"How is that I am voting Protestant if I am a spy for the Vatican?"

>....Jesuit agent Donald Trump will trigger religious war in USA.

1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

2 Timothy, 3:1-2

*   *   *

------------------edited

by C. Stiliyanov:

Trump will unleash Putin in Europe
http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.bg/2015/12/trump-will-unleash-putin-in-europe.html 

-------------------------

Donald Trump is clearly a Jesuit agent of Provokatskyia, his task is to try to drag some mainstream "evangelical", not-Catholic Christian support to his campaign, in order to provoke the Catholic immigration from Mexico, in order to fire the Catholic immigrates from Mexico with a resentment against the "White Protestant" USA.
Notice on how Trump once pretended to be "Protestant" (how it possible??? with a curricula at the anti-Protestant Fordham University???) and at the same time exhibiting open racist behavior against the Catholic immigration.

Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump has retweeted a quote widely attributed to Italian Fascist leader Benito Mussolini.

The tweet, created by a parody account and including Mr Trump's handle, read: "It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep."
The account is named @ilduce2016 after Mussolini's Italian title, the Leader.
Asked about the tweet in a TV interview, Mr Trump said he wanted "to be associated with interesting quotes".
"Mussolini was Mussolini... What difference does it make?" Mr Trump said when asked about the retweet on NBC's Meet The Press programme. "It got your attention, didn't it?"
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35682844

All this is clear when you see that among his opponents there's the Social-Democrat Sanders. The praising of "Protestant values" must be put against the immigration, and the denial of GOD and therefore the denial of the religious differences among immigrates and great part of US nation  the principal feature of anti-racism [Marxism]. Do you perceive the stench of Jesuitical tactic in this use of atheism and Socialism as fundament of anti-racism (Sanders), and the "Christian Protestant values" as fundamental of racism? (Trump).

Why are there suddenly millions of socialists in America?
Harold Meyerson
Members of the audience during a campaign rally for Bernie Sanders in Minneapolis, 29 February 2016. Photograph: Jacquelyn Martin/AP
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/29/why-are-there-suddenly-millions-of-socialists-in-america
Monday 29 February 2016 21.26 GMT
It used to be a dirty word. Bernie Sanders helped remove the stigma – but it’s the spectacular failure of capitalism that has really changed people’s mind

I can answer to the question of the title. There must be suddenly millions of Socialists in order to steal away from the Protestants and Baptists the role of religious opposition to the racism of Trump. The Gospel must be associated with "anti-Catholic" racism in USA, and therefore must be kicked off from the front of the opposition against Trump, or reduced to be an appendix of the Marxist manuals for the incoming urban guerrilla in USA. So you know why this tragic circus with "leftist" protests against Jesuit agent Trump:

Black Lives Matter protesters disrupted a Donald Trump rally held in Radford, Virginia, on Monday. The heated demonstration included about 20 people chanting “Black Lives Matter.” They all held all hands, raised in unity, as Trump supporters looked on. They moved their way through the energized crowd as security guards guided them out of the rally.
Real Clear Politics reports that Trump’s supporters responded by chanting “All Lives Matter.” This was a sentiment echoed by Donald Trump himself as he stood at the podium.
http://www.inquisitr.com/2841106/black-lives-matter-protesters-disrupt-donald-trump-rally-secret-service-agent-slams-photographer-to-ground/

The Latest on campaign 2016 on the eve of Super Tuesday (all times local):

11 p.m.

A small but well-coordinated cadre of protesters has kept Ted Cruz from getting a hometown welcome in Houston.

The Texas senator was addressing more than 1,000 people at a Houston Baptist University rally late Monday when he was interrupted repeatedly by demonstrators chanting, "Cruz, bad for Texas, bad for the country."

Cruz, who hails from Houston, at first laughed it off. He said, "It's nice to know three Bernie Sanders supporters got lost."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/latest-sanders-raises-36-million-february-37278581

Again anti-Christian Provokatskyia:

Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz claimed on Thursday that President Obama should recognize the threat of “radical Islamic terrorism” because Christians haven’t committed terrorist attacks for centuries. He seemingly forgot about the Christian terrorist who killed three people in Colorado last week.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/12/03/3727768/ted-cruz-christian-terrorism/

This is how the Jesuits are pulling down in the flesh of US Christians their knife called "Shoebat":

Ted Cruz, the darling of many is a disaster for Christianity and Jews for many reasons.
It is not only that Cruz’ father Rafael Cruz is a weird cultist who says that his son was anointed as “king” who will take control of all sectors of society, an agenda commonly referred to as the “Seven Mountains  Mandate“, but Cruz’s foreign policy supports the very issue he claims to uphold being pro-Jews pro-marriage etc … According to the Seven Mountain Initiative which started by reprobates in 1975 by R. J. Rushdoony and Francis Schaeffer” (whose son Frank Schaeffer converted to eastern Orthodox and later became atheist)  who claimed a special access to the Almighty and with a strange twist of Scripture started an evil movement. From this, Seven Mountain cult evolved. While it claimed that they used “biblical foundations” this cult evolved into complete insanity:

The 7 mountains initiative is not an initiative to establish dominion over all the earth or in governments. It is an initiative that seeks to love and serve all people on the earth. As followers of Christ, we believe we are called to love all people, regardless of faith, lifestyle or gender orientation.

