Category talk:Programming language topics

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

This & Category:Computer programming

How does this category differ from Category:Computer programming? They share many subcategories, and some articles in Category:Computer programming, such as thread-safe, are programming language topics. Shouldn't these two groupings be combined? Moogle001 15:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to make the same suggestion. —Egriffin (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that some articles in should be pushed down to . The first is a topic category. The latter is a specialization. I even think that could be renamed to `Programming language'. Every programming language-related topic (syntactic concepts, pragmatics, etc.) is related to computer programming. Truveldhc (talk) 19:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]