Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts

Sunday, January 23, 2022

Richards' Only Regret While Leader Of Planned Parenthood


The following is part of a guest essay in The New York Times by Cecile Richards (president of Planned Parenthood between 2006 and 2018):

This could well be the last anniversary of Roe. Ever since the Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion through that decision, 49 years ago on Saturday, Republicans have been chipping away at reproductive rights. Now, the court is poised to overturn the decision once and for all — fulfilling a longstanding dream not just of fringe elements of the Republican Party, but also of its leadership. I know, because I was one of the leading faces of the movement trying to stop them.

Years from now, historians will look back on the past two decades as a turning point in the fight for access to abortion. If I have one regret from my time leading Planned Parenthood, it is that we believed that providing vital health care, with public opinion on our side, would be enough to overcome the political onslaught. I underestimated the callousness of the Republican Party and its willingness to trade off the rights of women for political expediency.

The Roe decision not only made abortion in the United States extremely safe, it led to higher earnings, increased education levels and greater participation in the work force for generations of women, particularly Black women.

Ever since the 1976 Republican National Convention, when ending safe and legal abortion first became part of its platform, the Republican Party has been increasingly defined by its determination to undo this progress. A turning point for me came in 1994, when the emerging Christian Right helped defeat my mother, Gov. Ann Richards of Texas, and Democrats across the country. Up until then, plenty of Republicans had proudly supported reproductive rights, including in Texas. Believe it or not, Republicans were instrumental in founding many of the state’s first Planned Parenthood health centers.

The 1994 Republican landslide helped show that railing against abortion could be an effective political tactic. . . .

Looking back on the last 20 years, I see that I wasn’t cynical enough to fully comprehend the extent of the Republican Party’s willingness to trade away people’s lives for political power. I had faith that if we provided excellent health care and showed how access to reproductive rights had helped women, as well as our economy, and if we kept most of the country on our side, this, too, would pass. I was wrong. As a movement, I know we couldn’t have worked any harder, but maybe we could have been tougher.

Still, not all hope is lost. Despite years of punditry and sensationalist headlines, the myth that Americans will always be divided on this seemingly intractable issue is just that: a myth. According to Gallup, 80 percent of the country believes abortion should be legal under any or certain circumstances. And last year, American Bridge 21st Century, in partnership with Planned Parenthood Action Fund and Emily’s List, found that a majority of the voters polled (71 percent of women and 64 percent of men) felt Republicans were “out of step with their own views” on abortion. That may be because women from all walks of life have abortions — no matter their religion, socioeconomic status or political affiliation.

The erosion of reproductive rights is a result of raw, bare-knuckled politics, of a minority exercising their power over a majority. The millions of Americans who are watching, horrified, as the Supreme Court prepares to roll back a right they have had for nearly half a century need to be just as dogged and determined. But it’s going to take unprecedented levels of political activism to fight back. If Republicans are going to push their extreme agenda, we must make sure they have to answer for it where it counts: at the ballot box.

Wednesday, May 23, 2018

Public Does NOT Back Planned Parenthood Funding Ban


One of Donald Trump's latest proposals is to block federal funding for any entity that performs, supports, or even tells people about an option of abortion. This proposal is obviously aimed at Planned Parenthood (an obvious effort to please Trump's evangelical supporters), but could even prevent doctors and others from discussing abortion with their patients.

It is already against federal law to use federal government funding to provide abortions. This purely political proposal would instead dent the many other women's health functions of Planned Parenthood, which makes up about 95% of their spending. It is a mean-spirited proposal that would do nothing but harm the ability of millions of women to get health care.

And most Americans don't support it. Only 34% of the public supports Trump's hardhearted proposal -- about the same as the percentage of his base supporters. Meanwhile, a plurality of 47% opposes the proposal. This is not going to bring new voters to support the Republicans in November.

The chart reflects the results of a new Rasmussen Poll -- done on May 20th and 21st of a national sample of 1,000 likely voters, with a 3 point margin of error.

Thursday, February 02, 2017

Public Is Against The Defunding Of Planned Parenthood



The Republicans still want to cut funding to Planned Parenthood, and with a Republican now in the White House, they may finally be able to do it. But if they do, it will be against the wishes of a huge majority of Americans.

When just asked the question -- Should Planned Parenthood be cut off from government funding? -- a significant majority of 62% said "no". And when asked if that funding should be cut if none of it was used for abortions, that number rose to a whopping 80%. Well, guess what. No government funds provided for Planned Parenthood are used to provide any abortions -- and it's been that way for years.

