skip to main content
10.1145/2838739.2838749acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evanescent Adaptation on Small Screens

Published: 07 December 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of mastering the complexity of interacting with a large set of applications on smartphones. In one hand, number of applications increases. In the other hand, screen size reduces. To tackle this paradoxical evolution, we investigate adaptive user interfaces. We assume that it is possible to predict the applications of interest for a user in a given situation. Based on this hypothesis, our challenge is to accelerate user interaction when prediction is correct, without penalizing it when prediction is wrong. The paper proposes the concept of Evanescent Adaptation. The principle is a two-layer based representation: the predicted items (first layer) are displayed above the full list of items (second layer). The first layer is said to be evanescent in the sense that it automatically disappears progressively. The paper claims for putting this disappearing process under the control of the end-user. Thereby the user can close the first-layer as soon as s/he perceives prediction as irrelevant.

References

[1]
Bederson, B. B. Fisheye menus. ACM UIST, (2000), San Diego, USA. p, 217--225.
[2]
Bouzit, S., Chêne, D., and Calvary, G. From Appearing to Disappearing Ephemeral Adaptation for Small Screens. In Proc OZCHI'14 Proceedings of the 16th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design. Pages 41--48.
[3]
Bridle, R., and McCreath, E. Inducing shortcuts on a mobile phone interface. In. Proc. IUI, (2006), 327--329.
[4]
Caroll, J. M. and Carrithers, C. (1984). Training wheels in a user interface. Communications of the ACM, 27(8):800--806.
[5]
Clark, B., Matthews, J., Deciding Layers: Adaptive Composition of Layers in a Multi-Layer User Interface. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 7, July 2005.
[6]
Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C. and Greenbrerg, S. A predictive modal of menu performance. In. Proc CHI'07, (2007), 627--636.
[7]
Constantine, S. Adaptive Techniques for Universal Access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11: 159--179, 2001.
[8]
Findlater, L Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., and Dawson, J. (2009). Ephemeral Adaptation: The Use of Gradual Onset to Improve Menu Selection Performance. ACM CHI, 1655--1664.
[9]
Findlater, L., and McGrenere, J. Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1247--1256. ACM, 2008.
[10]
Findlater, L., and Mc Grenere, J. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 89--96. ACM, 2004.
[11]
Findlater, L., and Gajos., K. Z. Design space and evaluation challenges of adaptive graphical user interfaces. AI Magazine, 30(4) : 68, 2009.
[12]
Findlater, L. and McGrenere, J. Evaluating reduced functionality interfaces according to feature findability and awareness. In. Proc. IFIP Interact 2007, (2007), 592--605.
[13]
Francone, J., Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., Mandran, N., and Nigay, L. Wavelet Menus on Handheld Devices: Stacking Metaphor for Novice Mode and Eyes-Free Selection for Expert Mode. ACM AVI, 2010.
[14]
Gajos, K. Z., Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., and Weld, D. S. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proc. AVI'06, (2006),201--208.
[15]
Gajos, K. Z., Everitt, K., Tan, D. S., Czerwinski, M., and Weld, D. S. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive interfaces. In. Proc. CHI '08, (2008), 1271--1274.
[16]
Huhtala, J., Mantyjarvi, J., Venta, L. and Isomursu, M. Animated Transitions for Adaptive Small Size Mobile Menus. In Proc of the 12th IFIP TC 13 Int. Conf on Human-Computer Interaction Interact'2009.
[17]
Jones, M., Marsden, G. Mohd-Nasir, N., and Boone, K. Improving Web Interaction on Small Displays. In 8th World Wide Web conference, Toronto 1999.
[18]
Kang, H., Plaisant, C., Shneiderman, B., New approaches to help users get started with visual interfaces: multi-layered interfaces and integrated initial guidance. Proceedings of the 2003 annual national conference on Digital government research.
[19]
Lee, D. S. and Yoon, W. C.: Quantitative results assessing design issues of selection-supportive menus. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 33 (1), 2004, pp. 41--52.
[20]
Matejka, J., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. Patina: Dynamic Heatmaps for Visualizing Application Usage. ACM CHI, 2013.
[21]
Mitchell, J. and Shneiderman, B. Dynamic versus static menus: An exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bulletin 20, 4(1989), 33--37.
[22]
Patel, D., Marsden, G., Jones, M., and Jones, S. An Evaluation of Techniques for Image Searching and Browsing on Mobile Devices. Proceedings SAICSIT 2009, pp 60--69.
[23]
Raptis, D., Tselios, N., Kjeldskov, J., and Skov, M. Does size matter? Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users' perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency. MobileHCI, 2013.
[24]
Roudaut, A., Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., and Nigay, L. Leaf Menus: Linear Menus with Stroke Shortcuts for Small Handheld Devices. In Conference Proceedings of INTERACT'09, 2009.
[25]
Sears, A., and Shneiderman, B. Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM TOCHI 1, 1(1994), 27--51.
[26]
Shneiderman, B. (2003). Prompting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. In Proc of. CUU 2003, 1--8. ACM Press.
[27]
Tsandilas, T. and Schraefel, M. C. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts, (2005), 2009--2012.
[28]
Vermeulen, J. Improving Intelligibility and Control in Ubicomp. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Interaction Conference on Ubiquitous Computing-Adjunct Papers, Ubicomp'10 Adjunct, pages 485--488, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. ISBN 18.978-1-4503-0283-8.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)AB4WebProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33311603:EICS(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
  • (2019)Exploring a Design Space of Graphical Adaptive MenusACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/323719010:1(1-40)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2019
  • (2018)Portability Approaches for Business Web Applications to Mobile Devices: A Systematic MappingTechnology Trends10.1007/978-3-030-05532-5_11(148-164)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evanescent Adaptation on Small Screens

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction
    December 2015
    691 pages
    ISBN:9781450336734
    DOI:10.1145/2838739
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 December 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Adaptive interfaces
    2. ephemeral adaptation
    3. error
    4. evanescent adaptation
    5. time
    6. user performance

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    OzCHI '15

    Acceptance Rates

    OzCHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 47 of 97 submissions, 48%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)AB4WebProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33311603:EICS(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
    • (2019)Exploring a Design Space of Graphical Adaptive MenusACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/323719010:1(1-40)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2019
    • (2018)Portability Approaches for Business Web Applications to Mobile Devices: A Systematic MappingTechnology Trends10.1007/978-3-030-05532-5_11(148-164)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2018
    • (2017)The Influence of Personality Traits and Cognitive Load on the Use of Adaptive User InterfacesProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3025171.3025192(301-306)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2017
    • (2016)A comparison of shortcut and step-by-step adaptive menus for smartphonesProceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.26(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016
    • (2016)A design space for engineering graphical adaptive menusProceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems10.1145/2933242.2935874(239-244)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2016

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media