Showing posts with label UIP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UIP. Show all posts

Friday, November 04, 2016

MOVIE REVIEW: OUIJA: ORIGIN OF EVIL (2016)

0



From IMDB:

In 1965 Los Angeles, a widowed mother and her two daughters add a new stunt to bolster their seance scam business and unwittingly invite authentic evil into their home. When the youngest daughter is overtaken by a merciless spirit, the family confronts unthinkable fears to save her and send her possessor back to the other side.

Ouija: Origin of Evil (2016) on IMDb

Reviews 49 user | 138 critic


From Rotten Tomatoes:

In this horror sequel, a game of Ouija leads to supernatural activity. Annalise Basso, Henry Thomas, Doug Jones, and Elizabeth Reaser star. Directed by Mike Flanagan.

Rating: PG-13 (for disturbing images, terror and thematic elements)
Genre: Horror , Mystery & Suspense
Directed By: Mike Flanagan
In Theaters: Oct 20, 2016 Wide
Box Office: $24,678,810.00
Runtime: 99 minutes

TOMATOMETER 82%
Average Rating: 6.2/10
Reviews Counted: 92
Fresh: 75
Rotten: 17

Critics Consensus: Ouija: Origin of Evil swerves its franchise's planchette unexpectedly to YES with a surprisingly scary and dramatically satisfying follow-up to its lackluster predecessor.

AUDIENCE SCORE 64% liked it
Average Rating: 3.5/5
User Ratings: 7,876

OUIJA: ORIGIN OF EVIL OPENED IN THE U.S. ON THE 21st OF OCTOBER AND IN MALAYSIA ON THE 3rd OF NOVEMBER. TO FIND OUT WHEN IT OPENS IN A CINEMA NEAR YOU CLICK HERE

Problems always start when you do things alone, especially when you deal with the supernatural. ©Universal Pictures

The Ouija Board, it's a lot older than you think it is...

Okay, let's start off with an admission, I did not see the first movie Ouija (2014) but checking out various popular movie rating sites lets me know that it wasn't very good. So as with other situations such as this I'll be sharing my opinions without comparing it to the movie that came before it. 

So the Ouija board, a board with a bunch of letters and a couple of words which you would then use a planchette where you and your friends put your fingers on. Then you say some words to summon the spirits and then proceed to ask whatever questions pop into your mind, it could be about the future, your future, the afterlife, etc. Sounds like fun, right? But the Ouija board isn't something new, there's been something like it in existence throughout history, used by shamans, wisemen, soothsayers and many more. 

I guess when you're a teenager you don't really care that your kid sister is acting weird until it's too late. ©Universal Pictures

What the Ouija board is supposed to do while your fingers are on that planchette is to do what is called planchette writing or spirit-writing or also known as automatic writing. Presumably when you say those summoning words and you ask your questions a spirit will slowly move the planchette to answer yes or no or spell things out for you. All this is done without any of the participants moving the planchette themselves or putting any pressure on it. That's what the players of course believe is currently happening or should happen. But science isn't convinced that that actually happens. What they think happens is called an ideomotor response, it's when your fingers move involuntarily and in an unconscious way and the words that are spelled just happen to be whatever you may be thinking right at that moment when you asked that question. 

I guess a little girl just standing in the middle of the playground isn't all that interesting to the nuns. ©Universal Pictures

Spirit writing has been around for a long time, one of the earliest mentions of it happens to come from China from around 1100 AD from the Song Dynasty. Back then it was called Fuji, and as the Wikipedia puts it, "The use of planchette writing as an ostensible means of necromancy and communion with the spirit-world continued, and, albeit under special rituals and supervisions, was a central practice of the Quanzhen School, until it was forbidden by the Qing Dynasty." But China wasn't the only place in the world that practiced it, it is claimed that similar methods of mediumistic spirit writing have been practiced in ancient India, Greece, Rome, and medieval Europe.

This movie may not be super good but at least it doesn't make you yawn like that up there. ©Universal Pictures

The Ouija board that we see in the movies and that is popular in American Culture on the other hand comes courtesy of a man named Elijah Bond who on July 1, 1890 introduced it to the American public. for a while it was just considered a silly board game by everyone until an American Spiritualist named Pearl Curran used it as a divining tool during World War I. But even before that Spiritualist used to use a similar type of board to so that the living can communicate with the dead in camps in Ohio in 1886. 

Who knew spirits liked to play hide-and-seek. ©Universal Pictures

Now the first movie was actually considered a sequel to the movie that I'll be reviewing in this blog. In that movie, from what I've read, a bunch of teenagers decided to play with the board only to unleash a spirit that begins to kill everyone that played it. Then as the remaining survivors try to figure out what's going on they come across the history of the board that they're playing with and they discover that it has a history. A history involving a family and an unsolved case of a missing person. This movie is that history. 