It is this mimicking of some sort of a Global Caliphate that Christianity is all about becoming dominionists  in which Cruz’s father says that his son will “bring the spoils of war to the priests”, thus helping to bring about a prophesied “great transfer of wealth”, from the “wicked” to righteous gentile believers (link to video). Most are unaware that the cult Ted belongs to with his father Rafael Cruz’ is the dominionist cult.

This is the popish propaganda of Walid Shoebat against Baptism in USA, and of course the soldier of the pope Shoebat tries to fire the Catholic hate between Baptists, Protestants from a side and the Catholic immigration on the other. The smoking gun:

The only problem with this policy is that it undermines the situation for the Christians in the region, who are becoming highly persecuted. Such persecution will extend to the future in which the entire Christian population in the Middle East will have to flee or be slaughtered. To Christians, this issue should be the highest priority. Please help us rescue Christians.
Be a partner of the greatest rescue mission to save your brethren, donate here
Folks ask me why I support Donald Trump. It is not only that Trump has foresight and was one of very few to stand against the war in Iraq, but Trump also has a simple policy: bring Russia closer, prevent Russia and China to unite, while keeping Japan, Turkey and Iran at a distance, all the while defend U.S. economy from all these greedy nations that do not want to play fairly. This is the vision of a man with foresight:....".

From:

Anyone Who Loves Jesus And The Jews And Supports Ted Cruz As Candidate For President Are Out Of Their Mind
By Ted on August 10, 2015 in Featured, General
http://shoebat.com/2015/08/10/anyone-who-loves-jesus-and-the-jews-and-supports-ted-cruz-as-candidate-for-president-are-out-of-their-mind/

Forget China, Russia, Iran etc., this is only chatting, smoke in the eyes to distract the attention.

"Such persecution will extend to the future in which the entire Christian population in the Middle East will have to flee or be slaughtered.": this was often remarked by Eric John Phelps, but he gave not an answer, allegedly because he knew the truth, the slaughter of Christians is pursued in order to create the Anti-Christ's One World Government, unleashing Russia in Middle East, with Pope Francis or successor as ruler. 
But what interest here is to notice on how Jesuits (via Shoebat clan) are using to dirty Ted Cruz in order to give a "Christian" legitimacy to an anti-Christian N° 1, Donald Trump.
A revealing comment by Walid Shoebat:

Walid Shoebat Mod eassa • 7 months ago

I am electing a Czar not a saint. All the other supposed saints they elected in the past never turned out to be saint but Czars. If in doubt, see Jimmy Carter.
Also, I always get accused of being a Jesuit spy and here I am supporting Trump who says he is "Protestant". While there are Catholic candidates, how is it that I am voting Protestant if I am a spy for the vatican?

Above image - Walid loves Donald

I even feel ashamed to give an explanation to the anxious question posed by Walid Shoebat, but my duty is stronger: Usually spies, agents of Provokatsyia, etc. are always acting at the opposite of the front to which they belong.

Donald Trump, the best "Protestant" the Jesuits could buy. Every soldier of Pope Francis  has only to vote Donald Trump, who will bring the  religious war of the Man of Sin in USA:

Christian leader: Trump reveals that progressives were right about evangelicals all along
Bethania Palma Markus
01 Mar 2016 at 12:15 ET 
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/christian-leader-trump-reveals-that-progressives-were-right-about-evangelicals-all-along/
In a column for the Washington Post, conservative Christian leader Russell Moore is denouncing evangelical leaders for cynically embracing Donald Trump to leverage his popularity, though Trump doesn’t practice Christian values.
Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote on Monday that he has stopped calling himself an “evangelical” and instead refers to himself as a “gospel Christian” because he feels the word “evangelical” has been contaminated with contemporary politics.
While Moore doesn’t mention the real estate mogul and GOP front runner by name, he alludes to Trump as someone who this election cycle has been “spewing of profanities in campaign speeches, race-baiting and courting white supremacists, boasting of adulterous affairs, debauching public morality and justice through the casino and pornography industries.”
Moore has long been a critic of both Trump and the Christian right’s courting of him even though Trump doesn’t seem to know anything about the Bible. Recently Trump has been widely condemned for refusing to disavow support from white supremacists. Moore has in the past advocated for racial integration of Christian churches.
“Why are many evangelical leaders, including some who pontificate on nearly everything else, scared silent as evangelicalism is associated with everything from authoritarianism and bigotry to violations of religious freedom?” Moore asked. “How can they look the other way in silence when politicians praise Planned Parenthood and demur about white supremacists and neo-Nazis?”
Moore then admitted that “secular progressives” had been right in one criticism of contemporary evangelicals, who fuse religion and politics to gain power.
“For years, secular progressives have said that evangelical social action in America is not about religious conviction but all about power,” Moore wrote. “They have implied that the goal of the Religious Right is to cynically use the ‘moral’ to get to the ‘majority,’ not the other way around. This year, a group of high-profile old-guard evangelicals has proven these critics right.”
He criticized a willingness to look the other way when the word “evangelical” is “co-opted by heretics and lunatics.”
Moore had been critical of Liberty University president Jerry Falwell, Jr.’s endorsement of Trump, tweeting, “Politics driving the gospel rather than the other way around is the third temptation of Christ. He overcame it. Will we?”

 *   *   *

Next post I hope, how they will shut my mouth and destroy my life. But I have Christ with me, and GOD over me.
Below, links on Trump & Jesuitism:

Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Donald Trump aligning with Putin
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2015/12/donald-trump-aligning-with-putin.html

Sunday, January 3, 2016
ISIS - do you realize it NEVER seriously threatens Iran???...
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2016/01/isis-do-you-realize-it-never-threaten.html

Discussion on Walid Shoebat 812 comments

Kim Wagner Walid Shoebat 7 months ago

Fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. See any of those in Trump? Every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them. You find Trump in 2 timothy 3 in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people TURN AWAY! -Even the blind can see that He loves himself, loves money, is an unloving slanderous, haughty,headstrong boasting man who lacks self control and is full of pride.

---------------------------------------

The open confession of Catholic heresy of Walid Shoebat - II

>

On your pope and on everyone of you who bow down to that god of flesh in Rome,  the blood of Cathars, Vaudoises, Patarenes, Paulicians, Bogomiles,etc. (the perpetual church of the New Testament),  you murdered to build with their burned flesh your Synagogue of Satan in Rome,  is a witness of your wickedness and is falling also on you.

From: http://shoebat.com/2014/11/24/millions-church-will-follow-antichrist-will-end-hell/#disqus_thread

• 
  

shoebat Mod Tom_mcewen • 2 days ago

Even when you look at the Jews, they have Orthodox and Reformed. When you examine the "Reformed" theology, Moses ends up not hearing the voice of God and the Red sea never really parted, I call this Deformed theology.
When it comes to the Protestant, my dilemma is this with many (not all) who say they do not follow Luther or Calvin, but Christ, when reality is, they mostly follow Luther and Calvin, anyone but Christ. 

Catholics follow an idole of flesh called "the pope" and uses Christ as a justifier of any Scriptural perversion

They view the Bible from the prism of the written interpretations instead of reading the Scripture for what it says. 

Scriptures says that idols are Satanic, for this reason Satan built one idol  not out of rock but of flesh and called it  "the pope" in order to bypass the 2. Commandment.

I get so tired of hearing this infused, diffused, election, reformed, deformed ... Tulip shmoolip,
I was even searching for all the jargon they use, so I googled a few words to find them and the fist link was a blog that announced me as a heretic:
http://control-avles-blogs.blo...

I don't believe you find my blog just for a case but YOU wanted exactly to find my blog, because behind you there's the Whore of Revelation.

And why was I announced as heretic? Here, they supposedly have my "confession" as a "heretic" titled "The open confession of Catholic heresy of Walid Shoebat" and what is in this supposed confession? Here it is:
"..........What about the Coptic Church, Ethiopian Church, Chaldean, Byzantine Church … and then we have Eastern Orthodox; Russian, Estonian, Greek, Serbian, Macedonian, Bulgarian, Georgian, Cypriot, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Latvian, Moldavian, Ukranian … all these who suffered the yoke of Islam or Nazism (or even both), have what Mr. White considers “heretical views,” in which he would consider non-negotiable to enter heaven!?"
So the slandering bolgster concludes: "Here we have the open confession with that "heretical views". For the Roman Catholic church the "good works" no matter for what reason are done, are sufficient to go in Heaven, even if you are a staunch denier of God. Even quite the works without faith, just only the faith in works." The "work work work" is so repeated as if its the sound of a duck "quack quack quack".
But notice my supposed "confession" doesn't even mention the word "Catholic".
In other words, in these slandering tongues, the Coptic Church, Ethiopian Church, Chaldean, Byzantine Church … and then we have Eastern Orthodox; Russian, Estonian, Greek, Serbian, Macedonian, Bulgarian, Georgian, Cypriot, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Latvian, Moldavian, Ukranian are all DAMNED, regardless if they suffered Islam's persecutions and Nazi persecutions for their faith.