The Republicans won't admit it, but they got it into law years ago that no government funds could be used for abortions -- and all of the funding given to Planned Parenthood goes to the other 97% of their work (providing health care for women). Defunding Planned Parenthood won't prevent a single abortion, but it would keep some women from being able to access badly needed health care.

The defunding is just another bit of GOP political theater, aimed at placating the right-wing fundamentalists in their party. It actually has nothing to do with preventing abortions.

The charts above are from a recent Quinnipiac University Poll -- done between January 20th and 25th of a random national sample of 1,190 voters, with a margin of error of 2.8 points.

Monday, December 26, 2016

Texas Legislature Still Plans To Defund Planned Parenthood


In the last legislative session, the Texas legislature tried to completely defund Planned Parenthood (in spite of the fact that only 3% of what they do is abortion, and no government money goes toward providing any abortions). They were thwarted when President Obama threatened to cut off Medicaid funding for the state if they defunded Planned Parenthood.

But they no longer have that obstacle. With Trump about to be sworn in, there will be no one in the federal government to stop the defunding, and Texas legislators are already saying they will do that when they meet next month.

The only thing that defunding will accomplish is to deny health care to thousands of Texas women, especially poor women in the state. It won't stop a single abortion. But those legislators know that. This is just a sully bit of political theater meant to please right-wing fundamentalists (who hate Planned Parenthood).

At least one conservative newspaper has had enough of this nonsense. The editorial board of the reliably conservative Fort Worth Star-Telegram is calling for the legislature to abandon its war on Planned Parenthood. Here is their editorial:

Fighting Planned Parenthood isn’t worth the battle, but that doesn’t seem to stop officials from taking up arms.
In December 2015, Gov. Greg Abbott pledged to defund Planned Parenthood. Now, after a year, the state has issued a final notice to the healthcare organization. Planned Parenthood could lose its $3.1 million Medicaid funding.
The whole battle between the state and Planned Parenthood has been a frustrating, arduous ordeal — all over something that taxpayers don’t even pay for.
It’s all brought on by the abortion services provided by Planned Parenthood. That’s done by a separate entity from the Medicaid-eligible health programs, and no public dollars fund it.
The governor's office says Planned Parenthood is “no longer capable of performing medical services in a professionally competent, safe, legal and ethical manner” after allegations last year that the organization sold fetal tissue for research. 
Planned Parenthood has already filed a lawsuit. Federal officials warned the state that booting the healthcare provider from Medicaid could be illegal. Other states have failed in attempts to do the same thing.
So all this trouble could be for nothing.
We get that some state officials really don’t like Planned Parenthood, but couldn’t all the energy and taxpayer money in this fight be used somewhere else? Maybe to fix the broken Child Protective Services?
It would be a better use of state’s time and money.


Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/opinion/editorials/article122318964.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/opinion/editorials/article122318964.html#storylink=cpy

Monday, December 07, 2015

Anti-Choice Advocates Are Still A Minority In This Country




In 1973, the Supreme Court voted 7 to 2 that women have the right to get an abortion (at least in the first trimester of a pregnancy). That landmark case was Roe vs Wade. Since that year, the anti-choice advocates have done their best to change American minds on the issue, and one of their targets in doing this has been Planned Parenthood. They have failed.

A majority (53% to 41%) thinks abortion should be legal in all or most cases. A plurality (49% to 32%) oppose overturning Roe vs. Wade. And a majority (53% to 33%) have a favorable opinion of Planned Parenthood. The anti-choice folks remain a minority in this country.

Only one group of people have majorities wanting to make abortions illegal, supporting the overturning of Roe vs Wade, and having an unfavorable opinion of Planned Parenthood -- the Republicans. Once again (as on many other issues), the Republicans find themselves opposing the wishes of most Americans.

These charts show the results of a recent YouGov Poll -- done between November 30th and December 3rd of a random national sample of 1,000 adults, with a 4.3 point margin of error.


Sunday, November 29, 2015

Right-Wing Terrorist Fails To Cow Planned Parenthood

This photo is the mug shot of right-wing terrorist Robert lewis Dear. On Friday, he attacked the Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado -- killing a police officer and two civilians, and wounding five more police officers and four civilians. He gave up after police moved in and surrounded him.

Police have not released information on the terrorists motive for the cowardly attack on innocent people, but it would surprise me a great deal if it was not intended to support the anti-choice movement by trying to terrify those supporting choice, and those who attend Planned Parenthood to receive medical treatment.

