Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayatel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. I've chosen this rather than a third relist for reasons I'll explain. This comes down to a simple discussion around SIGCOV. I've disregarded a number of (mostly) keep !votes that do not reference this, or any of our P&G's. After doing this, there is no clear agreement or consensus regarding whether the sources propagated in this discussion are sufficient or not. Rather than relisting, closing as no consensus but noting that immediate renomination is allowed by any interested party, however if someone renominates I would encourage them to focus the debate on refuting the sources presented in terms of SIGCOV with a specific rebuttal to each (think a source analysis table or similar). Daniel (talk) 01:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nayatel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see this company meeting SIGCOV or even NCORP. The article mostly relies on sources tied to the organization, GENREL sources and even sources thats falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP The company is a regional ISP and citations are mostly reliable newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isoceles-sai (talk • contribs) 13:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Isoceles-sai, Please provide coverage that meets SIRS and SIGCOV. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I count 4 non-promotional articles in national English language newspapers. Another 2 non-promotional articles in technology press. Isoceles-sai (talk) 17:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Links? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP they are prividing 300 MB fiber internet, even PTCL is not providing 300 MB. Partner of FB as per DAWN.--Ameen Akbar (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- امین اکبر, This was WP:THISNUMBERISHUGE. Please provide coverage that meets SIRS and SIGCOV. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Dawn (newspaper) is RS for Pakistan. There are other sources as well. FB partner with this org showing it is leading in country. Ameen Akbar (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Please avoid WP:ATA such as WP:MUSTBESOURCES — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Providing internet access, regardless of speed, is not notable here, that's what internet companies around the globe do. Oaktree b (talk) 03:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: None of the !keep votes give any rationale for no deleting the article. No SIGCOV and I agree with the nom. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as this in-depth case study about the company in a reputed academic journal is an example of significant coverage. There is some additional negative coverage in form of controversies ([1], [2]) and some facts shared by Ameen Akbar suggest it is potentially a very notable topic per WP:GNG. 194.213.16.36 (talk) 19:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 00:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 194.213.16.36. C F A 💬 00:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lacking SIGCOV Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Nomad Vagabond)} 18:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look at the sources above? C F A 💬 19:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But none of the sources provided by the IP discuss the company in the detail required by SIGCOV. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they do. Did you read the case study? This also has several paragraphs of coverage. Then there's this, this, etc. C F A 💬 15:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Known for digitalization and fintech revival in Pakistan. Sufficient coverage can be seen in news [3]. 39.34.141.22 (talk) 09:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Nayatel is a prominent Pakistani telecommunications and internet service provider, known for its reliable services. More research is needed to identify comprehensive sources that detail its operations and impact. Crosji (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.