skip to main content
research-article

Fog-supported Low-latency Monitoring of System Disruptions in Industry 4.0: A Federated Learning Approach

Published: 24 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is based on machine learning and advanced digital technologies, such as Industrial-Internet-of-Things and Cyber-Physical-Production-Systems, to collect and process data coming from manufacturing systems. Thus, several industrial issues may be further investigated including, flows disruptions, machines’ breakdowns, quality crisis, and so on. In this context, traditional machine learning techniques require the data to be stored and processed in a central entity, e.g., a cloud server. However, these techniques are not suitable for all manufacturing use cases, due to the inaccessibility of private data such as resources’ localization in real time, which cannot be shared at the cloud level as they contain personal and sensitive information. Therefore, there is a critical need to go toward decentralized learning solutions to handle efficiently distributed private sub-datasets of manufacturing systems.
In this article, we design a new monitoring tool for system disruption related to the localization of mobile resources. Our tool may identify mobile resources (human operators) that are in unexpected locations, and hence has a high probability to disturb production planning. To do so, we use federated deep learning, as distributed learning technique, to build a prediction model of resources locations in manufacturing systems. Our prediction model is generated based on resources locations defined in the initial tasks schedule. Thus, system disruptions are detected, in real time, when comparing predicted locations to the real ones, that is collected through the IoT network. In addition, our monitoring tool is deployed at Fog computing level that provides local data processing support with low latency.
Furthermore, once a system disruption is detected, we develop a dynamic rescheduling module that assigns each task to the nearest available resource while improving the execution accuracy and reducing the execution delay. Therefore, we formulate an optimization problem of tasks rescheduling, before solving it using the meta-heuristic Tabu search. The numerical results show the efficiency of our schemes in terms of prediction accuracy when compared to other machine learning algorithms, in addition to their ability to detect and resolve system disruption in real time.

References

[1]
[n.d.]. TensorFlow Federated. Retrived May 29, 2020 from https://www.tensorflow.org/federated.
[2]
[n.d.]. What Is Industry 4.0. Retrieved July 1, 2020 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/09/02/what-is-industry-4-0-heres-a-super-easy-explanation-for-anyone/14ca62909788.
[3]
M. Aazam, S. Zeadally, and K. A. Harras. 2018. Deploying fog computing in industrial internet of things and industry 4.0. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 14, 10 (October 2018), 4674–4682.
[4]
A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash. 2015. Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17, 4 (2015), 2347–2376.
[5]
Bouziane Brik, Belgacem Bettayeb, M’hammed Sahnoun, and Fabrice Duval. 2019. Towards predicting system disruption in industry 4.0: Machine learning-based approach. Proc. Comput. Sci. 151 (2019), 667–674.
[6]
Bouziane Brik, Belgacem Bettayeb, M’hammed Sahnoun, and Anne Louis. 2019. Accuracy and localization-aware rescheduling for flexible flow shops in industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT’19). IEEE, 1929–1934.
[7]
B. Brik, A. Ksentini, and M. Bouaziz. 2020. Federated learning for UAVs-enabled wireless networks: Use cases, challenges, and open problems. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 53841–53849.
[8]
J. R. Brzezinski and G. J. Knafl. 1999. Logistic regression modeling for context-based classification. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’99). 755–759.
[9]
B. Chen, J. Wan, L. Shu, P. Li, M. Mukherjee, and B. Yin. 2018. Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 6505–6519.
[10]
Yagil Engel and Opher Etzion. 2011. Towards proactive event-driven computing. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-based System (DEBS’11). ACM, New York, NY, 125–136.
[11]
Umberto Fattore, Marco Liebsch, Bouziane Brik, and Adlen Ksentini. 2020. AutoMEC: LSTM-based user mobility prediction for service management in distributed MEC resources. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM’20). New York, NY, 155–159.
[12]
Zohar Feldman, Fabiana Fournier, Rod Franklin, and Andreas Metzger. 2013. Proactive event processing in action: A case study on the proactive management of transport processes (industry article). In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-based Systems (DEBS’13). ACM, New York, NY, 97–106.
[13]
K. Gao, F. Yang, M. Zhou, Q. Pan, and P. N. Suganthan. 2018. Flexible job-shop rescheduling for new job insertion by using discrete jaya algorithm. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 49, 5 (2019), 1944–1955.
[14]
Fred Glover, James P. Kelly, and Manuel Laguna. 1995. Genetic algorithms and tabu search: Hybrids for optimization. Comput. Operat. Res. 22, 1 (1995), 111–134. Genetic Algorithms.
[15]
Harshit Gupta, Amir Vahid Dastjerdi, Soumya K. Ghosh, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2016. iFogSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in internet of things, edge and fog computing environments. Software: Practice and Experience 47, 9 (2017), 1275–1296. arXiv:
[16]
Bouzarkouna Imen, Sahnoun M’hammed, Sghaier Nouha, Baudry David, and Gout Christian. 2018. Challenges facing the industrial implementation of fog computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud’18). IEEE, 341–348.
[17]
Boštjan Kaluža, Violeta Mirchevska, Erik Dovgan, Mitja Luštrek, and Matjaž Gams. 2010. An agent-based approach to care in independent living. In Ambient Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, 177–186.
[18]
H. Kamal, M. Coupechoux, and P. Godlewski. 2010. A Tabu search DSA algorithm for reward maximization in cellular networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications. 40–45.
[19]
A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan. 2012. Machine Scheduling Problems: Classification, Complexity and Computations. Springer Science & Business Media.
[20]
Manjot Kaur and Aakash Mohta. 2019. A review of deep learning with recurrent neural network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT’19). 460–465.
[21]
Kalevi Kilkki, Martti Mäntylä, Kimmo Karhu, Heikki Hämmäinen, and Heikki Ailisto. 2018. A disruption framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 129 (2018), 275–284.
[22]
Christos Koulamas. 1994. The total tardiness problem: Review and extensions. Operat. Res. 42 (12 1994), 1025–1041.
[23]
P. Lade, R. Ghosh, and S. Srinivasan. 2017. Manufacturing analytics and industrial internet of things. IEEE Intell. Syst. 32, 3 (May 2017), 74–79.
[24]
Shiqi Lai and Tongwen Chen. 2017. A method for pattern mining in multiple alarm flood sequences. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 117 (2017), 831–839.
[25]
C. Lin and J. Yang. 2018. Cost-efficient deployment of fog computing systems at logistics centers in industry 4.0. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 14, 10 (October 2018), 4603–4611.
[26]
M. Martinez-Arroyo and L. E. Sucar. 2006. Learning an optimal Naive bayes classifier. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06), Vol. 3. 1236–1239.
[27]
A. Metzger, R. Franklin, and Y. Engel. 2012. Predictive monitoring of heterogeneous service-oriented business networks: The transport and logistics case. In Proceedings of the Annual SRII Global Conference. 313–322.
[28]
A. Omar, B. Imen, S. M’hammed, B. Bouziane, and B. David. 2019. Deployment of fog computing platform for cyber physical production system based on docker technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics (ICAAID’19), Vol. 1. 1–6.
[29]
G. Peralta, M. Iglesias-Urkia, M. Barcelo, R. Gomez, A. Moran, and J. Bilbao. 2017. Fog computing based efficient IoT scheme for the industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and Their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM’17). 1–6.
[30]
R. Rao. 2016. Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int. J. Industr. Eng. Comput. 7, 1 (2016), 19–34.
[31]
S. R. Safavian and D. Landgrebe. 1991. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 21, 3 (May 1991), 660–674.
[32]
S. Sejdovic and N. Kleiner. 2016. Proactive and dynamic event-driven disruption management in the manufacturing domain. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN’16). 1320–1325.
[33]
Chun Xia ShangGuan, Jun Tao Li, and Rui Feng Shi. 2012. Rescheduling of parallel machines under machine failures. In Manufacturing Science and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Research), Vol. 443. 724–730.
[34]
Emiliano Sisinni, Abusayeed Saifullah, Song Han, Ulf Jennehag, and Mikael Gidlund. 2018. Industrial internet of things: Challenges, opportunities, and directions. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 14, 11 (2018), 4724–4734.
[35]
Pablo Valledor, Alberto Gomez, Paolo Priore, and Javier Puente. 2018. Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions. Int. J. Product. Res. 56, 19 (2018), 6363–6377.
[36]
Jian Xiong, Li ning Xing, and Ying wu Chen. 2013. Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns. Int. J. Product. Econ. 141, 1 (2013), 112–126.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating the Impact of Mobility on Differentially Private Federated LearningApplied Sciences10.3390/app1412524514:12(5245)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Federated Learning for Mobility ApplicationsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/363786856:5(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Split Aggregation: Lightweight Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Resistant to Byzantine AttacksIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security10.1109/TIFS.2024.340299319(5575-5590)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Fog-supported Low-latency Monitoring of System Disruptions in Industry 4.0: A Federated Learning Approach