 Exactly. I am slandering Satan's and his devices. And you and your Jesuit pope are only the tongue of Satan.

Taking alive Adolf Hitler and torture him is not a way to save his soul. ALL those denomination are leading people to damnation, no more or less you are doing with your blog of political Catholicism. The duty of the Christians is to tell this truth paying it even with his/her life.  In fact you are again gong against the Scriptures where Jesus says: "44Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh. "

Therefore for your Satan dialectic devices you can quite be not ready at the hour the Son of man cometh, you can be fornicator, robber, drunkard, murderer, etc. but if the Son of man cometh at the guise of an SS you are saved?

Jesus say about your hour, not if your hour comes with an assassination, with a car accident, with a stroke, with a gas chamber. You transform the word of God in chatting in pub, Mr Shoebat.

You don t understand the Scriptures, Mr Shoebat, you are only interested  in the political Catholicism, in to drag all those denomination you boast to have justified in the eyes of God, under the cup of the Whore in Rome. You are a crusader and you are not interested about Islam but to destroy the Christians who surrendered to Christ and don't bow down to that house of spiritual wickedness which is the Catholic church. May God be witness of my words.

To say that they are only against "Catholic" is a lie. They are against anyone who is of an apostolic succession. Period.

I am ready to take on my shoulder all the hate you are stirring among all those denominations. My denominations have been exterminated by your bloody Catholic church. All those denominations of our days you are quoting are pleasantly drinking from the cup filleth with the blood of the saints slain by  the Whore - the Catholic church. The adherents of those churches will chose if to surrender to Christ as did the Vaudoises, Patareni, Paulicians, etc. or to be condemned to the eternal damnation.

 They are no different than the Nazi, any smudge with a Jewish gene and off you go to the crematoria. Likewise with these, any smudge with apostolic succession and off you go to the furnace.

Catholic church was worst than Nazi as Nazi at least had not the hypocrite justification to do what they did in the name of Christ but at least they created their own religion.
Furnaces and Holocaust have been engineered by the Roman Catholic Apostolic church namely Wladimir Ledochowsky SJ the greatest among the Roman General - today an unknown person.

 So we wrote the slanderer saying that "I do not believe that salvation by works can take anyone to heaven. Salvation is through the grace of God. How anyone can extrapolate this from my statement above is mind boggling. So they tell me that the devil corrupted the Church which added works and so we needed a reformation which sprung up when someone said “faith alone”, but was it only Martin Luther who added the word “alone” with the word “faith” in the same phrase, or was it used way before Martin Luther arrived to the scene

 Satan can boast to be a follower of Jesus too. But if you challenge him as a liar he then exposes his true identity. The Catholic monk Martin Luther simply put at the light of the day how Satan through his church of Rome was using James. To justify the works without faith.

  by Origen (1) Hilary (2), Basil (3), Ambrosiaster (4), “sola fide justificati sunt dono Dei,” through faith alone they are justified by a gift of God; John Chrysostom (5) Cyril of Alexandria (6), Bernard and Theophylact (7) that man “is justified by faith alone” (8).

 These men, human being, said many things, for example there's even the certainity that Origen was believing to be a Christian, a follower of Christ. But his belief doesn't make out of him a believer, no more or less than a man believing to have faith but this is not true, when he perform works with that faith his works are false works, Mr Shoebat: "show me your faith! and i will show my works!". Faith is invisible to men's eyes, but works are very much visible to men's vanity.

The difference was that these were pro-James while Luther was vehemently anti-James: “Only the papists accept James on account of the righteousness of works, but my opinion is that it is not the writing of an apostle. Someday I will use James to fire my stove.” (9)"
And what did this slanderer say? 

And you what have you to say, defender of the greatest organization for the religious assassination on earth, the Catholic church?

Frankly Mr Shoebat, i believe  behind you there are hidden those who want to close my blog. Isn't it true Mr Shoebat?

Here it is:
"Salvation by works was always present in the Catholic church and declarations of the right doctrine (faith-alone) was only an opportunism in order to not fire the opposition of true Christians.

No more or less than the declaration of Trinitarianism, an opportunistic move of the early Catholicism to not fire the Trinitarians Vaudoises, etc.

 The doctrine of salvation by works is present with the canonization as 'saint' of the archangel Michael whose work of "judgement" (in substitution of Jesus Christ the Lord) is replied by the priest. Confession and "absolution" is the definitive proof that the Catholic church blasphemes God Father and the Son pretending to save humans from eternal damnation. Of course in this case the priest in order to absolve requires works as being a priest a human being he cannot inquire nor judge another human soul but only human works."

