Showing posts with label Political Correctness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Political Correctness. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Nanny state justice and thin skinned nincompoops.

No one has any common sense anymore. And everyone is always offended by something. Whenever something happens, someone must be at fault no matter what, even if it is something stupid.

Take this latest story for instance.

When 18-year-old Tyell Morton put a blow-up sex doll in a bathroom stall on the last day of school, he didn't expect school officials to call a bomb squad or that he'd be facing up to eight years in prison and a possible felony record.


The senior prank gone awry has raised questions of race, prosecutorial zeal and the post-Columbine mindset in a small Indiana town and around the country, The Indianapolis Star reported in its Tuesday editions.


Legal experts question the appropriateness of the charges against Morton, and law professor Jonathan Turley at George Washington University posed a wider question about Morton's case on his legal blog.


"The question is what type of society we are creating when our children have to fear that a prank (could) lead them to jail for almost a decade. What type of citizens are we creating who fear the arbitrary use of criminal charges by their government?"

In the wake of the OJ Simpson trial Round 2, I read this and I have to ask myself...what is wrong with our justice system?

Or perhaps it is a bigger, broader problem at the root of our society. We live in a day and age here in America where common sense can no longer be found. Simplicity and reason have vanished into thin air. Like I said at the top of the post, even for something as simple as a high school prank, someone has to be at fault. Well have you ever thought of it this way....that maybe there are some instances where no one is at fault? We saw the same crapola last year when a teenage prankster was charged with "bias intimidation" after pulling a seemingly innocent, though foolish, prank at Walmart.

Please.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Track coach fired because male athlete jogged shirtless. Females offended!

No Shirt No Service: High School Coach Jobless After His Boys Track Team Goes Topless

Westwood High track coach Tom Davis was fired last week because one of his runners decided to whip off a shirt during training on a 75-degree day. This wasn't a girl, by the way. It was a boy.


And the Westwood High athletic director, Karl Fogel, was so irate about it that Davis thought he was going to lay him out.


"I fully 100 percent was expecting to be swung at," the coach told NECN TV.


That wasn't the end of it. Davis was let go on the spot, in front of his team, and eventually escorted off school property.


"The kids on my team, it was terrible," Davis told the TV station. "Their faces, just pure disgust, pure fear."


The team was doing quite well this year under the second-year coach: one of the relay teams went to nationals less than two months ago and the outdoor team started off 5-0 this spring. But there was an undercurrent of tension at the school as Fogel told Davis that some members of the girls team felt uncomfortable when the boys ran without shirts. Davis even warned his team about possible punishment for not wearing a shirt.


Then, a week ago Friday, the situation boiled over, with Fogel going chest to chest with the coach, according to the Boston Globe.

Since when is jogging without a shirt a crime? And since when does being offended mean someone should lose their job? The lesbian females who complained should be punished, not the coach. I'm sure the entire track team, including most the girls team agrees. As a former track runner myself, I remembered days when running shirtless was more than acceptable. Not only did no one complain, but most of the girls actually preferred it. But that was in a small Midwestern town where heterosexuality was the orientation of choice. Not the enlightened, "liberated" suburbs of Boston.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

The state overrules the parent in modern day America.

Mass. mom who withheld son's meds gets 8-10 years

A woman who withheld potentially life-saving medications from her autistic, cancer-stricken son was sentenced Friday to eight to 10 years in prison by a judge who said her actions "really do chill one's soul."


Kristen LaBrie was convicted of attempted murder Tuesday for withholding at least five months of at-home chemotherapy treatments for her son, Jeremy Fraser. The boy died at age 9 in 2009.


LaBrie, 38, wept and apologized before Judge Richard Welch handed down her punishment in Lawrence Superior Court.


...


His oncologist testified that she told LaBrie that her son's cancer had a cure rate of about 85 percent to 90 percent under an intensive, two-year treatment plan that included doses of chemotherapy to be given during hospital stays and clinic visits as well as at-home medications LaBrie was supposed to administer at home.


LaBrie testified that she largely followed doctor's orders during the first four phases of his treatment. But she acknowledged that she stopped giving him the at-home medications during the final phase of treatment because she could not bear to see how much pain and suffering the side effects of the medication caused him.


The boy's doctor said she discovered in February 2008 that LaBrie had not filled five months of prescriptions and that Jeremy's cancer had returned as leukemia.


LaBrie testified in her own defense, saying she did not give her son at least five months of chemotherapy medications because the side effects made him so sick she was afraid the treatments would kill him. LaBrie called her son "very, very fragile" and said she didn't think he could withstand any more chemotherapy.

You know what's even more chilling to me? That the state can send someone away to prison for deciding how to care for their child! Who is the real criminal here? How dare they. Put that judge in ONE DAY of her shoes and I guarantee you he'd be singing a different tune. Attempted murder? Honestly, does the judge and jury legitimately believe this mother was purposefully trying to murder her son? She has already suffered enough with her child's death, and these robots decide to send her to prison for ten years.