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
        ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems  Volume 6, Issue 2
        April 2022
        247 pages
        ISSN:2378-962X
        EISSN:2378-9638
        DOI:10.1145/3530302
        • Editor:
        • Chenyang Lu
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Journal Family

        Publication History

        Published: 24 May 2022
        Online AM: 04 February 2022
        Accepted: 01 July 2021
        Revised: 01 June 2021
        Received: 01 August 2020
        Published in TCPS Volume 6, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Industry 4.0
        2. system disruption prediction
        3. tasks rescheduling
        4. fog computing
        5. locations
        6. IoT
        7. federated learning
        8. Tabu search

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Refereed

        Funding Sources

        • Normandy region and the European Union

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)103
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
        Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Evaluating the Impact of Mobility on Differentially Private Federated LearningApplied Sciences10.3390/app1412524514:12(5245)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Federated Learning for Mobility ApplicationsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/363786856:5(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
        • (2024)Split Aggregation: Lightweight Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Resistant to Byzantine AttacksIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security10.1109/TIFS.2024.340299319(5575-5590)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
        • (2024)Incorporating uncertain human behavior in production scheduling for enhanced productivity in Industry 5.0 contextInternational Journal of Production Economics10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109311274(109311)Online publication date: Aug-2024
        • (2024)Artificial intelligence in metal formingCIRP Annals10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.10273:2(561-587)Online publication date: 2024
        • (2023)When Collaborative Federated Learning Meets Blockchain to Preserve Privacy in HealthcareIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2022.321119210:5(2455-2465)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Sustainable Fog-Assisted Intelligent Monitoring Framework for Consumer Electronics in Industry 5.0 ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics10.1109/TCE.2023.333245470:1(1501-1510)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2023
        • (2023)Distributed Dynamics Scheduling Based Reinforcement Learning: Importance and Challenges2023 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286796(314-319)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Probability-Based Load-Distribution Framework: To Reduce Latency in Fog ComputingProceedings of Data Analytics and Management10.1007/978-981-99-6550-2_43(565-584)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
        • (2022)Remote Monitoring and Maintenance for Equipment and Production Lines on Industrial Internet: A Literature ReviewMachines10.3390/machines1101001211:1(12)Online publication date: 22-Dec-2022
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media