Wednesday, December 6, 2023
8 Tips For Solving Problems
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
6 Mistakes to Avoid When Problem Solving
Every day we
face challenges and problems in life, both big and small, and so it’s very
important to be good at tackling them. However, that can be easier said than
done, and if we make one of these mistakes when trying to solve a problem, we
might make the situation worse instead.
Finding the
best solutions to problems is a necessary skill for navigating the changes that
are continuously affecting our company. Organization that take a proactive and
structured approach to problem solving position themselves to overcome
obstacles and take advantage of opportunities. This approach comes from making
a concerted effort to avoid the following six common problem-solving mistakes.
Mistake 1: Not
Involving the Right People
When the right
people are excluded from the problem-solving process, the proposed solutions
can be one-sided or limited. Different perspectives help to better understand
the problem at hand. Resist the trap of allowing busy schedules and a desire
for quick resolution to allow people to be excluded. However, this doesn’t mean
that everyone needs to be involved. Progress may be slower when too many people
participate. The most effective problem solving teams include representatives
from various levels in the firm who share their perspective and insights.
Mistake 2: Lack
of Alignment
Certain people
may agree that a problem exists, but that doesn’t mean that everyone has the
same problem in mind. People often have different expectations, opinions on
issues and goals, and potential solutions. Effective problem solving requires
getting everyone on the same page. When this doesn’t happen, there is a risk of
running in different directions – this means that everyone may cross a finish
line, but no one wins the race. Take the time to define and document issues and
get alignment before attempting to solve a problem. The result will be better
solutions.
Mistake 3:
Looking for Blame Instead of Prevention
People don’t
wake up intending to create problems during their work day. Errors do occur at
work, but the overwhelming majority is unintentional. “Blame” is sometimes
confused with “accountability,” and accountability within an organization has
come to refer to disciplinary action. Accountability actually means taking
responsibility for actions and instigating specific steps so the problem is
less likely to occur again—and it does not require punishment. The
blame-and-punish approach teaches others in an organization that, if they make
a mistake, they should make sure no one finds out.
Mistake 4: Lack
of Clarity
Many times, a
problem solving team is assembled and they immediately discuss possible causes
or solutions. Team members may have different information or a different
understanding of the problem. Discussions are confusing, disjointed and
inefficient. We do not have a common purpose. Rushing into analysis with a
vague problem statement is a clear formula for long hours and frustrated
customers.
Create a clear problem statement devoid of an unnecessary or distracting description. A clear problem statement contains an OBJECT (the thing which has the problem) and the DEFECT (undesirable condition or defect). The famous inventor, Charles Kettering, stated, “A problem well stated is a problem half solved.” Once we have this statement, we can start asking “why” questions to dig deeper into the causes, and all team members have a common focus and understanding.
Mistake 5: Assuming
There is A Singular Cause
Most
incorrectly believe that root-cause analysis ultimately finds one cause. When
asked to define a root cause, they typically say, “It’s the one thing that
caused the problem to happen.” A longer explanation might go as follows: “Root
cause is the fundamental cause that, if removed or controlled, prevents the
problem from occurring.” More significant than just a “cause,” they say, the
root cause, if eliminated, prevents the problem from occurring. This seems
reasonable, but in reality it’s just not accurate.
Mistake 6: Lack
of a Problem Solving Method
Rather
frequently, companies – notably management – demand swift action when facing a
problem. Well, there is nothing wrong with a bias for action but what often
results is “cutting corners” in the rank and file. Finding the best solutions
starts with having a structured approach to problem solving.
Root cause
analysis is a fact-based methodology. Many of the problem solving tools are
similar. 5Whys, Ishikawa Fish-bones, 8Ds for automotive, A3 for Lean, PDCA,
DMAIC for Six sigma….All “logically” based fact systems and follow how the
basic "instinctive" brain works, you set a goal, brain storm ideas,
evaluate it, you do it, and see whether it works. The difference is the level
of complexity. This is why PDCA is a cycle, in every turn you can understand
different parts of the problem. The more complicated the problem or the
improvement, the more you need to repeat the cycle.
Of all things needed to foster a problem
solving culture, training is the most important, allowing and expecting
associates to be systematic. Socratic questioning works best! The reason is
simple: the problem is usually smarter than us and will always win over
shortcuts.