Assistant District Attorney Kate MacDougall acknowledged that LaBrie had a difficult time caring for Jeremy alone and watching him suffer horrible side effects from chemotherapy. But she said the jury found that whatever her difficult circumstances were, she "made a decision to harm Jeremy. ... She intended to kill him."
"At the end of the day this was just child abuse ... she withheld from this child intentionally his chance for a cure," MacDougall said.

Who are they to speculate such things? Because they know ALL about what she was going through!

LaBrie's older son, Matthew, 18, wrote a letter to the judge asking for leniency.
"My mother was nothing but unbelievably kind, caring and completely devoted to Jeremy in every aspect of her life," he wrote.

He described his mother sitting by Jeremy's bedside while he was treated for cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital.

"Something like that takes a toll on a person and after all that, could anybody so easily sit by and watch while a cure is making a child feel worse?"
Here's what I think. I think that judge and every single person on the jury who voted 'guilty' should be sent away to prison for LIFE. Yes, that is real justice here. This is appalling to me. She made a mistake. This is a mother making a decision that SHE believes is in the best interest of her child, NOT the state! Who are they to judge? These fools in their ivory tower of self thought moral superiority are the criminals in this case. We live in a cruel, cruel society to allow this to happen.

I hope the judge and jury sleep well at night knowing they sent an already grieving mother to prison for ten years of her life.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Katie Couric- Did she really just say that?

We all knew she was a buffoon anyway but her most recent blathering of mushmouth stupidity puts her in good company with the likes of Rosie O'Donnell, Chris Matthews, Hugo Chavez, and Porky Pig.

Katie Couric, CBS anchor, suggests America needs a Muslim version of 'The Cosby Show'


The CBS News anchor made the suggestion on her web show while discussing the biggest news stories of 2010, including the mosque near Ground Zero and the "seething hatred" that has grown against Muslims in America.

"Maybe we need a Muslim version of 'The Cosby Show'... I know that sounds crazy, I know that sounds crazy," said Couric. "But 'The Cosby Show' did so much to change attitudes about African-Americans in this country, and I think sometimes people are afraid of things they don't understand."

Katie, I think we all understand Muslims quite well. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that Muslims are inherently violent and incompatible with Western society. I'm sure the Jews getting rocketed everyday in Israel understand the Muslims well. I'm sure the Russians who saw their people annihilated from Islamic bomb blasts in Moscow understand Muslims now. The same goes for the Brits who witnessed Muslims protesting and insulting British troops returning home from Afghanistan. I'm sure the Spaniards have a pretty good idea of who the Muslims are now, after seeing hundreds of their people, innocent men, women, and children of all ages obliterated by Muslim bombs as they boarded a train in Madrid. Shall we continue Katie? I think I will! The Egyptian Copts know Muslims perhaps better than anyone. They live among them and are subjected to ruthless attacks by them all the time. Just a few days ago Muslims bombed a church full of them. The Dutch certainly know and understand Muslims. Just ask filmmaker Theo van Gogh. Oh wait, he's dead, murdered by Muslims. The Danes have a pretty good idea as well. You can ask Kurt Westergaard and his granddaughter about that. Or please feel free to ask any Christian living in Pakistan, Indonesia, or Thailand. I would bet the Christians in Nigeria have a very good understanding of Muslims where they live. Most importantly, I'm pretty sure New Yorkers now understand Muslims after watching thousands of their people die horrible deaths at the hand of Muslims.

As of today Katie, Muslims account for over 75% of the world's terrorist activity, and over 90% of all conflict zones worldwide. Yet somehow they are the victim? Whose side are you on?

Aside from insulting Bill Cosby and blacks in general with your statement, you have also aligned yourself with the most violent people on planet earth. Good work.

Not only that, you have also given us a prime example and flawless demonstration of the elite, white liberal mentality.

First, insinuating that somehow the Cosby Show's purpose was simply for blacks to gain the approval of whites by painting them as a typical "white American" family. Right Katie?

Now that the mean white man doesn't hate the black man anymore (thanks to Bill Cosby of course) we need a Muslim tv show that falsely portrays the American Muslim as a typical white American. Then we will all hold hands, the bombings will stop, and Sleeper Cell Mohammad in New York and Billy Bob Redneck in Tennessee will together sing kumbaya in loving embrace for countless utopian liberal years to come.

Ahhh, thank god for Katie Couric and her infinite liberal wisdom. What would the poor, helpless people of color do without her?

I have an idea. Let's let Katie Couric play the burqua'd up Muslim housewife living under Sharia law in this new Muslim sitcom! I'm sure you'd love that wouldn't you Katie? ......Katie?