In other words, the Catholic added "Grace Alone" as a conspiracy.

Catholic church is a conspiracy in herself. From the beginning till her destruction by Jesus Christ our Lord.

 And then the priest does "works" is condemned. Absolute insanity. They write what they write without a shred of evidence. 

The fact they wanted to put doc Martin Luther at the stake is the evidence. Catholicism is based on a lie starting from the pretense that the Apostle Peter was the "fist bishop" of Rome.
 
They are "Catholic", therefore they are "liars". Every time I quote a historian who is Catholic, no matter how great his reputation is, he is automatically a "liar".

No, because the Catholic monk doc Martin Luther was sincere. It is not my guilty but the one of your murderous assassin Roman Catholic Apostolic church if all the Catholic who were not liar have ben put at the stake or murdered in many world conflicts as for example the WW2 where the most modern and not loyal to the pope Catholics have been purposely sent to death by Jesuit-linked dictatorships.

They are walking-living slandering juke-boxes. And dare you expose them, it is then that a hail of comments come raining at you as "lacking love and humility" and they paint you as "attacking" when in reality you are defending. 

I am proud you define me as "slanderer". The same did the murderous friars, monks, cardinals, Jesuits, popes, nuns, priests, deacons, of your church, the Synagogue of Satan when they wanted to murder and torture the "slanderer", or Vaudoises, Patareni, Cathari, Albigenses, Bogomiles etc. which I consider the brother to whose martyrdom I bow down in eternal remembrance of the Christ's sacrifice on the cross.

They then paint you as anti-Protestants when some of my best friends are Protestants who do not think like them.

Also Adolf Hitler boasted to have had some Jewish friends.

As I wrote before: "They fill up libraries of useless theological jargon. I read the Bible, I never knew until I entered the Church where they told me that salvation is so simple to comprehend since it was all about grace, yet then they showed me a Bible which they compartmentalized and neatly sectioned into subjects, as if we had a Bible chapter called “Imputed righteousness,” and another titled “Imparted Righteousness,” then “Infused Righteousness,” and a prophet who wrote an entire thesis on “Justification and Sanctification,” yet another who argued all the point on “Total Depravity,” “Unconditional Election,” “Limited Atonement,” “Irresistible Grace,” “The Five Points of Calvinism,” “doctrine of perspicuity,” “Covenant theology,” “God's transcendence,” and “substitutionary atonement” while the poor sinner who stands on a street corner is singing “all I need is love”. 

“All I need is love”? Mr Shoebat, give a look here of a jargon you don't know about:

" 32For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them." [Luke 6:32]

 The anti-legalism I found created hair-splitting jargon, which takes a legalist lawyer to unravel."

 Your  "holy" bloody church murdered all the Patarenes, Vaudoises, Albigenses, Cathars, who were spaking the words of God as they were from the Scripture, but not before to have slandered them as "manicheans", "dualists", "adoptionists", a Catholic slander, a Continuing Assassinating those martyrs exactly as did your Great Pharisee, pope Francis SJ, worshipper of heathen idols as the first thing he did after being appointed Pontifex Maximus was to praise the Madonna, aka the Whore.

Go figure.

But is this my crime? That I do not adhere to complicated jargon and that Faith Alone is what was taught by the very churches I mentioned above in my quote who do not have the name "Catholic"?

11

•

Reply

•

Share ›

• 
  

• 
  

• 
  

 Tuesday, November 25, 2014
"Down with Paul!" - Gnostic slandering against Paulicians
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/11/down-with-paul-gnostic-slandering.html

Monday, August 11, 2014
The open confession of Catholic heresy of Walid Shoebat
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-open-confession-of-catholic-heresy.html

"Down with Paul!" - Gnostic slandering against Paulicians

>

*   *   *

From Wikipedia source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulicianism

"...... The founder of the sect is said to have been an Armenian by the name of Constantine,^[6] who hailed from Mananalis, a community near Paytakaran. He studied the Gospels and Epistles, combined dualistic and Christian doctrines, and, upon the basis of the former, vigorously opposed the formalism of the church.....(....).....in the year 660 [ Constantine ] received a deacon in his house, who put in his hands a precious and rare treasure in those days before the invention of the printing press: a New Testament. Upon reading the same he came to know about the whole salvation in Christ; and upon sharing said good news with others, he formed a group of sincere believers; later on, of preachers ... who became known as Paulicians ..."
Regarding himself as called to restore the pure Christianity of Paul (of Tarsus), he adopted the name Silvanus (one of Paul's disciples) and about the year 660 founded his first congregation at Kibossa in Armenia. Twenty-seven years afterwards he was arrested by the Imperial authorities, tried for heresy and stoned to death.^[8] Simeon, the court official who executed the order, was himself converted and adopting the name Titus became Constantine’s successor. He was burned to death (the punishment pronounced upon the Manichaeans) in 690.^[8]

(.......)

