Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbtrip
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE by unambiguous and unanimous community decision. -- Psy guy Talk 00:19, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing but linkspam, with text straight from the website. I added the link to the Melbourne page. I don’t think a redirect is necessary. •DanMS 07:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Useful for planning a trip in Melbourne I'm sure but not encyclopedic. Capitalistroadster 08:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. Cnwb 09:17, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A textbook example of linkspam. --Roisterer 09:43, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nominator. Sarah Ewart 12:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The site's only notability lies in the Australian railfan community, where it is notorious for plagiarising nearly all its content and spamming. Apart from that, it's utterly non-notable. Ambi 13:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete linkspam IanBailey (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's a copyvio too. Stifle 23:46, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as blatant advertising. Zordrac 12:36, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Longhair 21:38, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.