If that was his intent, and I don't doubt that it was, then he failed. Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Foundation of America, assured people that Planned Parenthood will continue to offer medical services to those who need it, and will not be deterred by the vicious acts of anti-choice terrorists.

Below is the message Cecile Richards sent to all supporters of Planned Parenthood: 

It is heartbreaking. Our thoughts are with the families of the three people whose lives were lost in yesterday's attack at the Planned Parenthood health center in Colorado Springs. We wish those who were injured a quick and complete recovery.

And, we are deeply grateful to the law enforcement officers who responded with courage to protect Planned Parenthood staff, patients, and community members.

I want every Planned Parenthood patient to know: your safety is our top priority. Planned Parenthood health centers have extensive security measures in place, work closely with law enforcement agencies, and have a very strong safety record.

Planned Parenthood health centers opened their doors again today, in Colorado and across the country. As always, patients were welcomed by extraordinary doctors, nurses, and staff. We will never, ever back away from providing safe, reliable care to the millions of patients who are counting on us to be there.

These doors stay open, no matter what.

It's still too soon to know what exactly motivated this attack. We share the concerns of many Americans that extremists are creating a poisonous environment that feeds domestic terrorism in this country. In the days and weeks ahead, we will continue to stand up for Planned Parenthood patients, staff, and the communities they serve — and it means so much to know that you stand with us, ready for whatever comes next.

Like you, I am full of sadness for the people who were harmed in Colorado. I am also full of admiration for what every member of Planned Parenthood's staff do every day — to ensure that people can get the health care they need, and to work toward a day when we no longer see this kind of violence.

At this moment, our hearts are broken, but our commitment is unchanged. Care, no matter what.

Thank you for standing with Planned Parenthood.

Sincerely,
Cecile Richards, President
Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Saturday, November 28, 2015

Terrorist Strikes In Colorado Springs


While right-wing politicians were busy trying to scare Americans over the possibility of a terrorist attack in this country by islamic jihadists, terrorism struck in Colorado Springs, Colorado. A gunman attacked the Planned Parenthood clinic in that city, killing a police officer and two civilians and wounding nine others (three police officers and six civilians).  But this was no islamic jihadist. It was a white male, and almost assuredly a right-wing christian terrorist.

I'm sure the right-wing will take exception to my using the word terrorist. They prefer that those on the right who commit these horrific acts be called "mentally unstable" or "lone wolf attackers". I find that to be disingenuous. Except for the number of victims and attackers, I fail to see how this is any different from the Paris attacks (which everyone is quick to label as terrorism). In both instances, we have religious extremists attacking innocent victims for a political reason. That is terrorism -- no matter the race, ethnicity, or religion of the attackers.

Hopefully, this will remind (or make clear to) Americans that the biggest terrorist risk in this country is not from islamic jihadists (and certainly not from thoroughly vetted refugees), but from right-wing home-grown christian terrorists (who are almost exclusively white and male). A lot of our politicians, especially Republicans, don't want to admit that -- but that is the reality.

(Photo of terrorist being taken into custody is by Reuters. CBS News identifies him as Robert Lewis Dear, age 59.)

Friday, October 09, 2015

In Defense Of Planned Parenthood (And Margaret Sanger)


The far-right-wing congressional Republicans came very close to shutting down the government again in September. It was averted only on the last day of the fiscal year by John Boehner and a minority of Republicans joining with House Democrats to pass a continuing resolution to fund the federal government until December 11th. That resolution did not include the defunding of Planned Parenthood (which was the issue that the far-right was willing to shut the government down over).

But Boehner knew that doing that would cost him his speakership, so he resigned before doing it. Now the Republicans are fighting among themselves over who the new speaker should be -- with the supposed favorite, Kevin McCarthy, withdrawing from consideration. That means it is likely that the new Speaker (whoever he or she might be) will probably be even farther to the right than Boehner was (which is a scary thought).

It also means we are likely to see the defunding of Planned Parenthood once again included in the proposed House budget on December 11th -- and this time there won't be a Speaker willing to give up his job to stop a government shutdown. And that makes it more likely than not that the government will be shut down in December.

The issue is a silly one. The Republicans want to defund Planned Parenthood -- supposedly to prevent government money being spent to fund abortions. The crazy part is that there is already a law preventing government money being spent for that purpose -- and the Republicans know it, because they are the ones that passed that law. That means they are just playing a political game to please their evangelical/teabagger voter base -- and they are willing to let a huge number of women go without the health care they get from Planned Parenthood to play that electoral game.