Baanes was supplanted by Sergius-Tychicus in 801, who was very active for thirty-four years. His activity was the occasion of renewed persecutions on the part of Leo the Armenian. Obliged to flee, Sergius and his followers settled at Argaun, in that part of Armenia which was under the control of the Saracens. At the death of Sergius, the control of the sect was divided between several leaders. The Empress Theodora, as regent to her son Michael III, instituted a thoroughgoing persecution against the Paulicians throughout Asia Minor,^[10] in which a hundred thousand Paulicians in Byzantine Armenia are said to have lost their lives and all of their property and lands were confiscated by the State.^[11]
Paulicians under their new leader Karbeas fled to new areas. They built two cities, Amara and Tephrike (modern Divriği). By 844, at the height of its power, the Paulicians established a State of the Paulicians^[12][13] at Tephrike. In 856 Karbeas and his people took refuge with the Arabs in the territory around Tephrike and joined forces with Umar al-Aqta, emir of Melitene (who reigned 835-863).^[14] Karbeas was killed in 863 in Michael III's campaign against the Paulicians, and was possibly with Umar at Malakopea before the battle of Lalakaon.
His successor, Chrysocheres, devastated many cities; in 867 he advanced as far as Ephesus, and took many priests as prisoners.^[15][16] In 868 the Emperor Basil I dispatched Petrus Siculus to arrange for their exchange. His sojourn of nine months among the Paulicians gave him an opportunity to collect many facts, which he preserved in his History of the empty and vain heresy of the Manichæans, otherwise called Paulicians. The propositions of peace were not accepted, the war was renewed, and Chrysocheres was killed at Bathys Ryax. The power of the Paulicians was broken. Meanwhile other Paulicians, sectarians but not rebels, lived in communities throughout the empire. Constantine V had already transferred large numbers of them to Thrace.^[17] According Theophanes, the Paulicians of Armenia were moved to Thrace, in 747, in order to strengthen the Bulgarian frontier with a reliable population.^[18]
..........".

Catholicism, both Byzantine as well Roman, are really a bloody stuff coming straight out of Hell.  Do you perceive the smell of this  Catholic persecution against the Paulicians in the Shoebat's crusade?....

 неделя, 10 август 2014 г.
Guilty by association - Joachim of Fiore circa 2014 (pt 10)
http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2014/08/guilty-by-association-joachim-of-fiore.html

.......Well, now you have your "alliance" between the "heretic" and the Islam. It was only the cruelty and wickedness of the Catholicism to push persecuted Christians to find shelter even among Muslims. Then Gioacchino Fiore, a scribe of the Great Pharisee nested in Vatican ("pope") did the literary dirty job in to slander those Christians, haunted, tortured, assassinated by the Catholic Army of Hell.
But we have more interesting things to discover about and around the persecution of Paulicians. Similarly as Albigenses, Cathars, Vaudoises, etc. who were slandered yesterday as well today by the cultural CIA (Catholics In Action, both with a knife in their hand as well with a keyboard of a computer), presenting them as "Arian", "Manichean", "Zoroastrian" and only-Satan-knows which else particular gnostic perversion,  so also it happened and happens for the Paulicians. 

".....

Petrus Siculus or Peter Sikeliotes (Greek: Πέτρος Σικελιώτης) was either a monk or a learned nobleman, who in 870 was sent as a legate from the Byzantine emperor Basil I to the Paulician leader Chrysocheir, negotiating for an exchange of prisoners. He stayed in the Paulician city of Tephrike/Tibrica, now Divrigi in Turkey, on the upper Euphrates, for nine months. While there he wrote his Historia Manichaeorum qui Pauliciani dicuntur, which is one of the main sources for the history of the Paulician sect.
The Historia Manichaeorum was first published by Rader in Ingolstadt in 1604.
......"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrus_Siculus

That it deals with slandering, it is obvious. Just only after a quick survey of the historical documented facts it is possible to ascertain that there were no need of any scholar to understand which kind of doctrine the Paulicians were teaching and following. Bright it appears that they were so much spread and for so long time that everyone there living could know their doctrine. 
BUT just for this reason there was no treatise on them till the moment Petrus Siculus, in order to deal with some hostages priests, sojourned in their state. Orthodoxies did hate them very much and I don't believe cause Manichean doctrines.

