skip to main content
article
Free access

Electronic meeting systems

Published: 01 July 1991 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
Ackoff R,{ gupta, s.k. and Minas. j.s. scientific method, john wiley & sons, 1962.
[2]
Albanese, R. and Van Fleet, D.D. Rational behavior in group,: The free riding tendency. Academ,; o)~ Management Review, 10 (1985), 244 255.
[3]
Connotly, T., Jessup, L.M. and Valacich, J.S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer, mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 6 (1990), 689-703.
[4]
Daft, R.t. and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554-571.
[5]
Dennis, A.R., George, J.F., Jessup, L.M., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Vogel, D.R. Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly 12, 4 (1988), 591- 624.
[6]
Dennis, A.R., Heminger, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Vogel, D.R. Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr~Brown Experience. InfoT~nation and Management, 18, 3 (1990), 111-12 I.
[7]
Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Paranka, D. Supporting the search for competitive advantage. Journal of MIS, forthcoming.
[8]
Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Vogel, D.R. A comparison of laboratory experiments and field studies in the study of electronic meeting systems. Journal of MIS, 7, 2 (1991), 107-I35.
[9]
Dennis, A.R., Tyran, C.K., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. An evaluation of electronic meeting support for strategic management. In Proceedings oflCIS (1990), 37-52.
[10]
Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. An experimental investigation of group size in an electronic meeting system environment. IEEE Transactions on System. s, Man, and Cybernetic.~, 20, 5 (1990), 1049-1057.
[11]
Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Group, Subgroup and Nominal Group Idea Generation in an Electronic Meeting Environment, HICSS-24, 1991, III: 573-579.
[12]
DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (1987), 589-609.
[13]
Diehl, M. and Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 3 (1987), 497-509.
[14]
Easton, A.C., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Stakeh~lder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: An experimental study. HICSS-22, 1989, IIl 344-352.
[15]
Easton, G., George, J.F., Nunsmaker Jr., J.F. and Pendergast; M.O. Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. J. of MIS, 7, I (1990), 85-100.
[16]
Fellers, J.W. The effect of group size and computer support on group idea generation for creativity tasks: An experimental evaluation using a repeated measures design. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, 1989.
[17]
Gatlupe, R.B., Cooper, W. and Bastianutti, L. Why is electronic brainstorming more productive than traditional brainstorming. Adminis~ trative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Proceedings, Information Systems Division (Whistler, Canada, 1990), 82-92.
[18]
Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Bastianutti, L. Group size and electronic brainstorming. Queen's University Working Paper, 1991.
[19]
George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunsmaker Jr., J.F. and Northcraft, G.B. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer based support. Inf. Syst. Res., t, 4 (1990), 394-415.
[20]
Grohowski, R.B., McGoff, C., Vogel, D.R., Martz, W.B. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Implementation of electronic meeting systems at IBM. MIS Quarterly, 14, 4 (1990), 369-383.
[21]
Hackman, J.R. and Kaplan, R.E. Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sci- ~ces, 5 (1974), 459-480.
[22]
Hill, G.W. Group versus individual performance: Are N + I heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3 (1982), 517-539.
[23]
Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Commun. ACM, 28, 7 (1985), 680-689.
[24]
Hirokawa, R.Y. and Pace, R. A descriptive investigation of the possible communication based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Commun. Mono- ~ffraphs, 50 (1983), 363-379.
[25]
}tuber, G.P. Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Qm, rterly, (1984), 195-204.
[26]
Huber, G.P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technology on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. o/ Manag. Rev., 15, 1 (1990), 47-71
[27]
Jabtin, F.M. and Seibold, D.R. Implications fbr problem solving groups of empirical research on 'brainstorming': A critical review of the literature. The Southern States Speech Commun. J., 43 (Summer 1978), 327-356.
[28]
Jessup, L.M., Connolly, T. and Galegher, J. The effects of anonymity on group process in automated group problem solving. MIS Quarterly, 14, 3 (1990), 313-321.
[29]
Jessup, L.M. Tansik, D.A. and Lasse, 'F.D. Group problem solving in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity on group process and outcome with a GDSS. Decision Sciences, forthcoming.
[30]
Lamm, H. and Trommsdorff, G. Group versus individual perfor. mance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. EuropeanJ. of Soc. Psy., (1973), 361-387.
[31]
Maidique, M.A. Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovations. Slosh Manag. Rev., 21, 2 (1980), 59-76.
[32]
Mason, R.O. and Mitrof{, t.t.C.hat~ &ng'ing St~ate,45c Planning A.ssump tion~s:,John Wiley & Sons. New York. 198I~.
[33]
Milter, J.C. Information input overload and psychopathology. J2 of Psy. chiatry, (Feb. 1960), 696-704.
[34]
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 2I (1976), 246-275.
[35]
Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Applegate, L.M., and Konsynski, B.R. Facilitating group creativity with GDSS.J. o} MI.~, 3, 4 (1987), 5-19.
[36]
Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Applegate, L.M. and Konsynski, B.R. Com~ puter-aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. J. of Operations Res., 36, 6 (1988), 826-848.
[37]
Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Vogel, D., Heminger, A., Martz, B.~ Grohowski, R. and McGoff, C. Experiences at IBM with group support systems. A field study Decision support systems, 5,2 (1989), 183- 196.
[38]
Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination. principles and procedures of Creative Thinking, 2nd edition, Scribners, New York. 1957.
[39]
Pinsonnault, A. and Kraemar, K.I., The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Syst., 5,2 (1989). 197-216.
[40]
Poole, M.S. Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences of decision making. Communication Monographs, 50 (1983), 206-232.
[41]
Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R., and REchner, P.I., Experimental effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making, Academy of Management Review, 32, 4 (1989), 745-772.
[42]
Shaw, M. Group Dynamics: The Psy chology of Small Group behavior. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill, New york, 1981.
[43]
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V. Kiesler, S. and McGuire, T.W. Group processes in computer mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37 (1986), 157-187.
[44]
Silver. M.S. Decision support systems: Directed and non-directed change. information Systems Research. 1, I (1990), 47-70.
[45]
Simon. H.A. Administrative behavior 3rd edition, Free press, 1976.
[46]
Stefik. M., Foster, G., bobrow, D.G., Khan, K., Lanning, S., and Suchman, L Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Commun. ACM, 30, 1 (1987), 33-47.
[47]
Steiner, I.D. Group Process and productivity. Academic press, new York, 1972.
[48]
Valacich, J.S. Group size and proximity effects on computer mediated generation: A laboratory investigation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona. 1989.
[49]
Valacich, J.S., Dennis. A.R., George. J.F. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Electronic support for group idea generation: Shifitin the balance of process gains and losses. Arizona working paper, 1991.
[50]
Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Anonymity and group size effects on computer mediated idea generation. proceedings of Academy of management meeting, 1991, forthcoming.
[51]
Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.f. Electonic Meeting Support; The Group- Systems concept. Intern. J. of man machine Studiesl, Forth coming.
[52]
Vogel, D.R., Martz. W.B., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Grohowski, R.b. and McGoff, C. Electronic meeting system experience at IBM J. of MIS. 6. 3 (1990), 25-43.
[53]
Vogel, D.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., George, J.F. and Dennis, A.R. Group decision support systems: Evolution and status at the university of Arizona. In R.M. Leee, A.M. McCosh, and P. Migliarese Eds. organizational Decision Support Systems, proceedings of IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference on organizational DSS, North Holland. 1988. 287- 305.
[54]
Williams, E. 1977, Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and medidated communication: A review. Psychol. Bull., 84. 5, 963-976.
[55]
Winniford, M.A. The effect of eletronic meeting support on large and small decision-making groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1989.
[56]
Zack. M.H. and McKenney, J.I., Characteristics of organizational information domain; An organizational information processing perspective. Harvard Business School Working Paper 89-027, 1989.
[57]
Zajonc. R.B. Socaial facilitation. Science, 149 (1965), 269-274.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Experimental Sustainable Finance SymposiumSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4818198Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)EmoScribe Camera: A Virtual Camera System to Enliven Online Conferencing with Automatically Generated Emotional Text CaptionsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650987(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Deborah A. Kirkman

