing demand for biodegradable materials
86. destruction of corals due to siltation of rivers and seabed
87. drought
88. flooding of lowlands and agricultural plains
89. siltation of dams
90. shortening of lifespan of milti- billion peso dam
91. el niño
92. habitat for the living things
93. irrigation
94. massive illegal logging
95. wind breakers
96. rainforest
97. intense heat
98. loss of agricultural productivity
99. my responsibility
100. your responsibility
101. for our future sons and daughters that are yet to come.
...aren't you convinced yet OR YOU ARE JUST HEEDLESS?!
2008-01-28
Alarming Facts...
Since I became aware of the environmental problem, I dedicated myself supporting the groups advancing their interest of protecting the environment.
While reading my mail, I received this alarming facts from Environmental Defense.
And here it is...
Global warming is the most serious environmental threat of our time.
As these facts show, affordable options are available. And America cannot afford to fall behind any more in the race to invent clean, renewable energy sources.
45%-Increase in world’s solar generating capacity in 2005.
2-Rank of China as global producer of solar cells, behind Japan (U.S. ranks 4th).
$1.5 billion-Amount US government spends a year on renewable energy research.
$1 billion-ExxonMobil's daily revenue.
$2 billion-Amount GE Energy Financial Services invested in wind, solar, biomass and geothermal energy in 2007.
$200 billion-Amount China has committed to invest in renewable energy sources over the next 15 years.
0.74%-Projected cost of smart cap-and-trade climate policy on US economic output in 2030.
100%-Projected growth of the US economy by 2030.
53-Number of senators supporting cap and trade legislation.
0-Number of bills passed by Congress to cap and reduce America's global warming pollution.
Sources: World Watch Institute, Earth Policy Institute, Department of Energy, CNN, GE Energy Financial Services, Reuters, Upcoming Report: Climate Policy and the U.S. Economy. Environmental Defense, 2008
Negative comments might be heard from the abovementioned, but in this world of uncertainty, it is better to have done something than having done nothing at all.
Labels: environment, environmental defense, global warming