I think I got my point across.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

My take on TSA patdowns, full body scanners, and Muslims being exempt from them.

I'm in the mood for a much needed rant.

So it hasn't been that long, and I still have yet to totally catch up on the news but apparently things have really got out of control with airport security measures in this country.

TSA agents are patting people down with more frequency and intimacy and full body scanners are revealing a little too much more than travelers would like.

At the same time burqua clad Muslim women are exempt from such searches.

I'm so positively baffled, speechless, and ticked off that I am at a loss for words. Well, not really, but the majority of what I would like to say is not appropriate for posting.

If our government has become this backwards, incompetent, politically correct, and so positively asinine in judgement then I say we deserve to be attacked. How positively ridiculous. Our country has become so weak and feeble it makes me want to vomit. Our leaders have no backbone. They are absolutely positively 100% WEAKLING, in every fiber of their being.

May I point out the obvious? I will say this time and time and time again until someone hears it and takes heed. Look at every single instance of aviation terrorism, both carried out and planned, and you will find that somewhere between 99.5 and 100% of them are carried out by......MUSLIMS. It's fact. Cold hard fact Janet. Barack. Harry. Nancy. JOHN BOEHNER. Both you Democrats and Republicans and everyone else needs to acknowledge this.

Instead, we are subjecting 80 year old women to grope filled patdowns and spending a quarter million dollars a pop on machines that virtually strip a person down to their bare essentials, while we let the very people who actually might pose a threat to breeze on by. I could absolutely explode.

Not only is it unbelievably naive and foolish, it is a waste of money, resources, and law abiding Americans' time!

If I was in charge of airport security in this country I would do exactly what the nation of Israel does. Target 18-30 year old Muslim males, no questions asked. I take that back I would target all Muslims. This would reduce the need to put elderly women with no criminal record through nonsensical physical searches. If a nun decides to bomb an aircraft we have a lot more to worry about than we thought!

NEWSFLASH: If there is going to be another terrorist attack, whether by air, rail, or carrier pigeon it will be by Muslims!

So lets target them instead of making THEM OF ALL PEOPLE exempt!!!!






Oh wait, that makes far too much sense.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Sunday Night Football.....In Spanish!

Don't know if any of you greedy, lazy, arrogant, Capitalist, American football fans watched the Sunday night feature between the Miami Dolphins and New York Jets last night but if you did, I'm sure you noticed the little "change" in the wording on the screen. "Futbol Americano"? "Jets de Nueva York"? "Dolphins de Miami?" Commercials in Spanish?

Apparently this month is Hispanic Heritage Month.

If that's the case, I encourage NBC to broadcast the rest of their games this month in Spanish, with Spanish speaking commentators and pinata shows at halftime. Then, we'll see how their ratings go.

Friday, September 24, 2010

PURE TYRANNY in England. Muslims now own Britain.

Listen up Brits! You better get a hold of your country and fast.

Great Britain is now a nation where freedom of speech is no longer honored. Unless you are a Muslim! Then you can say all kinds of things such as, "Bomb, bomb UK!" and "Bomb, bomb USA!".

However...

Six arrested in Gateshead over 'Koran burning'


Officers detained two men on September 15 and four more yesterday and all six were bailed pending further inquiries, Northumbria Police said.


''The arrests followed the burning of what are believed to have been two Korans in Gateshead on September 11,'' the spokesman said.


''The incident was recorded and a video placed on the internet.''


In a video still accessible on YouTube, six young men in hooded tops or wearing scarves over their faces can be seen pouring petrol on a book and setting it alight, before burning another.
On the video, which appeared to have been filmed behind a pub, they cheer as the first book bursts into flames.


Northumbria Police said the men were not arrested for watching or distributing the video, but on suspicion of burning the Koran.

Here's the video...


So they are burning a book that inspires violence worldwide. They should be given medals not a prison sentence! If you boys ever read this, BRAVO for doing your duty! Oh, and shall I remind you what the Muslims were allowed to do that very same day with not a hint of police opposition?



The West needs to realize something. Western ideas, culture, and governance are absolutely 100% INCOMPATIBLE with Islam. The two cannot co-exist. It is like oil and water. Or maybe blood and water would be a better analogy. Why is it we see conflict arise wherever Muslims exist? Because to Muslims, Islam is the only way, period, and any other form of government or lifestyle is wrong if it doesn't strictly adhere to the principles of Islam. How does a country like Britain allow such a menacing danger to linger within their borders? Why does any Western nation?

I am going to make a statement here and now that not many will like or agree with. I firmly believe that the best course of action to combat Islam (note, not Islamic extremism...ISLAM) is to ban ALL Muslims from entering the country. This is to include every Western nation. In addition, I believe ALL Muslims should be immediately deported. Extremist? Absolutely! But extreme times call for extreme views. And you know that supposed "Blowback" theory the leftists love to use? (American imperialism caused the Muslims to hate us and attack us on 9/11) Well take this Islam hate coming from one angry American as blowback from what they did to us then! And what they continue to do today!