You know something's up when the school priest decides to join in the seance. ©Universal Pictures

So if you're in the U.S. and are a horror movie fan you've probably already seen it. If you haven't and like horror movies you've probably seen the trailers, right? Or read the synopsis for it by now. Anyway if you haven't it's the story of mother Alice (Elizabeth Reaser) and daughters Lina (Annalise Basso) and Doris (Lulu Wilson) and their struggle to make ends meet. Where's the husband and father? He was killed when a drunk driver drove into him. So to make ends meet Alice provides and unusual service to those who have lost a loved one, she offers to get in touch with them and help them find closure by asking only three questions. Things aren't going so well though. 

If your child begins to act up it may just be a demonic possession. ©Universal Pictures

Then one day Lina sneaks out to hang out at a friends house and while there her friends decide to play with a Ouija Board. While playing they are caught by her friend's mother and Alice is called to pick her up. Alice of course isn't happy and Lina only excuse is that they were just hanging out and playing with the Ouija board. Lina then suggests to her mother that she should consider adding the board as part of her methods of communication. So when she goes to pick up a few supplies the next day it just so happens that the store also just happens to be carrying the board game. 

No she's not trying to seduce her sister's boyfriend. ©Universal Pictures

So now the board game is at their home and Alice is preparing it to use in her work. Now the Ouija board comes with instructions, a couple of really important ones are to never play alone and to always say goodbye. While setting up the board Alice reads of the summoning words alone and when she is done she doesn't say goodbye. While Alice does all that up stairs Doris goes into a trance and begins to answer the questions that Alice is asking downstairs. And so the scary part begins. Doris begins to behave strangely, Lina begins to experience odd things and even having nightmares, Doris begins to write in Polish. And when Lina discovers that Doris has been writing in Polish she takes those notes to Father Tom Hogan (Henry Thomas). When Father Tom has it translated he meets with Lina and Alice and tells them what Doris has written. 

But before he tells them what is written Father Tom decides to test Doris's abilities to talk to the dead. He isn't convinced and when he informs Alice and Lina of what Doris has written the three decide to confront Doris and what is possessing her. 

And here's the required wall/ceiling crawling scene all horror movies these days have. ©Universal Pictures

So here's the good and bad as I see it. 
  • A pretty cool idea to use the Ouija board I guess, it hasn't been done in a while. 
  • The story is decent and predictable but doesn't hold up very well towards the end. Some parts don't make much sense, the discovery of what is possessing Doris isn't at all original or interesting. 
  • It's a slow to build film. Slow in the beginning, better in the middle, loses steam towards the end. 
  • The casting is decent. The main character here is actually Lina and Annalise Basso does a pretty good job. Doris played by Lulu Wilson does a decent job but not all the time. She does do the creepy factor well though. 
  • The scares were okay, it's the usual stuff. Nothing new here. 

Why is always the fault of some crazy doctor? ©Universal Pictures

To be honest this movie wasn't a bad one it's just that there's nothing new or fresh or original about it. Every element in it you've seen somewhere before. Could it have been better? Maybe, maybe not. Could it have been worse? Definitely. For whatever shortcomings or failings this movie has it's still an okay horror movie. If you're looking to waste a few hours and maybe get a few scares in then there are worse options than this one. Not too sure if there are better options playing at the moment. Ouija: Origin of Evil gets a 2.5 out of 5 from me. 

Here's the trailer.


A GREAT BIG THANKS TO BFM RADIO AND UNITED INTERNATIONAL PICTURES MALAYSIA FOR THE PASSES!!



Friday, October 07, 2016

MOVIE REVIEW: THE GIRL ON THE TRAIN (2016)

1



From IMDB:

The Girl on the Train is the story of Rachel Watson's life post-divorce. Every day, she takes the train in to work in New York, and every day the train passes by her old house. The house she lived in with her husband, who still lives there, with his new wife and child. As she attempts to not focus on her pain, she starts watching a couple who live a few houses down -- Megan and Scott Hipwell. She creates a wonderful dream life for them in her head, about how they are a perfect happy family. And then one day, as the train passes, she sees something shocking, filling her with rage. The next day, she wakes up with a horrible hangover, various wounds and bruises, and no memory of the night before. She has only a feeling: something bad happened. Then come the TV reports: Megan Hipwell is missing. Rachel becomes invested in the case and trying to find out what happened to Megan, where she is, and what exactly she herself was up to that same night Megan went missing.

The Girl on the Train (2016) on IMDb

47 Metascore From metacritic.com

Reviews 10 user | 64 critic


From Rotten Tomatoes:

Rachel, devastated by her recent divorce, spends her daily commute fantasizing about the seemingly perfect couple who live in a house that her train passes every day, until one morning she sees something shocking happen there and becomes entangled in the mystery that unfolds. Based on Paula Hawkins' bestselling novel.

