|
|
St. schrieb:
> "Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] panoramasde> wrote in message
> news:46d52d67@news.povray.org...
>> Hi, me again, sorry, ...
>>
>> "...NOT!" ;)
>
> Heh... :)
>
>> Well, i'm almost ready to upload now (assuming the final video compression
>> later today works out), but how long can/should the text description be?
>> Checking my production notes and the writeup following the old IRTC form,
>> I'm afraid i already got a bit of logorrhea there... ;) (i.e.: you'll have
>> to scroll the page... several times...)
>>
>> Maybe, for the webpage, something like a "... more >" link that cuts in
>> after ... 500? 1000? characters of a text would be a good idea?
>
> Good idea Markus! Something like this?
> http://smartwebby.com/DHTML/textbox_characters_counter.asp#explanation
*shriek* No! Actually, the opposite - people can enter as much as they
want, but the display in "viewing mode" starts with only the first one
or two paragraphs or 200/300 characters, whatever happens first, and the
remaining text is initially hidden, but "unfolds" when clicked upon. Like:
"Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah...
August 16th: Rendered the first part, and built the .... [more >]"
Clicking "more" turns it into:
"Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah...
August 16th: Rendered the first part, and built the scenery
for the second half of the video. Working time: about 6-8 hours today.
[< less]"
i.e. Just initally hiding long texts, not discarding them entirely :)
like those (the tiny +/- below the headers would be the "more/less", and
i'd start with at least part of the text visible instead of entirely
hiding it)
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/archives/blog_last_visited/
-M
Post a reply to this message
|
|