Effective
problem solving doesn’t happen by accident. It takes time, commitment and a
methodical approach. Businesses can fall into these pitfalls with problem
solving if they fail to give the issue at hand the correct level of priority
and importance. Remember, for every month this problem continues, your business
could be losing out!
People love to
solve problems. However, people will avoid problem solving situations when they
are unsure of how to approach the issue. If we keep in mind the practical rules
of problem solving, we shouldn’t shy away from any business puzzle.
Just don’t put
the cart before the horse.
Wednesday, December 7, 2022
Stop Firefighting at Work, Make Time for Change
Productivity
goes down, profitability goes down, and the constant day-to-day battling
demotivates staff. Meanwhile, managers have no time to work on the things that
would really benefit the organization.
Fire fighting
is popular because it is exciting. Furthermore, it is a win-win situation for
the fire fighter. If the fix works out, the fire fighter is a hero. If it
doesn’t, the fire fighter can’t be blamed, because the situation was virtually
hopeless to begin with. Notice that it is to the fire fighter’s advantage to
actually let the problem become worse, because then there will be less blame if
they fail or more praise if they succeed.
When constant
firefighting is the norm, it’s easy to fall into the trap of seeing the fire
extinguisher as the hero. But it’s important to remember that fire
extinguishers do not prevent fires from occurring. The fires will only stop
once learning and root cause problem solving are valued over the firefighting
itself.
But the real
problem is the people in charge. Fighting fires instead of developing a plan to
stop fire fighting and making sure it will not happen again is the job of
management. Most of us deplore the firefighting style, yet many managers and
organizations perpetuate it by rewarding firefighters for the miraculous things
they do. In fact, it may be the absence of a vision and plan that cause your
organization to be so reactive, and spend a lot of time fire-fighting rather
than proactively meeting the needs of your customers. This is all easier said
than done, of course, but if you get things right the first time, there's
usually not much fire-fighting later.
To prevent
firefighting becoming the norm, leaders instead need to develop a culture of
problem solving and fixing issues at the source. This is a skill that can be
learnt. A good problem-solving manager will always begin by asking the Five Whys to get to the root cause of every
issue.
Once the Whys
have been identified, the next question should be “How can we stop this
happening again?” This is a crucial part that many organizations tend to miss.
Empowering
people
The next step
is to delegate responsibility, rather than pass problems up the chain.
Supervisors and staff members need to be empowered to ask the Five Whys and solve small
issues themselves, thereby freeing up time for managers to focus on more
important tasks and preventing other fires from occurring.
This requires coaching, which takes time and energy, but if
you were to compare it to all the time and energy you spend fighting the same
recurring problems, the investment is more than worthwhile.
Visual Management
Visualizing
performance can be a useful tool in preventing fires from breaking out. This
often takes the form of visual management boards showing metrics such as SQCDP
(Safety, Quality, Cost, Delivery, People), which was certainly missing in the
example of Company A above.
Standardization
Another way of
looking at a problem is to see it as a gap between the ‘standard’ and what’s
actually happening in reality. Once you have identified the root cause of the
gap (using the Five Whys) and how to close it, you create a new Standard Work to replace the old one.
If you don’t
have any standard work instructions or operating procedures in place to begin
with, it’s difficult to solve problems because you have nothing to compare
against – you cannot really identify what went wrong.
When
introducing a new standard to your organization, always use the Plan, Do,
Check, Act (PDCA) cycle to ensure changes are planned and analyzed effectively
before being adopted.
Improvement
doesn’t just happen. It takes time, and
in the pressure pot of our day to day activities, there is never enough time to
improve our situation. The structure of Lean permits and requires time be set
aside for improvement. If managers do not definitively provide time for the task of improvement, then people will know that they are
not serious about making improvement a formal part of the work.
There can be no
improvement without the time and resource commitment from management to solve
problems.
Wednesday, February 9, 2022
Five Problem-Solving Mindsets You Should Embrace
Wednesday, July 7, 2021
Avoid These Common Problem Solving Pitfalls
Finding the
best solutions to problems is a necessary skill for navigating the changes that
are continuously affecting our company. Organization that take a proactive and
structured approach to problem solving position themselves to overcome
obstacles and take advantage of opportunities. This approach comes from making
a concerted effort to avoid the following five common problem-solving mistakes.