Unfortunately for the GOP, while defunding Planned Parenthood may play well with many in their base, it doesn't go over so well with the general public. Most Americans don't want the government shut down over this issue. And as the chart above shows (from a Rasmussen Poll done on September 30th and October 1st of a random national sample of 1,000 likely voters, with a 3 point margin of error), a majority of Americans still have a favorable opinion of Planned Parenthood -- meaning a shutdown of the government over this issue could cost them in the next election.

They are trying to change the public's opinion. We already know they are telling scurrilous lies about Planned Parenthood, but they are going further. They are also spreading stories about the founder of that organization -- Margaret Sanger (pictured). The most odious of these stories is that Sanger was a racist. This was even claimed by GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson recently.

Of course this is not true. Here is what Politifact (by the Concord Monitor) has to say about Carson's (and the GOP's) claim:

Despite being dead for 49 years, Margaret Sanger, founder of the organization that became Planned Parenthood, has a way of turning up in the news. Her latest appearance came during  remarks by Republican presidential candidate Ben Carsonat a retirement center in Exeter, N.H.
Answering a question at RiverWoods Retirement Community, Carson said that "Planned Parenthood, as you know, was founded by Margaret Sanger. . . . Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist. She believed that people like me should be eliminated, or kept under control."
At a press conference later, he specified what he meant by "people like me."  He said he was "talking about the black race."
Claims like this have been examined by PolitiFact before. Back in March, New Hampshire Rep. William O’Brien claimed Sanger was an "an active participant in the Ku Klux Klan." That claim was rated false.
And in 2011, businessman and GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain said Planned Parenthood’s early mission was to "help kill black babies before they came into the world." That statement was rated Pants on Fire.
Carson’s statement pulls on the same threads.
Sanger was indeed a believer in eugenics, but the basic concept that humanity could be improved by selective breeding was an article of faith for many in the years before World War II. Winston Churchill, Herbert Hoover, Theodore Roosevelt, George Bernard Shaw and H. G. Wells all supported the movement. African-American leader W. E. B. Du Bois backed many of its principles as well.
Although the eugenics movement included some who had racist ideas, wanting to create some sort of master race, "only a minority of eugenicists" ever believed this, according to Ruth Engs, professor emerita at the Indiana University School of Public Health and an expert in the movement.
At the time that Sanger was active, Engs wrote, "the purpose of eugenics was to improve the human race by having people be more healthy through exercise, recreation in parks, marriage to someone free from sexually transmitted diseases, well-baby clinics, immunizations, clean food and water, proper nutrition, non-smoking and drinking."
It’s a far cry to equate eugenics with advocating the elimination of black people.
For Sanger, her ideas were a matter a public health. As late as 1957, she put her views this way in an interview with Mike Wallace: "I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world -- that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they're born. That to me is the greatest sin -- that people can -- can commit."
Sanger was indeed a birth control activist, which means that she wanted women to be able to avoid unwanted pregnancies. She worked for women of all classes and races to have that choice, which she believed to be a right.
Quoted in an article about the false accusation that Sanger supported the Ku Klux Klan (she merely addressed a women’s auxiliary and later compared them to children because of their mental simplicity), Jean H. Baker, author of Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion, said Sanger actually opposed prejudice.
Sanger "was far ahead of her times in terms of opposing racial segregation," wrote Baker, a history professor at Goucher College, in an email. She worked closely with black leaders to open birth control clinics in Harlem and elsewhere."
Even authors who treat Sanger critically don’t believe she held negative views about African-Americans. Edwin Black wrote a comprehensive history of the eugenics movement, War Against the Weak, and is no fan of the activist’s beliefs. Ultimately, though, he writes, "Sanger was no racist. Nor was she anti-Semitic."
It’s also worth noting that Sanger died in 1966, six years before the Supreme Court established a nationwide right to abortion services in Roe v. Wade.
Those who point a finger at Sanger as a racist often cite a particular statement in claiming she harbored ill will toward black people. In a Dec. 10, 1939, letter, she wrote that "We don’t want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs."
But PolitFact Georgia debunked those who would read the statement as something sinister.
"Sanger’s correspondence shows this sentence advocates for black doctors and ministers to play leadership roles in the Negro Project to avoid misunderstandings. Lynchings and Jim Crow laws gave blacks good reason to be wary of attempts to limit the number of children they bore. In Harlem, she hired a black doctor and social worker to quell those fears," the article says.
She attracted an impressive roster of supporters, including DuBois; Mary McLeod Bethune, founder of National Council of Negro Women; and the pastor of the Abyssinian Baptist Church. Eleanor Roosevelt also backed the effort.
"For Sanger to launch a genocidal plot behind their backs and leave no true evidence in her numerous writings would require powers just shy of witchcraft," the PolitiFact piece notes.
Finally, in 1966 Planned Parenthood gave its Margaret Sanger award to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The civil rights leader accepted, and sent his wife, Coretta, to accept. The speech he wrote for the occasion stated that ""There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts."
Sanger was still alive at that point, and her history and statements were well known (she had published an autobiography in 1938 and was never shy about sharing her opinions). If she had, in fact, been a supporter of eliminating black people, it’s doubtful King would have accepted that award.
Our ruling
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson said that birth control activist Margaret Sanger "believed that people like me should be eliminated." He later clarified that he meant African-Americans. While Sanger indeed supported the eugenics movement, substantial evidence shows that she was not racist and in fact worked closely with black leaders and health care professionals.
Carson’s statement bears no relation to historical reality. We rate the claim False.

