Showing posts with label Keanu Reeves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keanu Reeves. Show all posts

Thursday, 18 April 2013

Side by Side.



A modern digital camera.
Its not the first time that the future of cinema and filmmaking has been discussed at the Robert Burns Centre Film Theatre Film Club and it probably won’t be the last. In September 2012 we showed The Last Projectionist (2011) that touched on the demise of 35mm film and its replacement by digital technology. This week’s film club movie, gamely introduced by Mike Gray, was described as ‘The Science, Art and Impact of Digital Cinema’[1]. Side by Side (2012) is a documentary film directed by Chris Kenneally that investigates the history, process and workflow of both digital and photochemical film creation. It professes to show what artists and filmmakers have been able to accomplish with both film stock and the digital process and how their needs and innovations have helped push filmmaking in new directions. Enthusiastically introduced by Keanu Reeves it included interviews with directors, cinematographers, colorists, scientists and engineers and as Mike told us they all had their own opinions on the pro and con’s of each form of film making.


The discussion that followed the film included many of the points that Mike had raised in his introduction. The role of the cinematographer or Director of Photography as they are more often known, is the unsung hero’s of the movie making fraternity and although recognized as one of the most important people on the film set, are rarely mentioned in the list of credits in Film Guides or DVD’s. Mike had pointed out that the DoP was expected to provide his own equipment and assistant staff even on big budget productions! The consensus of the many people interviewed, a list to long to mention, seemed to be that both 35mm and digital filming had their benefits, a point agreed by the members of the RBC audience. It was also pointed out that the boundaries are constantly being pushed by the advent of the digital age, and not always for the best. Worries were also expressed about the archiving of digital films but no conclusions were reached. It was generally agreed that this documentary was an enlightening piece of work that gave an interesting incite, by the professional’s, into the technological mystery’s involved in filmmaking which most of us did profess not to know an awful lot about. Incidentally in 1999 there were only two digital screens in existence, today there are more than 85,000 worldwide, a figure that is expected to increase to 150,000 by 2015. I agree with the German cinematographer Michael Ballhaus, who worked on 16 Rainer Werner Fassbinder films including the brilliant The Marriage of Maria Braun (1978)if you do something with your heart, it doesn’t matter what you’re using’.
 
The legendary DoP Michael Ballhaus. 


[1] Side by Side Official Website.

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

Bram Stoker’s Dracula.


For me the Robert Burns Centre Film Theatre is far more than just a place to watch movies, for me it’s a haven, an escape from the pressures and stresses of life. It’s a place I have fallen in love with over the years, where you meet friend’s and acquaintances and have conversations with complete strangers about film. Its run and staffed by people, some of which have worked there for over 25 years, who give the impression that would not care to work any where else, people that always make you feel at home and your visit enjoyable.

One member of the staff Ms Susan Kenny is in the last semester of her third year of an MA in Liberal Arts at the University of Glasgow on the Dumfries Campus. Susan’s options for this particular semester where either to continue with classes as usual or deliver a proposal for a placement in a working environment. She pitched a suggestion for a week long Academic Film Festival that would bring together the University and its students along with Film and RBC. Which would have the additional benefit of introducing new young people to the Film Theatre. Both of the RBCFT Film Officers were more than happy to encourage and mentor Susan.

The first film in her programme was quite a coup; she managed to land an unreleased American documentary that had never been screened without the director being present. By using her persuasive powers she not only convinced Doctor Randy Olson, a marine biologist turned filmmaker, to allow her to show his film Sizzle: A Global Warming Comedy (2008) but to take part in a Q&A via the medium of Skype. After screening mainly documentary’s to her student audience the closing event was a feature film with Doctor Ralph Jessop, one of the University of Glasgow’s emanate lecturers in Literature, leading the post-film discussion with Victorian Literature, Art and Philosophy students and one or two visitors.

Count Dracula and Mina Harker.
Very much based on Bram Stokers 1897 classic novel Dracula, Bram Stokers Dracula (1992) is powerfully directed by the man that gave us such near masterpieces as The Godfather Trilogy (1972-1990), The Conversation (1974) and best of all, Apocalypse Now (1979). Francis Ford Coppola and his screenplay writer James V Hart set out with the deliberate intent to make this film as close as possible to Stokers original text, going as far as including a prologue to demonstrate that Dracula was a direct descendant of Vlad the Impaler an Eastern European Prince from the House of Draculesti, also included was the novels diary and letter format which was cleverly used as a narrative device. The film also makes reference to previous movies about the vampiratic Lord of Darkness including Nosferartu: A Symphony of Horror (1922) and the Hammer Film Company’s ‘depictions into the deeper tendrils of Victorian naughtiness and gothic mischief[1]’. The film starred a rather convincing Gary Oldman as Count Dracula, Winona Ryder as Mina Harker for whom the Count has a deeply obsessive love, Anthony Hopkins plays Professor Abraham Van Helsing a character best known as a vampire hunter and the archenemy of Dracula with Keanu Reeves type cast as a pathetic Jonathan Harker.

The discussion that followed this gothic love story was slightly more academic than the normal RBC’s Film Club discussions, but was extremely interesting to this observer. They included the link between blood and menstruation, erotic sexual lovemaking and the symbolism of white wax oozing down a candle, and the fact that all the erotic sequences featured oral sex! We touched on the violation of the Christian sacrament and how the film demonstrated the liberalisation of women.  It was agreed that it was a difficult book to adapt for the screen in a way that does not loose the meaning or ‘feel’ of the original, but it was pointed out there was considerable more humour in the film than in the book.

Although the main character was obviously in contravention of normal behavioral patterns Coppola’s film encouraged the viewer to have a certain amount of sympathy for his humane interpretation of Dracula and the man’s rather unorthodox wooing of Mina Harker.  Although the colour had slightly faded the Blu-ray copy of this film sounded and looked very good.  It’s only left to thank Susan for all her hard work putting on this Film Festival and to wish her success with her Dissertation.

The book and its author.


[1] Susan Kenny 2013.