skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2661941acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Aligning Vertical Collection Relevance with User Intent

Published: 03 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Selecting and aggregating different types of content from multiple vertical search engines is becoming popular in web search. The user vertical intent, the verticals the user expects to be relevant for a particular information need, might not correspond to the vertical collection relevance, the verticals containing the most relevant content. In this work we propose different approaches to define the set of relevant verticals based on document judgments. We correlate the collection-based relevant verticals obtained from these approaches to the real user vertical intent, and show that they can be aligned relatively well. The set of relevant verticals defined by those approaches could therefore serve as an approximate but reliable ground-truth for evaluating vertical selection, avoiding the need for collecting explicit user vertical intent, and vice versa.

References

[1]
J. Arguello, F. Diaz, J. Callan, and J.-F. Crespo. Sources of evidence for vertical selection. In SIGIR'09.
[2]
T. Demeester, D. Trieschnigg, D. Nguyen, D. Hiemstra. Overview of the TREC 2013 Federated Web Search Track. In TREC'13.
[3]
L. Gravano, H. Garcia-Molina and A. Tomasic. Precision and recall of GlOSS estimators for database discovery. In IEEE Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, 1994.
[4]
J. Kekalainen and J. Kalervo. Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. In JASIST'02.
[5]
M. Sanderson, M. L. Paramita, P. Clough, and E. Kanoulas. Do user preferences and evaluation measures line up? In SIGIR'10.
[6]
S. Sushmita, H. Joho, M. Lalmas, and R. Villa. Factors affecting click-through behavior in aggregated search interfaces. In CIKM'10.
[7]
A. Powell and J. French. Comparing the performance of collection selection algorithms. In ACM TOIS'03.
[8]
K. Zhou, R. Cummins, M. Lalmas, and J. M. Jose. Evaluating reward and risk for vertical selection. In CIKM'12.
[9]
K. Zhou, R. Cummins, M. Lalmas and J.M. Jose. Which Vertical Search Engines are Relevant? In WWW'13.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Academic Aggregated Search Approach Based on BERT Language Model2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET)10.1109/IRASET52964.2022.9737888(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2022
  • (2018)Aggregated SearchFoundations and Trends in Information Retrieval10.1561/150000005210:5(365-502)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2018
  • (2017)Mobile Vertical Ranking based on Preference GraphsProceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3121050.3121082(225-228)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Aligning Vertical Collection Relevance with User Intent

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    November 2014
    2152 pages
    ISBN:9781450325981
    DOI:10.1145/2661829
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 November 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. aggregated search
    2. evaluation
    3. federated search
    4. user intent
    5. vertical relevance

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    CIKM '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 175 of 838 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Academic Aggregated Search Approach Based on BERT Language Model2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET)10.1109/IRASET52964.2022.9737888(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2022
    • (2018)Aggregated SearchFoundations and Trends in Information Retrieval10.1561/150000005210:5(365-502)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2018
    • (2017)Mobile Vertical Ranking based on Preference GraphsProceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3121050.3121082(225-228)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
    • (2015)A Comparative Analysis of Interleaving Methods for Aggregated SearchACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/266812033:2(1-38)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2015

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media