But what about the "moderate" Muslims?!?

There are no moderate Muslims. There are people that practice the religion like it is written, such as the terrorists above and the 9/11 hijackers. Then there are half ass Muslims like the ones in America that don't really know anything other than pray to Mecca 5 times a day in between playing Xbox and surfing the web. Too bad. You made the decision to follow a religion conjured up by a murderous pedophile which slaughters people worldwide and has been since its inception. That in itself is a breach of moral character and dignity. I don't care how "moderate" you are! Anyone who willingly chooses to follow the cult of Islam is not moderate. Just like any German who willingly chose to follow Adolf Hitler was not moderate. To many of them, murdering Jews was the furthest thing from their mind, but they followed the Nazis nonetheless! They are not innocent, nor moderate. The modern day American Muslim is not innocent or moderate.

People need to realize something. We are at war with Islam. Whether you want to accept this or not is irrelevant. The Muslims know it. They demonstrate it every day. The only way to fight back is to deport every last one of them. Hate speech? You bet. Islam is a cult of death. It is my duty as a human being to hate it. And any person who does not......well then, I'd say you are the one in a moral conundrum.

Do I hate Muslims? Of course not. I could never hate any person. I hate Islam and the Q'uran from cover to cover.

Ban Muslim immigration now. And deport all of them.

As wrong as it sounds, you know I'm right.

Friday, September 17, 2010

The Church of Body Modification and Religious Relativism

 I seriously don't make this garbage up. This blog is so easy to maintain. The material just comes out of the woodwork in these ridiculous times.

Now here's a story of a 14 year old girl who got suspended from school for blatantly violating the school's dress code for having a nose ring. Typical non issue, right?

"I think it's kind of stupid for them to kick me out of school for a nose piercing," she said. "It's in the First Amendment for me to have freedom of religion."


Iacono and her mother, Nikki, belong to the Church of Body Modification, a small group unfamiliar to rural North Carolina, but one with a clergy, a statement of beliefs and a formal process for accepting new members.


It's enough to draw the interest of the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, which has contacted school officials with concerns that the rights of the Iaconos are being violated by the suspension.


...


"They're basically saying, because they don't agree and because they choose not to respect our beliefs, that it can't be a sincerely held religious belief," he said.


Ivey describes the church as a non-theistic faith that draws people who see tattoos, piercings and other physical alterations as ways of experiencing the divine.


"We don't worship the god of body modification or anything like that," he said. "Our spirituality comes from what we choose to do ourselves. Through body modification, we can change how we feel about ourselves and how we feel about the world."

It was too good to be true! This opens the flood gates. Those of you who are regular readers know my previous rants about various forms of relativism. Well here we have a classic case of religious relativism. (If you believe sincerely that's your religion, then it's your religion!)

I looked up the Church of Body Modification. Here is their statement of "faith":

As followers of this faith, it is our purpose to educate and inspire, to share ideas, and to help each other achieve our dreams. We strive to unify and strengthen our mind, body, and soul so we can overcome any challenges we may encounter. We assert and protect our rights to modify our bodies and to practice our rituals.
We believe our bodies belong only to ourselves and are a whole and integrated entity: mind, body, and soul. We maintain we have the right to alter them for spiritual and other reasons.
Affirmation of our living, breathing, physical beings is paramount to our self-identities and helps us define who we are. The Church of Body Modification promotes affirmation and growth of a more expansive perspective of our physical and spiritual being.

This is not a religion. It is a cult. Plain and simple. The "Church" of Body Modification is a joke. The ACLU is treading on dangerous ground. To accept and recognize this cult as a religion so that all should accommodate their beliefs, whatever they may be, regardless of rule systems, then they must also also regard virtually any stray cult or aimless belief system as a true religion. Where do you draw the line?


Let's get something straight. Religious freedom does NOT mean you are allowed to break the rules where you work/study/play. Nor does it mean you have free reign to do whatever, whenever, because you are simply "expressing" yourself. No one is telling this girl she can't practice her "religion". Just don't wear the nose ring while in school.

Hey stupid! I have an idea. Maybe, just maaaaybe, you could take the precious goblet of all knowing power out of your nose during the 7 hours you are at school and put in back in when you get home. Is that that difficult to do? Nope! Not in this day and age where everyone is entitled to something and everyone's "rights" are being trampled on!

Maybe I'll go rob a bank today and tell the police when they get there I'm a member of the Church of Thievery.

Heck, maybe I'll start my own church called the Church of Holy Rulebreakers. We will all worship ourselves by breaking rules wherever they may be. Who's with me!?