[Of course to make the deduction on how much the Jesuit "hostage" of today - Fr. Paolo Dall'Oglio SJ -  in the hands of "fundamentalists" of Islam is another theatrical boutade of the Catho-gnosticism alluding to those ancient Orthodox priests hostages of Paulicians (Paulicians-ISIS, Orthodox priests-Dall'Oglio, Guilty by Association? Bread for Stiliyanov's teeth here), I leave it to your understanding ].

What interest to me to deal with in this post is to underline the perfidy of the Byzantyne Orthodox Catholicism which, being likely doctrinally framed by the Paulicians Christians who, with their example of Christian life being under the eyes of everyone were seriously puzzling the Caste of Orthodox priests, thought well to "discover" the "truth" behind the Christian "appearance" of the everywhere spread Paulicians with a "scoop" by one of their agit-prop scribes, Petrus Siculus. 

I can imagine the slogan for the launch of the Siculus' treatise on the Paulicians: "This is the hidden truth Paulicians are hiding under the veil of a false Christian doctrine but when hidden in their state, they exhibit it without shame: the Satanic doctrine of Manicheans! So let's do a crusade to wipe 'em away from the earth these children of Satan who are accusing us poor Orthodoxies to be heretics!". 

Let's see who was the first publisher. Rader. Matthew Rader SJ ?

"...Philologist and historian, born at Innichen in the Tyrol in 1561; died at Munich, 22 December, 1634. At the age of twenty he entered the Society of Jesus and subsequently taught the humanities for twenty-one years in different Jesuit institutions. He wrote several school dramas, but was particularly known among Catholics and non-Catholics for his scholarly attainments. In 1599 he published an improved and expurgated edition of Martial, and in 1628 one of Quintus Curtius. His edition of the Acts of the Eighth Ecumenical Council was incorporated by Labbe and Cossart in their collection of the Acts of councils; that of the works of St. John Climacus, published in 1614, was reprinted by Migne in his Greek Patrology (LXXXVIII, 585 sqq.). More important than the publications just mentioned were his now very rare works: "Bavaria Sancta" (Munich, 7), and "Bavaria Pia" (Munich, 1628). Both were reprinted in 1704 at Dillingen and Augsburg, and the former was partly published in a German translation by Father Rassler at Straubing in 1840. ...."

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12631a.htm

And the city. Ingolstadt? The city of the Jesuits?

http://cdn.ucadia.net/images/one-evil.org/images_navigation_people_large/people_18_Weishaupt.jpg

Adam Weishaupt was born in Ingolstadt, Bavaria (Germany) to Johann Georg Weishaupt (1717–1753) Professor of Law at the Jesuit controlled University of Ingolstadt. When his father died in 1753, he was adopted by his godfather Johann Adam Freiherr von Ickstatt who took up his father's position at the University.
Weishaupt later enrolled at the University of Ingolstadt and graduated in 1768 at age 20 with a doctorate of law. In 1772 he became a professor of law. The following year he married Afra Sausenhofer of Eichstätt.
On the suppression of the Jesuits by Pope Clement XIV in 1773, his life changed dramatically. He decided to join the Jesuits, now seeking safe havens in Southern Germany and at Ingolstadt.
In 1773, Weishaupt became professor of canon law, now being a Jesuit and set about supporting his Jesuit brothers hiding from persecution. Having joined a number of secret societies, such as the Freemasonry Lodge in Munich in order to see how they operated, Weishaupt finalized a new model of operation for the Jesuits in exile by April 1776.....etc. etc. etc.
http://one-evil.org/content/people_18c_weishaupt.html

All this successive anxiety of the Jesuits in to continue to publish the old Orthodox slander against  the Paulicians not only fits with the re-building of the Czar throne in Russia having in sight the End of the 1054 Schism for the Super-Catholicism ruling the world, but just tell us about the worries of the Jesuits who knew about the doctrinal Christian essence of Paulicians and were frightened to see "ancient Protestant" just in the land of the Catholicism they wanted to take back in the Romish herd.

I post here the last excerpt from Wikipedia as evidence. The best source describing the Paulicians as "not Trinitarian" and "adoptionists" (being the accuse of Manichean doctrine too weak) comes from a Catholic bishop of England (in this case "bishop" is not a clergy charge, he was lay professor of theology) - Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare - a man of course  interested in the diffusion of the perverted Alexandrine revision of the Bible by the Two False Witnesses Westcott & Hort. In fact Conybeare was 26 years old when the ugly fetus of the WH New Testament was published pardon, aborted......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Cornwallis_Conybeare

Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare (14 September 1856 – 9 January 1924) was a British orientalist, Fellow of University College, Oxford, and Professor of Theology at the University of Oxford.

 And the Rationalist Association of which he was member?