One of the newer areas of research in networking services is supporting group interactions and decision making. The University of Arizona is active in this area, and has developed a meeting environment called the Electronic Meeting System (EMS). Their efforts have included both developing tools to support an EMS and analyzing the effects of these tools in different kinds of meetings. The work has included meetings that have all participants together and those that have participants distributed in different locations. This paper is aimed at a general audience, and lays out the overall model of group interactions and the types of meetings that are held. The paper is written and organized well; the authors explain the different factors that were evaluated in their research. Factors include the activity type (exploration and idea generation, idea organization, prioritizing, and policy development and evaluation), the mechanisms of EMS (process support, process structure, task structure, and task support), and the types of group process gains and losses, such as increases in information and overall group knowledge (a gain), synergy of ideas (a gain), or socializing (a loss). The authors are careful not to overgeneralize the results of their research. Instead, they present the gains and losses of EMS in the context of its use, such as the activity type. For those wishing to understand the issues in computer support of group activities, this paper provides an excellent way to understand the analysis of group behavior in an electronic setting.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 34, Issue 7
Special issue on computer graphics: state of the arts
July 1991
68 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/105783
  • Editor:
  • Peter Denning
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 1991
Published in CACM Volume 34, Issue 7

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)393
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41
Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Experimental Sustainable Finance SymposiumSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4818198Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)EmoScribe Camera: A Virtual Camera System to Enliven Online Conferencing with Automatically Generated Emotional Text CaptionsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650987(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Working smarter: Using technology-enabled processes to leverage virtual group member intelligenceInternational Journal of Information Management10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10282079(102820)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Exploring sex differences in collaborative virtual environments for participation equality and user experienceVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-01022-y28:3Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Using Word Games as Facilitator to Awareness Raising Communication in Public SpacesCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_15(212-219)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2024
  • (2023)CoShare: a Multi-Pointer Collaborative Screen Sharing ToolProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202310.1145/3603555.3608524(325-329)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Influence of Media Capabilities on Trust in the Sharing EconomyJournal of Management Information Systems10.1080/07421222.2023.222911840:3(953-982)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2023
  • (2023)AI Agents as Team Members: Effects on Satisfaction, Conflict, Trustworthiness, and Willingness to Work WithJournal of Management Information Systems10.1080/07421222.2023.219677340:2(307-337)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Past, present and futureInformation and Organization10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.10044633:2Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media