Saturday, September 26, 2015

Boehner Resignation Could Be Good (In The Short Term)

By now, if you keep up with politics at all, you've probably heard that Speaker of the House John Boehner is resigning both his speakership and his House seat at the end of October. Some people (on both the left and the right) are celebrating, and others are fearful that this will just bring bigger problems for Congress (without solving anything).

I am in the latter group. I think it is terrible for the Republican Party, because he is likely to be replaced by a person even farther to the right -- or someone who will continue to have problems with those on the far-right. Neither is good for that party. They will be viewed as even more extreme (and the American people hate extremism) or they will continue to fight amongst themselves.

It will also be bad for Congress -- because Congress will continue to remain the dysfunctional body that it has become known for. It will remain a body that prefers to play political fames, rather than a body capable of compromise for the good of the country.

Having said all that, I do believe there may be a small silver lining to that dark cloud -- at least in the short term. It could give Speaker Boehner the freedom to act on his own and prevent a government shutdown.

Boehner had promised that there would be no government shutdown. But things got out of hand in Congress. The teabagger congressmen on the far-right were able to include in the budget bill a provision to defund Planned Parenthood (which would hurt health care for many women). They knew full well that this had no chance of passing the Senate, and if by some miracle it did, would be vetoed by the president. But they did it anyway. They want government shutdown to please the teabagger extremists in their base.

This put Speaker Boehner between a rock and a hard place. He had only two choices -- break his promise of no government shutdown, or take the Republicans who were with him and join the Democrats to prevent the shutdown. That latter option would have resulted in a no-confidence vote that probably would have ended his speakership (because there would have been enough votes on the far-right to deny him a majority, and it is unlikely that Democrats would have voted to save him).

His resignation frees him of this dilemma. He can now appeal to Democrats to help him (and the anti-shutdown Republicans with him) to help him pass a budget bill without the odious Planned Parenthood provision -- and that bill would prevent the impending government shutdown. While the far-right would not like that, they would have no recourse against him.

Will Boehner now act to stop the government shutdown. I hope he does. The ball is now back in his court, and he can do that if he wants to keep his "no shutdown" promise. I think he will. We'll find out in the next few days.

(The caricature of Speaker Boehner above is by DonkeyHotey.)

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Republicans Still Planning To Shut Down The Government


The Republicans are currently engaged in an effort to shut down the United States government again. This time they're going to do it over Planned Parenthood. They want to completely defund that organization because it helps some women get an abortion -- and they say they don't want any government money spent for that purpose.

That's a rather disingenuous argument, since they know full well that no government money is spent for that purpose. It can't be, and they have to know that because they are the ones that passed the law preventing it.

The truth is that only 3% of Planned Parenthood expenditures are spent on abortion services, and none of it is government money. The money they get from the government is spent on the other 97% of the services they provide to women (see chart below). The GOP's effort to defund the organization won't prevent any abortions. That will happen no matter what. What it will do is cut funding for women's health, and other services -- and that is nothing short of shameful.

The chart above, from The Washington Post, shows just how tiny a portion of the U.S. government budget we are talking about. The Republicans are going to shut down the government over 1/50th of 1% of each dollar the government spends -- an amount that would represent no real decrease in the budget.

It's a ridiculous argument (and a false issue), and it's just political theater -- being played out for the benefit of the teabagger base of the Republican Party. These Republicans (especially Ted Cruz who is trying to jump-start his presidential campaign) are playing politics to get votes from their base -- and they are willing to shut down the government to do that.

Remember this when it comes time to vote in the next election.

(Chart is from Liberapedia.)