Pitfall 1: Involving
the wrong people
Often when a
problem needs to be solved, a team is quickly pulled together of people who may
have done this kind of thing before and those who have the spare capacity.
While the logic in this decision making is clear, it doesn’t actually lead to
the best teams.
Your best man
for the job might be disappearing under work, but if the problem is
strategically significant to the business it should be more important to clear
his decks than to find someone else.
If the right
people are not involved from the start your problem may not be solved as
quickly or efficiently as you want, which could make the rest of your employees
disengage from the process.
Pitfall 2: The
problem isn’t clear
Sometimes the
problem is more a lack of coherence about what actually needs to be done,
rather than any direct issues with the ability of the team.
Poor project
goals such as solve the sales issue or reduce scrap rates are fine as ultimate
goals or outcomes, but they are too vague to actually tackle the problem. Often
when problem statements are written in this way the project encounters issues
as the person running the project doesn’t know if they are fixing the right
problem, they can’t know when they’re finished working on it as they have no
yardstick and if they have no clear starting point it will be tough to prevent
the issue returning.
Problems need
to be articulated clearly to indicate exactly what the issue is so instead of
reduce the scrap rates the project should aim to reduce the scrap rate from 30%
to 5% by the end of the year.
Pitfall 3: Lack
of data
This brings us
nicely to the next pitfall; a lack of data. Imagine you know exactly what the
problem is – the sister factory in Germany is producing output with a higher
defect rate, or the customer representatives in London are reporting a sharp
drop in repeat business – you should be able to get to work identifying the
cause and solving the problem.
But the only
reason you know this problem exists is through anecdotal evidence – you’ve not
collected any hard data on it. If you start to make improvements now, it will
be impossible to know when you’ve done enough to achieve an acceptable defect
rate, and it won’t be possible to show how much you’ve reduced the defect rate
by.
Without hard
evidence, it will be challenging to show that any new processes are actually an
improvement so it won’t be long before people slide back into old habits.
Pitfall 4:
Addressing a symptom not root cause
Brainstorming
sessions are great for getting ideas flowing, but activity should not be
mistaken for achievement. Finding solutions that don’t address the root of the
problem only leads to more problems in the long run.
Pitfall 5: No
systematic / scientific approach
Rather
frequently, companies – notably management – demand swift action when facing a
problem. Well, there is nothing wrong with a bias for action but what often
results is “cutting corners” in the rank and file. Finding the best solutions
starts with having a structured approach to problem solving. Of all things
needed to foster a problem solving culture, training is the most important,
allowing and expecting associates to be systematic. Socratic questioning works
best! The reason is simple: the problem is usually smarter than us and will
always win over shortcuts.
Effective
problem solving doesn’t happen by accident. It takes time, commitment and a
methodical approach. Businesses can fall into these pitfalls with problem
solving if they fail to give the issue at hand the correct level of priority
and importance. Remember, for every month this problem continues, your business
could be losing out!
People love to solve
problems. However, people will avoid problem solving situations when they are
unsure of how to approach the issue. If we keep in mind the practical rules of
problem solving, we shouldn’t shy away from any business puzzle.
Just don’t put
the cart before the horse.
Monday, December 7, 2020
4 Techniques for Better Brainstorming
It’s often said
that inspiration strikes when you least expect it, but that’s a rather
inefficient way to drive innovation and creativity. Just think of a time when
you, or a team you were on, needed to solve a particular problem. As soon as
you begin thinking of ideas, your mind goes blank.
The point of
brainstorming is to produce a comprehensive list of potential ideas, solutions
or plans. When done well, brainstorming should increase participation, reduce
inhibition, stimulate ideas, increase creativity and be a group process.
The general
rules for all brainstorming methods are:
- Focus on quantity first-capture as
many ideas as possible.
- Encourage and welcome all ideas -
ask the team to dig deep and think beyond the obvious - every idea
submitted should be captured.
- Hold off on judgment, criticism or
reality checks - this should be a “safe time.” Ideas will be discussed and
debated later.
- Use short phrases and bullet
points, not paragraphs and lengthy explanations.
- “Piggy back” on others’ ideas.
Outlandish ideas can be stepping stones to good, workable ideas.
