skip to main content
10.1145/2882903.2914831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Minimizing Average Regret Ratio in Database

Published: 26 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We propose "average regret ratio" as a metric to measure users' satisfaction after a user sees k selected points of a database, instead of all of the points in the database. We introduce the average regret ratio as another means of multi-criteria decision making. Unlike the original k-regret operator that uses the maximum regret ratio, the average regret ratio takes into account the satisfaction of a general user. While assuming the existence of some utility functions for the users, in contrast to the top-k query, it does not require a user to input his or her utility function but instead depends on the probability distribution of the utility functions. We prove that the average regret ratio is a supermodular function and provide a polynomial-time approximation algorithm to find the average regret ratio minimizing set for a database.

References

[1]
S. Borzsony, D. Kossmann, and K. Stocker. The skyline operator. ICDE, 2001.
[2]
V. P. Il'ev. An approximation guarantee of the greedy descent algorithm for minimizing a supermodular set function. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 114 (1--3): 131--146, October 2001.
[3]
X. Lin, Y. Yuan, Q. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. Selecting stars: The k most representative skyline operator. phICDE, 2007.
[4]
D. Nanongkai, A. D. Sarma, A. Lall, R. J. Lipton, and J. Xu. Regret-minimizing representative databases. phVLDB, 2010.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGMOD '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data
June 2016
2300 pages
ISBN:9781450335317
DOI:10.1145/2882903
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 June 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. k-regret queries
  2. query processing
  3. skyline queries
  4. top-k queries

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS'16
Sponsor:
SIGMOD/PODS'16: International Conference on Management of Data
June 26 - July 1, 2016
California, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Identifying Rank-Happiness Maximizing Sets Under Group Fairness ConstraintsWeb and Big Data10.1007/978-981-97-7238-4_21(325-341)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Computing Online Average Happiness Maximization Sets over Data StreamsWeb and Big Data10.1007/978-3-031-25201-3_2(19-33)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2023
  • (2022)On Finding Rank Regret RepresentativesACM Transactions on Database Systems10.1145/353105447:3(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Efficient computation of deletion-robust k-coverage queriesKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-020-01540-663:3(759-789)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Fair Regret Minimization QueriesIntelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 202110.1007/978-3-030-91608-4_51(511-523)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2021
  • (2021)A Coreset Based Approach for Continuous k-regret Minimization Set Queries over Sliding WindowsWeb Information Systems and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-87571-8_5(49-61)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Sorting-Based Interactive Regret MinimizationWeb and Big Data10.1007/978-3-030-60290-1_36(473-490)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2020
  • (2019)A unified optimization algorithm for solving "regret-minimizing representative" problemsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3368289.336829113:3(239-251)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019
  • (2019)RRRProceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data10.1145/3299869.3300080(263-280)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2019
  • (2019)Finding Average Regret Ratio Minimizing Set in Database2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE.2019.00182(1722-1725)Online publication date: Apr-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media