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Nearly 3 Out Of 4 Oppose A New Government Shutdown


The federal government's fiscal year ends on September 30th. That means Congress has two weeks to pass a new budget, or the government will once again be shut down. And right now, it is looking like a shutdown is likely to happen. Both Boehner and McConnell, the GOP leaders of the House and Senate, have said they don't want another shutdown. They know that the GOP was mainly blamed for the last one.

But they have right-wing extremists in their party who disagree. And the worst of these is Ted Cruz (who would love to cause a government shutdown to appease the teabagger base of the GOP, and give his presidential campaign a boost). And the issue he has chosen is the complete defunding of Planned Parenthood. He (and the other extremists) know that it's already federal law that no government money can be used to fund abortions, but they don't seem to care. They know their base hates Planned Parenthood (in spite of all the health services for women that PP provides), so they are willing to shut down the government to increase their own political chances.

But they are playing a very dangerous game. While shutting down the government over this issue might play well to their ignorant base, it will not please most American voters -- and it could hurt their party when the general election comes around in 2016. Americans didn't like the last government shutdown, and they don't want to see another one.

As the chart above shows, nearly a quarter of the population (71%) say passing a budget is much more important than defunding Planned Parenthood. They don't think this issue is important enough to shut down the government over.

The next couple of weeks will be interesting. Will congressional Republicans pass a new budget by September 30th, or will they shut down the government? I think there is a better than 50% chance they'll choose to play political games, and shut down the government.

The chart above is from a recent CNN / ORC Poll -- done between September 4th and 8th of a random national sample of 1,012 adults, with a 3 point margin of error.

The chart below gives a demographic breakdown of the survey. Note that huge majorities of every group (except Republicans) say a government shutdown should be avoided -- and even 48% of Republicans believe that (while 44% would support a shutdown to defund Planned Parenthood). Once again, the congressional Republicans seem to be going against the wishes of the American people.


Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Wendy Davis Steps Up Again To Defend Planned Parenthood


The following op-ed was written by Wendy Davis (former state senator and gubernatorial candidate) in defense of Planned Parenthood and the services they provide for Texas women. It appeared in the August 21 edition of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram:

I feel compelled to begin with this: Planned Parenthood was a lifeline for me many years ago when I was an uninsured teenaged mother struggling financially.
Had Planned Parenthood not been there for me, I’d not have had access to basic health screenings and contraceptive care. 
As a 19-year-old mother trying to work my way up and out of poverty, an unplanned second pregnancy would have likely derailed me. 
My story is not unique. Scores of Texas women can tell a similar story. 
Even more compelling are the stories of women whose cancers would have otherwise gone undiagnosed and untreated were it not for care from Planned Parenthood.
The very sad truth is that many who serve in elected office fail to comprehend (or, more likely, willingly ignore) that Planned Parenthood is the primary care physician, the go-to contraceptive resource and the first and last hope for healthcare for so many women today, just as it was for me 30 years ago.
Making Planned Parenthood the “bogeyman” because abortion care comprises 3 percent of its services, and attempting to defund it in order to score political points, not only represents demagoguery of the worst kind, it also threatens to endanger the health of countless women.
The truth is that no state or federal funds are provided to Planned Parenthood for abortion care in Texas. 
In spite of that, years of hostile legislative policies aimed at closing off funds to Planned Parenthood have left tens of thousands of Texas women without access to cancer screenings, birth control, HIV tests and other preventative care. 
A series of recent studies have detailed the real-world impact of Texas’ devastating budget cuts and funding schemes that blocked care at Planned Parenthood health centers. 
The Texas Policy Evaluation Project at the University of Texas found that 55 percent of Texas women now report at least one barrier to accessing reproductive healthcare, including life-saving cancer screenings or family planning services.
And, with these barriers in place, the Health and Human Services Commission estimated that an additional 23,760 babies would be born under Medicaid in 2014-15, with a projected cost of $136 million in state dollars from 2013 through 2015. 
So not only do Texas women pay the price, Texas taxpayers pay up as well.
To say that women can just seek care elsewhere is a flagrant denial of reality. 
Though the coverage purportedly continues, “that may not mean much if you look at the overall picture” said Jose E. Camacho, executive director of the Texas Association of Community Health Centers, in a May 11, 2011, Huffington Post article. 
He added: “… we can’t say in good conscience that Federally Qualified Health Centers have the capacity to take these women in.” 
The fact is, they do not. And scores of low-income Texas women are left suffering the consequences. 
To cite just one example, according to the Department of State Health Services, the state’s budget for reproductive health and family planning for uninsured, low-income women served just 47,332 clients in 2012, a drastic 77 percent decrease from the 202,968 clients served in 2011.
The cumulative impacts of slashing state support for the non-abortion services of Planned Parenthood are dramatic, and they are real. 
And real Texas women, far removed from the political games played in the Texas Capitol, have been and will continue to bear the costs of right-wing politicians who will do whatever it takes to feed red meat to their base, women’s health be damned.