 ".....The Rationalist Association, originally the Rationalist Press Association, is an organization in the United Kingdom, founded in 1885 by a group of free thinkers who were unhappy with the increasingly political and decreasingly intellectual tenor of the British secularist movement.^[1] The purpose of the Press Association was to publish literature that was too anti-religious to be handled by mainstream publishers and booksellers. The RPA changed its name to the 'Rationalist Association' in 2002.^[2]...."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalist_Association

  And what says Conybeare about the "Trinitarianism" of the Paulicians?

"......In Russia, after the war of 1828-29 Paulician communities could still be found in the part of Armenia occupied by the Russians. Documents of their professions of faith and disputations with the Georgian bishop about 1837 (Key of Truth, xxiii-xxviii) were later published by Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare. It is with Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare publications of the Paulicians disputations and "The Key of Truth" that Conybeare based his depiction of the Paulicians as simple, godly folk who had kept an earlier (sc. Adoptionistic) form of Christianity (ibid., introduction).^[17]....
(.....)
The Paulicians were branded as Jews, Mohammedans, Arians, and Manichæans but we always readily perceive that their opponents employed these appellations merely as term of abuse.^[28] They call themselves Christians^[29] or "True Believers".^[2] Armenians always formed the majority in the provinces where the Paulicians were most influential and successful in spreading their doctrines.^[5]
Frederick Conybeare in his edition of the Paulician manuel The Key of Truth concluded that "The word Trinity is nowhere used, and was almost certainly rejected as being unscriptural."^[30]
......" [same URL as above - Wikipedia page on Paulicians]

"Nowhere used"? Is this really a proof of Adoptionism when there's such a lack of sources and the few ones are easily manipulated? 
"Was ALMOST certainly rejected"? Sure.....

Do you begin to smell the stench of a planned slandering of Paulicians from the above excerpt, were contradictory statements are mixed with indisputable evidence of pure Christian doctrine? You see there the exactly same pattern of slandering already proved & demonstrated as fabricated by the Catholic Inquisition:

THE WALDENSES WERE INDEPENDENT BAPTISTS
http://www.abaptistvoice.com/English/Books/Waldenses.htm

At page 18 of Conybeare's book on Paulicians you can try his reasoning aimed  to compress Cathars (brothers of Vaudoises) and early English Christian church inside the  Adoptionist coffin. But invisible to the eyes of the blinds, there is the enormous elephant of the Catholic interests trying  to describe the early competitors (true Christians) of the  Harlot of Rome in the British Islands as "deviant from the doctrine":

http://rbedrosian.com/Cony02/Conybeare_Key_of_Truth.pdf

found in:

http://rbedrosian.com/Ref/conybeare.html

If you have still doubts about the interests of Catholicism, both Roman as well Orthodox/Byzanthine, in to destroy the Christian image of Paulicians, give a look here about the love of Conybeare for the perverted Septuagint and never forget that the strategic goal of the Vatican and of the Jesuit order was  to keep the British Protestants out of the Orthodox field....:

Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare, St. George William Joseph Stock

Zondervan Publishing House, 1980 - 100 pagine

Grammar of the Septuagint Greek with Selected Readings from the Septuagint

http://books.google.it/books/about/A_Grammar_of_Septuagint_Greek.html?id=Rb8zAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

http://books.google.com/sitemap/Sitemap/Religion/Biblical_Reference/Language_Study.html

Paulicians were true Christians and members of the perpetual church of Christ from the Apostolic age till our days, together with Vaudoises, Cathars, Albigenses, Anabaptists, Baptists etc. 
They may have been some deviations from the doctrine, like others denominations, but in  comparison the Catholic and Orthodox churches  were and are truly the church of Satan (and sometimes also, even if in very less measure, some pedo-baptist Protestant Reformed denominations). 
The way in which Paulicians could survive for a longer period of time (similarly as the Vaoudoises) demonstrates that they were protected by the power of God and in those centuries were true legitime representatives of that woman of the chapter 12 of Revelation, the church of Christ.
 

"....Simon Magus and PaulThe Clementine literature had its first origin in the Apostolic Age, and belonged to the original Jewish, Petrine, legal Church. It is directed wholly against St. Paul and his sect. Simon Magus never existed; it is a nickname for St. Paul....."

 събота, 11 октомври 2014 г.
The thousand faces of Simon Magus - Jesuit Anti-Paulinism (pt 1)
http://jesus-partisans-balkans.blogspot.it/2014/10/the-thousand-faces-of-simon-magus.html

Tuesday, April 8, 2014
Paul was right [Philippians 3:19 and Alexander Hislop]
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/04/paul-was-right-philippians-319-and.html

Sunday, September 7, 2014
Were Vaudoises persecuted cause reincarnation?
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/09/were-vaudoises-persecuted-cause.html