- Although it can be helpful to give
a brief overview of brainstorming rules, there’s no need to go into an
elaborate explanation. “Let’s brainstorm annual priorities that will move
us toward our 3-5 year strategic plan. Remember, let’s not judge the
ideas but just capture and understand them first.” Then, begin your chosen
method of brainstorming. As you move through the process, anticipate that
someone will break the rules - that’s when the facilitator steps in and
makes the correction.
Everyone
everywhere uses brainstorming techniques to get the creative juices flowing. There
are numerous methods for running more effective brainstorming sessions,
including:
Round Robin
Ask for a
volunteer to start the brainstorming process with one idea. The facilitator
captures the idea on a flip chart for all to see. Ask the volunteer to choose
whether to go to the right or the left, allowing the person sitting next to
them to offer one idea. The facilitator continues to chart the answers, going
around the room until everyone has had a chance to contribute at least one
idea. You can then try to take a second pass around the room if the ideas are
flowing freely, or you may open it up to anyone who has another idea not previously
mentioned.
Freewheeling
If you’re
working with a group where equal participation is not an issue, you may be able
to open the brainstorming session up by asking for ideas, allowing people to
offer suggestions in any order at all. Be sure to chart all ideas with short
bullet points using the participants’ words. This method can go fast, so you
may want to ask for a volunteer to help chart answers using a second flip
chart.
Group Pass
Each person in
the group starts with a piece of paper, writes down one idea, and then passes
the piece of paper to the next person. The next person then builds on the
original idea, adding a few thoughts. Continue around the room until the owner
gets their original piece of paper back. You can then ask each person to take a
minute to review their original idea and share with the team.
Silent
Reflection
Some people
need a little time to think and formulate their ideas. Instruct the team that
you are giving them a certain amount of time (5-15 minutes, depending on the
topic) to think and write down their ideas. You can ask them to write their
ideas on sticky notes, one idea per note, or list them on a sheet of paper. If
you use sticky notes, you can then ask them to read one idea at a time and
place them on the wall, grouping all similar ideas together. If they are
written on a piece of notebook paper, you can use the Round Robin method to
share and chart the ideas.
Brainstorming
is a terrific technique for idea generation, coming up with alternatives and
possibilities, discovering fatal flaws, and developing creative approaches. But
it’s only as good as its participants and facilitator. The better you are at
selecting participants, setting the stage, and encouraging discussion, the
better your outcomes are likely to be.
Monday, October 19, 2020
3 Critical Facilitation Skills For Root Cause Analysis
1. Be
dynamic
As facilitator,
you need to guide the direction of the group and yet still be alert for other
cause paths that may crop up. You are the prime mover, controlling the focus of
the group. Don’t be a bystander to the process. You are the conduit through
which the group is interacting.
Ask questions
that are as precise as possible. This will elicit better, more concise
responses which make it easier to identify causes. Good questioning will also
eliminate unnecessary discussion and storytelling from the group.
Once the
information has been recorded, get the group to help you organise the
information and then challenge the logic of the way that information is linked
together. Your cause and effect chart needs to make sense – or it risks being
challenged and disregarded by those who look at it.
2. Be a good
listener
Attentive
listening skills are critical. You need to be able to hear more than one
response at a time. Your ears should be like radar, picking up on all signals.
Don’t miss a response while recording another. You need to record everything.
Being a good
listener means keeping an open mind, suspending judgment, and maintaining a
positive bias.
It also
requires the efforts of the whole group – ask the group not to have discussions
on the side, as they might come up with causes that should be included but may
not be shared with the group. This will also help you to hear all responses
more clearly.
3. Don’t
profess to be an expert
Don’t profess
to be the expert about the problem at hand. You were appointed to be the
facilitator, an independent guide, without a vested interest in the outcome.
Ask the others in the group to explain what they know so that everyone can
follow and understand it. That is why they are there.
Remember … you
don’t hold all the answers. That isn’t why you are the facilitator or it
shouldn’t be. A good facilitator plays dumb whilst still directing traffic and
working the cause and effects paths to a reasonable stop point.
Every
organization needs advanced problem solvers who can lead timely and effective
issue-resolutions and prevent their recurrence. Developing facilitators goes
hand-in-hand with building new capabilities in an organization. Adoption of new
skills is a driver of results. Better problem solving skills is key to
achieving maximum ROI around any initiative to improve quality within an
organization. Problem-solving facilitators can help others transition new
skills to the workplace and lead teams charged with resolving complex issues in
a timely fashion.