Re
ad more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/other-voices/article31848990.html#storylink=cpy

Monday, August 10, 2015

Planned Parenthood Support Is Stronger Than Opposition


Recently an anti-abortion group tried to help the congressional Republicans bring down Planned Parenthood by issuing a heavily-edited film of the group. That editing made it look like Planned Parenthood does abortions so they can make money by selling "baby parts" to researchers. Of course, it is an outrageous LIE! Planned Parenthood does not do any such thing! They have never profited in the past by doing this, and they won't profit in the future.

Has this odious and unethical action been successful in turning the public against Planned Parenthood? In a word, NO. Planned Parenthood still has significantly more support among the general public than opposition. If the Republicans were hoping this would make it so they could campaign against Planned Parenthood in the coming general election, then they have failed.

There is currently a 14 point gap, with those viewing Planned Parenthood favorable topping those who view it unfavorably. Only two groups show a higher unfavorable than favorable -- Republicans and those 65 years old and older. All other groups show support for Planned Parenthood.

The chart above was made from information provide by a recent YouGov Poll -- done between July 30th and August 2nd of a random national sample of 1,000 adults, with a margin of error of 4 points.

Sunday, August 02, 2015

Warren Defends Planned Parenthood & Asks You To Help

(This photo of Senator Elizabeth Warren is from her own website.)

The congressional Republicans are at it again -- demonizing Planned Parenthood, and trying to cut off all funding for it. They try to paint PP as an organization that just exists to promote abortions. They know it's not true, and they know that defunding PP would cause many thousands of women to go without medical care. They just don't care. They are playing politics to please their ignorant base voters.

Senator Elizabeth Warren is one of those fighting to protect Planned Parenthood, and she urges all of us to join her in that fight. Here is her latest missive to her supporters:

The Republicans have a plan. Just look at the facts:
  • In 2013, Republicans threatened to shut down the government unless they could change the law to let employers deny women access to birth control.

  • In 2015, Republicans held hostage an easy-to-pass bipartisan bill to stop human trafficking, demanding an unprecedented expansion of anti-abortion restrictions to cover new funds for providing assistance to trafficking victims.

  • Republicans have voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act dozens of times, including the portions that require insurers to cover contraception – and stop them from charging women more.  

  • In state legislatures, Republicans have passed nearly 300 new restrictions on abortion access in the past five years – more than 50 this year alone.
So let’s be really clear about something: The Republicans’ scheme to defund Planned Parenthood isn’t some sort of surprised response to highly edited videos. 

Let’s call out the Republican vote to defund Planned Parenthood on Monday for exactly what it is: Another piece of a deliberate, methodical, orchestrated right-wing attack on women’s rights. And I’m sick and tired of it.

Defunding Planned Parenthood is a big deal. Whatever your age, wherever you live, I guarantee that you know someone who has used a Planned Parenthood health center.

No one may mention it at Thanksgiving dinner or post it on Facebook, but look at the facts: One in five women in America is a Planned Parenthood patient at least once in her life. Every single year, nearly 2.7 million people show up for help at Planned Parenthood.

Why do so many people use Planned Parenthood? Because they are nonprofit doctors’ offices – more than half are in rural or medically underserved areas.

Young people go to Planned Parenthood for birth control. Women who can’t get appointments anywhere else go to Planned Parenthood for affordable Pap tests and cancer screenings. Couples go to Planned Parenthood for STD treatments or pregnancy tests. And yes, 3% of patients visit Planned Parenthood for a safe and legal abortion with a doctor who will show compassion and care for a woman who is making one of the most difficult decisions of her life.

Rand Paul and Ted Cruz may think it’s fun to play politics with these people to score points with presidential primary voters, but this isn’t a game. This is about cancer. This is about HIV. This is about birth control. This is about access to basic medical care.

The Republican plan to defund Planned Parenthood is a Republican plan to defund women’s health care. Join me now to say enough is enough.

I stand with Planned Parenthood. I fight for my daughter, for my granddaughters, and for people all across Massachusetts and all across this country. We cannot let the Senate Republicans defund Planned Parenthood.

