login
A173713
Similar to A173065 but without the constraint that the sequence be increasing.
2
1, 144, 43, 120, 80, 60, 5, 390, 87, 58, 56, 42, 9, 6, 160, 108, 72, 48, 4, 186, 124, 93, 100, 75, 90, 103, 114, 76, 57, 148, 111, 132, 104, 78, 117, 180, 110, 88, 96, 64, 176, 192, 126, 175, 140, 130, 195, 300, 98, 384, 153, 102, 68, 85, 204, 216, 162, 135, 234, 252, 168, 315, 150, 200, 420, 224, 432, 159, 106, 477, 906, 360, 330, 209, 342, 513, 266, 684, 152, 460, 138, 92, 69
OFFSET
1,2
COMMENTS
The sequence was computed by D. S. McNeil.
Comments on A173713 and A173065 from Jack Brennen, Sep 21 2010: (Start)
Note that the sequence A173713 reaches 9-digit numbers fairly quickly, at index 451, but out to index 12000, it still does not reach 10-digit numbers.
The sequence A173065 (strictly increasing) seems to grow fairly slowly, with occasional big jumps, which isn't really surprising, I guess. It reaches 9-digit numbers at index 8060, and then grows very slowly.
The fact that 9-digit numbers usually get the job done is due to the relative abundance of divisors of 10^9 + 1 (32 divisors).
Note that 10^15 + 1 has 128 divisors, and so it seems very unlikely to me that you could ever reasonably calculate the sequence far enough to the point where 15-digit numbers would not suffice... (End)
REFERENCES
Eric Angelini, Posting to Sequence Fans Mailing List, Sep 21 2010
LINKS
E. Angelini, |a-b| divides concatenation [ab] [Cached copy, with permission]
Jack Brennen, PARI Program
CROSSREFS
Cf. A173065.
Sequence in context: A147553 A030122 A057404 * A252485 A185589 A093159
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
N. J. A. Sloane, Nov 25 2010
STATUS
approved