Rating: R (for violence, sexual content, language and nudity)
Genre: Drama , Mystery & Suspense
Directed By: Tate Taylor
In Theaters: Oct 6, 2016 Wide
Runtime: 112 minutes
Studio: Universal Pictures

TOMATOMETER  52%
Average Rating: 5.7/10
Reviews Counted: 66
Fresh: 34
Rotten: 32

Critics Consensus: Emily Blunt's outstanding performance isn't enough to keep The Girl on the Train from sliding sluggishly into exploitative melodrama.

WANT TO SEE 98% want to see
User Ratings: 15,169

THE GIRL ON THE TRAIN OPENS IN THE US ON THE 7th OF OCTOBER IN THE U.S. AND ON THE 6TH OF OCTOBER IN MALAYSIA. FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD FIND OUT HERE.

Meet Rachel, she's recently divorced and has a substance abuse problem... ©Universal Pictures

There are two other movies with the same title but you won't have heard of the other two...

In fact, I didn't even know they existed until I did a little search to find out about this movie. Truthfully, I didn't know about this movie until I knew I was going to watch it and I didn't know there was a book first either. So I saw this movie last night which means it's been a full 24 hours since I saw it. It opens today in Malaysia and in a little over a day in the US but if you've been curious about this movie I'm guessing you've already read some of the early reviews for it. My opinions of this movie won't diverge all that much from the general opinions found in those early reviews. 

Rachel on her daily commute sees Megan and begins to fantasize about who she is and the type of life she has. ©Universal Pictures

The book written by British writer Paula Hawkins was first published in January 2015 quickly became a bestseller and debuted at No. 1 on The New York Times Fiction Best Sellers of 2015 list and remained at the top until April. Then about a year later it again went to the top of the best sellers list but this time reviewers began to comparisons between it and Gone Girl, claiming it to be the next Gone Girl. Gone Girl too became a movie in 2014 and went on to be nominated for several awards. Gone Girl was an incredible film. You can read my review of it here

She also passes the home of Tom and Anna. Tom used to be her husband and their house used to be her home. ©Universal Pictures

Unlike Gone Girl which took a bit more time to be picked up by the studios, DreamWorks Pictures acquired the film rights to the novel before the book was even available to the public in March 2014. By January 2015 while the public was falling in love with the book and putting it on the best sellers list, Erin Cressida Wilson was already working on the films screenplay. In May of the same year Tate Taylor was hired to direct and in the following months various actors and actresses were rumoured to be part of the production. Among them included Emily Blunt, Kate Mara, Rebecca Ferguson, Haley Bennett, Jared Leto, Chris Evans, Édgar Ramírez, Justin Theroux, Allison Janney, Lisa Kudrow, Luke Evans and Laura Prepon. Of course not everyone was available to be part of the final film. 

Then one day she decides to get off the train after a particularly bad day. ©Universal Pictures

So if you haven't read the book and have only seen the trailers then the only other clues you have regarding what this movie is about are the two things that are mentioned above, that it's the new Gone Girl and the title that mentions a girl on the train. With regards to Gone Girl this film shares a few similarities I guess. The tone of the two films are pretty similar. The two films have a gritty and tense atmosphere. They both throw all sorts of details at you to try and throw you off the path of the true criminal. Both use a fair bit of sex in the film to add another layer of complexity to the characters and their situations. As for the girl on the train, Emily Blunt plays the central character who rides the train from her home to work and back and is the one is the link to all the main players in this mystery. 

After which she gets a little visit from a detective. ©Universal Pictures

So here's what I enjoyed about the film.

  1. The story wasn't too bad. Played out pretty nicely but if you were paying attention you could about two thirds of the way in figure out what really happened and who the culprit really is.
  2. Emily Blunt is pretty amazing. 
  3. Visually. Scenes nicely played out and paced. Tate Taylor and Charlotte Bruus Christensen did a pretty good job of keeping the scenes tense and gritty. 
After the detectives' visit Rachel decides to help this man out. ©Universal Pictures

A few things I didn't fancy much.

  1. The balance between the characters or something like that. Emily Blunt was amazing but the others sort of were not. 
  2. Things ended up being too melodramatic at times. Didn't suit the scenes so well or the film overall.
But in the end she's back on the train. ©Universal Pictures

Overall this was a pretty good story to watch, it was tense and as things played out you were kept guessing. But to compare it to Gone Girl is to flatter this movie a little too much. If I were to say how similar or close to Gone Girl this film is I'd probably say about 60% maybe. The thing or person that really drives this film is Emily Blunt without her I don't think this film would be as entertaining or watchable. But since I did enjoy it I'm going to give it a decent 3.2 out of 5.

Check out the trailer. 


MUCH THANKS GO TO BFM RADIO AND UIP MALAYSIA FOR THE PREVIEW PASSES!!