Thank you for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

Monday, January 06, 2014

Right-Wing Politics Hurt Komen Foundation Funding

Since its inception in 1982, the foundation called Susan G. Komen (formerly known as Susan G. Komen for the Cure) has raised funds through donations, corporate sponsorships, walks & races, and other activities to fund finding a cure for breast cancer. They fund both research and organizations dedicated to diagnosing and preventing that terrible disease. They had established a reputation envied by many other charitable organizations, and they were growing.

But then they decided to dip their toe into right-wing politics, and announced that as of January 2012 they would no longer provide funding for Planned Parenthood. Evidently this was because the organization leaders disapproved of Planned Parenthood's involvement in helping some women to get an abortion. This had nothing to do with breast cancer, and Planned Parenthood performed many other services (abortion being only a tiny percentage of their services). In fact, Planned Parenthood offered the only resource for many women in receiving diagnosis for breast cancer.

This ridiculous decision by Komen was met with a firestorm of disapproval in the general public. And after only a short time, Komen reversed its decision and said Planned Parenthood would be considered for donations in the future. The hope was that this reversal of policy would prevent a drop in revenue for the foundation. But those revenues dropped significantly anyway -- maybe not as much as if the decision had not been reversed, but still a significant drop nonetheless. The charts below show the drop in revenue report by Komen from 2012 to 2013.


Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Judge Stops Texas GOP's Anti-Woman Law

Last summer, the Republicans in the Texas legislature was bound and determined to pass an anti-woman law that, if it went into effect, would close almost all clinics performing abortions in Texas -- thus denying Texas women the right to control over their own bodies. To accomplish this, a special session of the legislature was called.

But they failed to pass that odious law in that special session, primarily because State Senator Wendy Davis (pictured above on the left) filibustered the bill until the time allotted for that special session ran out. That didn't deter them though. A second special session was called, and some legislative rules were changed, and the bill was rammed through the legislature (and signed by the governor).

That's when Planned Parenthood, headed by Cecile Richards (pictured above on the right), stepped up to do their part for Texas women. They filed suit in federal court to stop two of the worst provisions of the law -- one that required doctors performing abortions to have privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their clinic, and another that required doctor's to follow federal protocols for using abortion pills (even though they are no longer considered the best medical practice).

Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel issued an order overturning both provisions -- giving Planned Parenthood, and the women of Texas, an initial victory in this fight for women's rights. The judge concluded his decision by saying:

. . .the court will render a final judgement declaring that the admitting-privileges provision of House Bill 2 does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the state in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman's health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her. The court will enjoin enforcement of that provision. Although the medication-abortion provisions do not generally place an undue burden on a woman seeking an abortion, they do if they ban a medication abortion where a physician determines, in appropriate medical judgement, such a procedure is necessary for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. The court will so declare and enjoin enforcement of those provisions in such instance.

The decision will undoubtably be appealed to a higher court by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, if for no other reason, because the teabaggers and fundamentalists want it to be appealed. Abbott knows that those are the people who control the Republican Party in Texas, and he badly wants to be the GOP nominee for governor in 2014.                                                                                                                                                            

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

Texas Planned Parenthood Gets Big Boost

(The image of Margot Perot to the left is from the website of The Salvation Army.)

The Republican-dominated legislature of Texas voted to defund Planned Parenthood of Texas a while back. This resulted in Texas women's health programs losing all of their federal funds (about 90% of all funding), and the closing of dozens of women's health clinics across the state.

The crazy part is that none of those clinics that closed were Planned Parenthood clinics -- the organization targeted by the GOP legislature. Planned Parenthood was hurt, but was  able to keep going in the state. In other words, the GOP played to their base by trying to close Planned Parenthood, claiming they were just an abortion organization (even though that is only 3% of the services provided to women) -- and did nothing but close a bunch of clinics they weren't even targeting. But then politics has always been more important to Texas Republicans than reality -- and hurting poor women in the state has never been a concern.

Fortunately, not all Texans are as mean-spirited as the Republicans. Planned Parenthood of Texas has received a big boost from the Perot Foundation, founded by Ross Perot and his wife Margot. That Foundation has given Planned Parenthood of Texas a $1 million donation -- a donation that will assure that the organization can continue its mission of helping Texas women (especially poor women who have no other resource). In a written statement Margot Perot said:

“For nearly 100 years Planned Parenthood has helped to educate men and women regarding family planning and general family health. Our family has supported this nonprofit for many years because we are impressed with the work they do — providing birth control; scientifically based education; breast health exams; and basic, life-saving healthcare for women who cannot afford services otherwise.”

“We also recognize the need to further inform the public of the mission of this great organization and the need to support it at this critical time.”